Assessing the reliability of MRI-CBCT image registration to visualize temporomandibular joints
To evaluate image quality of two methods of registering MRI and CBCT images of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), particularly regarding TMJ articular disc-condyle relationship and osseous abnormality. MR and CBCT images for 10 patients (20 TMJs) were obtained and co-registered using two methods (no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology 2015-07, Vol.44 (6), p.20140244-20140244 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20140244 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 20140244 |
container_title | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Al-Saleh, M A Q Jaremko, J L Alsufyani, N Jibri, Z Lai, H Major, P W |
description | To evaluate image quality of two methods of registering MRI and CBCT images of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), particularly regarding TMJ articular disc-condyle relationship and osseous abnormality.
MR and CBCT images for 10 patients (20 TMJs) were obtained and co-registered using two methods (non-guided and marker guided) using Mirada XD software (Mirada Medical Ltd, Oxford, UK). Three radiologists independently and blindly evaluated three types of images (MRI, CBCT and registered MRI-CBCT) at two times (T1 and T2) on two criteria: (1) quality of MRI-CBCT registrations (excellent, fair or poor) and (2) TMJ disc-condylar position and articular osseous abnormalities (osteophytes, erosions and subcortical cyst, surface flattening, sclerosis).
75% of the non-guided registered images showed excellent quality, and 95% of the marker-guided registered images showed poor quality. Significant difference was found between the non-guided and marker-guided registration (χ(2) = 108.5; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/dmfr.20140244 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4628397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1691014898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-af1d70bdd9bc9347729a2eb7d1bf1a7d65e7487024411d6928b736cfc4cfd9c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtLAzEUhYMoWqtLt5Klm6l5zWSyEbT4KCiCKHRlyCSZGpmZ1CRTqL_eKVbR1V2cj3PPvQeAE4wmmOTi3LR1mBCEGSKM7YARZrzIckbmu2CESI6ykpL5ATiM8R0hxGhe7IMDknPKCMMj8HoZo43RdQuY3iwMtnGqco1La-hr-PA0y6ZX02foWrXYqAsXU1DJ-Q4mD1cu9qpxnxYm2y598K3qjKv6RgX47l2X4hHYq1UT7fF2jsHLzfXz9C67f7ydTS_vM01LnjJVY8NRZYyotKCMcyIUsRU3uKqx4qbILWcl35yIsSkEKStOC11rpmsjNKJjcPHtu-yr1hptuyFmI5dhCB7W0isn_yude5MLv5KsICUVfDA42xoE_9HbmGTrorZNozrr-yhxIfDw5FKUA5p9ozr4GIOtf9dgJDedyE0n8qeTgT_9m-2X_imBfgE5kIr5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691014898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the reliability of MRI-CBCT image registration to visualize temporomandibular joints</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Al-Saleh, M A Q ; Jaremko, J L ; Alsufyani, N ; Jibri, Z ; Lai, H ; Major, P W</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Saleh, M A Q ; Jaremko, J L ; Alsufyani, N ; Jibri, Z ; Lai, H ; Major, P W</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate image quality of two methods of registering MRI and CBCT images of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), particularly regarding TMJ articular disc-condyle relationship and osseous abnormality.
MR and CBCT images for 10 patients (20 TMJs) were obtained and co-registered using two methods (non-guided and marker guided) using Mirada XD software (Mirada Medical Ltd, Oxford, UK). Three radiologists independently and blindly evaluated three types of images (MRI, CBCT and registered MRI-CBCT) at two times (T1 and T2) on two criteria: (1) quality of MRI-CBCT registrations (excellent, fair or poor) and (2) TMJ disc-condylar position and articular osseous abnormalities (osteophytes, erosions and subcortical cyst, surface flattening, sclerosis).
75% of the non-guided registered images showed excellent quality, and 95% of the marker-guided registered images showed poor quality. Significant difference was found between the non-guided and marker-guided registration (χ(2) = 108.5; p < 0.01). The interexaminer variability of the disc position in MRI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.50 at T1, 0.56 at T2] was lower than that in MRI-CBCT registered images [ICC = 0.80 (0.52-0.92) at T1, 0.84 (0.62-0.93) at T2]. Erosions and subcortical cysts were noticed less frequently in the MRI-CBCT images than in CBCT images.
Non-guided registration proved superior to marker-guided registration. Although MRI-CBCT fused images were slightly more limited than CBCT alone to detect osseous abnormalities, use of the fused images improved the consistency among examiners in detecting disc position in relation to the condyle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-542X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140244</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25734241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alberta ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Multimodal Imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2015-07, Vol.44 (6), p.20140244-20140244</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2015 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-af1d70bdd9bc9347729a2eb7d1bf1a7d65e7487024411d6928b736cfc4cfd9c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-af1d70bdd9bc9347729a2eb7d1bf1a7d65e7487024411d6928b736cfc4cfd9c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Saleh, M A Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaremko, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsufyani, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibri, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Major, P W</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the reliability of MRI-CBCT image registration to visualize temporomandibular joints</title><title>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</title><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><description>To evaluate image quality of two methods of registering MRI and CBCT images of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), particularly regarding TMJ articular disc-condyle relationship and osseous abnormality.
MR and CBCT images for 10 patients (20 TMJs) were obtained and co-registered using two methods (non-guided and marker guided) using Mirada XD software (Mirada Medical Ltd, Oxford, UK). Three radiologists independently and blindly evaluated three types of images (MRI, CBCT and registered MRI-CBCT) at two times (T1 and T2) on two criteria: (1) quality of MRI-CBCT registrations (excellent, fair or poor) and (2) TMJ disc-condylar position and articular osseous abnormalities (osteophytes, erosions and subcortical cyst, surface flattening, sclerosis).
75% of the non-guided registered images showed excellent quality, and 95% of the marker-guided registered images showed poor quality. Significant difference was found between the non-guided and marker-guided registration (χ(2) = 108.5; p < 0.01). The interexaminer variability of the disc position in MRI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.50 at T1, 0.56 at T2] was lower than that in MRI-CBCT registered images [ICC = 0.80 (0.52-0.92) at T1, 0.84 (0.62-0.93) at T2]. Erosions and subcortical cysts were noticed less frequently in the MRI-CBCT images than in CBCT images.
Non-guided registration proved superior to marker-guided registration. Although MRI-CBCT fused images were slightly more limited than CBCT alone to detect osseous abnormalities, use of the fused images improved the consistency among examiners in detecting disc position in relation to the condyle.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alberta</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multimodal Imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0250-832X</issn><issn>1476-542X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtLAzEUhYMoWqtLt5Klm6l5zWSyEbT4KCiCKHRlyCSZGpmZ1CRTqL_eKVbR1V2cj3PPvQeAE4wmmOTi3LR1mBCEGSKM7YARZrzIckbmu2CESI6ykpL5ATiM8R0hxGhe7IMDknPKCMMj8HoZo43RdQuY3iwMtnGqco1La-hr-PA0y6ZX02foWrXYqAsXU1DJ-Q4mD1cu9qpxnxYm2y598K3qjKv6RgX47l2X4hHYq1UT7fF2jsHLzfXz9C67f7ydTS_vM01LnjJVY8NRZYyotKCMcyIUsRU3uKqx4qbILWcl35yIsSkEKStOC11rpmsjNKJjcPHtu-yr1hptuyFmI5dhCB7W0isn_yude5MLv5KsICUVfDA42xoE_9HbmGTrorZNozrr-yhxIfDw5FKUA5p9ozr4GIOtf9dgJDedyE0n8qeTgT_9m-2X_imBfgE5kIr5</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Al-Saleh, M A Q</creator><creator>Jaremko, J L</creator><creator>Alsufyani, N</creator><creator>Jibri, Z</creator><creator>Lai, H</creator><creator>Major, P W</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Assessing the reliability of MRI-CBCT image registration to visualize temporomandibular joints</title><author>Al-Saleh, M A Q ; Jaremko, J L ; Alsufyani, N ; Jibri, Z ; Lai, H ; Major, P W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-af1d70bdd9bc9347729a2eb7d1bf1a7d65e7487024411d6928b736cfc4cfd9c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alberta</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multimodal Imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Saleh, M A Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaremko, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsufyani, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibri, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Major, P W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Saleh, M A Q</au><au>Jaremko, J L</au><au>Alsufyani, N</au><au>Jibri, Z</au><au>Lai, H</au><au>Major, P W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the reliability of MRI-CBCT image registration to visualize temporomandibular joints</atitle><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>20140244</spage><epage>20140244</epage><pages>20140244-20140244</pages><issn>0250-832X</issn><eissn>1476-542X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate image quality of two methods of registering MRI and CBCT images of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), particularly regarding TMJ articular disc-condyle relationship and osseous abnormality.
MR and CBCT images for 10 patients (20 TMJs) were obtained and co-registered using two methods (non-guided and marker guided) using Mirada XD software (Mirada Medical Ltd, Oxford, UK). Three radiologists independently and blindly evaluated three types of images (MRI, CBCT and registered MRI-CBCT) at two times (T1 and T2) on two criteria: (1) quality of MRI-CBCT registrations (excellent, fair or poor) and (2) TMJ disc-condylar position and articular osseous abnormalities (osteophytes, erosions and subcortical cyst, surface flattening, sclerosis).
75% of the non-guided registered images showed excellent quality, and 95% of the marker-guided registered images showed poor quality. Significant difference was found between the non-guided and marker-guided registration (χ(2) = 108.5; p < 0.01). The interexaminer variability of the disc position in MRI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.50 at T1, 0.56 at T2] was lower than that in MRI-CBCT registered images [ICC = 0.80 (0.52-0.92) at T1, 0.84 (0.62-0.93) at T2]. Erosions and subcortical cysts were noticed less frequently in the MRI-CBCT images than in CBCT images.
Non-guided registration proved superior to marker-guided registration. Although MRI-CBCT fused images were slightly more limited than CBCT alone to detect osseous abnormalities, use of the fused images improved the consistency among examiners in detecting disc position in relation to the condyle.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>25734241</pmid><doi>10.1259/dmfr.20140244</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0250-832X |
ispartof | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2015-07, Vol.44 (6), p.20140244-20140244 |
issn | 0250-832X 1476-542X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4628397 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Adult Alberta Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dentistry Female Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Multimodal Imaging Reproducibility of Results Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - diagnostic imaging |
title | Assessing the reliability of MRI-CBCT image registration to visualize temporomandibular joints |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A46%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20reliability%20of%20MRI-CBCT%20image%20registration%20to%20visualize%20temporomandibular%20joints&rft.jtitle=Dento-maxillo-facial%20radiology&rft.au=Al-Saleh,%20M%20A%20Q&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=20140244&rft.epage=20140244&rft.pages=20140244-20140244&rft.issn=0250-832X&rft.eissn=1476-542X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/dmfr.20140244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1691014898%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691014898&rft_id=info:pmid/25734241&rfr_iscdi=true |