SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process

In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of medical quality 2015-11, Vol.30 (6), p.543-549
Hauptverfasser: Ogrinc, Greg, Davies, Louise, Goodman, Daisy, Batalden, Paul, Davidoff, Frank, Stevens, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 549
container_issue 6
container_start_page 543
container_title American journal of medical quality
container_volume 30
creator Ogrinc, Greg
Davies, Louise
Goodman, Daisy
Batalden, Paul
Davidoff, Frank
Stevens, David
description In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1062860615605176
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4620592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1062860615605176</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1727986032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4459ee1911f1504586543cbbe129e9a7dc56f2f9f644b9e2dd107e602ac4b693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUmO9ZC6u9nddC-ClKoFQfoF3pZNMqkpSTbupsX-9ya0FhU8zcB782bmh9A1wQNCwvCOYEGHAgvCBeYkFCeoSzjn_pCyt9Omb2S_1Tvowrk1xpRzRs5RhwomQyZxF43m0-VkNvboAHv9ea3LRNvEeamx3nSp86zeeZOismYLBZS1N4PK2DorV974M4Y8hzKG20t0lurcwdWh9tDicbwYPfsvr0-T0cOLHweM1z5jXAIQSUhKOGZ8KDgL4igCQiVIHSYxFylNZSoYiyTQJCE4BIGpjlkkZNBD9_vYahMVkMTNPVbnqrJZoe1OGZ2p30qZvauV2SomKOaSNgH9Q4A1HxtwtSoy136hSzAbp0hIQ9ngClor3ltja5yzkB7XEKxa9Oov-mbk5ud5x4Fv1o3B3xucXoFam40tG1r_B34BN9SKdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1727986032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Ogrinc, Greg ; Davies, Louise ; Goodman, Daisy ; Batalden, Paul ; Davidoff, Frank ; Stevens, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogrinc, Greg ; Davies, Louise ; Goodman, Daisy ; Batalden, Paul ; Davidoff, Frank ; Stevens, David</creatorcontrib><description>In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-8606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-824X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1062860615605176</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26497490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Consensus ; Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Humans ; Periodicals as Topic - standards ; Publishing - standards ; Quality Improvement - standards ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Terminology as Topic</subject><ispartof>American journal of medical quality, 2015-11, Vol.30 (6), p.543-549</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015 2015 American College of Medical Quality</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4459ee1911f1504586543cbbe129e9a7dc56f2f9f644b9e2dd107e602ac4b693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1062860615605176$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1062860615605176$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,21802,27907,27908,43604,43605</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26497490$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogrinc, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Daisy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalden, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, David</creatorcontrib><title>SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process</title><title>American journal of medical quality</title><addtitle>Am J Med Qual</addtitle><description>In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Publishing - standards</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - standards</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><issn>1062-8606</issn><issn>1555-824X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUmO9ZC6u9nddC-ClKoFQfoF3pZNMqkpSTbupsX-9ya0FhU8zcB782bmh9A1wQNCwvCOYEGHAgvCBeYkFCeoSzjn_pCyt9Omb2S_1Tvowrk1xpRzRs5RhwomQyZxF43m0-VkNvboAHv9ea3LRNvEeamx3nSp86zeeZOismYLBZS1N4PK2DorV974M4Y8hzKG20t0lurcwdWh9tDicbwYPfsvr0-T0cOLHweM1z5jXAIQSUhKOGZ8KDgL4igCQiVIHSYxFylNZSoYiyTQJCE4BIGpjlkkZNBD9_vYahMVkMTNPVbnqrJZoe1OGZ2p30qZvauV2SomKOaSNgH9Q4A1HxtwtSoy136hSzAbp0hIQ9ngClor3ltja5yzkB7XEKxa9Oov-mbk5ud5x4Fv1o3B3xucXoFam40tG1r_B34BN9SKdg</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Ogrinc, Greg</creator><creator>Davies, Louise</creator><creator>Goodman, Daisy</creator><creator>Batalden, Paul</creator><creator>Davidoff, Frank</creator><creator>Stevens, David</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence)</title><author>Ogrinc, Greg ; Davies, Louise ; Goodman, Daisy ; Batalden, Paul ; Davidoff, Frank ; Stevens, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4459ee1911f1504586543cbbe129e9a7dc56f2f9f644b9e2dd107e602ac4b693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Publishing - standards</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - standards</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogrinc, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Daisy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalden, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of medical quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogrinc, Greg</au><au>Davies, Louise</au><au>Goodman, Daisy</au><au>Batalden, Paul</au><au>Davidoff, Frank</au><au>Stevens, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process</atitle><jtitle>American journal of medical quality</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med Qual</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>543-549</pages><issn>1062-8606</issn><eissn>1555-824X</eissn><abstract>In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26497490</pmid><doi>10.1177/1062860615605176</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-8606
ispartof American journal of medical quality, 2015-11, Vol.30 (6), p.543-549
issn 1062-8606
1555-824X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4620592
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Consensus
Guidelines as Topic - standards
Humans
Periodicals as Topic - standards
Publishing - standards
Quality Improvement - standards
Quality of Health Care - standards
Terminology as Topic
title SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A57%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SQUIRE%202.0%20(Standards%20for%20QUality%20Improvement%20Reporting%20Excellence):%20Revised%20Publication%20Guidelines%20From%20a%20Detailed%20Consensus%20Process&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20medical%20quality&rft.au=Ogrinc,%20Greg&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=543-549&rft.issn=1062-8606&rft.eissn=1555-824X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1062860615605176&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1727986032%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1727986032&rft_id=info:pmid/26497490&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1062860615605176&rfr_iscdi=true