The Efficacy of Stuttering Measurement Training: Evaluating Two Training Programs
Purpose: Two stuttering measurement training programs currently used for training clinicians were evaluated for their efficacy in improving the accuracy of total stuttering event counting. Method: Four groups, each with 12 randomly allocated participants, completed a pretest-posttest design training...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2015-04, Vol.58 (2), p.278-286 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 286 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 278 |
| container_title | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | Bainbridge, Lauren A Stavros, Candace Ebrahimian, Mineh Wang, Yuedong Ingham, Roger J |
| description | Purpose: Two stuttering measurement training programs currently used for training clinicians were evaluated for their efficacy in improving the accuracy of total stuttering event counting. Method: Four groups, each with 12 randomly allocated participants, completed a pretest-posttest design training study. They were evaluated by their counts of stuttering events on eight 3-min audiovisual speech samples from adults and children who stutter. Stuttering judgment training involved use of either the Stuttering Measurement System (SMS), Stuttering Measurement Assessment and Training (SMAAT) programs, or no training. To test for the reliability of any training effect, SMS training was repeated with the 4th group. Results: Both SMS-trained groups produced approximately 34% improvement, significantly better than no training or the SMAAT program. The SMAAT program produced a mixed result. Conclusions: The SMS program was shown to produce a "medium" effect size improvement in the accuracy of stuttering event counts, and this improvement was almost perfectly replicated in a 2nd group. Half of the SMAAT judges produced a 36% improvement in accuracy, but the other half showed no improvement. Additional studies are needed to demonstrate the durability of the reported improvements, but these positive effects justify the importance of stuttering measurement training. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0200 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4675120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A413787816</galeid><ericid>EJ1060005</ericid><sourcerecordid>A413787816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-7b44a9073a94839073c4c21758f8a95d0766cd1fea2e8a44bf99410a394c80aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1vFCEUhidGY2v1H6iZxMR4MxUGGMALk6ZZrc0aP3a9JmdZmKWZgQozNf33Mtm67ZqFC07Oed7DgbxF8RKjU4wofV8jzNTlYn7xs1pUmFaoRuhRcYwZE5XEqH6cYyTrihIhjopnKV2hvDBtnhZHNWtqKVlzXPxYbkw5s9Zp0LdlsOViGIfBROfb8quBNEbTGz-UywjO5-SHcnYD3QjDBCz_hF2h_B5DG6FPz4snFrpkXtydJ8WvT7Pl-UU1__b5y_nZvNJM0qHiK0pBIk5AUkGmQFNdY86EFSDZGvGm0WtsDdRGAKUrKyXFCIikWiAAclJ83Pa9Hle9Wes8ZYROXUfXQ7xVAZzar3i3UW24UbThDNcoN3h31yCG36NJg-pd0qbrwJswJoUbTrhEEsuMvvkPvQpj9Pl5E8Xz2ASRe6qFzijnbcj36qmpOqOYcMEFbjJVHaBa400eMnhjXU7v8acH-LzXpnf6oODtA8HGQDdsUujGwQWf9kG6BXUMKUVjd5-HkZo8pu49phYKUzV5LMteP_z4neifqTLwagtkG-ldeXaJUZMdyMhf_wrUGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1677217303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Efficacy of Stuttering Measurement Training: Evaluating Two Training Programs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bainbridge, Lauren A ; Stavros, Candace ; Ebrahimian, Mineh ; Wang, Yuedong ; Ingham, Roger J</creator><creatorcontrib>Bainbridge, Lauren A ; Stavros, Candace ; Ebrahimian, Mineh ; Wang, Yuedong ; Ingham, Roger J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Two stuttering measurement training programs currently used for training clinicians were evaluated for their efficacy in improving the accuracy of total stuttering event counting. Method: Four groups, each with 12 randomly allocated participants, completed a pretest-posttest design training study. They were evaluated by their counts of stuttering events on eight 3-min audiovisual speech samples from adults and children who stutter. Stuttering judgment training involved use of either the Stuttering Measurement System (SMS), Stuttering Measurement Assessment and Training (SMAAT) programs, or no training. To test for the reliability of any training effect, SMS training was repeated with the 4th group. Results: Both SMS-trained groups produced approximately 34% improvement, significantly better than no training or the SMAAT program. The SMAAT program produced a mixed result. Conclusions: The SMS program was shown to produce a "medium" effect size improvement in the accuracy of stuttering event counts, and this improvement was almost perfectly replicated in a 2nd group. Half of the SMAAT judges produced a 36% improvement in accuracy, but the other half showed no improvement. Additional studies are needed to demonstrate the durability of the reported improvements, but these positive effects justify the importance of stuttering measurement training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25629956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Adults ; Agreements ; Audiovisual Communications ; Behavior ; Behavior Patterns ; Care and treatment ; Child ; Children ; Education - methods ; Effect Size ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Measurement ; Measurement Techniques ; Measuring instruments ; Phonology ; Pretests Posttests ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Speech ; Speech disorders ; Speech Impairments ; Speech Perception ; Speech Production Measurement - methods ; Speech-Language Pathology - education ; Studies ; Stuttering ; Stuttering - diagnosis ; Syllables ; Teaching Methods ; Training ; Transcripts (Written Records) ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2015-04, Vol.58 (2), p.278-286</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Apr 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-7b44a9073a94839073c4c21758f8a95d0766cd1fea2e8a44bf99410a394c80aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-7b44a9073a94839073c4c21758f8a95d0766cd1fea2e8a44bf99410a394c80aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1060005$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25629956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bainbridge, Lauren A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stavros, Candace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimian, Mineh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuedong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Roger J</creatorcontrib><title>The Efficacy of Stuttering Measurement Training: Evaluating Two Training Programs</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Purpose: Two stuttering measurement training programs currently used for training clinicians were evaluated for their efficacy in improving the accuracy of total stuttering event counting. Method: Four groups, each with 12 randomly allocated participants, completed a pretest-posttest design training study. They were evaluated by their counts of stuttering events on eight 3-min audiovisual speech samples from adults and children who stutter. Stuttering judgment training involved use of either the Stuttering Measurement System (SMS), Stuttering Measurement Assessment and Training (SMAAT) programs, or no training. To test for the reliability of any training effect, SMS training was repeated with the 4th group. Results: Both SMS-trained groups produced approximately 34% improvement, significantly better than no training or the SMAAT program. The SMAAT program produced a mixed result. Conclusions: The SMS program was shown to produce a "medium" effect size improvement in the accuracy of stuttering event counts, and this improvement was almost perfectly replicated in a 2nd group. Half of the SMAAT judges produced a 36% improvement in accuracy, but the other half showed no improvement. Additional studies are needed to demonstrate the durability of the reported improvements, but these positive effects justify the importance of stuttering measurement training.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Audiovisual Communications</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Patterns</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Education - methods</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech disorders</subject><subject>Speech Impairments</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Speech-Language Pathology - education</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Stuttering</subject><subject>Stuttering - diagnosis</subject><subject>Syllables</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transcripts (Written Records)</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1vFCEUhidGY2v1H6iZxMR4MxUGGMALk6ZZrc0aP3a9JmdZmKWZgQozNf33Mtm67ZqFC07Oed7DgbxF8RKjU4wofV8jzNTlYn7xs1pUmFaoRuhRcYwZE5XEqH6cYyTrihIhjopnKV2hvDBtnhZHNWtqKVlzXPxYbkw5s9Zp0LdlsOViGIfBROfb8quBNEbTGz-UywjO5-SHcnYD3QjDBCz_hF2h_B5DG6FPz4snFrpkXtydJ8WvT7Pl-UU1__b5y_nZvNJM0qHiK0pBIk5AUkGmQFNdY86EFSDZGvGm0WtsDdRGAKUrKyXFCIikWiAAclJ83Pa9Hle9Wes8ZYROXUfXQ7xVAZzar3i3UW24UbThDNcoN3h31yCG36NJg-pd0qbrwJswJoUbTrhEEsuMvvkPvQpj9Pl5E8Xz2ASRe6qFzijnbcj36qmpOqOYcMEFbjJVHaBa400eMnhjXU7v8acH-LzXpnf6oODtA8HGQDdsUujGwQWf9kG6BXUMKUVjd5-HkZo8pu49phYKUzV5LMteP_z4neifqTLwagtkG-ldeXaJUZMdyMhf_wrUGw</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Bainbridge, Lauren A</creator><creator>Stavros, Candace</creator><creator>Ebrahimian, Mineh</creator><creator>Wang, Yuedong</creator><creator>Ingham, Roger J</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>The Efficacy of Stuttering Measurement Training: Evaluating Two Training Programs</title><author>Bainbridge, Lauren A ; Stavros, Candace ; Ebrahimian, Mineh ; Wang, Yuedong ; Ingham, Roger J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-7b44a9073a94839073c4c21758f8a95d0766cd1fea2e8a44bf99410a394c80aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Audiovisual Communications</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Patterns</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Education - methods</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech disorders</topic><topic>Speech Impairments</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Speech-Language Pathology - education</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Stuttering</topic><topic>Stuttering - diagnosis</topic><topic>Syllables</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transcripts (Written Records)</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bainbridge, Lauren A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stavros, Candace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimian, Mineh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuedong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Roger J</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bainbridge, Lauren A</au><au>Stavros, Candace</au><au>Ebrahimian, Mineh</au><au>Wang, Yuedong</au><au>Ingham, Roger J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1060005</ericid><atitle>The Efficacy of Stuttering Measurement Training: Evaluating Two Training Programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>278-286</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Two stuttering measurement training programs currently used for training clinicians were evaluated for their efficacy in improving the accuracy of total stuttering event counting. Method: Four groups, each with 12 randomly allocated participants, completed a pretest-posttest design training study. They were evaluated by their counts of stuttering events on eight 3-min audiovisual speech samples from adults and children who stutter. Stuttering judgment training involved use of either the Stuttering Measurement System (SMS), Stuttering Measurement Assessment and Training (SMAAT) programs, or no training. To test for the reliability of any training effect, SMS training was repeated with the 4th group. Results: Both SMS-trained groups produced approximately 34% improvement, significantly better than no training or the SMAAT program. The SMAAT program produced a mixed result. Conclusions: The SMS program was shown to produce a "medium" effect size improvement in the accuracy of stuttering event counts, and this improvement was almost perfectly replicated in a 2nd group. Half of the SMAAT judges produced a 36% improvement in accuracy, but the other half showed no improvement. Additional studies are needed to demonstrate the durability of the reported improvements, but these positive effects justify the importance of stuttering measurement training.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</pub><pmid>25629956</pmid><doi>10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0200</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1092-4388 |
| ispartof | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2015-04, Vol.58 (2), p.278-286 |
| issn | 1092-4388 1558-9102 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4675120 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Accuracy Adult Adults Agreements Audiovisual Communications Behavior Behavior Patterns Care and treatment Child Children Education - methods Effect Size Female Humans Male Measurement Measurement Techniques Measuring instruments Phonology Pretests Posttests Program Effectiveness Program Evaluation Reproducibility of Results Speech Speech disorders Speech Impairments Speech Perception Speech Production Measurement - methods Speech-Language Pathology - education Studies Stuttering Stuttering - diagnosis Syllables Teaching Methods Training Transcripts (Written Records) Young Adult |
| title | The Efficacy of Stuttering Measurement Training: Evaluating Two Training Programs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A08%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Efficacy%20of%20Stuttering%20Measurement%20Training:%20Evaluating%20Two%20Training%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Bainbridge,%20Lauren%20A&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=278-286&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0200&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA413787816%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1677217303&rft_id=info:pmid/25629956&rft_galeid=A413787816&rft_ericid=EJ1060005&rfr_iscdi=true |