Development of a Multiantigen Panel for Improved Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in Early Lyme Disease

The current standard for laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease in the United States is serologic detection of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a two-tiered testing algorithm; however, this scheme has limited sensitivity for detecting e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2015-12, Vol.53 (12), p.3834-3841
Hauptverfasser: Lahey, Lauren J, Panas, Michael W, Mao, Rong, Delanoy, Michelle, Flanagan, John J, Binder, Steven R, Rebman, Alison W, Montoya, Jose G, Soloski, Mark J, Steere, Allen C, Dattwyler, Raymond J, Arnaboldi, Paul M, Aucott, John N, Robinson, William H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3841
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3834
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 53
creator Lahey, Lauren J
Panas, Michael W
Mao, Rong
Delanoy, Michelle
Flanagan, John J
Binder, Steven R
Rebman, Alison W
Montoya, Jose G
Soloski, Mark J
Steere, Allen C
Dattwyler, Raymond J
Arnaboldi, Paul M
Aucott, John N
Robinson, William H
description The current standard for laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease in the United States is serologic detection of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a two-tiered testing algorithm; however, this scheme has limited sensitivity for detecting early Lyme disease. Thus, there is a need to improve diagnostics for Lyme disease at the early stage, when antibiotic treatment is highly efficacious. We examined novel and established antigen markers to develop a multiplex panel that identifies early infection using the combined sensitivity of multiple markers while simultaneously maintaining high specificity by requiring positive results for two markers to designate a positive test. Ten markers were selected from our initial analysis of 62 B. burgdorferi surface proteins and synthetic peptides by assessing binding of IgG and IgM to each in a training set of Lyme disease patient samples and controls. In a validation set, this 10-antigen panel identified a higher proportion of early-Lyme-disease patients as positive at the baseline or posttreatment visit than two-tiered testing (87.5% and 67.5%, respectively; P < 0.05). Equivalent specificities of 100% were observed in 26 healthy controls. Upon further analysis, positivity on the novel 10-antigen panel was associated with longer illness duration and multiple erythema migrans. The improved sensitivity and comparable specificity of our 10-antigen panel compared to two-tiered testing in detecting early B. burgdorferi infection indicates that multiplex analysis, featuring the next generation of markers, could advance diagnostic technology to better aid clinicians in diagnosing and treating early Lyme disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.02111-15
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4652118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1762375280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-1ba363fbe305e0db7535caeb7cc31ca9604c06e7dfce86e87a1b684fce1491703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1vEzEQxS0EoqFw44x85MAWz_prc0GCpIWgVHAAiZvl9c4GI-86tXcj5b_HbUMFN06j0fvpaeY9Ql4CuwCom7efV9cXrAaACuQjsgC2bCql2I_HZMHYUlYAXJ-RZzn_YgyEkPIpOauVELoIC5LWeMAQ9wOOE409tfR6DpO34-R3ONKvdsRA-5joZtineMCOrnFCN_k43uIfYkoYvKXtnHZdTD0mTzdjfyL8SC9tCke6PQ5I1z6jzficPOltyPjiNM_J96vLb6tP1fbLx83q_bZyAvRUQWu54n2LnElkXasll85iq53j4OxSMeGYQt31DhuFjbbQqkaUDcQSNOPn5N29735uB-xc-TDZYPbJDzYdTbTe_KuM_qfZxYMRSpY8m2Lw-mSQ4s2MeTKDzw5DKKHEORvQquZa1g37D5RLXjcl9IK-uUddijkn7B8uAmZuGzWlUXPXqAFZ8Fd_f_EA_6mQ_waTp533</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735328471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a Multiantigen Panel for Improved Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in Early Lyme Disease</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lahey, Lauren J ; Panas, Michael W ; Mao, Rong ; Delanoy, Michelle ; Flanagan, John J ; Binder, Steven R ; Rebman, Alison W ; Montoya, Jose G ; Soloski, Mark J ; Steere, Allen C ; Dattwyler, Raymond J ; Arnaboldi, Paul M ; Aucott, John N ; Robinson, William H</creator><creatorcontrib>Lahey, Lauren J ; Panas, Michael W ; Mao, Rong ; Delanoy, Michelle ; Flanagan, John J ; Binder, Steven R ; Rebman, Alison W ; Montoya, Jose G ; Soloski, Mark J ; Steere, Allen C ; Dattwyler, Raymond J ; Arnaboldi, Paul M ; Aucott, John N ; Robinson, William H</creatorcontrib><description>The current standard for laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease in the United States is serologic detection of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a two-tiered testing algorithm; however, this scheme has limited sensitivity for detecting early Lyme disease. Thus, there is a need to improve diagnostics for Lyme disease at the early stage, when antibiotic treatment is highly efficacious. We examined novel and established antigen markers to develop a multiplex panel that identifies early infection using the combined sensitivity of multiple markers while simultaneously maintaining high specificity by requiring positive results for two markers to designate a positive test. Ten markers were selected from our initial analysis of 62 B. burgdorferi surface proteins and synthetic peptides by assessing binding of IgG and IgM to each in a training set of Lyme disease patient samples and controls. In a validation set, this 10-antigen panel identified a higher proportion of early-Lyme-disease patients as positive at the baseline or posttreatment visit than two-tiered testing (87.5% and 67.5%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). Equivalent specificities of 100% were observed in 26 healthy controls. Upon further analysis, positivity on the novel 10-antigen panel was associated with longer illness duration and multiple erythema migrans. The improved sensitivity and comparable specificity of our 10-antigen panel compared to two-tiered testing in detecting early B. burgdorferi infection indicates that multiplex analysis, featuring the next generation of markers, could advance diagnostic technology to better aid clinicians in diagnosing and treating early Lyme disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02111-15</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26447113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; Antigens, Bacterial - immunology ; Borrelia burgdorferi ; Borrelia burgdorferi - immunology ; Cohort Studies ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoassay - methods ; Immunoassays ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Lyme Disease - diagnosis ; Male ; Membrane Proteins - immunology ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; United States ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015-12, Vol.53 (12), p.3834-3841</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. 2015 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-1ba363fbe305e0db7535caeb7cc31ca9604c06e7dfce86e87a1b684fce1491703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-1ba363fbe305e0db7535caeb7cc31ca9604c06e7dfce86e87a1b684fce1491703</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0026-6864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652118/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652118/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3175,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lahey, Lauren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panas, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delanoy, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagan, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Steven R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebman, Alison W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Jose G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soloski, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steere, Allen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dattwyler, Raymond J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnaboldi, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aucott, John N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, William H</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a Multiantigen Panel for Improved Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in Early Lyme Disease</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>The current standard for laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease in the United States is serologic detection of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a two-tiered testing algorithm; however, this scheme has limited sensitivity for detecting early Lyme disease. Thus, there is a need to improve diagnostics for Lyme disease at the early stage, when antibiotic treatment is highly efficacious. We examined novel and established antigen markers to develop a multiplex panel that identifies early infection using the combined sensitivity of multiple markers while simultaneously maintaining high specificity by requiring positive results for two markers to designate a positive test. Ten markers were selected from our initial analysis of 62 B. burgdorferi surface proteins and synthetic peptides by assessing binding of IgG and IgM to each in a training set of Lyme disease patient samples and controls. In a validation set, this 10-antigen panel identified a higher proportion of early-Lyme-disease patients as positive at the baseline or posttreatment visit than two-tiered testing (87.5% and 67.5%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). Equivalent specificities of 100% were observed in 26 healthy controls. Upon further analysis, positivity on the novel 10-antigen panel was associated with longer illness duration and multiple erythema migrans. The improved sensitivity and comparable specificity of our 10-antigen panel compared to two-tiered testing in detecting early B. burgdorferi infection indicates that multiplex analysis, featuring the next generation of markers, could advance diagnostic technology to better aid clinicians in diagnosing and treating early Lyme disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Antigens, Bacterial - immunology</subject><subject>Borrelia burgdorferi</subject><subject>Borrelia burgdorferi - immunology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Lyme Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Membrane Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1vEzEQxS0EoqFw44x85MAWz_prc0GCpIWgVHAAiZvl9c4GI-86tXcj5b_HbUMFN06j0fvpaeY9Ql4CuwCom7efV9cXrAaACuQjsgC2bCql2I_HZMHYUlYAXJ-RZzn_YgyEkPIpOauVELoIC5LWeMAQ9wOOE409tfR6DpO34-R3ONKvdsRA-5joZtineMCOrnFCN_k43uIfYkoYvKXtnHZdTD0mTzdjfyL8SC9tCke6PQ5I1z6jzficPOltyPjiNM_J96vLb6tP1fbLx83q_bZyAvRUQWu54n2LnElkXasll85iq53j4OxSMeGYQt31DhuFjbbQqkaUDcQSNOPn5N29735uB-xc-TDZYPbJDzYdTbTe_KuM_qfZxYMRSpY8m2Lw-mSQ4s2MeTKDzw5DKKHEORvQquZa1g37D5RLXjcl9IK-uUddijkn7B8uAmZuGzWlUXPXqAFZ8Fd_f_EA_6mQ_waTp533</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Lahey, Lauren J</creator><creator>Panas, Michael W</creator><creator>Mao, Rong</creator><creator>Delanoy, Michelle</creator><creator>Flanagan, John J</creator><creator>Binder, Steven R</creator><creator>Rebman, Alison W</creator><creator>Montoya, Jose G</creator><creator>Soloski, Mark J</creator><creator>Steere, Allen C</creator><creator>Dattwyler, Raymond J</creator><creator>Arnaboldi, Paul M</creator><creator>Aucott, John N</creator><creator>Robinson, William H</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0026-6864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Development of a Multiantigen Panel for Improved Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in Early Lyme Disease</title><author>Lahey, Lauren J ; Panas, Michael W ; Mao, Rong ; Delanoy, Michelle ; Flanagan, John J ; Binder, Steven R ; Rebman, Alison W ; Montoya, Jose G ; Soloski, Mark J ; Steere, Allen C ; Dattwyler, Raymond J ; Arnaboldi, Paul M ; Aucott, John N ; Robinson, William H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-1ba363fbe305e0db7535caeb7cc31ca9604c06e7dfce86e87a1b684fce1491703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Antigens, Bacterial - immunology</topic><topic>Borrelia burgdorferi</topic><topic>Borrelia burgdorferi - immunology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Lyme Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Membrane Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lahey, Lauren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panas, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delanoy, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagan, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Steven R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebman, Alison W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Jose G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soloski, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steere, Allen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dattwyler, Raymond J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnaboldi, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aucott, John N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, William H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lahey, Lauren J</au><au>Panas, Michael W</au><au>Mao, Rong</au><au>Delanoy, Michelle</au><au>Flanagan, John J</au><au>Binder, Steven R</au><au>Rebman, Alison W</au><au>Montoya, Jose G</au><au>Soloski, Mark J</au><au>Steere, Allen C</au><au>Dattwyler, Raymond J</au><au>Arnaboldi, Paul M</au><au>Aucott, John N</au><au>Robinson, William H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a Multiantigen Panel for Improved Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in Early Lyme Disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3834</spage><epage>3841</epage><pages>3834-3841</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>The current standard for laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease in the United States is serologic detection of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a two-tiered testing algorithm; however, this scheme has limited sensitivity for detecting early Lyme disease. Thus, there is a need to improve diagnostics for Lyme disease at the early stage, when antibiotic treatment is highly efficacious. We examined novel and established antigen markers to develop a multiplex panel that identifies early infection using the combined sensitivity of multiple markers while simultaneously maintaining high specificity by requiring positive results for two markers to designate a positive test. Ten markers were selected from our initial analysis of 62 B. burgdorferi surface proteins and synthetic peptides by assessing binding of IgG and IgM to each in a training set of Lyme disease patient samples and controls. In a validation set, this 10-antigen panel identified a higher proportion of early-Lyme-disease patients as positive at the baseline or posttreatment visit than two-tiered testing (87.5% and 67.5%, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). Equivalent specificities of 100% were observed in 26 healthy controls. Upon further analysis, positivity on the novel 10-antigen panel was associated with longer illness duration and multiple erythema migrans. The improved sensitivity and comparable specificity of our 10-antigen panel compared to two-tiered testing in detecting early B. burgdorferi infection indicates that multiplex analysis, featuring the next generation of markers, could advance diagnostic technology to better aid clinicians in diagnosing and treating early Lyme disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>26447113</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.02111-15</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0026-6864</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015-12, Vol.53 (12), p.3834-3841
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4652118
source American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Bacterial - blood
Antigens, Bacterial - immunology
Borrelia burgdorferi
Borrelia burgdorferi - immunology
Cohort Studies
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods
Early Diagnosis
Female
Humans
Immunoassay - methods
Immunoassays
Immunoglobulin G - blood
Immunoglobulin M - blood
Lyme Disease - diagnosis
Male
Membrane Proteins - immunology
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
United States
Young Adult
title Development of a Multiantigen Panel for Improved Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in Early Lyme Disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A05%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20Multiantigen%20Panel%20for%20Improved%20Detection%20of%20Borrelia%20burgdorferi%20Infection%20in%20Early%20Lyme%20Disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Lahey,%20Lauren%20J&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3834&rft.epage=3841&rft.pages=3834-3841&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.02111-15&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1762375280%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735328471&rft_id=info:pmid/26447113&rfr_iscdi=true