Vaginal excision of the sub-urethral sling: analysis of indications, safety and outcome

Sling techniques are the method of choice in stress urinary incontinence management, despite the high rates of complications leading sometimes to the necessity of re-operation, and the tape transection and resection are of the greatest importance. The study was aimed at analyzing the indications, te...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of medical science 2015-10, Vol.11 (5), p.982-988
Hauptverfasser: Fabian, George, Kociszewski, Jacek, Kuszka, Andrzej, Fabian, Margarethe, Grothey, Susane, Zwierzchowska, Aneta, Majkusiak, Wojciech, Barcz, Ewa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 988
container_issue 5
container_start_page 982
container_title Archives of medical science
container_volume 11
creator Fabian, George
Kociszewski, Jacek
Kuszka, Andrzej
Fabian, Margarethe
Grothey, Susane
Zwierzchowska, Aneta
Majkusiak, Wojciech
Barcz, Ewa
description Sling techniques are the method of choice in stress urinary incontinence management, despite the high rates of complications leading sometimes to the necessity of re-operation, and the tape transection and resection are of the greatest importance. The study was aimed at analyzing the indications, technique and effects of transvaginal tape excision. A retrospective study including 100 patients who underwent surgical removal of the sub-urethral sling in Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe was conducted. The analyzed measures were: sling type, onset of symptoms, rates of particular complications, safety and outcome of the operative procedure. Most complications occurred in the first 2 years after surgery. The most common indications for re-operation were: overactive bladder (OAB) (64%), persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (59%), pain (40%), urinary retention (40%), and erosion (29%). Some of the complications co-existed (i.e. vaginal erosion with postoperative pain, infections with urinary retention). During the procedure 1 bladder was injured and 1 patient had a hematoma. In women with OAB, 24-hour frequency decreased from 13.3 to 8.5 (p < 0.001), the mean voiding volume increased from 131.7 to 216.4 ml (p < 0.001), and nocturia increased from 3.28 to 1.19 (p < 0.001). Intensity of urgency decreased from 8.78 to 0.92 in the 10-point visual score (p < 0.001). Pain and urinary retention resolved in 39 out of 40 patients (p < 0.0001). The rate of SUI increased from 59% to 83% (p < 0.001). Sling removal is safe and associated with a minimal rate of complications. Removing the tape causes resolution of most of the complications, but SUI recurs or worsens.
doi_str_mv 10.5114/aoms.2014.42305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4624732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3894852301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-ab9621795b4b533d5c206c91bd89390cc83ae971e9f17bbe537294fd68f86b933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMozji6dicFNy7smGebuBBk8AUDbnwsS5KmMxnaZmxSsf_eDI6iru7lnu8eDgeAYwSnDCF6IV3jpxgiOqWYQLYDxoiLLBWIod2454SmSGA8AgferyCk8YL2wQhnDHNC4Ri8vsiFbWWdmA9tvXVt4qokLE3ie5X2nQnLLoq-tu3iMpERHLz1G8a2pdUyxA9_nnhZmTBEvUxcH7RrzCHYq2TtzdF2TsDz7c3T7D6dP949zK7n6RoLGlKpRIZRLpiiihFSMo1hpgVSJRdEQK05kUbkyIgK5UoZRvL4V5UZr3imBCETcPXlu-5VY0pt2hADF-vONrIbCidt8Vdp7bJYuPeCZpjmBEeDs61B595640PRWK9NXcvWuN4XsTEIMSSYRfT0H7pyfRc72VCUc8wZ3iQ6-Z3oJ8p35-QTFReEeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1748828523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaginal excision of the sub-urethral sling: analysis of indications, safety and outcome</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fabian, George ; Kociszewski, Jacek ; Kuszka, Andrzej ; Fabian, Margarethe ; Grothey, Susane ; Zwierzchowska, Aneta ; Majkusiak, Wojciech ; Barcz, Ewa</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabian, George ; Kociszewski, Jacek ; Kuszka, Andrzej ; Fabian, Margarethe ; Grothey, Susane ; Zwierzchowska, Aneta ; Majkusiak, Wojciech ; Barcz, Ewa</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Sling techniques are the method of choice in stress urinary incontinence management, despite the high rates of complications leading sometimes to the necessity of re-operation, and the tape transection and resection are of the greatest importance. The study was aimed at analyzing the indications, technique and effects of transvaginal tape excision. A retrospective study including 100 patients who underwent surgical removal of the sub-urethral sling in Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe was conducted. The analyzed measures were: sling type, onset of symptoms, rates of particular complications, safety and outcome of the operative procedure. Most complications occurred in the first 2 years after surgery. The most common indications for re-operation were: overactive bladder (OAB) (64%), persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (59%), pain (40%), urinary retention (40%), and erosion (29%). Some of the complications co-existed (i.e. vaginal erosion with postoperative pain, infections with urinary retention). During the procedure 1 bladder was injured and 1 patient had a hematoma. In women with OAB, 24-hour frequency decreased from 13.3 to 8.5 (p < 0.001), the mean voiding volume increased from 131.7 to 216.4 ml (p < 0.001), and nocturia increased from 3.28 to 1.19 (p < 0.001). Intensity of urgency decreased from 8.78 to 0.92 in the 10-point visual score (p < 0.001). Pain and urinary retention resolved in 39 out of 40 patients (p < 0.0001). The rate of SUI increased from 59% to 83% (p < 0.001). Sling removal is safe and associated with a minimal rate of complications. Removing the tape causes resolution of most of the complications, but SUI recurs or worsens.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1734-1922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1896-9151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2014.42305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26528340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><subject>Clinical Research</subject><ispartof>Archives of medical science, 2015-10, Vol.11 (5), p.982-988</ispartof><rights>Copyright Termedia Publishing House 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Termedia &amp; Banach 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624732/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624732/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabian, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kociszewski, Jacek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuszka, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabian, Margarethe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grothey, Susane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwierzchowska, Aneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majkusiak, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barcz, Ewa</creatorcontrib><title>Vaginal excision of the sub-urethral sling: analysis of indications, safety and outcome</title><title>Archives of medical science</title><addtitle>Arch Med Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Sling techniques are the method of choice in stress urinary incontinence management, despite the high rates of complications leading sometimes to the necessity of re-operation, and the tape transection and resection are of the greatest importance. The study was aimed at analyzing the indications, technique and effects of transvaginal tape excision. A retrospective study including 100 patients who underwent surgical removal of the sub-urethral sling in Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe was conducted. The analyzed measures were: sling type, onset of symptoms, rates of particular complications, safety and outcome of the operative procedure. Most complications occurred in the first 2 years after surgery. The most common indications for re-operation were: overactive bladder (OAB) (64%), persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (59%), pain (40%), urinary retention (40%), and erosion (29%). Some of the complications co-existed (i.e. vaginal erosion with postoperative pain, infections with urinary retention). During the procedure 1 bladder was injured and 1 patient had a hematoma. In women with OAB, 24-hour frequency decreased from 13.3 to 8.5 (p < 0.001), the mean voiding volume increased from 131.7 to 216.4 ml (p < 0.001), and nocturia increased from 3.28 to 1.19 (p < 0.001). Intensity of urgency decreased from 8.78 to 0.92 in the 10-point visual score (p < 0.001). Pain and urinary retention resolved in 39 out of 40 patients (p < 0.0001). The rate of SUI increased from 59% to 83% (p < 0.001). Sling removal is safe and associated with a minimal rate of complications. Removing the tape causes resolution of most of the complications, but SUI recurs or worsens.]]></description><subject>Clinical Research</subject><issn>1734-1922</issn><issn>1896-9151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMozji6dicFNy7smGebuBBk8AUDbnwsS5KmMxnaZmxSsf_eDI6iru7lnu8eDgeAYwSnDCF6IV3jpxgiOqWYQLYDxoiLLBWIod2454SmSGA8AgferyCk8YL2wQhnDHNC4Ri8vsiFbWWdmA9tvXVt4qokLE3ie5X2nQnLLoq-tu3iMpERHLz1G8a2pdUyxA9_nnhZmTBEvUxcH7RrzCHYq2TtzdF2TsDz7c3T7D6dP949zK7n6RoLGlKpRIZRLpiiihFSMo1hpgVSJRdEQK05kUbkyIgK5UoZRvL4V5UZr3imBCETcPXlu-5VY0pt2hADF-vONrIbCidt8Vdp7bJYuPeCZpjmBEeDs61B595640PRWK9NXcvWuN4XsTEIMSSYRfT0H7pyfRc72VCUc8wZ3iQ6-Z3oJ8p35-QTFReEeg</recordid><startdate>20151012</startdate><enddate>20151012</enddate><creator>Fabian, George</creator><creator>Kociszewski, Jacek</creator><creator>Kuszka, Andrzej</creator><creator>Fabian, Margarethe</creator><creator>Grothey, Susane</creator><creator>Zwierzchowska, Aneta</creator><creator>Majkusiak, Wojciech</creator><creator>Barcz, Ewa</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151012</creationdate><title>Vaginal excision of the sub-urethral sling: analysis of indications, safety and outcome</title><author>Fabian, George ; Kociszewski, Jacek ; Kuszka, Andrzej ; Fabian, Margarethe ; Grothey, Susane ; Zwierzchowska, Aneta ; Majkusiak, Wojciech ; Barcz, Ewa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-ab9621795b4b533d5c206c91bd89390cc83ae971e9f17bbe537294fd68f86b933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Clinical Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabian, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kociszewski, Jacek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuszka, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabian, Margarethe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grothey, Susane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwierzchowska, Aneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majkusiak, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barcz, Ewa</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabian, George</au><au>Kociszewski, Jacek</au><au>Kuszka, Andrzej</au><au>Fabian, Margarethe</au><au>Grothey, Susane</au><au>Zwierzchowska, Aneta</au><au>Majkusiak, Wojciech</au><au>Barcz, Ewa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaginal excision of the sub-urethral sling: analysis of indications, safety and outcome</atitle><jtitle>Archives of medical science</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Med Sci</addtitle><date>2015-10-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>982</spage><epage>988</epage><pages>982-988</pages><issn>1734-1922</issn><eissn>1896-9151</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Sling techniques are the method of choice in stress urinary incontinence management, despite the high rates of complications leading sometimes to the necessity of re-operation, and the tape transection and resection are of the greatest importance. The study was aimed at analyzing the indications, technique and effects of transvaginal tape excision. A retrospective study including 100 patients who underwent surgical removal of the sub-urethral sling in Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe was conducted. The analyzed measures were: sling type, onset of symptoms, rates of particular complications, safety and outcome of the operative procedure. Most complications occurred in the first 2 years after surgery. The most common indications for re-operation were: overactive bladder (OAB) (64%), persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (59%), pain (40%), urinary retention (40%), and erosion (29%). Some of the complications co-existed (i.e. vaginal erosion with postoperative pain, infections with urinary retention). During the procedure 1 bladder was injured and 1 patient had a hematoma. In women with OAB, 24-hour frequency decreased from 13.3 to 8.5 (p < 0.001), the mean voiding volume increased from 131.7 to 216.4 ml (p < 0.001), and nocturia increased from 3.28 to 1.19 (p < 0.001). Intensity of urgency decreased from 8.78 to 0.92 in the 10-point visual score (p < 0.001). Pain and urinary retention resolved in 39 out of 40 patients (p < 0.0001). The rate of SUI increased from 59% to 83% (p < 0.001). Sling removal is safe and associated with a minimal rate of complications. Removing the tape causes resolution of most of the complications, but SUI recurs or worsens.]]></abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><pmid>26528340</pmid><doi>10.5114/aoms.2014.42305</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1734-1922
ispartof Archives of medical science, 2015-10, Vol.11 (5), p.982-988
issn 1734-1922
1896-9151
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4624732
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Clinical Research
title Vaginal excision of the sub-urethral sling: analysis of indications, safety and outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A54%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaginal%20excision%20of%20the%20sub-urethral%20sling:%20analysis%20of%20indications,%20safety%20and%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20medical%20science&rft.au=Fabian,%20George&rft.date=2015-10-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=982&rft.epage=988&rft.pages=982-988&rft.issn=1734-1922&rft.eissn=1896-9151&rft_id=info:doi/10.5114/aoms.2014.42305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3894852301%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1748828523&rft_id=info:pmid/26528340&rfr_iscdi=true