Digital tomosynthesis and high resolution computed tomography as clinical tools for vertebral endplate topography measurements: Comparison with microcomputed tomography

Abstract Endplate morphology is understood to play an important role in the mechanical behavior of vertebral bone as well as degenerative processes in spinal tissues; however, the utility of clinical imaging modalities in assessment of the vertebral endplate has been limited. The objective of this s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2015-12, Vol.81, p.300-305
Hauptverfasser: Oravec, Daniel, Quazi, Abrar, Xiao, Angela, Yang, Ellen, Zauel, Roger, Flynn, Michael J, Yeni, Yener N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 305
container_issue
container_start_page 300
container_title Bone (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 81
creator Oravec, Daniel
Quazi, Abrar
Xiao, Angela
Yang, Ellen
Zauel, Roger
Flynn, Michael J
Yeni, Yener N
description Abstract Endplate morphology is understood to play an important role in the mechanical behavior of vertebral bone as well as degenerative processes in spinal tissues; however, the utility of clinical imaging modalities in assessment of the vertebral endplate has been limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of two clinical imaging modalities (digital tomosynthesis, DTS; high resolution computed tomography, HRCT) to assess endplate topography by correlating the measurements to a microcomputed tomography (μCT) standard. DTS, HRCT, and μCT images of 117 cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebrae (T10–L1; 23 male, 19 female; ages 36–100 years) were segmented, and inferior and superior endplate surface topographical distribution parameters were calculated. Both DTS and HRCT showed statistically significant correlations with μCT approaching a moderate level of correlation at the superior endplate for all measured parameters (R2Adj = 0.19–0.57), including averages, variability, and higher order statistical moments. Correlation of average depths at the inferior endplate was comparable to the superior case for both DTS and HRCT (R2Adj = 0.14–0.51), while correlations became weak or nonsignificant for higher moments of the topography distribution. DTS was able to capture variations in the endplate topography to a slightly better extent than HRCT, and taken together with the higher speed and lower radiation cost of DTS than HRCT, DTS appears preferable for endplate measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4640984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S8756328215003075</els_id><sourcerecordid>1735919552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-d1fe9e59a5e90d7f485cf92ced69258e190fea01510e1b426c92eb890fc391823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk1v1DAQjRCILoU_wAH5yCXBH3ESI1SpWmhBqsQBOFteZ7LxktjBdhbtP-Jn4nS7FSCEOFkav_dm5s3LsucEFwST6tWu2DgLBcWEF7guMGMPshVpapbTumIPs1VT8ypntKFn2ZMQdhhjJmryODujFU2skq-yH2_N1kQ1oOhGFw429hBMQMq2qDfbHnkIbpijcRZpN05zhPYWuvVq6g9IBaQHY42-VXBDQJ3zaA8-wsanGth2GlSE9DmdOCOoMHsYwcbwGq2TqvImpAbfTezRaLR3f2n1NHvUqSHAs7v3PPty9e7z-n1-8_H6w_ryJte8ZDFvSQcCuFAcBG7rrmy47gTV0FaC8gaIwB2o5BjBQDYlrbSgsGlSVTNBGsrOs4uj7jRvRmh1mjItIidvRuUP0ikjf_-xppdbt5dlVWLRlEng5Z2Ad99mCFGOJmgYBmXBzUGSmnFBBOf0f6CUEVyyRZUeocmdEDx09xMRLJc0yJ1c0iCXNEhcy5SGRHrx6y73lNP5E-DNEQDJ0b0BL4M2YJNbxoOOsnXm3_oXf9BPYfgKBwg7N3ubbiWJDFRi-WnJ4xJHwlMScc3ZT3La4ho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732310434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital tomosynthesis and high resolution computed tomography as clinical tools for vertebral endplate topography measurements: Comparison with microcomputed tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Oravec, Daniel ; Quazi, Abrar ; Xiao, Angela ; Yang, Ellen ; Zauel, Roger ; Flynn, Michael J ; Yeni, Yener N</creator><creatorcontrib>Oravec, Daniel ; Quazi, Abrar ; Xiao, Angela ; Yang, Ellen ; Zauel, Roger ; Flynn, Michael J ; Yeni, Yener N</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Endplate morphology is understood to play an important role in the mechanical behavior of vertebral bone as well as degenerative processes in spinal tissues; however, the utility of clinical imaging modalities in assessment of the vertebral endplate has been limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of two clinical imaging modalities (digital tomosynthesis, DTS; high resolution computed tomography, HRCT) to assess endplate topography by correlating the measurements to a microcomputed tomography (μCT) standard. DTS, HRCT, and μCT images of 117 cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebrae (T10–L1; 23 male, 19 female; ages 36–100 years) were segmented, and inferior and superior endplate surface topographical distribution parameters were calculated. Both DTS and HRCT showed statistically significant correlations with μCT approaching a moderate level of correlation at the superior endplate for all measured parameters (R2Adj = 0.19–0.57), including averages, variability, and higher order statistical moments. Correlation of average depths at the inferior endplate was comparable to the superior case for both DTS and HRCT (R2Adj = 0.14–0.51), while correlations became weak or nonsignificant for higher moments of the topography distribution. DTS was able to capture variations in the endplate topography to a slightly better extent than HRCT, and taken together with the higher speed and lower radiation cost of DTS than HRCT, DTS appears preferable for endplate measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-3282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26220145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bone Density ; Computed tomography ; Digital tomosynthesis ; Endplate topography ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Microcomputed tomography ; Orthopedics ; Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards ; Vertebral bodies ; X-Ray Microtomography - methods ; X-Ray Microtomography - standards</subject><ispartof>Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2015-12, Vol.81, p.300-305</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-d1fe9e59a5e90d7f485cf92ced69258e190fea01510e1b426c92eb890fc391823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-d1fe9e59a5e90d7f485cf92ced69258e190fea01510e1b426c92eb890fc391823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26220145$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oravec, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quazi, Abrar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zauel, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeni, Yener N</creatorcontrib><title>Digital tomosynthesis and high resolution computed tomography as clinical tools for vertebral endplate topography measurements: Comparison with microcomputed tomography</title><title>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><description>Abstract Endplate morphology is understood to play an important role in the mechanical behavior of vertebral bone as well as degenerative processes in spinal tissues; however, the utility of clinical imaging modalities in assessment of the vertebral endplate has been limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of two clinical imaging modalities (digital tomosynthesis, DTS; high resolution computed tomography, HRCT) to assess endplate topography by correlating the measurements to a microcomputed tomography (μCT) standard. DTS, HRCT, and μCT images of 117 cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebrae (T10–L1; 23 male, 19 female; ages 36–100 years) were segmented, and inferior and superior endplate surface topographical distribution parameters were calculated. Both DTS and HRCT showed statistically significant correlations with μCT approaching a moderate level of correlation at the superior endplate for all measured parameters (R2Adj = 0.19–0.57), including averages, variability, and higher order statistical moments. Correlation of average depths at the inferior endplate was comparable to the superior case for both DTS and HRCT (R2Adj = 0.14–0.51), while correlations became weak or nonsignificant for higher moments of the topography distribution. DTS was able to capture variations in the endplate topography to a slightly better extent than HRCT, and taken together with the higher speed and lower radiation cost of DTS than HRCT, DTS appears preferable for endplate measurements.</description><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Digital tomosynthesis</subject><subject>Endplate topography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microcomputed tomography</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><subject>Vertebral bodies</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography - methods</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography - standards</subject><issn>8756-3282</issn><issn>1873-2763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk1v1DAQjRCILoU_wAH5yCXBH3ESI1SpWmhBqsQBOFteZ7LxktjBdhbtP-Jn4nS7FSCEOFkav_dm5s3LsucEFwST6tWu2DgLBcWEF7guMGMPshVpapbTumIPs1VT8ypntKFn2ZMQdhhjJmryODujFU2skq-yH2_N1kQ1oOhGFw429hBMQMq2qDfbHnkIbpijcRZpN05zhPYWuvVq6g9IBaQHY42-VXBDQJ3zaA8-wsanGth2GlSE9DmdOCOoMHsYwcbwGq2TqvImpAbfTezRaLR3f2n1NHvUqSHAs7v3PPty9e7z-n1-8_H6w_ryJte8ZDFvSQcCuFAcBG7rrmy47gTV0FaC8gaIwB2o5BjBQDYlrbSgsGlSVTNBGsrOs4uj7jRvRmh1mjItIidvRuUP0ikjf_-xppdbt5dlVWLRlEng5Z2Ad99mCFGOJmgYBmXBzUGSmnFBBOf0f6CUEVyyRZUeocmdEDx09xMRLJc0yJ1c0iCXNEhcy5SGRHrx6y73lNP5E-DNEQDJ0b0BL4M2YJNbxoOOsnXm3_oXf9BPYfgKBwg7N3ubbiWJDFRi-WnJ4xJHwlMScc3ZT3La4ho</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Oravec, Daniel</creator><creator>Quazi, Abrar</creator><creator>Xiao, Angela</creator><creator>Yang, Ellen</creator><creator>Zauel, Roger</creator><creator>Flynn, Michael J</creator><creator>Yeni, Yener N</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Digital tomosynthesis and high resolution computed tomography as clinical tools for vertebral endplate topography measurements: Comparison with microcomputed tomography</title><author>Oravec, Daniel ; Quazi, Abrar ; Xiao, Angela ; Yang, Ellen ; Zauel, Roger ; Flynn, Michael J ; Yeni, Yener N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-d1fe9e59a5e90d7f485cf92ced69258e190fea01510e1b426c92eb890fc391823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Digital tomosynthesis</topic><topic>Endplate topography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microcomputed tomography</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><topic>Vertebral bodies</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography - methods</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oravec, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quazi, Abrar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zauel, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeni, Yener N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oravec, Daniel</au><au>Quazi, Abrar</au><au>Xiao, Angela</au><au>Yang, Ellen</au><au>Zauel, Roger</au><au>Flynn, Michael J</au><au>Yeni, Yener N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital tomosynthesis and high resolution computed tomography as clinical tools for vertebral endplate topography measurements: Comparison with microcomputed tomography</atitle><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>300</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>300-305</pages><issn>8756-3282</issn><eissn>1873-2763</eissn><abstract>Abstract Endplate morphology is understood to play an important role in the mechanical behavior of vertebral bone as well as degenerative processes in spinal tissues; however, the utility of clinical imaging modalities in assessment of the vertebral endplate has been limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of two clinical imaging modalities (digital tomosynthesis, DTS; high resolution computed tomography, HRCT) to assess endplate topography by correlating the measurements to a microcomputed tomography (μCT) standard. DTS, HRCT, and μCT images of 117 cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebrae (T10–L1; 23 male, 19 female; ages 36–100 years) were segmented, and inferior and superior endplate surface topographical distribution parameters were calculated. Both DTS and HRCT showed statistically significant correlations with μCT approaching a moderate level of correlation at the superior endplate for all measured parameters (R2Adj = 0.19–0.57), including averages, variability, and higher order statistical moments. Correlation of average depths at the inferior endplate was comparable to the superior case for both DTS and HRCT (R2Adj = 0.14–0.51), while correlations became weak or nonsignificant for higher moments of the topography distribution. DTS was able to capture variations in the endplate topography to a slightly better extent than HRCT, and taken together with the higher speed and lower radiation cost of DTS than HRCT, DTS appears preferable for endplate measurements.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26220145</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.033</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8756-3282
ispartof Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2015-12, Vol.81, p.300-305
issn 8756-3282
1873-2763
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4640984
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Bone Density
Computed tomography
Digital tomosynthesis
Endplate topography
Female
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Male
Microcomputed tomography
Orthopedics
Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards
Vertebral bodies
X-Ray Microtomography - methods
X-Ray Microtomography - standards
title Digital tomosynthesis and high resolution computed tomography as clinical tools for vertebral endplate topography measurements: Comparison with microcomputed tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A57%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20tomosynthesis%20and%20high%20resolution%20computed%20tomography%20as%20clinical%20tools%20for%20vertebral%20endplate%20topography%20measurements:%20Comparison%20with%20microcomputed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Bone%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Oravec,%20Daniel&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=300-305&rft.issn=8756-3282&rft.eissn=1873-2763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1735919552%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732310434&rft_id=info:pmid/26220145&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S8756328215003075&rfr_iscdi=true