A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada

The 5-level version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) was recently developed. A number of preference-based scoring systems are being developed for several countries around the world. To develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on societal preferences in Canada. We used age, sex, and education quota sampling...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care 2016-01, Vol.54 (1), p.98-105
Hauptverfasser: Xie, Feng, Pullenayegum, Eleanor, Gaebel, Kathy, Bansback, Nick, Bryan, Stirling, Ohinmaa, Arto, Poissant, Lise, Johnson, Jeffrey A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue 1
container_start_page 98
container_title Medical care
container_volume 54
creator Xie, Feng
Pullenayegum, Eleanor
Gaebel, Kathy
Bansback, Nick
Bryan, Stirling
Ohinmaa, Arto
Poissant, Lise
Johnson, Jeffrey A.
description The 5-level version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) was recently developed. A number of preference-based scoring systems are being developed for several countries around the world. To develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on societal preferences in Canada. We used age, sex, and education quota sampling from the general population from 4 cities across Canada. Composite time trade-off (cTTO) and traditional time trade-off (tTTO) were used as the main elicitation technique. A total of 86 EQ-5D-5L health states grouped into 10 blocks were valued using cTTO, whereas a subset of 18 severe states was also valued using tTTO. Participants meeting predefined inconsistency criteria were excluded from the analyses. For the value set development, we used tTTO and positive cTTO values, while censoring negative and zero cTTO values at zero. Models with the main effects presented using linear terms combined with various additional terms were estimated. The preferred model was selected based primarily on logically ordered coefficients, and secondly model fit. Of the 1209 participants who completed the interview, 136 met criteria that excluded them from the primary analyses. The demographics and socioeconomic status of the remaining 1073 participants were similar to the Canadian general population. The preferred model has 5 linear terms for the main effects, a term for level 4 or 5 for each dimension, and a term for the squared total number of level 4 or 5 beyond the first. For this preferred model, the health utilities ranged from -0.148 for the worst (55555) to 0.949 for the best (11111) EQ-5D-5L states. This is the first TTO-based value set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. It can be used to support the health utility estimation in economic evaluations for reimbursement decision making in Canada.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4674140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26418106</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26418106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fe1df2d7c4ec04bb5442c8cbd2bfa8b04638b315c2fbd21494f17c5040d2d61a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9LHDEQx4NU9Gr7H7Ql4Isv0Uw22WQfKshpW-FE2p6-hmx-1D32NprsCv3vm_asnM7LwMxnvszMF6EPQI-BNvLkavHjmG4H53IHzUBUkkDD1Rs0o5QJIqls9tHbnFeUgqwE20P7rOYNY8Bn6PMZXnZrj5fJOE9iCMT51D16h29NP3n80484BjzeeXzxnYhzIhY4xITnZjDOvEO7wfTZv3_KB-jmy8Vy_o0srr9ezs8WxAqmRhI8uMCctNxbyttWcM6ssq1jbTCqpbyuVFuBsCyUGvCGB5BWUE4dczWY6gCdbnTvp3btnfXDmEyv71O3Num3jqbTLztDd6d_xUfNa8mB0yJw9CSQ4sPk86jXXba-783g45Q1yJoqqZSCgh6-QldxSkM5r1Di35uFKhTfUDbFnJMPz8sA1X_90cUf_dqfMvZp-5Dnof-GFODjBljlMabtPiigdfUHfiCSIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750044758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Xie, Feng ; Pullenayegum, Eleanor ; Gaebel, Kathy ; Bansback, Nick ; Bryan, Stirling ; Ohinmaa, Arto ; Poissant, Lise ; Johnson, Jeffrey A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Feng ; Pullenayegum, Eleanor ; Gaebel, Kathy ; Bansback, Nick ; Bryan, Stirling ; Ohinmaa, Arto ; Poissant, Lise ; Johnson, Jeffrey A. ; Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group ; Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The 5-level version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) was recently developed. A number of preference-based scoring systems are being developed for several countries around the world. To develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on societal preferences in Canada. We used age, sex, and education quota sampling from the general population from 4 cities across Canada. Composite time trade-off (cTTO) and traditional time trade-off (tTTO) were used as the main elicitation technique. A total of 86 EQ-5D-5L health states grouped into 10 blocks were valued using cTTO, whereas a subset of 18 severe states was also valued using tTTO. Participants meeting predefined inconsistency criteria were excluded from the analyses. For the value set development, we used tTTO and positive cTTO values, while censoring negative and zero cTTO values at zero. Models with the main effects presented using linear terms combined with various additional terms were estimated. The preferred model was selected based primarily on logically ordered coefficients, and secondly model fit. Of the 1209 participants who completed the interview, 136 met criteria that excluded them from the primary analyses. The demographics and socioeconomic status of the remaining 1073 participants were similar to the Canadian general population. The preferred model has 5 linear terms for the main effects, a term for level 4 or 5 for each dimension, and a term for the squared total number of level 4 or 5 beyond the first. For this preferred model, the health utilities ranged from -0.148 for the worst (55555) to 0.949 for the best (11111) EQ-5D-5L states. This is the first TTO-based value set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. It can be used to support the health utility estimation in economic evaluations for reimbursement decision making in Canada.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26492214</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MELAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Canada ; Demographics ; Female ; Health Status ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Models, Statistical ; Original ; Original Article ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Socioeconomic factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Tradeoff analysis ; Valuation methods</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 2016-01, Vol.54 (1), p.98-105</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Jan 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fe1df2d7c4ec04bb5442c8cbd2bfa8b04638b315c2fbd21494f17c5040d2d61a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fe1df2d7c4ec04bb5442c8cbd2bfa8b04638b315c2fbd21494f17c5040d2d61a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26418106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26418106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26492214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullenayegum, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaebel, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansback, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, Stirling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohinmaa, Arto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poissant, Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada</title><title>Medical care</title><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><description>The 5-level version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) was recently developed. A number of preference-based scoring systems are being developed for several countries around the world. To develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on societal preferences in Canada. We used age, sex, and education quota sampling from the general population from 4 cities across Canada. Composite time trade-off (cTTO) and traditional time trade-off (tTTO) were used as the main elicitation technique. A total of 86 EQ-5D-5L health states grouped into 10 blocks were valued using cTTO, whereas a subset of 18 severe states was also valued using tTTO. Participants meeting predefined inconsistency criteria were excluded from the analyses. For the value set development, we used tTTO and positive cTTO values, while censoring negative and zero cTTO values at zero. Models with the main effects presented using linear terms combined with various additional terms were estimated. The preferred model was selected based primarily on logically ordered coefficients, and secondly model fit. Of the 1209 participants who completed the interview, 136 met criteria that excluded them from the primary analyses. The demographics and socioeconomic status of the remaining 1073 participants were similar to the Canadian general population. The preferred model has 5 linear terms for the main effects, a term for level 4 or 5 for each dimension, and a term for the squared total number of level 4 or 5 beyond the first. For this preferred model, the health utilities ranged from -0.148 for the worst (55555) to 0.949 for the best (11111) EQ-5D-5L states. This is the first TTO-based value set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. It can be used to support the health utility estimation in economic evaluations for reimbursement decision making in Canada.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Tradeoff analysis</subject><subject>Valuation methods</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9LHDEQx4NU9Gr7H7Ql4Isv0Uw22WQfKshpW-FE2p6-hmx-1D32NprsCv3vm_asnM7LwMxnvszMF6EPQI-BNvLkavHjmG4H53IHzUBUkkDD1Rs0o5QJIqls9tHbnFeUgqwE20P7rOYNY8Bn6PMZXnZrj5fJOE9iCMT51D16h29NP3n80484BjzeeXzxnYhzIhY4xITnZjDOvEO7wfTZv3_KB-jmy8Vy_o0srr9ezs8WxAqmRhI8uMCctNxbyttWcM6ssq1jbTCqpbyuVFuBsCyUGvCGB5BWUE4dczWY6gCdbnTvp3btnfXDmEyv71O3Num3jqbTLztDd6d_xUfNa8mB0yJw9CSQ4sPk86jXXba-783g45Q1yJoqqZSCgh6-QldxSkM5r1Di35uFKhTfUDbFnJMPz8sA1X_90cUf_dqfMvZp-5Dnof-GFODjBljlMabtPiigdfUHfiCSIg</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Xie, Feng</creator><creator>Pullenayegum, Eleanor</creator><creator>Gaebel, Kathy</creator><creator>Bansback, Nick</creator><creator>Bryan, Stirling</creator><creator>Ohinmaa, Arto</creator><creator>Poissant, Lise</creator><creator>Johnson, Jeffrey A.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada</title><author>Xie, Feng ; Pullenayegum, Eleanor ; Gaebel, Kathy ; Bansback, Nick ; Bryan, Stirling ; Ohinmaa, Arto ; Poissant, Lise ; Johnson, Jeffrey A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fe1df2d7c4ec04bb5442c8cbd2bfa8b04638b315c2fbd21494f17c5040d2d61a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Tradeoff analysis</topic><topic>Valuation methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullenayegum, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaebel, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansback, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, Stirling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohinmaa, Arto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poissant, Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Feng</au><au>Pullenayegum, Eleanor</au><au>Gaebel, Kathy</au><au>Bansback, Nick</au><au>Bryan, Stirling</au><au>Ohinmaa, Arto</au><au>Poissant, Lise</au><au>Johnson, Jeffrey A.</au><aucorp>Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>98-105</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><coden>MELAAD</coden><abstract>The 5-level version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) was recently developed. A number of preference-based scoring systems are being developed for several countries around the world. To develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on societal preferences in Canada. We used age, sex, and education quota sampling from the general population from 4 cities across Canada. Composite time trade-off (cTTO) and traditional time trade-off (tTTO) were used as the main elicitation technique. A total of 86 EQ-5D-5L health states grouped into 10 blocks were valued using cTTO, whereas a subset of 18 severe states was also valued using tTTO. Participants meeting predefined inconsistency criteria were excluded from the analyses. For the value set development, we used tTTO and positive cTTO values, while censoring negative and zero cTTO values at zero. Models with the main effects presented using linear terms combined with various additional terms were estimated. The preferred model was selected based primarily on logically ordered coefficients, and secondly model fit. Of the 1209 participants who completed the interview, 136 met criteria that excluded them from the primary analyses. The demographics and socioeconomic status of the remaining 1073 participants were similar to the Canadian general population. The preferred model has 5 linear terms for the main effects, a term for level 4 or 5 for each dimension, and a term for the squared total number of level 4 or 5 beyond the first. For this preferred model, the health utilities ranged from -0.148 for the worst (55555) to 0.949 for the best (11111) EQ-5D-5L states. This is the first TTO-based value set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. It can be used to support the health utility estimation in economic evaluations for reimbursement decision making in Canada.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>26492214</pmid><doi>10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7079
ispartof Medical care, 2016-01, Vol.54 (1), p.98-105
issn 0025-7079
1537-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4674140
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE
subjects Canada
Demographics
Female
Health Status
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Models, Statistical
Original
Original Article
Psychometrics - instrumentation
Quality of Life - psychology
Socioeconomic factors
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Tradeoff analysis
Valuation methods
title A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T03%3A41%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Time%20Trade-off-derived%20Value%20Set%20of%20the%20EQ-5D-5L%20for%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Xie,%20Feng&rft.aucorp=Canadian%20EQ-5D-5L%20Valuation%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=98-105&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft.coden=MELAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26418106%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750044758&rft_id=info:pmid/26492214&rft_jstor_id=26418106&rfr_iscdi=true