Most common robotic bariatric procedures: review and technical aspects
Since its appear in the year 1997, when Drs. Cadiere and Himpens did the first robotic cholecystectomy in Brussels, not long after the first cholecystectomy, they performed the first robotic bariatric procedure. It is believed that robotically-assisted surgery's most notable contributions are r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical innovation and research 2015-10, Vol.9 (1), p.9-9, Article 9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Annals of surgical innovation and research |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Acquafresca, Pablo A Palermo, Mariano Rogula, Tomasz Duza, Guillermo E Serra, Edgardo |
description | Since its appear in the year 1997, when Drs. Cadiere and Himpens did the first robotic cholecystectomy in Brussels, not long after the first cholecystectomy, they performed the first robotic bariatric procedure. It is believed that robotically-assisted surgery's most notable contributions are reflected in its ability to extend the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to procedures not routinely performed using minimal access techniques. We describe the 3 most common bariatric procedures done by robot. The main advantages of the robotic system applied to the gastric bypass appear to be better control of stoma size, avoidance of stapler costs, elimination of the potential for oropharyngeal and esophageal trauma, and a potential decrease in wound infection. While in the sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding its utility is more debatable, giving a bigger advantage during surgery on patients with a very large BMI or revisional cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13022-015-0019-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4624655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541563756</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541563756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-beebedfdb7e97908e2ad37b762d67fe5f876030f5ebb14c114cdea7c63cbf6483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl9rFDEUxYMotl39AL7IgCB9mZpM_s34IJTSaqHiiz6HJHPTTZlJ1iRT8ds3y9ayKyVcckl-54RcDkLvCD4jpBefMqG461pMeIsxGdrhBTomkuOWEMFe7vVH6CTnO4w5Gxh-jY46wYmgjB2jq-8xl8bGeY6hSdHE4m1jdPK6pNptUrQwLgny5ybBvYc_jQ5jU8Cug7d6anTegC35DXrl9JTh7eO-Qr-uLn9efGtvfny9vji_aS1jeGgNgIHRjUbCIAfcQ6dHKo0U3SikA-56KTDFjoMxhFlSawQtraDWOMF6ukJfdr6bxcwwWggl6Ultkp91-qui9urwJvi1uo33iomOCc6rwemjQYq_F8hFzT5bmCYdIC5ZEdn1QlKJu4p--A-9i0sK9XuVkoPsGSZ71K2eQPngYn3Xbk3VOWeECyprrdDZM1RdI8zexgDO1_MDwcc9wRr0VNY5TkvxMeRDkOxAm2LOCdzTMAhW25SoXUpUTYnapkQNVfN-f4pPin-xoA8_bbb7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779784012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Most common robotic bariatric procedures: review and technical aspects</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Acquafresca, Pablo A ; Palermo, Mariano ; Rogula, Tomasz ; Duza, Guillermo E ; Serra, Edgardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Acquafresca, Pablo A ; Palermo, Mariano ; Rogula, Tomasz ; Duza, Guillermo E ; Serra, Edgardo</creatorcontrib><description>Since its appear in the year 1997, when Drs. Cadiere and Himpens did the first robotic cholecystectomy in Brussels, not long after the first cholecystectomy, they performed the first robotic bariatric procedure. It is believed that robotically-assisted surgery's most notable contributions are reflected in its ability to extend the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to procedures not routinely performed using minimal access techniques. We describe the 3 most common bariatric procedures done by robot. The main advantages of the robotic system applied to the gastric bypass appear to be better control of stoma size, avoidance of stapler costs, elimination of the potential for oropharyngeal and esophageal trauma, and a potential decrease in wound infection. While in the sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding its utility is more debatable, giving a bigger advantage during surgery on patients with a very large BMI or revisional cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1750-1164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-1164</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13022-015-0019-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26516344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Forecasts and trends ; Health aspects ; Innovations ; Medical equipment and supplies industry ; Medical test kit industry ; Methods ; Obesity ; Review ; Robotic surgery ; Robots ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical innovation and research, 2015-10, Vol.9 (1), p.9-9, Article 9</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2015</rights><rights>Acquafresca et al. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-beebedfdb7e97908e2ad37b762d67fe5f876030f5ebb14c114cdea7c63cbf6483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-beebedfdb7e97908e2ad37b762d67fe5f876030f5ebb14c114cdea7c63cbf6483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624655/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4624655/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516344$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Acquafresca, Pablo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Mariano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogula, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duza, Guillermo E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Edgardo</creatorcontrib><title>Most common robotic bariatric procedures: review and technical aspects</title><title>Annals of surgical innovation and research</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Innov Res</addtitle><description>Since its appear in the year 1997, when Drs. Cadiere and Himpens did the first robotic cholecystectomy in Brussels, not long after the first cholecystectomy, they performed the first robotic bariatric procedure. It is believed that robotically-assisted surgery's most notable contributions are reflected in its ability to extend the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to procedures not routinely performed using minimal access techniques. We describe the 3 most common bariatric procedures done by robot. The main advantages of the robotic system applied to the gastric bypass appear to be better control of stoma size, avoidance of stapler costs, elimination of the potential for oropharyngeal and esophageal trauma, and a potential decrease in wound infection. While in the sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding its utility is more debatable, giving a bigger advantage during surgery on patients with a very large BMI or revisional cases.</description><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Medical equipment and supplies industry</subject><subject>Medical test kit industry</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1750-1164</issn><issn>1750-1164</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl9rFDEUxYMotl39AL7IgCB9mZpM_s34IJTSaqHiiz6HJHPTTZlJ1iRT8ds3y9ayKyVcckl-54RcDkLvCD4jpBefMqG461pMeIsxGdrhBTomkuOWEMFe7vVH6CTnO4w5Gxh-jY46wYmgjB2jq-8xl8bGeY6hSdHE4m1jdPK6pNptUrQwLgny5ybBvYc_jQ5jU8Cug7d6anTegC35DXrl9JTh7eO-Qr-uLn9efGtvfny9vji_aS1jeGgNgIHRjUbCIAfcQ6dHKo0U3SikA-56KTDFjoMxhFlSawQtraDWOMF6ukJfdr6bxcwwWggl6Ultkp91-qui9urwJvi1uo33iomOCc6rwemjQYq_F8hFzT5bmCYdIC5ZEdn1QlKJu4p--A-9i0sK9XuVkoPsGSZ71K2eQPngYn3Xbk3VOWeECyprrdDZM1RdI8zexgDO1_MDwcc9wRr0VNY5TkvxMeRDkOxAm2LOCdzTMAhW25SoXUpUTYnapkQNVfN-f4pPin-xoA8_bbb7</recordid><startdate>20151028</startdate><enddate>20151028</enddate><creator>Acquafresca, Pablo A</creator><creator>Palermo, Mariano</creator><creator>Rogula, Tomasz</creator><creator>Duza, Guillermo E</creator><creator>Serra, Edgardo</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151028</creationdate><title>Most common robotic bariatric procedures: review and technical aspects</title><author>Acquafresca, Pablo A ; Palermo, Mariano ; Rogula, Tomasz ; Duza, Guillermo E ; Serra, Edgardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4409-beebedfdb7e97908e2ad37b762d67fe5f876030f5ebb14c114cdea7c63cbf6483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Medical equipment and supplies industry</topic><topic>Medical test kit industry</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Acquafresca, Pablo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Mariano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogula, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duza, Guillermo E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Edgardo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical innovation and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Acquafresca, Pablo A</au><au>Palermo, Mariano</au><au>Rogula, Tomasz</au><au>Duza, Guillermo E</au><au>Serra, Edgardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Most common robotic bariatric procedures: review and technical aspects</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical innovation and research</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Innov Res</addtitle><date>2015-10-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>9-9</pages><artnum>9</artnum><issn>1750-1164</issn><eissn>1750-1164</eissn><abstract>Since its appear in the year 1997, when Drs. Cadiere and Himpens did the first robotic cholecystectomy in Brussels, not long after the first cholecystectomy, they performed the first robotic bariatric procedure. It is believed that robotically-assisted surgery's most notable contributions are reflected in its ability to extend the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to procedures not routinely performed using minimal access techniques. We describe the 3 most common bariatric procedures done by robot. The main advantages of the robotic system applied to the gastric bypass appear to be better control of stoma size, avoidance of stapler costs, elimination of the potential for oropharyngeal and esophageal trauma, and a potential decrease in wound infection. While in the sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding its utility is more debatable, giving a bigger advantage during surgery on patients with a very large BMI or revisional cases.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26516344</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13022-015-0019-9</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1750-1164 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical innovation and research, 2015-10, Vol.9 (1), p.9-9, Article 9 |
issn | 1750-1164 1750-1164 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4624655 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Forecasts and trends Health aspects Innovations Medical equipment and supplies industry Medical test kit industry Methods Obesity Review Robotic surgery Robots Surgery |
title | Most common robotic bariatric procedures: review and technical aspects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T10%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Most%20common%20robotic%20bariatric%20procedures:%20review%20and%20technical%20aspects&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20innovation%20and%20research&rft.au=Acquafresca,%20Pablo%20A&rft.date=2015-10-28&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=9-9&rft.artnum=9&rft.issn=1750-1164&rft.eissn=1750-1164&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13022-015-0019-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541563756%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779784012&rft_id=info:pmid/26516344&rft_galeid=A541563756&rfr_iscdi=true |