Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advant...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2015-08, Vol.94 (32), p.e1254-e1254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1254 |
---|---|
container_issue | 32 |
container_start_page | e1254 |
container_title | Medicine (Baltimore) |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Xu, Bin Zhu, Ya-Hui Qian, Ming-Ping Shen, Rong-Rong Zheng, Wen-Yan Zhang, Yong-Wei |
description | Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Braun enteroenterostomy in PD.Clinical studies compared perioperative outcomes between the Braun group and the non-Braun group following PD before December 21, 2014 were retrieved and filtered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases (VIP database, WanFang database, and CNKI database). Relevant data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Blood loss, operating time, and postoperative mortality and morbidity were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference, or standard mean difference (SMD).Ten studies concerning 1614 patients were included. No significant differences between the Braun and the non-Braun group were identified in mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.60), intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.035, 95% CI: -0.253 to 0.183), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.67), bile leakage (OR: 0.537, 95% CI: 0.287-1.004), postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.578-2.385), intraabdominal abscesses (OR: 0.793, 95% CI: 0.444-1.419), wound complications (OR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.490-1.325), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.098, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.033). Braun enteroenterostomy extended operating time (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.78), but it was associated with lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.380, 95% CI: 0.149-0.968), lower morbidity rate (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), lower clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (Grades B and C) (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.164-0.858), lower nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.232-0.818), and less postoperative vomiting (OR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.262-0.755).Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed during PD. It is beneficial for patients and could be recommended in PD from the current published data.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016198. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MD.0000000000001254 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4616697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1704351200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-301bb4031f109349d31e918c9061e00756bc27ce751be97209a30995c12b3b0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1vFCEUhonR2LX1F5iYufRm6gEGKF6YbL_UpJs2Va-RYc52RxmoMNPN_nvZbm2qXMDFec4Dh5eQNxQOKWj1fnF6CE8WZaJ5RmZUcFkLLZvnZAbARK20avbIq5x_FoYr1rwke0wyKbmQM_LjONkpVGdhxBTxfs9jHDbVefQ-rvtwU13Z4BLasXexm2KHAd2W-FDNq6-bPOKwLVXXeNfjurKhqxY42noerN_kPh-QF0vrM75-OPfJ9_Ozbyef64vLT19O5he140LImgNt2wY4XZbZeKM7TlHTI6dBUgRQQraOKYdK0Ba1YqAtB62Fo6zlLVi-Tz7uvLdTO2DnyizJenOb-sGmjYm2N_9WQr8yN_HONJJKqVURvHsQpPh7wjyaoc8OvbcB45QNVdBwQRlAQfkOdeW3csLl4zUUzDYbszg1_2dTut4-feFjz98wCtDsgHX0JYj8y09rTGaF1o-re59QmtUMqIAjYFBvzZL_AbHgmmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704351200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Xu, Bin ; Zhu, Ya-Hui ; Qian, Ming-Ping ; Shen, Rong-Rong ; Zheng, Wen-Yan ; Zhang, Yong-Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin ; Zhu, Ya-Hui ; Qian, Ming-Ping ; Shen, Rong-Rong ; Zheng, Wen-Yan ; Zhang, Yong-Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Braun enteroenterostomy in PD.Clinical studies compared perioperative outcomes between the Braun group and the non-Braun group following PD before December 21, 2014 were retrieved and filtered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases (VIP database, WanFang database, and CNKI database). Relevant data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Blood loss, operating time, and postoperative mortality and morbidity were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference, or standard mean difference (SMD).Ten studies concerning 1614 patients were included. No significant differences between the Braun and the non-Braun group were identified in mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.60), intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.035, 95% CI: -0.253 to 0.183), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.67), bile leakage (OR: 0.537, 95% CI: 0.287-1.004), postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.578-2.385), intraabdominal abscesses (OR: 0.793, 95% CI: 0.444-1.419), wound complications (OR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.490-1.325), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.098, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.033). Braun enteroenterostomy extended operating time (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.78), but it was associated with lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.380, 95% CI: 0.149-0.968), lower morbidity rate (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), lower clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (Grades B and C) (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.164-0.858), lower nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.232-0.818), and less postoperative vomiting (OR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.262-0.755).Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed during PD. It is beneficial for patients and could be recommended in PD from the current published data.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016198.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26266356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical ; Enterostomy - methods ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Reoperation ; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2015-08, Vol.94 (32), p.e1254-e1254</ispartof><rights>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-301bb4031f109349d31e918c9061e00756bc27ce751be97209a30995c12b3b0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616697/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616697/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26266356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ya-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Ming-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Rong-Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wen-Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yong-Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Braun enteroenterostomy in PD.Clinical studies compared perioperative outcomes between the Braun group and the non-Braun group following PD before December 21, 2014 were retrieved and filtered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases (VIP database, WanFang database, and CNKI database). Relevant data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Blood loss, operating time, and postoperative mortality and morbidity were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference, or standard mean difference (SMD).Ten studies concerning 1614 patients were included. No significant differences between the Braun and the non-Braun group were identified in mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.60), intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.035, 95% CI: -0.253 to 0.183), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.67), bile leakage (OR: 0.537, 95% CI: 0.287-1.004), postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.578-2.385), intraabdominal abscesses (OR: 0.793, 95% CI: 0.444-1.419), wound complications (OR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.490-1.325), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.098, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.033). Braun enteroenterostomy extended operating time (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.78), but it was associated with lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.380, 95% CI: 0.149-0.968), lower morbidity rate (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), lower clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (Grades B and C) (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.164-0.858), lower nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.232-0.818), and less postoperative vomiting (OR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.262-0.755).Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed during PD. It is beneficial for patients and could be recommended in PD from the current published data.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016198.</description><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Enterostomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1vFCEUhonR2LX1F5iYufRm6gEGKF6YbL_UpJs2Va-RYc52RxmoMNPN_nvZbm2qXMDFec4Dh5eQNxQOKWj1fnF6CE8WZaJ5RmZUcFkLLZvnZAbARK20avbIq5x_FoYr1rwke0wyKbmQM_LjONkpVGdhxBTxfs9jHDbVefQ-rvtwU13Z4BLasXexm2KHAd2W-FDNq6-bPOKwLVXXeNfjurKhqxY42noerN_kPh-QF0vrM75-OPfJ9_Ozbyef64vLT19O5he140LImgNt2wY4XZbZeKM7TlHTI6dBUgRQQraOKYdK0Ba1YqAtB62Fo6zlLVi-Tz7uvLdTO2DnyizJenOb-sGmjYm2N_9WQr8yN_HONJJKqVURvHsQpPh7wjyaoc8OvbcB45QNVdBwQRlAQfkOdeW3csLl4zUUzDYbszg1_2dTut4-feFjz98wCtDsgHX0JYj8y09rTGaF1o-re59QmtUMqIAjYFBvzZL_AbHgmmA</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Xu, Bin</creator><creator>Zhu, Ya-Hui</creator><creator>Qian, Ming-Ping</creator><creator>Shen, Rong-Rong</creator><creator>Zheng, Wen-Yan</creator><creator>Zhang, Yong-Wei</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Xu, Bin ; Zhu, Ya-Hui ; Qian, Ming-Ping ; Shen, Rong-Rong ; Zheng, Wen-Yan ; Zhang, Yong-Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-301bb4031f109349d31e918c9061e00756bc27ce751be97209a30995c12b3b0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Enterostomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ya-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Ming-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Rong-Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wen-Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yong-Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Bin</au><au>Zhu, Ya-Hui</au><au>Qian, Ming-Ping</au><au>Shen, Rong-Rong</au><au>Zheng, Wen-Yan</au><au>Zhang, Yong-Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>e1254</spage><epage>e1254</epage><pages>e1254-e1254</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) holds high postoperative morbidity. How to resolve this issue is challenged. An additional anastomosis (Braun enteroenterostomy) following PD may decrease the postoperative morbidity, but holds conflicting results. The objective of this study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of Braun enteroenterostomy in PD.Clinical studies compared perioperative outcomes between the Braun group and the non-Braun group following PD before December 21, 2014 were retrieved and filtered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese electronic databases (VIP database, WanFang database, and CNKI database). Relevant data were extracted according to predesigned sheets. Blood loss, operating time, and postoperative mortality and morbidity were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference, or standard mean difference (SMD).Ten studies concerning 1614 patients were included. No significant differences between the Braun and the non-Braun group were identified in mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.60), intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.035, 95% CI: -0.253 to 0.183), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35-1.67), bile leakage (OR: 0.537, 95% CI: 0.287-1.004), postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.578-2.385), intraabdominal abscesses (OR: 0.793, 95% CI: 0.444-1.419), wound complications (OR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.490-1.325), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.098, 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.033). Braun enteroenterostomy extended operating time (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.78), but it was associated with lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.380, 95% CI: 0.149-0.968), lower morbidity rate (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), lower clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (Grades B and C) (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.164-0.858), lower nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.232-0.818), and less postoperative vomiting (OR: 0.444, 95% CI: 0.262-0.755).Braun enteroenterostomy can be safely performed during PD. It is beneficial for patients and could be recommended in PD from the current published data.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016198.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26266356</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000001254</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7974 |
ispartof | Medicine (Baltimore), 2015-08, Vol.94 (32), p.e1254-e1254 |
issn | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4616697 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anastomosis, Surgical Enterostomy - methods Humans Length of Stay Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Reoperation Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Braun Enteroenterostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A48%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Braun%20Enteroenterostomy%20Following%20Pancreaticoduodenectomy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Xu,%20Bin&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=e1254&rft.epage=e1254&rft.pages=e1254-e1254&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000001254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1704351200%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704351200&rft_id=info:pmid/26266356&rfr_iscdi=true |