Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews

ObjectiveTo identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care.DesignSystematic review of reviews.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were sea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2015-01, Vol.5 (12), p.e009993-e009993
Hauptverfasser: Lau, Rosa, Stevenson, Fiona, Ong, Bie Nio, Dziedzic, Krysia, Treweek, Shaun, Eldridge, Sandra, Everitt, Hazel, Kennedy, Anne, Qureshi, Nadeem, Rogers, Anne, Peacock, Richard, Murray, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e009993
container_issue 12
container_start_page e009993
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 5
creator Lau, Rosa
Stevenson, Fiona
Ong, Bie Nio
Dziedzic, Krysia
Treweek, Shaun
Eldridge, Sandra
Everitt, Hazel
Kennedy, Anne
Qureshi, Nadeem
Rogers, Anne
Peacock, Richard
Murray, Elizabeth
description ObjectiveTo identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care.DesignSystematic review of reviews.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were searched, from first publication until December 2013; the bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional reports.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesEligible reviews had to (1) examine effectiveness of single or multifaceted implementation strategies, (2) measure health professional practice or process outcomes and (3) include studies from predominantly primary care in developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles of potentially eligible reviews for inclusion.Data synthesisExtracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach.Results91 reviews were included. The most commonly evaluated strategies were those targeted at the level of individual professionals, rather than those targeting organisations or context. These strategies (eg, audit and feedback, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders) on their own demonstrated a small to modest improvement (2–9%) in professional practice or behaviour with considerable variability in the observed effects. The effects of multifaceted strategies targeted at professionals were mixed and not necessarily more effective than single strategies alone. There was relatively little review evidence on implementation strategies at the levels of organisation and wider context. Evidence on cost-effectiveness was limited and data on costs of different strategies were scarce and/or of low quality.ConclusionsThere is a substantial literature on implementation strategies aimed at changing professional practices or behaviour. It remains unclear which implementation strategies are more likely to be effective than others and under what conditions. Future research should focus on identifying and assessing the effectiveness of strategies targeted at the wider context and organisational levels and examining the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42014009410.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009993
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4691771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4306378281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-21f91d9ec535245ffe9eca6a1628cb458518378b106d5a1de2ea461541e67b853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi0EolXpEyAhS1y4pHgc20k4IFUV_6RKXOBsOd7JrleJvdjeLb3xDIgn5ElwyFIVTvjiT-PffJ7RR8hTYBcAtXrZT9uwQ19xBrJirOu6-gE55UyISjEpH97TJ-Q8pS0rR8hOSv6YnHDVMMY7dkq-X9qNw4Pza2o3xq-ROk930U0m3lJrIv789gOHAW12B_SYEg0DTTmajGuHiQ4hUjftYvhtUdSIE_pssgt-Rm2YS1-La8ZYHOZ6ekXTbco4FcrSWH7Hm5ldVHpCHg1mTHh-vM_I57dvPl29r64_vvtwdXld9aLhueIwdLDq0MpaciHLjEUbZUDx1vZCthLauml7YGolDayQoxEKpABUTd_K-oy8Xnx3-37ClS3DRTPq4_I6GKf_fvFuo9fhoIXqoGmgGLw4GsTwZY8p68kli-NoPIZ90tBIXktQghX0-T_oNuyjL-tpaBVrOVOCF6peKBtDShGHu2GA6Tl2fYxdz7HrJfbS9ez-Hnc9f0IuwMUClO7_cvwFfdK-qA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1860820642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lau, Rosa ; Stevenson, Fiona ; Ong, Bie Nio ; Dziedzic, Krysia ; Treweek, Shaun ; Eldridge, Sandra ; Everitt, Hazel ; Kennedy, Anne ; Qureshi, Nadeem ; Rogers, Anne ; Peacock, Richard ; Murray, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Lau, Rosa ; Stevenson, Fiona ; Ong, Bie Nio ; Dziedzic, Krysia ; Treweek, Shaun ; Eldridge, Sandra ; Everitt, Hazel ; Kennedy, Anne ; Qureshi, Nadeem ; Rogers, Anne ; Peacock, Richard ; Murray, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveTo identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care.DesignSystematic review of reviews.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were searched, from first publication until December 2013; the bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional reports.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesEligible reviews had to (1) examine effectiveness of single or multifaceted implementation strategies, (2) measure health professional practice or process outcomes and (3) include studies from predominantly primary care in developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles of potentially eligible reviews for inclusion.Data synthesisExtracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach.Results91 reviews were included. The most commonly evaluated strategies were those targeted at the level of individual professionals, rather than those targeting organisations or context. These strategies (eg, audit and feedback, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders) on their own demonstrated a small to modest improvement (2–9%) in professional practice or behaviour with considerable variability in the observed effects. The effects of multifaceted strategies targeted at professionals were mixed and not necessarily more effective than single strategies alone. There was relatively little review evidence on implementation strategies at the levels of organisation and wider context. Evidence on cost-effectiveness was limited and data on costs of different strategies were scarce and/or of low quality.ConclusionsThere is a substantial literature on implementation strategies aimed at changing professional practices or behaviour. It remains unclear which implementation strategies are more likely to be effective than others and under what conditions. Future research should focus on identifying and assessing the effectiveness of strategies targeted at the wider context and organisational levels and examining the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42014009410.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009993</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26700290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Developed Countries ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ; Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2015-01, Vol.5 (12), p.e009993-e009993</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-21f91d9ec535245ffe9eca6a1628cb458518378b106d5a1de2ea461541e67b853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-21f91d9ec535245ffe9eca6a1628cb458518378b106d5a1de2ea461541e67b853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/12/e009993.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/12/e009993.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27548,27549,27923,27924,53790,53792,77372,77403</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lau, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Bie Nio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziedzic, Krysia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treweek, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everitt, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Nadeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>ObjectiveTo identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care.DesignSystematic review of reviews.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were searched, from first publication until December 2013; the bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional reports.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesEligible reviews had to (1) examine effectiveness of single or multifaceted implementation strategies, (2) measure health professional practice or process outcomes and (3) include studies from predominantly primary care in developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles of potentially eligible reviews for inclusion.Data synthesisExtracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach.Results91 reviews were included. The most commonly evaluated strategies were those targeted at the level of individual professionals, rather than those targeting organisations or context. These strategies (eg, audit and feedback, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders) on their own demonstrated a small to modest improvement (2–9%) in professional practice or behaviour with considerable variability in the observed effects. The effects of multifaceted strategies targeted at professionals were mixed and not necessarily more effective than single strategies alone. There was relatively little review evidence on implementation strategies at the levels of organisation and wider context. Evidence on cost-effectiveness was limited and data on costs of different strategies were scarce and/or of low quality.ConclusionsThere is a substantial literature on implementation strategies aimed at changing professional practices or behaviour. It remains unclear which implementation strategies are more likely to be effective than others and under what conditions. Future research should focus on identifying and assessing the effectiveness of strategies targeted at the wider context and organisational levels and examining the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42014009410.</description><subject>Developed Countries</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi0EolXpEyAhS1y4pHgc20k4IFUV_6RKXOBsOd7JrleJvdjeLb3xDIgn5ElwyFIVTvjiT-PffJ7RR8hTYBcAtXrZT9uwQ19xBrJirOu6-gE55UyISjEpH97TJ-Q8pS0rR8hOSv6YnHDVMMY7dkq-X9qNw4Pza2o3xq-ROk930U0m3lJrIv789gOHAW12B_SYEg0DTTmajGuHiQ4hUjftYvhtUdSIE_pssgt-Rm2YS1-La8ZYHOZ6ekXTbco4FcrSWH7Hm5ldVHpCHg1mTHh-vM_I57dvPl29r64_vvtwdXld9aLhueIwdLDq0MpaciHLjEUbZUDx1vZCthLauml7YGolDayQoxEKpABUTd_K-oy8Xnx3-37ClS3DRTPq4_I6GKf_fvFuo9fhoIXqoGmgGLw4GsTwZY8p68kli-NoPIZ90tBIXktQghX0-T_oNuyjL-tpaBVrOVOCF6peKBtDShGHu2GA6Tl2fYxdz7HrJfbS9ez-Hnc9f0IuwMUClO7_cvwFfdK-qA</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Lau, Rosa</creator><creator>Stevenson, Fiona</creator><creator>Ong, Bie Nio</creator><creator>Dziedzic, Krysia</creator><creator>Treweek, Shaun</creator><creator>Eldridge, Sandra</creator><creator>Everitt, Hazel</creator><creator>Kennedy, Anne</creator><creator>Qureshi, Nadeem</creator><creator>Rogers, Anne</creator><creator>Peacock, Richard</creator><creator>Murray, Elizabeth</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews</title><author>Lau, Rosa ; Stevenson, Fiona ; Ong, Bie Nio ; Dziedzic, Krysia ; Treweek, Shaun ; Eldridge, Sandra ; Everitt, Hazel ; Kennedy, Anne ; Qureshi, Nadeem ; Rogers, Anne ; Peacock, Richard ; Murray, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-21f91d9ec535245ffe9eca6a1628cb458518378b106d5a1de2ea461541e67b853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Developed Countries</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lau, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Bie Nio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziedzic, Krysia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treweek, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everitt, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Nadeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lau, Rosa</au><au>Stevenson, Fiona</au><au>Ong, Bie Nio</au><au>Dziedzic, Krysia</au><au>Treweek, Shaun</au><au>Eldridge, Sandra</au><au>Everitt, Hazel</au><au>Kennedy, Anne</au><au>Qureshi, Nadeem</au><au>Rogers, Anne</au><au>Peacock, Richard</au><au>Murray, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e009993</spage><epage>e009993</epage><pages>e009993-e009993</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveTo identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care.DesignSystematic review of reviews.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were searched, from first publication until December 2013; the bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional reports.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesEligible reviews had to (1) examine effectiveness of single or multifaceted implementation strategies, (2) measure health professional practice or process outcomes and (3) include studies from predominantly primary care in developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles of potentially eligible reviews for inclusion.Data synthesisExtracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach.Results91 reviews were included. The most commonly evaluated strategies were those targeted at the level of individual professionals, rather than those targeting organisations or context. These strategies (eg, audit and feedback, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders) on their own demonstrated a small to modest improvement (2–9%) in professional practice or behaviour with considerable variability in the observed effects. The effects of multifaceted strategies targeted at professionals were mixed and not necessarily more effective than single strategies alone. There was relatively little review evidence on implementation strategies at the levels of organisation and wider context. Evidence on cost-effectiveness was limited and data on costs of different strategies were scarce and/or of low quality.ConclusionsThere is a substantial literature on implementation strategies aimed at changing professional practices or behaviour. It remains unclear which implementation strategies are more likely to be effective than others and under what conditions. Future research should focus on identifying and assessing the effectiveness of strategies targeted at the wider context and organisational levels and examining the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42014009410.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>26700290</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009993</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2015-01, Vol.5 (12), p.e009993-e009993
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4691771
source BMJ Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Developed Countries
Health Services Research
Humans
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Primary Health Care - organization & administration
Primary Health Care - standards
Systematic review
title Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A08%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Achieving%20change%20in%20primary%20care%E2%80%94effectiveness%20of%20strategies%20for%20improving%20implementation%20of%20complex%20interventions:%20systematic%20review%20of%20reviews&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Lau,%20Rosa&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e009993&rft.epage=e009993&rft.pages=e009993-e009993&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009993&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4306378281%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1860820642&rft_id=info:pmid/26700290&rfr_iscdi=true