SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process
In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of medical quality 2015-11, Vol.30 (6), p.543-549 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 549 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | American journal of medical quality |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Ogrinc, Greg Davies, Louise Goodman, Daisy Batalden, Paul Davidoff, Frank Stevens, David |
description | In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1062860615605176 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4620592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1062860615605176</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1727986032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4459ee1911f1504586543cbbe129e9a7dc56f2f9f644b9e2dd107e602ac4b693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUmO9ZC6u9nddC-ClKoFQfoF3pZNMqkpSTbupsX-9ya0FhU8zcB782bmh9A1wQNCwvCOYEGHAgvCBeYkFCeoSzjn_pCyt9Omb2S_1Tvowrk1xpRzRs5RhwomQyZxF43m0-VkNvboAHv9ea3LRNvEeamx3nSp86zeeZOismYLBZS1N4PK2DorV974M4Y8hzKG20t0lurcwdWh9tDicbwYPfsvr0-T0cOLHweM1z5jXAIQSUhKOGZ8KDgL4igCQiVIHSYxFylNZSoYiyTQJCE4BIGpjlkkZNBD9_vYahMVkMTNPVbnqrJZoe1OGZ2p30qZvauV2SomKOaSNgH9Q4A1HxtwtSoy136hSzAbp0hIQ9ngClor3ltja5yzkB7XEKxa9Oov-mbk5ud5x4Fv1o3B3xucXoFam40tG1r_B34BN9SKdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1727986032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Ogrinc, Greg ; Davies, Louise ; Goodman, Daisy ; Batalden, Paul ; Davidoff, Frank ; Stevens, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogrinc, Greg ; Davies, Louise ; Goodman, Daisy ; Batalden, Paul ; Davidoff, Frank ; Stevens, David</creatorcontrib><description>In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-8606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-824X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1062860615605176</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26497490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Consensus ; Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Humans ; Periodicals as Topic - standards ; Publishing - standards ; Quality Improvement - standards ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Terminology as Topic</subject><ispartof>American journal of medical quality, 2015-11, Vol.30 (6), p.543-549</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015 2015 American College of Medical Quality</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4459ee1911f1504586543cbbe129e9a7dc56f2f9f644b9e2dd107e602ac4b693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1062860615605176$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1062860615605176$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,21802,27907,27908,43604,43605</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26497490$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogrinc, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Daisy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalden, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, David</creatorcontrib><title>SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process</title><title>American journal of medical quality</title><addtitle>Am J Med Qual</addtitle><description>In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Publishing - standards</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - standards</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><issn>1062-8606</issn><issn>1555-824X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUmO9ZC6u9nddC-ClKoFQfoF3pZNMqkpSTbupsX-9ya0FhU8zcB782bmh9A1wQNCwvCOYEGHAgvCBeYkFCeoSzjn_pCyt9Omb2S_1Tvowrk1xpRzRs5RhwomQyZxF43m0-VkNvboAHv9ea3LRNvEeamx3nSp86zeeZOismYLBZS1N4PK2DorV974M4Y8hzKG20t0lurcwdWh9tDicbwYPfsvr0-T0cOLHweM1z5jXAIQSUhKOGZ8KDgL4igCQiVIHSYxFylNZSoYiyTQJCE4BIGpjlkkZNBD9_vYahMVkMTNPVbnqrJZoe1OGZ2p30qZvauV2SomKOaSNgH9Q4A1HxtwtSoy136hSzAbp0hIQ9ngClor3ltja5yzkB7XEKxa9Oov-mbk5ud5x4Fv1o3B3xucXoFam40tG1r_B34BN9SKdg</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Ogrinc, Greg</creator><creator>Davies, Louise</creator><creator>Goodman, Daisy</creator><creator>Batalden, Paul</creator><creator>Davidoff, Frank</creator><creator>Stevens, David</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence)</title><author>Ogrinc, Greg ; Davies, Louise ; Goodman, Daisy ; Batalden, Paul ; Davidoff, Frank ; Stevens, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4459ee1911f1504586543cbbe129e9a7dc56f2f9f644b9e2dd107e602ac4b693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Publishing - standards</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - standards</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogrinc, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Daisy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalden, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of medical quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogrinc, Greg</au><au>Davies, Louise</au><au>Goodman, Daisy</au><au>Batalden, Paul</au><au>Davidoff, Frank</au><au>Stevens, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process</atitle><jtitle>American journal of medical quality</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med Qual</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>543-549</pages><issn>1062-8606</issn><eissn>1555-824X</eissn><abstract>In the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26497490</pmid><doi>10.1177/1062860615605176</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1062-8606 |
ispartof | American journal of medical quality, 2015-11, Vol.30 (6), p.543-549 |
issn | 1062-8606 1555-824X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4620592 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Consensus Guidelines as Topic - standards Humans Periodicals as Topic - standards Publishing - standards Quality Improvement - standards Quality of Health Care - standards Terminology as Topic |
title | SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A57%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SQUIRE%202.0%20(Standards%20for%20QUality%20Improvement%20Reporting%20Excellence):%20Revised%20Publication%20Guidelines%20From%20a%20Detailed%20Consensus%20Process&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20medical%20quality&rft.au=Ogrinc,%20Greg&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=543-549&rft.issn=1062-8606&rft.eissn=1555-824X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1062860615605176&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1727986032%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1727986032&rft_id=info:pmid/26497490&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1062860615605176&rfr_iscdi=true |