Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine
The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oncology letters 2015-11, Vol.10 (5), p.2731-2738 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2738 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2731 |
container_title | Oncology letters |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | JIANG, HAO WANG, GENGMING SONG, HONGWEI XU, HONGBO ZHANG, YAJUN ZHOU, YUFU CAI, HANFEI DUAN, SHIMIAO |
description | The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 24 being treated with IMRT and 29 being treated with 2D-CRT. All 53 patients received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy subsequent to radiation. The patients were clinically staged according to the seventh edition of the UICC and AJCC staging systems. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.7% and 45.5% in the IMRT-treated group and 65.5% and 9.1% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.01). The 3- and 5-year LPES rates were 87.4% and 69.9% in the IMRT-treated group compared with 49.4% and 9.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group, respectively (P=0.00). The 3- and 5-year DMFS rates were 94.4 and 40.8% in the IMRT-treated group and 79.8 and 30.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.13). N stage (P=0.00) and radiotherapy methods (P=0.01) were relevant to the OS and LPFS rates, it also revealed a significant difference when the DMFS rates were analyzed in N stage. The incidence of dry mouth in the IMRT group was significantly lower (P=0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference in acute oropharyngeal mucositis or myelosuppression. IMRT had significant advantages in local control and OS compared with conventional 2D-CRT, but IMRT failed to reduce the incidence of distant metastasis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3892/ol.2015.3668 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4665756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A439320241</galeid><sourcerecordid>A439320241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-a974d57d7105ebdfc7a0133fde60daf0ecaae092c55991a4e76a0746644659663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhk1paUKaW8_F0FJ6qLeSbMn2JbCEfkEgl_YsFGm8VpAl15I37I_qf-w4m2yzpdJBX8-8GmbeLHtNyapsWvYpuBUjlK9KIZpn2SmtW1ZQ0rDnh31dnWTnMd4SHFzQphEvsxMmasZYWZ5mv9deuV20MQ9dnnrIoeusVnq3nK1P4KNNu2IIZnYqgcknZWxAcFLjLlfe5OkuFMYOCxhQK9fBb8Gn_eGItj73KoaxV9POb2Bh1aStD4PK72zqEdgGtwXUSo_paJi2mI_L42g9vMpedMpFOH9Yz7KfXz7_uPxWXF1__X65vio0L9tUqLauDK9NTQmHG9PpWhFalp0BQYzqCGilgLRMc962VFVQC4WFEqKqBG-FKM-yi73uON8MYDQmNCknx8kOmLsMysrjF297uQlbiRq85ovAhweBKfyaISY52KjBOeUhzFHShuFvTSUaRN_-g96GecLiIdWWTPBGVPQvtVEOpPVdwH_1IirXVYkcYffU6j8UTgODxcZAZ_H-KOD9k4Aee5L6GNy8tC8egx_3oJ5CjBN0h2JQIhcryuDkYkW5WBHxN08LeIAfjYfAuz0QRzSRNSEemOurguC81_kD8ozoyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932658641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine</title><source>Spandidos Publications Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>JIANG, HAO ; WANG, GENGMING ; SONG, HONGWEI ; XU, HONGBO ; ZHANG, YAJUN ; ZHOU, YUFU ; CAI, HANFEI ; DUAN, SHIMIAO</creator><creatorcontrib>JIANG, HAO ; WANG, GENGMING ; SONG, HONGWEI ; XU, HONGBO ; ZHANG, YAJUN ; ZHOU, YUFU ; CAI, HANFEI ; DUAN, SHIMIAO</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 24 being treated with IMRT and 29 being treated with 2D-CRT. All 53 patients received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy subsequent to radiation. The patients were clinically staged according to the seventh edition of the UICC and AJCC staging systems. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.7% and 45.5% in the IMRT-treated group and 65.5% and 9.1% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.01). The 3- and 5-year LPES rates were 87.4% and 69.9% in the IMRT-treated group compared with 49.4% and 9.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group, respectively (P=0.00). The 3- and 5-year DMFS rates were 94.4 and 40.8% in the IMRT-treated group and 79.8 and 30.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.13). N stage (P=0.00) and radiotherapy methods (P=0.01) were relevant to the OS and LPFS rates, it also revealed a significant difference when the DMFS rates were analyzed in N stage. The incidence of dry mouth in the IMRT group was significantly lower (P=0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference in acute oropharyngeal mucositis or myelosuppression. IMRT had significant advantages in local control and OS compared with conventional 2D-CRT, but IMRT failed to reduce the incidence of distant metastasis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1792-1074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1792-1082</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26722233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece: D.A. Spandidos</publisher><subject>Age ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; cervical spine involvement ; Chemotherapy ; Dose-response relationship (Biochemistry) ; intensity-modulated radiotherapy ; Lymphatic system ; Medical imaging ; Medical prognosis ; Metastasis ; Methods ; Nasopharyngeal cancer ; nasopharyngeal carcinoma ; Neck ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Oncology, Experimental ; prognosis ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Throat cancer ; two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Oncology letters, 2015-11, Vol.10 (5), p.2731-2738</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Spandidos Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Spandidos Publications UK Ltd. 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-a974d57d7105ebdfc7a0133fde60daf0ecaae092c55991a4e76a0746644659663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-a974d57d7105ebdfc7a0133fde60daf0ecaae092c55991a4e76a0746644659663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665756/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665756/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,5571,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26722233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JIANG, HAO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, GENGMING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONG, HONGWEI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>XU, HONGBO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, YAJUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YUFU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAI, HANFEI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUAN, SHIMIAO</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine</title><title>Oncology letters</title><addtitle>Oncol Lett</addtitle><description>The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 24 being treated with IMRT and 29 being treated with 2D-CRT. All 53 patients received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy subsequent to radiation. The patients were clinically staged according to the seventh edition of the UICC and AJCC staging systems. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.7% and 45.5% in the IMRT-treated group and 65.5% and 9.1% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.01). The 3- and 5-year LPES rates were 87.4% and 69.9% in the IMRT-treated group compared with 49.4% and 9.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group, respectively (P=0.00). The 3- and 5-year DMFS rates were 94.4 and 40.8% in the IMRT-treated group and 79.8 and 30.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.13). N stage (P=0.00) and radiotherapy methods (P=0.01) were relevant to the OS and LPFS rates, it also revealed a significant difference when the DMFS rates were analyzed in N stage. The incidence of dry mouth in the IMRT group was significantly lower (P=0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference in acute oropharyngeal mucositis or myelosuppression. IMRT had significant advantages in local control and OS compared with conventional 2D-CRT, but IMRT failed to reduce the incidence of distant metastasis.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>cervical spine involvement</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Dose-response relationship (Biochemistry)</subject><subject>intensity-modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nasopharyngeal cancer</subject><subject>nasopharyngeal carcinoma</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>prognosis</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Throat cancer</subject><subject>two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>1792-1074</issn><issn>1792-1082</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhk1paUKaW8_F0FJ6qLeSbMn2JbCEfkEgl_YsFGm8VpAl15I37I_qf-w4m2yzpdJBX8-8GmbeLHtNyapsWvYpuBUjlK9KIZpn2SmtW1ZQ0rDnh31dnWTnMd4SHFzQphEvsxMmasZYWZ5mv9deuV20MQ9dnnrIoeusVnq3nK1P4KNNu2IIZnYqgcknZWxAcFLjLlfe5OkuFMYOCxhQK9fBb8Gn_eGItj73KoaxV9POb2Bh1aStD4PK72zqEdgGtwXUSo_paJi2mI_L42g9vMpedMpFOH9Yz7KfXz7_uPxWXF1__X65vio0L9tUqLauDK9NTQmHG9PpWhFalp0BQYzqCGilgLRMc962VFVQC4WFEqKqBG-FKM-yi73uON8MYDQmNCknx8kOmLsMysrjF297uQlbiRq85ovAhweBKfyaISY52KjBOeUhzFHShuFvTSUaRN_-g96GecLiIdWWTPBGVPQvtVEOpPVdwH_1IirXVYkcYffU6j8UTgODxcZAZ_H-KOD9k4Aee5L6GNy8tC8egx_3oJ5CjBN0h2JQIhcryuDkYkW5WBHxN08LeIAfjYfAuz0QRzSRNSEemOurguC81_kD8ozoyg</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>JIANG, HAO</creator><creator>WANG, GENGMING</creator><creator>SONG, HONGWEI</creator><creator>XU, HONGBO</creator><creator>ZHANG, YAJUN</creator><creator>ZHOU, YUFU</creator><creator>CAI, HANFEI</creator><creator>DUAN, SHIMIAO</creator><general>D.A. Spandidos</general><general>Spandidos Publications</general><general>Spandidos Publications UK Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine</title><author>JIANG, HAO ; WANG, GENGMING ; SONG, HONGWEI ; XU, HONGBO ; ZHANG, YAJUN ; ZHOU, YUFU ; CAI, HANFEI ; DUAN, SHIMIAO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-a974d57d7105ebdfc7a0133fde60daf0ecaae092c55991a4e76a0746644659663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>cervical spine involvement</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Dose-response relationship (Biochemistry)</topic><topic>intensity-modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nasopharyngeal cancer</topic><topic>nasopharyngeal carcinoma</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>prognosis</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Throat cancer</topic><topic>two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JIANG, HAO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, GENGMING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONG, HONGWEI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>XU, HONGBO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, YAJUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YUFU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAI, HANFEI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUAN, SHIMIAO</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Oncology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JIANG, HAO</au><au>WANG, GENGMING</au><au>SONG, HONGWEI</au><au>XU, HONGBO</au><au>ZHANG, YAJUN</au><au>ZHOU, YUFU</au><au>CAI, HANFEI</au><au>DUAN, SHIMIAO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine</atitle><jtitle>Oncology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Oncol Lett</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2731</spage><epage>2738</epage><pages>2731-2738</pages><issn>1792-1074</issn><eissn>1792-1082</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 24 being treated with IMRT and 29 being treated with 2D-CRT. All 53 patients received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy subsequent to radiation. The patients were clinically staged according to the seventh edition of the UICC and AJCC staging systems. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.7% and 45.5% in the IMRT-treated group and 65.5% and 9.1% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.01). The 3- and 5-year LPES rates were 87.4% and 69.9% in the IMRT-treated group compared with 49.4% and 9.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group, respectively (P=0.00). The 3- and 5-year DMFS rates were 94.4 and 40.8% in the IMRT-treated group and 79.8 and 30.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.13). N stage (P=0.00) and radiotherapy methods (P=0.01) were relevant to the OS and LPFS rates, it also revealed a significant difference when the DMFS rates were analyzed in N stage. The incidence of dry mouth in the IMRT group was significantly lower (P=0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference in acute oropharyngeal mucositis or myelosuppression. IMRT had significant advantages in local control and OS compared with conventional 2D-CRT, but IMRT failed to reduce the incidence of distant metastasis.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pub>D.A. Spandidos</pub><pmid>26722233</pmid><doi>10.3892/ol.2015.3668</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1792-1074 |
ispartof | Oncology letters, 2015-11, Vol.10 (5), p.2731-2738 |
issn | 1792-1074 1792-1082 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4665756 |
source | Spandidos Publications Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Age Cancer Cancer therapies Care and treatment cervical spine involvement Chemotherapy Dose-response relationship (Biochemistry) intensity-modulated radiotherapy Lymphatic system Medical imaging Medical prognosis Metastasis Methods Nasopharyngeal cancer nasopharyngeal carcinoma Neck NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Oncology, Experimental prognosis Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Throat cancer two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy Vertebrae |
title | Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A01%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20the%20efficacy%20of%20intensity-modulated%20radiotherapy%20and%20two-dimensional%20conventional%20radiotherapy%20in%20nasopharyngeal%20carcinoma%20with%20involvement%20of%20the%20cervical%20spine&rft.jtitle=Oncology%20letters&rft.au=JIANG,%20HAO&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2731&rft.epage=2738&rft.pages=2731-2738&rft.issn=1792-1074&rft.eissn=1792-1082&rft_id=info:doi/10.3892/ol.2015.3668&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA439320241%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932658641&rft_id=info:pmid/26722233&rft_galeid=A439320241&rfr_iscdi=true |