Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine

The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oncology letters 2015-11, Vol.10 (5), p.2731-2738
Hauptverfasser: JIANG, HAO, WANG, GENGMING, SONG, HONGWEI, XU, HONGBO, ZHANG, YAJUN, ZHOU, YUFU, CAI, HANFEI, DUAN, SHIMIAO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2738
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2731
container_title Oncology letters
container_volume 10
creator JIANG, HAO
WANG, GENGMING
SONG, HONGWEI
XU, HONGBO
ZHANG, YAJUN
ZHOU, YUFU
CAI, HANFEI
DUAN, SHIMIAO
description The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 24 being treated with IMRT and 29 being treated with 2D-CRT. All 53 patients received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy subsequent to radiation. The patients were clinically staged according to the seventh edition of the UICC and AJCC staging systems. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.7% and 45.5% in the IMRT-treated group and 65.5% and 9.1% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.01). The 3- and 5-year LPES rates were 87.4% and 69.9% in the IMRT-treated group compared with 49.4% and 9.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group, respectively (P=0.00). The 3- and 5-year DMFS rates were 94.4 and 40.8% in the IMRT-treated group and 79.8 and 30.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.13). N stage (P=0.00) and radiotherapy methods (P=0.01) were relevant to the OS and LPFS rates, it also revealed a significant difference when the DMFS rates were analyzed in N stage. The incidence of dry mouth in the IMRT group was significantly lower (P=0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference in acute oropharyngeal mucositis or myelosuppression. IMRT had significant advantages in local control and OS compared with conventional 2D-CRT, but IMRT failed to reduce the incidence of distant metastasis.
doi_str_mv 10.3892/ol.2015.3668
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4665756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A439320241</galeid><sourcerecordid>A439320241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-a974d57d7105ebdfc7a0133fde60daf0ecaae092c55991a4e76a0746644659663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhk1paUKaW8_F0FJ6qLeSbMn2JbCEfkEgl_YsFGm8VpAl15I37I_qf-w4m2yzpdJBX8-8GmbeLHtNyapsWvYpuBUjlK9KIZpn2SmtW1ZQ0rDnh31dnWTnMd4SHFzQphEvsxMmasZYWZ5mv9deuV20MQ9dnnrIoeusVnq3nK1P4KNNu2IIZnYqgcknZWxAcFLjLlfe5OkuFMYOCxhQK9fBb8Gn_eGItj73KoaxV9POb2Bh1aStD4PK72zqEdgGtwXUSo_paJi2mI_L42g9vMpedMpFOH9Yz7KfXz7_uPxWXF1__X65vio0L9tUqLauDK9NTQmHG9PpWhFalp0BQYzqCGilgLRMc962VFVQC4WFEqKqBG-FKM-yi73uON8MYDQmNCknx8kOmLsMysrjF297uQlbiRq85ovAhweBKfyaISY52KjBOeUhzFHShuFvTSUaRN_-g96GecLiIdWWTPBGVPQvtVEOpPVdwH_1IirXVYkcYffU6j8UTgODxcZAZ_H-KOD9k4Aee5L6GNy8tC8egx_3oJ5CjBN0h2JQIhcryuDkYkW5WBHxN08LeIAfjYfAuz0QRzSRNSEemOurguC81_kD8ozoyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932658641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine</title><source>Spandidos Publications Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>JIANG, HAO ; WANG, GENGMING ; SONG, HONGWEI ; XU, HONGBO ; ZHANG, YAJUN ; ZHOU, YUFU ; CAI, HANFEI ; DUAN, SHIMIAO</creator><creatorcontrib>JIANG, HAO ; WANG, GENGMING ; SONG, HONGWEI ; XU, HONGBO ; ZHANG, YAJUN ; ZHOU, YUFU ; CAI, HANFEI ; DUAN, SHIMIAO</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 24 being treated with IMRT and 29 being treated with 2D-CRT. All 53 patients received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy subsequent to radiation. The patients were clinically staged according to the seventh edition of the UICC and AJCC staging systems. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.7% and 45.5% in the IMRT-treated group and 65.5% and 9.1% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.01). The 3- and 5-year LPES rates were 87.4% and 69.9% in the IMRT-treated group compared with 49.4% and 9.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group, respectively (P=0.00). The 3- and 5-year DMFS rates were 94.4 and 40.8% in the IMRT-treated group and 79.8 and 30.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.13). N stage (P=0.00) and radiotherapy methods (P=0.01) were relevant to the OS and LPFS rates, it also revealed a significant difference when the DMFS rates were analyzed in N stage. The incidence of dry mouth in the IMRT group was significantly lower (P=0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference in acute oropharyngeal mucositis or myelosuppression. IMRT had significant advantages in local control and OS compared with conventional 2D-CRT, but IMRT failed to reduce the incidence of distant metastasis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1792-1074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1792-1082</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26722233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece: D.A. Spandidos</publisher><subject>Age ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; cervical spine involvement ; Chemotherapy ; Dose-response relationship (Biochemistry) ; intensity-modulated radiotherapy ; Lymphatic system ; Medical imaging ; Medical prognosis ; Metastasis ; Methods ; Nasopharyngeal cancer ; nasopharyngeal carcinoma ; Neck ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Oncology, Experimental ; prognosis ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Throat cancer ; two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Oncology letters, 2015-11, Vol.10 (5), p.2731-2738</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Spandidos Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Spandidos Publications UK Ltd. 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-a974d57d7105ebdfc7a0133fde60daf0ecaae092c55991a4e76a0746644659663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-a974d57d7105ebdfc7a0133fde60daf0ecaae092c55991a4e76a0746644659663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665756/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665756/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,5571,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26722233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JIANG, HAO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, GENGMING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONG, HONGWEI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>XU, HONGBO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, YAJUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YUFU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAI, HANFEI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUAN, SHIMIAO</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine</title><title>Oncology letters</title><addtitle>Oncol Lett</addtitle><description>The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 24 being treated with IMRT and 29 being treated with 2D-CRT. All 53 patients received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy subsequent to radiation. The patients were clinically staged according to the seventh edition of the UICC and AJCC staging systems. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.7% and 45.5% in the IMRT-treated group and 65.5% and 9.1% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.01). The 3- and 5-year LPES rates were 87.4% and 69.9% in the IMRT-treated group compared with 49.4% and 9.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group, respectively (P=0.00). The 3- and 5-year DMFS rates were 94.4 and 40.8% in the IMRT-treated group and 79.8 and 30.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.13). N stage (P=0.00) and radiotherapy methods (P=0.01) were relevant to the OS and LPFS rates, it also revealed a significant difference when the DMFS rates were analyzed in N stage. The incidence of dry mouth in the IMRT group was significantly lower (P=0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference in acute oropharyngeal mucositis or myelosuppression. IMRT had significant advantages in local control and OS compared with conventional 2D-CRT, but IMRT failed to reduce the incidence of distant metastasis.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>cervical spine involvement</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Dose-response relationship (Biochemistry)</subject><subject>intensity-modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nasopharyngeal cancer</subject><subject>nasopharyngeal carcinoma</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>prognosis</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Throat cancer</subject><subject>two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>1792-1074</issn><issn>1792-1082</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhk1paUKaW8_F0FJ6qLeSbMn2JbCEfkEgl_YsFGm8VpAl15I37I_qf-w4m2yzpdJBX8-8GmbeLHtNyapsWvYpuBUjlK9KIZpn2SmtW1ZQ0rDnh31dnWTnMd4SHFzQphEvsxMmasZYWZ5mv9deuV20MQ9dnnrIoeusVnq3nK1P4KNNu2IIZnYqgcknZWxAcFLjLlfe5OkuFMYOCxhQK9fBb8Gn_eGItj73KoaxV9POb2Bh1aStD4PK72zqEdgGtwXUSo_paJi2mI_L42g9vMpedMpFOH9Yz7KfXz7_uPxWXF1__X65vio0L9tUqLauDK9NTQmHG9PpWhFalp0BQYzqCGilgLRMc962VFVQC4WFEqKqBG-FKM-yi73uON8MYDQmNCknx8kOmLsMysrjF297uQlbiRq85ovAhweBKfyaISY52KjBOeUhzFHShuFvTSUaRN_-g96GecLiIdWWTPBGVPQvtVEOpPVdwH_1IirXVYkcYffU6j8UTgODxcZAZ_H-KOD9k4Aee5L6GNy8tC8egx_3oJ5CjBN0h2JQIhcryuDkYkW5WBHxN08LeIAfjYfAuz0QRzSRNSEemOurguC81_kD8ozoyg</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>JIANG, HAO</creator><creator>WANG, GENGMING</creator><creator>SONG, HONGWEI</creator><creator>XU, HONGBO</creator><creator>ZHANG, YAJUN</creator><creator>ZHOU, YUFU</creator><creator>CAI, HANFEI</creator><creator>DUAN, SHIMIAO</creator><general>D.A. Spandidos</general><general>Spandidos Publications</general><general>Spandidos Publications UK Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine</title><author>JIANG, HAO ; WANG, GENGMING ; SONG, HONGWEI ; XU, HONGBO ; ZHANG, YAJUN ; ZHOU, YUFU ; CAI, HANFEI ; DUAN, SHIMIAO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-a974d57d7105ebdfc7a0133fde60daf0ecaae092c55991a4e76a0746644659663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>cervical spine involvement</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Dose-response relationship (Biochemistry)</topic><topic>intensity-modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nasopharyngeal cancer</topic><topic>nasopharyngeal carcinoma</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>prognosis</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Throat cancer</topic><topic>two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JIANG, HAO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, GENGMING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONG, HONGWEI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>XU, HONGBO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, YAJUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YUFU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAI, HANFEI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUAN, SHIMIAO</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Oncology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JIANG, HAO</au><au>WANG, GENGMING</au><au>SONG, HONGWEI</au><au>XU, HONGBO</au><au>ZHANG, YAJUN</au><au>ZHOU, YUFU</au><au>CAI, HANFEI</au><au>DUAN, SHIMIAO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine</atitle><jtitle>Oncology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Oncol Lett</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2731</spage><epage>2738</epage><pages>2731-2738</pages><issn>1792-1074</issn><eissn>1792-1082</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy and side-effects of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 53 NPC patients with cervical spine involvement, without distant metastases. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 24 being treated with IMRT and 29 being treated with 2D-CRT. All 53 patients received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy subsequent to radiation. The patients were clinically staged according to the seventh edition of the UICC and AJCC staging systems. Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.7% and 45.5% in the IMRT-treated group and 65.5% and 9.1% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.01). The 3- and 5-year LPES rates were 87.4% and 69.9% in the IMRT-treated group compared with 49.4% and 9.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group, respectively (P=0.00). The 3- and 5-year DMFS rates were 94.4 and 40.8% in the IMRT-treated group and 79.8 and 30.4% in the 2D-CRT-treated group (P=0.13). N stage (P=0.00) and radiotherapy methods (P=0.01) were relevant to the OS and LPFS rates, it also revealed a significant difference when the DMFS rates were analyzed in N stage. The incidence of dry mouth in the IMRT group was significantly lower (P=0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference in acute oropharyngeal mucositis or myelosuppression. IMRT had significant advantages in local control and OS compared with conventional 2D-CRT, but IMRT failed to reduce the incidence of distant metastasis.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pub>D.A. Spandidos</pub><pmid>26722233</pmid><doi>10.3892/ol.2015.3668</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1792-1074
ispartof Oncology letters, 2015-11, Vol.10 (5), p.2731-2738
issn 1792-1074
1792-1082
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4665756
source Spandidos Publications Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Age
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
cervical spine involvement
Chemotherapy
Dose-response relationship (Biochemistry)
intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Lymphatic system
Medical imaging
Medical prognosis
Metastasis
Methods
Nasopharyngeal cancer
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Neck
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Oncology, Experimental
prognosis
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Throat cancer
two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy
Vertebrae
title Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A01%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20the%20efficacy%20of%20intensity-modulated%20radiotherapy%20and%20two-dimensional%20conventional%20radiotherapy%20in%20nasopharyngeal%20carcinoma%20with%20involvement%20of%20the%20cervical%20spine&rft.jtitle=Oncology%20letters&rft.au=JIANG,%20HAO&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2731&rft.epage=2738&rft.pages=2731-2738&rft.issn=1792-1074&rft.eissn=1792-1082&rft_id=info:doi/10.3892/ol.2015.3668&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA439320241%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932658641&rft_id=info:pmid/26722233&rft_galeid=A439320241&rfr_iscdi=true