Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2015-08, Vol.94 (32), p.e1254-e1254
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Bin, Zhu, Ya-Hui, Qian, Ming-Ping, Shen, Rong-Rong, Zheng, Wen-Yan, Zhang, Yong-Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1254
container_issue 32
container_start_page e1254
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 94
creator Xu, Bin
Zhu, Ya-Hui
Qian, Ming-Ping
Shen, Rong-Rong
Zheng, Wen-Yan
Zhang, Yong-Wei
description Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Braun enteroenterostomy in PD.Clinical studies compared perioperative outcomes between the Braun group and the non-Braun group following PD before December 21, 2014 were retrieved and filtered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases (VIP database, WanFang database, and CNKI database). Relevant data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Blood loss, operating time, and postoperative mortality and morbidity were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference, or standard mean difference (SMD).Ten studies concerning 1614 patients were included. No significant differences between the Braun and the non-Braun group were identified in mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.60), intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.035, 95% CI: -0.253 to 0.183), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.67), bile leakage (OR: 0.537, 95% CI: 0.287-1.004), postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.578-2.385), intraabdominal abscesses (OR: 0.793, 95% CI: 0.444-1.419), wound complications (OR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.490-1.325), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.098, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.033). Braun enteroenterostomy extended operating time (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.78), but it was associated with lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.380, 95% CI: 0.149-0.968), lower morbidity rate (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), lower clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (Grades B and C) (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.164-0.858), lower nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.232-0.818), and less postoperative vomiting (OR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.262-0.755).Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed during PD. It is beneficial for patients and could be recommended in PD from the current published data.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016198.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000001254
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4616697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1704351200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-301bb4031f109349d31e918c9061e00756bc27ce751be97209a30995c12b3b0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1vFCEUhonR2LX1F5iYufRm6gEGKF6YbL_UpJs2Va-RYc52RxmoMNPN_nvZbm2qXMDFec4Dh5eQNxQOKWj1fnF6CE8WZaJ5RmZUcFkLLZvnZAbARK20avbIq5x_FoYr1rwke0wyKbmQM_LjONkpVGdhxBTxfs9jHDbVefQ-rvtwU13Z4BLasXexm2KHAd2W-FDNq6-bPOKwLVXXeNfjurKhqxY42noerN_kPh-QF0vrM75-OPfJ9_Ozbyef64vLT19O5he140LImgNt2wY4XZbZeKM7TlHTI6dBUgRQQraOKYdK0Ba1YqAtB62Fo6zlLVi-Tz7uvLdTO2DnyizJenOb-sGmjYm2N_9WQr8yN_HONJJKqVURvHsQpPh7wjyaoc8OvbcB45QNVdBwQRlAQfkOdeW3csLl4zUUzDYbszg1_2dTut4-feFjz98wCtDsgHX0JYj8y09rTGaF1o-re59QmtUMqIAjYFBvzZL_AbHgmmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704351200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Xu, Bin ; Zhu, Ya-Hui ; Qian, Ming-Ping ; Shen, Rong-Rong ; Zheng, Wen-Yan ; Zhang, Yong-Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin ; Zhu, Ya-Hui ; Qian, Ming-Ping ; Shen, Rong-Rong ; Zheng, Wen-Yan ; Zhang, Yong-Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Braun enteroenterostomy in PD.Clinical studies compared perioperative outcomes between the Braun group and the non-Braun group following PD before December 21, 2014 were retrieved and filtered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases (VIP database, WanFang database, and CNKI database). Relevant data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Blood loss, operating time, and postoperative mortality and morbidity were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference, or standard mean difference (SMD).Ten studies concerning 1614 patients were included. No significant differences between the Braun and the non-Braun group were identified in mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.60), intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.035, 95% CI: -0.253 to 0.183), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.67), bile leakage (OR: 0.537, 95% CI: 0.287-1.004), postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.578-2.385), intraabdominal abscesses (OR: 0.793, 95% CI: 0.444-1.419), wound complications (OR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.490-1.325), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.098, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.033). Braun enteroenterostomy extended operating time (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.78), but it was associated with lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.380, 95% CI: 0.149-0.968), lower morbidity rate (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), lower clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (Grades B and C) (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.164-0.858), lower nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.232-0.818), and less postoperative vomiting (OR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.262-0.755).Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed during PD. It is beneficial for patients and could be recommended in PD from the current published data.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016198.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26266356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical ; Enterostomy - methods ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Reoperation ; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2015-08, Vol.94 (32), p.e1254-e1254</ispartof><rights>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-301bb4031f109349d31e918c9061e00756bc27ce751be97209a30995c12b3b0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616697/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616697/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26266356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ya-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Ming-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Rong-Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wen-Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yong-Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Braun enteroenterostomy in PD.Clinical studies compared perioperative outcomes between the Braun group and the non-Braun group following PD before December 21, 2014 were retrieved and filtered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases (VIP database, WanFang database, and CNKI database). Relevant data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Blood loss, operating time, and postoperative mortality and morbidity were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference, or standard mean difference (SMD).Ten studies concerning 1614 patients were included. No significant differences between the Braun and the non-Braun group were identified in mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.60), intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.035, 95% CI: -0.253 to 0.183), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.67), bile leakage (OR: 0.537, 95% CI: 0.287-1.004), postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.578-2.385), intraabdominal abscesses (OR: 0.793, 95% CI: 0.444-1.419), wound complications (OR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.490-1.325), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.098, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.033). Braun enteroenterostomy extended operating time (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.78), but it was associated with lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.380, 95% CI: 0.149-0.968), lower morbidity rate (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), lower clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (Grades B and C) (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.164-0.858), lower nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.232-0.818), and less postoperative vomiting (OR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.262-0.755).Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed during PD. It is beneficial for patients and could be recommended in PD from the current published data.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016198.</description><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Enterostomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1vFCEUhonR2LX1F5iYufRm6gEGKF6YbL_UpJs2Va-RYc52RxmoMNPN_nvZbm2qXMDFec4Dh5eQNxQOKWj1fnF6CE8WZaJ5RmZUcFkLLZvnZAbARK20avbIq5x_FoYr1rwke0wyKbmQM_LjONkpVGdhxBTxfs9jHDbVefQ-rvtwU13Z4BLasXexm2KHAd2W-FDNq6-bPOKwLVXXeNfjurKhqxY42noerN_kPh-QF0vrM75-OPfJ9_Ozbyef64vLT19O5he140LImgNt2wY4XZbZeKM7TlHTI6dBUgRQQraOKYdK0Ba1YqAtB62Fo6zlLVi-Tz7uvLdTO2DnyizJenOb-sGmjYm2N_9WQr8yN_HONJJKqVURvHsQpPh7wjyaoc8OvbcB45QNVdBwQRlAQfkOdeW3csLl4zUUzDYbszg1_2dTut4-feFjz98wCtDsgHX0JYj8y09rTGaF1o-re59QmtUMqIAjYFBvzZL_AbHgmmA</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Xu, Bin</creator><creator>Zhu, Ya-Hui</creator><creator>Qian, Ming-Ping</creator><creator>Shen, Rong-Rong</creator><creator>Zheng, Wen-Yan</creator><creator>Zhang, Yong-Wei</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Xu, Bin ; Zhu, Ya-Hui ; Qian, Ming-Ping ; Shen, Rong-Rong ; Zheng, Wen-Yan ; Zhang, Yong-Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-301bb4031f109349d31e918c9061e00756bc27ce751be97209a30995c12b3b0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Enterostomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ya-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Ming-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Rong-Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wen-Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yong-Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Bin</au><au>Zhu, Ya-Hui</au><au>Qian, Ming-Ping</au><au>Shen, Rong-Rong</au><au>Zheng, Wen-Yan</au><au>Zhang, Yong-Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>e1254</spage><epage>e1254</epage><pages>e1254-e1254</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Braun enteroenterostomy in PD.Clinical studies compared perioperative outcomes between the Braun group and the non-Braun group following PD before December 21, 2014 were retrieved and filtered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases (VIP database, WanFang database, and CNKI database). Relevant data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Blood loss, operating time, and postoperative mortality and morbidity were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference, or standard mean difference (SMD).Ten studies concerning 1614 patients were included. No significant differences between the Braun and the non-Braun group were identified in mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.60), intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.035, 95% CI: -0.253 to 0.183), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.67), bile leakage (OR: 0.537, 95% CI: 0.287-1.004), postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.578-2.385), intraabdominal abscesses (OR: 0.793, 95% CI: 0.444-1.419), wound complications (OR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.490-1.325), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.098, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.033). Braun enteroenterostomy extended operating time (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.78), but it was associated with lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.380, 95% CI: 0.149-0.968), lower morbidity rate (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), lower clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (Grades B and C) (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.164-0.858), lower nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.232-0.818), and less postoperative vomiting (OR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.262-0.755).Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed during PD. It is beneficial for patients and could be recommended in PD from the current published data.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016198.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26266356</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000001254</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2015-08, Vol.94 (32), p.e1254-e1254
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4616697
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anastomosis, Surgical
Enterostomy - methods
Humans
Length of Stay
Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Reoperation
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A48%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Braun%20Enteroenterostomy%20Following%20Pancreaticoduodenectomy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Xu,%20Bin&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=e1254&rft.epage=e1254&rft.pages=e1254-e1254&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000001254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1704351200%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704351200&rft_id=info:pmid/26266356&rfr_iscdi=true