Retrospective analysis comparing hollow fiber and silicone membrane oxygenators for neonates on ECMO

There is little information showing the use of microporous polypropylene hollow fiber oxygenators during extra-corporeal life support (ECLS). Recent surveys have shown increasing use of these hollow fibers amongst ECLS centers in the United States. We performed a retrospective analysis comparing the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The Journal of extra-corporeal technology 2007-06, Vol.39 (2), p.71-74
Hauptverfasser:	Mejak, Brian, Giacomuzzi, Carmen, Heller, Eileen, You, Xiaomang, Ungerleider, Ross, Shen, Irving
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Abstract Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - economics Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - instrumentation Female Health technology assessment Humans Infant, Newborn Intensive Care Units, Neonatal Life Support Care - instrumentation Male Polypropylenes Retrospective Studies Silicones
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	74
container_issue	2
container_start_page	71
container_title	The Journal of extra-corporeal technology
container_volume	39
creator	Mejak, Brian Giacomuzzi, Carmen Heller, Eileen You, Xiaomang Ungerleider, Ross Shen, Irving
description	There is little information showing the use of microporous polypropylene hollow fiber oxygenators during extra-corporeal life support (ECLS). Recent surveys have shown increasing use of these hollow fibers amongst ECLS centers in the United States. We performed a retrospective analysis comparing the Terumo BabyRx hollow fiber oxygenator to the Medtronic 800 silicone membrane oxygenator on 14 neonatal patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this study was to investigate the similarities and differences when comparing pressure drops, prime volumes, oxygenator endurance, and gas transfer capabilities between the two groups.
doi_str_mv	10.1051/ject/200739071
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4680669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68120166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3031-d612aa2d40d7c7ba11bd4ac103e826fd3b29bbc7495e176807f8cb021e276ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1PAjEQxRujEUSvHk1P3hba7tLuXkwMwY8EQ2K4N213Fkp2t9guKP-9JRA_Tp1m3vz6pg-hW0qGlIzpaA2mGzFCRFoQQc9QnxW8SPKCk3PUJ4SxJMryHroKYU0IpySll6hHBReM5ryPynfovAubiLE7wKpV9T7YgI1rNsrbdolXrq7dJ66sBh_7JQ62tsa1gBtotFexcF_7JbSqcz7gynncgos3CNi1eDp5m1-ji0rVAW5O5wAtnqaLyUsymz-_Th5niUmjr6TklCnFyoyUwgitKNVlpkz0DDnjVZlqVmhtRFaMIW6QE1HlRhNGgQkOJh2ghyN2s9UNlAbazqtabrxtlN9Lp6z832ntSi7dTmaRxXkRAfcngHcfWwidbGwwUNdxSbcNkueUEcp5FA6PQhP_Lniofh6hRB5ykYdc5E8uceDur7Vf-SmI9Bs9loyV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68120166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective analysis comparing hollow fiber and silicone membrane oxygenators for neonates on ECMO</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mejak, Brian ; Giacomuzzi, Carmen ; Heller, Eileen ; You, Xiaomang ; Ungerleider, Ross ; Shen, Irving</creator><creatorcontrib>Mejak, Brian ; Giacomuzzi, Carmen ; Heller, Eileen ; You, Xiaomang ; Ungerleider, Ross ; Shen, Irving</creatorcontrib><description>There is little information showing the use of microporous polypropylene hollow fiber oxygenators during extra-corporeal life support (ECLS). Recent surveys have shown increasing use of these hollow fibers amongst ECLS centers in the United States. We performed a retrospective analysis comparing the Terumo BabyRx hollow fiber oxygenator to the Medtronic 800 silicone membrane oxygenator on 14 neonatal patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this study was to investigate the similarities and differences when comparing pressure drops, prime volumes, oxygenator endurance, and gas transfer capabilities between the two groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2969-8960</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/ject/200739071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17672186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology</publisher><subject>Abstract ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - economics ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - instrumentation ; Female ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; Life Support Care - instrumentation ; Male ; Polypropylenes ; Retrospective Studies ; Silicones</subject><ispartof>The Journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2007-06, Vol.39 (2), p.71-74</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 AMSECT 2007</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3031-d612aa2d40d7c7ba11bd4ac103e826fd3b29bbc7495e176807f8cb021e276ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3031-d612aa2d40d7c7ba11bd4ac103e826fd3b29bbc7495e176807f8cb021e276ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680669/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680669/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17672186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mejak, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giacomuzzi, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Xiaomang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungerleider, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Irving</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective analysis comparing hollow fiber and silicone membrane oxygenators for neonates on ECMO</title><title>The Journal of extra-corporeal technology</title><addtitle>J Extra Corpor Technol</addtitle><description>There is little information showing the use of microporous polypropylene hollow fiber oxygenators during extra-corporeal life support (ECLS). Recent surveys have shown increasing use of these hollow fibers amongst ECLS centers in the United States. We performed a retrospective analysis comparing the Terumo BabyRx hollow fiber oxygenator to the Medtronic 800 silicone membrane oxygenator on 14 neonatal patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this study was to investigate the similarities and differences when comparing pressure drops, prime volumes, oxygenator endurance, and gas transfer capabilities between the two groups.</description><subject>Abstract</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - economics</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</subject><subject>Life Support Care - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Polypropylenes</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><issn>0022-1058</issn><issn>2969-8960</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1PAjEQxRujEUSvHk1P3hba7tLuXkwMwY8EQ2K4N213Fkp2t9guKP-9JRA_Tp1m3vz6pg-hW0qGlIzpaA2mGzFCRFoQQc9QnxW8SPKCk3PUJ4SxJMryHroKYU0IpySll6hHBReM5ryPynfovAubiLE7wKpV9T7YgI1rNsrbdolXrq7dJ66sBh_7JQ62tsa1gBtotFexcF_7JbSqcz7gynncgos3CNi1eDp5m1-ji0rVAW5O5wAtnqaLyUsymz-_Th5niUmjr6TklCnFyoyUwgitKNVlpkz0DDnjVZlqVmhtRFaMIW6QE1HlRhNGgQkOJh2ghyN2s9UNlAbazqtabrxtlN9Lp6z832ntSi7dTmaRxXkRAfcngHcfWwidbGwwUNdxSbcNkueUEcp5FA6PQhP_Lniofh6hRB5ykYdc5E8uceDur7Vf-SmI9Bs9loyV</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Mejak, Brian</creator><creator>Giacomuzzi, Carmen</creator><creator>Heller, Eileen</creator><creator>You, Xiaomang</creator><creator>Ungerleider, Ross</creator><creator>Shen, Irving</creator><general>American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Retrospective analysis comparing hollow fiber and silicone membrane oxygenators for neonates on ECMO</title><author>Mejak, Brian ; Giacomuzzi, Carmen ; Heller, Eileen ; You, Xiaomang ; Ungerleider, Ross ; Shen, Irving</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3031-d612aa2d40d7c7ba11bd4ac103e826fd3b29bbc7495e176807f8cb021e276ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abstract</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - economics</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</topic><topic>Life Support Care - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Polypropylenes</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mejak, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giacomuzzi, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Xiaomang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungerleider, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Irving</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of extra-corporeal technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mejak, Brian</au><au>Giacomuzzi, Carmen</au><au>Heller, Eileen</au><au>You, Xiaomang</au><au>Ungerleider, Ross</au><au>Shen, Irving</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective analysis comparing hollow fiber and silicone membrane oxygenators for neonates on ECMO</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of extra-corporeal technology</jtitle><addtitle>J Extra Corpor Technol</addtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>71-74</pages><issn>0022-1058</issn><eissn>2969-8960</eissn><abstract>There is little information showing the use of microporous polypropylene hollow fiber oxygenators during extra-corporeal life support (ECLS). Recent surveys have shown increasing use of these hollow fibers amongst ECLS centers in the United States. We performed a retrospective analysis comparing the Terumo BabyRx hollow fiber oxygenator to the Medtronic 800 silicone membrane oxygenator on 14 neonatal patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this study was to investigate the similarities and differences when comparing pressure drops, prime volumes, oxygenator endurance, and gas transfer capabilities between the two groups.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology</pub><pmid>17672186</pmid><doi>10.1051/ject/200739071</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0022-1058
ispartof	The Journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2007-06, Vol.39 (2), p.71-74
issn	0022-1058 2969-8960
language	eng
recordid	cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4680669
source	MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects	Abstract Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - economics Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - instrumentation Female Health technology assessment Humans Infant, Newborn Intensive Care Units, Neonatal Life Support Care - instrumentation Male Polypropylenes Retrospective Studies Silicones
title	Retrospective analysis comparing hollow fiber and silicone membrane oxygenators for neonates on ECMO
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20analysis%20comparing%20hollow%20fiber%20and%20silicone%20membrane%20oxygenators%20for%20neonates%20on%20ECMO&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20extra-corporeal%20technology&rft.au=Mejak,%20Brian&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=71-74&rft.issn=0022-1058&rft.eissn=2969-8960&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/ject/200739071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68120166%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68120166&rft_id=info:pmid/17672186&rfr_iscdi=true