Variability of the plateau response to methacholine in subjects without respiratory symptoms

BACKGROUND--Interpretation of measurements of limited maximal airway narrowing, or plateau response, requires knowledge of its variability within subjects and between methods. METHODS--The repeatability of the plateau response to inhaled methacholine with a dosimeter (D) method (maximal dose 210 mum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thorax 1993-05, Vol.48 (5), p.512-517
Hauptverfasser: Lougheed, M D, Pearce-Pinto, G, de Klerk, N H, Ryan, G, Musk, A W, James, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 517
container_issue 5
container_start_page 512
container_title Thorax
container_volume 48
creator Lougheed, M D
Pearce-Pinto, G
de Klerk, N H
Ryan, G
Musk, A W
James, A
description BACKGROUND--Interpretation of measurements of limited maximal airway narrowing, or plateau response, requires knowledge of its variability within subjects and between methods. METHODS--The repeatability of the plateau response to inhaled methacholine with a dosimeter (D) method (maximal dose 210 mumol) and a tidal breathing (T) method (730 mumol), and the agreement of the two methods, were measured in 16 subjects with mild or no asthma. Two tests by each method (D1,D2,T1,T2) were performed in random order over four consecutive days, with a third dosimeter (D3) test one week later. The dose producing a decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 10% (PD10) and the plateau were calculated from each dose-response curve. RESULTS--A plateau was reached in all five tests in 12 subjects and in all tests except D3 in 14 subjects. PD10 was inversely related to the plateau (r = -0.95 for D, r = -0.77 for T). The 95% ranges for differences between two determinations of the plateau in a subject were +/- 11.9% (change in FEV1), +/- 19.2%, and +/- 20.3%, estimated from D1-2 and 1-3, and T1-2 tests, respectively. From the same tests the 95% ranges for the difference of a single determination from an individual's true mean value were +/- 8.3%, +/- 13.6%, and +/- 14.3%. The limits of agreement between methods indicated that 95% of the measurements of the plateau by tidal breathing ranged from 15.2% below to 13.3% above those obtained by dosimeter. There was no significant bias between methods. Tachyphylaxis over 24 hours occurred with PD10 but not with the plateau response. CONCLUSIONS--The plateau response is a subject characteristic which is independent of the method of inhalation challenge testing. Repeatability of the plateau is low in this group of subjects with low airway responsiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/thx.48.5.512
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_464505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75802377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b505t-f4ac9465a6864e58f52ed591421dbdb292020d6d8599731afd67d65ac62d90b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90b1v1DAYBnALgcq1sLEiWQKVhRz-tjMwVCe-pFNBorQLkuUkDvGRxKntQO-_r9s7nYCBycPze63HfgF4htESYyrepO5mydSSLzkmD8ACM6EKSkrxECwQYqgQVIrH4DjGDUJIYSyPwJGihBCqFuD7pQnOVK53aQt9C1Nn4dSbZM0Mg42TH6OFycPBps7Une_daKEbYZyrja1ThL9d6vyc7rELJvmwhXE7TMkP8Ql41Jo-2qf78wR8e__uYvWxWH_-8Gl1ti4qjngqWmbqkgluhBLMctVyYhteYkZwUzUVKQkiqBGN4mUpKTZtI2STeS1IU6IK0RPwdnfvNFeDbWo7pmB6PQU3mLDV3jj9dzK6Tv_wvzQTLDfI86f7-eCvZxuTHlysbd-b0fo5askVIlTKDF_8Azd-DmN-m8ZSYkoUwiSr1ztVBx9jsO2hCUb6bmU6r0wzpbnm9_z5n-0PeL-jnL_c5ybWpm-DGWsXD4xJqTi--4Rix1xM9uYQm_BTC0kl1-eXK62uri6-0LXSX7N_tfPVsPl_wVtLvbza</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771328012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability of the plateau response to methacholine in subjects without respiratory symptoms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lougheed, M D ; Pearce-Pinto, G ; de Klerk, N H ; Ryan, G ; Musk, A W ; James, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lougheed, M D ; Pearce-Pinto, G ; de Klerk, N H ; Ryan, G ; Musk, A W ; James, A</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND--Interpretation of measurements of limited maximal airway narrowing, or plateau response, requires knowledge of its variability within subjects and between methods. METHODS--The repeatability of the plateau response to inhaled methacholine with a dosimeter (D) method (maximal dose 210 mumol) and a tidal breathing (T) method (730 mumol), and the agreement of the two methods, were measured in 16 subjects with mild or no asthma. Two tests by each method (D1,D2,T1,T2) were performed in random order over four consecutive days, with a third dosimeter (D3) test one week later. The dose producing a decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 10% (PD10) and the plateau were calculated from each dose-response curve. RESULTS--A plateau was reached in all five tests in 12 subjects and in all tests except D3 in 14 subjects. PD10 was inversely related to the plateau (r = -0.95 for D, r = -0.77 for T). The 95% ranges for differences between two determinations of the plateau in a subject were +/- 11.9% (change in FEV1), +/- 19.2%, and +/- 20.3%, estimated from D1-2 and 1-3, and T1-2 tests, respectively. From the same tests the 95% ranges for the difference of a single determination from an individual's true mean value were +/- 8.3%, +/- 13.6%, and +/- 14.3%. The limits of agreement between methods indicated that 95% of the measurements of the plateau by tidal breathing ranged from 15.2% below to 13.3% above those obtained by dosimeter. There was no significant bias between methods. Tachyphylaxis over 24 hours occurred with PD10 but not with the plateau response. CONCLUSIONS--The plateau response is a subject characteristic which is independent of the method of inhalation challenge testing. Repeatability of the plateau is low in this group of subjects with low airway responsiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-6376</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/thx.48.5.512</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8322238</identifier><identifier>CODEN: THORA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchi - drug effects ; Bronchial Provocation Tests - methods ; Bronchoconstriction - drug effects ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques of respiratory function ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methacholine Chloride - administration &amp; dosage ; Middle Aged ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Thorax, 1993-05, Vol.48 (5), p.512-517</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD May 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b505t-f4ac9465a6864e58f52ed591421dbdb292020d6d8599731afd67d65ac62d90b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b505t-f4ac9465a6864e58f52ed591421dbdb292020d6d8599731afd67d65ac62d90b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC464505/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC464505/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4778510$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8322238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lougheed, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce-Pinto, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Klerk, N H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musk, A W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, A</creatorcontrib><title>Variability of the plateau response to methacholine in subjects without respiratory symptoms</title><title>Thorax</title><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND--Interpretation of measurements of limited maximal airway narrowing, or plateau response, requires knowledge of its variability within subjects and between methods. METHODS--The repeatability of the plateau response to inhaled methacholine with a dosimeter (D) method (maximal dose 210 mumol) and a tidal breathing (T) method (730 mumol), and the agreement of the two methods, were measured in 16 subjects with mild or no asthma. Two tests by each method (D1,D2,T1,T2) were performed in random order over four consecutive days, with a third dosimeter (D3) test one week later. The dose producing a decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 10% (PD10) and the plateau were calculated from each dose-response curve. RESULTS--A plateau was reached in all five tests in 12 subjects and in all tests except D3 in 14 subjects. PD10 was inversely related to the plateau (r = -0.95 for D, r = -0.77 for T). The 95% ranges for differences between two determinations of the plateau in a subject were +/- 11.9% (change in FEV1), +/- 19.2%, and +/- 20.3%, estimated from D1-2 and 1-3, and T1-2 tests, respectively. From the same tests the 95% ranges for the difference of a single determination from an individual's true mean value were +/- 8.3%, +/- 13.6%, and +/- 14.3%. The limits of agreement between methods indicated that 95% of the measurements of the plateau by tidal breathing ranged from 15.2% below to 13.3% above those obtained by dosimeter. There was no significant bias between methods. Tachyphylaxis over 24 hours occurred with PD10 but not with the plateau response. CONCLUSIONS--The plateau response is a subject characteristic which is independent of the method of inhalation challenge testing. Repeatability of the plateau is low in this group of subjects with low airway responsiveness.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchi - drug effects</subject><subject>Bronchial Provocation Tests - methods</subject><subject>Bronchoconstriction - drug effects</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques of respiratory function</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methacholine Chloride - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0040-6376</issn><issn>1468-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp90b1v1DAYBnALgcq1sLEiWQKVhRz-tjMwVCe-pFNBorQLkuUkDvGRxKntQO-_r9s7nYCBycPze63HfgF4htESYyrepO5mydSSLzkmD8ACM6EKSkrxECwQYqgQVIrH4DjGDUJIYSyPwJGihBCqFuD7pQnOVK53aQt9C1Nn4dSbZM0Mg42TH6OFycPBps7Une_daKEbYZyrja1ThL9d6vyc7rELJvmwhXE7TMkP8Ql41Jo-2qf78wR8e__uYvWxWH_-8Gl1ti4qjngqWmbqkgluhBLMctVyYhteYkZwUzUVKQkiqBGN4mUpKTZtI2STeS1IU6IK0RPwdnfvNFeDbWo7pmB6PQU3mLDV3jj9dzK6Tv_wvzQTLDfI86f7-eCvZxuTHlysbd-b0fo5askVIlTKDF_8Azd-DmN-m8ZSYkoUwiSr1ztVBx9jsO2hCUb6bmU6r0wzpbnm9_z5n-0PeL-jnL_c5ybWpm-DGWsXD4xJqTi--4Rix1xM9uYQm_BTC0kl1-eXK62uri6-0LXSX7N_tfPVsPl_wVtLvbza</recordid><startdate>19930501</startdate><enddate>19930501</enddate><creator>Lougheed, M D</creator><creator>Pearce-Pinto, G</creator><creator>de Klerk, N H</creator><creator>Ryan, G</creator><creator>Musk, A W</creator><creator>James, A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930501</creationdate><title>Variability of the plateau response to methacholine in subjects without respiratory symptoms</title><author>Lougheed, M D ; Pearce-Pinto, G ; de Klerk, N H ; Ryan, G ; Musk, A W ; James, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b505t-f4ac9465a6864e58f52ed591421dbdb292020d6d8599731afd67d65ac62d90b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchi - drug effects</topic><topic>Bronchial Provocation Tests - methods</topic><topic>Bronchoconstriction - drug effects</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques of respiratory function</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methacholine Chloride - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lougheed, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce-Pinto, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Klerk, N H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musk, A W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lougheed, M D</au><au>Pearce-Pinto, G</au><au>de Klerk, N H</au><au>Ryan, G</au><au>Musk, A W</au><au>James, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability of the plateau response to methacholine in subjects without respiratory symptoms</atitle><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><date>1993-05-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>512-517</pages><issn>0040-6376</issn><eissn>1468-3296</eissn><coden>THORA7</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND--Interpretation of measurements of limited maximal airway narrowing, or plateau response, requires knowledge of its variability within subjects and between methods. METHODS--The repeatability of the plateau response to inhaled methacholine with a dosimeter (D) method (maximal dose 210 mumol) and a tidal breathing (T) method (730 mumol), and the agreement of the two methods, were measured in 16 subjects with mild or no asthma. Two tests by each method (D1,D2,T1,T2) were performed in random order over four consecutive days, with a third dosimeter (D3) test one week later. The dose producing a decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 10% (PD10) and the plateau were calculated from each dose-response curve. RESULTS--A plateau was reached in all five tests in 12 subjects and in all tests except D3 in 14 subjects. PD10 was inversely related to the plateau (r = -0.95 for D, r = -0.77 for T). The 95% ranges for differences between two determinations of the plateau in a subject were +/- 11.9% (change in FEV1), +/- 19.2%, and +/- 20.3%, estimated from D1-2 and 1-3, and T1-2 tests, respectively. From the same tests the 95% ranges for the difference of a single determination from an individual's true mean value were +/- 8.3%, +/- 13.6%, and +/- 14.3%. The limits of agreement between methods indicated that 95% of the measurements of the plateau by tidal breathing ranged from 15.2% below to 13.3% above those obtained by dosimeter. There was no significant bias between methods. Tachyphylaxis over 24 hours occurred with PD10 but not with the plateau response. CONCLUSIONS--The plateau response is a subject characteristic which is independent of the method of inhalation challenge testing. Repeatability of the plateau is low in this group of subjects with low airway responsiveness.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>8322238</pmid><doi>10.1136/thx.48.5.512</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-6376
ispartof Thorax, 1993-05, Vol.48 (5), p.512-517
issn 0040-6376
1468-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_464505
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Bronchi - drug effects
Bronchial Provocation Tests - methods
Bronchoconstriction - drug effects
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques of respiratory function
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Methacholine Chloride - administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Reproducibility of Results
title Variability of the plateau response to methacholine in subjects without respiratory symptoms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A28%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20of%20the%20plateau%20response%20to%20methacholine%20in%20subjects%20without%20respiratory%20symptoms&rft.jtitle=Thorax&rft.au=Lougheed,%20M%20D&rft.date=1993-05-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=512-517&rft.issn=0040-6376&rft.eissn=1468-3296&rft.coden=THORA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/thx.48.5.512&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E75802377%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771328012&rft_id=info:pmid/8322238&rfr_iscdi=true