Glutamine Supplementation in Intensive Care Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
The role of glutamine (GLN) supplementation in critically ill patients is controversial. Our aim was to analyze its potential effect in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).We performed a systematic literature review through Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2015-08, Vol.94 (31), p.e1319-e1319 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1319 |
---|---|
container_issue | 31 |
container_start_page | e1319 |
container_title | Medicine (Baltimore) |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Oldani, Massimo Sandini, Marta Nespoli, Luca Coppola, Sara Bernasconi, Davide Paolo Gianotti, Luca |
description | The role of glutamine (GLN) supplementation in critically ill patients is controversial. Our aim was to analyze its potential effect in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).We performed a systematic literature review through Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane-Controlled Trials Register searching for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1983 to 2014 and comparing GLN supplementation to no supplementation in patients admitted to ICU. A random-effect meta-analysis for each outcome (hospital and ICU mortality and rate of infections) of interest was carried out. The effect size was estimated by the risk ratio (RR).Thirty RCTs were analyzed with a total of 3696 patients, 1825 (49.4%) receiving GLN and 1859 (50.6%) no GLN (control groups). Hospital mortality rate was 27.6% in the GLN patients and 28.6% in controls with an RR of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.81-1.07; P = 0.325, I = 10.7%). ICU mortality was 18.0 % in the patients receiving GLN and 17.6% in controls with an RR of 1.01 (95% CI = 0.86-1.19; P = 0.932, I = 0%). The incidence of infections was 39.7% in GLN group versus 41.7% in controls. The effect of GLN was not significant (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.76-1.03; P = 0.108, I = 56.1%).These results do not allow to recommend GLN supplementation in a generic population of critically ills. Further RCTs are needed to explore the effect of GLN in more specific cohort of patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MD.0000000000001319 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4616616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1702651102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-883d9c3e03df71e56fa8361963a8657494970979efea53926d4d2bc8dbed52503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9rFDEUxYModq1-AkHy6MvU_JkkEx-EZau10EXR-hyykztuNJNsk5mW-unNurVUQ-BCzu-ee8NB6CUlJ5Ro9WZ9ekIeHMqpfoQWVHDZCC3bx2hBCBON0qo9Qs9K-bFnFGufoiMmmWCVX6D-LMyTHX0E_HXe7QKMECc7-RSxj_g8ThCLvwa8shnw5ypUubzFS7yGyTbLaMNt8QWnAX-x0aXR_wKHV8FH39uAL7O3oTxHT4Za4MVdPUbfPry_XH1sLj6dna-WF03PheBN13Gnew6Eu0FREHKwHZdUS247KVSrW63qvzUMYAXXTLrWsU3fuQ04wQThx-jdwXc3b0ZwfV0122B22Y8235pkvflXiX5rvqdr00oq660Gr-8McrqaoUxm9KWHEGyENBdDFWFSUEpYRfkB7XMqJcNwP4YSs4_HrE_N__HUrlcPN7zv-ZtHBdoDcJPCBLn8DPMNZLMFG6btHz-hNGsYoYJ0hJJm_8L5b9JWmxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1702651102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glutamine Supplementation in Intensive Care Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials</title><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Oldani, Massimo ; Sandini, Marta ; Nespoli, Luca ; Coppola, Sara ; Bernasconi, Davide Paolo ; Gianotti, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Oldani, Massimo ; Sandini, Marta ; Nespoli, Luca ; Coppola, Sara ; Bernasconi, Davide Paolo ; Gianotti, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>The role of glutamine (GLN) supplementation in critically ill patients is controversial. Our aim was to analyze its potential effect in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).We performed a systematic literature review through Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane-Controlled Trials Register searching for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1983 to 2014 and comparing GLN supplementation to no supplementation in patients admitted to ICU. A random-effect meta-analysis for each outcome (hospital and ICU mortality and rate of infections) of interest was carried out. The effect size was estimated by the risk ratio (RR).Thirty RCTs were analyzed with a total of 3696 patients, 1825 (49.4%) receiving GLN and 1859 (50.6%) no GLN (control groups). Hospital mortality rate was 27.6% in the GLN patients and 28.6% in controls with an RR of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.81-1.07; P = 0.325, I = 10.7%). ICU mortality was 18.0 % in the patients receiving GLN and 17.6% in controls with an RR of 1.01 (95% CI = 0.86-1.19; P = 0.932, I = 0%). The incidence of infections was 39.7% in GLN group versus 41.7% in controls. The effect of GLN was not significant (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.76-1.03; P = 0.108, I = 56.1%).These results do not allow to recommend GLN supplementation in a generic population of critically ills. Further RCTs are needed to explore the effect of GLN in more specific cohort of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26252319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Critical Care ; Critical Illness - therapy ; Dietary Supplements ; Glutamine - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2015-08, Vol.94 (31), p.e1319-e1319</ispartof><rights>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-883d9c3e03df71e56fa8361963a8657494970979efea53926d4d2bc8dbed52503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616616/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616616/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26252319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oldani, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandini, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nespoli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppola, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernasconi, Davide Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianotti, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>Glutamine Supplementation in Intensive Care Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>The role of glutamine (GLN) supplementation in critically ill patients is controversial. Our aim was to analyze its potential effect in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).We performed a systematic literature review through Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane-Controlled Trials Register searching for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1983 to 2014 and comparing GLN supplementation to no supplementation in patients admitted to ICU. A random-effect meta-analysis for each outcome (hospital and ICU mortality and rate of infections) of interest was carried out. The effect size was estimated by the risk ratio (RR).Thirty RCTs were analyzed with a total of 3696 patients, 1825 (49.4%) receiving GLN and 1859 (50.6%) no GLN (control groups). Hospital mortality rate was 27.6% in the GLN patients and 28.6% in controls with an RR of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.81-1.07; P = 0.325, I = 10.7%). ICU mortality was 18.0 % in the patients receiving GLN and 17.6% in controls with an RR of 1.01 (95% CI = 0.86-1.19; P = 0.932, I = 0%). The incidence of infections was 39.7% in GLN group versus 41.7% in controls. The effect of GLN was not significant (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.76-1.03; P = 0.108, I = 56.1%).These results do not allow to recommend GLN supplementation in a generic population of critically ills. Further RCTs are needed to explore the effect of GLN in more specific cohort of patients.</description><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Critical Illness - therapy</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Glutamine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9rFDEUxYModq1-AkHy6MvU_JkkEx-EZau10EXR-hyykztuNJNsk5mW-unNurVUQ-BCzu-ee8NB6CUlJ5Ro9WZ9ekIeHMqpfoQWVHDZCC3bx2hBCBON0qo9Qs9K-bFnFGufoiMmmWCVX6D-LMyTHX0E_HXe7QKMECc7-RSxj_g8ThCLvwa8shnw5ypUubzFS7yGyTbLaMNt8QWnAX-x0aXR_wKHV8FH39uAL7O3oTxHT4Za4MVdPUbfPry_XH1sLj6dna-WF03PheBN13Gnew6Eu0FREHKwHZdUS247KVSrW63qvzUMYAXXTLrWsU3fuQ04wQThx-jdwXc3b0ZwfV0122B22Y8235pkvflXiX5rvqdr00oq660Gr-8McrqaoUxm9KWHEGyENBdDFWFSUEpYRfkB7XMqJcNwP4YSs4_HrE_N__HUrlcPN7zv-ZtHBdoDcJPCBLn8DPMNZLMFG6btHz-hNGsYoYJ0hJJm_8L5b9JWmxQ</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Oldani, Massimo</creator><creator>Sandini, Marta</creator><creator>Nespoli, Luca</creator><creator>Coppola, Sara</creator><creator>Bernasconi, Davide Paolo</creator><creator>Gianotti, Luca</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Glutamine Supplementation in Intensive Care Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials</title><author>Oldani, Massimo ; Sandini, Marta ; Nespoli, Luca ; Coppola, Sara ; Bernasconi, Davide Paolo ; Gianotti, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-883d9c3e03df71e56fa8361963a8657494970979efea53926d4d2bc8dbed52503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Critical Illness - therapy</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Glutamine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oldani, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandini, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nespoli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppola, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernasconi, Davide Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianotti, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oldani, Massimo</au><au>Sandini, Marta</au><au>Nespoli, Luca</au><au>Coppola, Sara</au><au>Bernasconi, Davide Paolo</au><au>Gianotti, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glutamine Supplementation in Intensive Care Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>31</issue><spage>e1319</spage><epage>e1319</epage><pages>e1319-e1319</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>The role of glutamine (GLN) supplementation in critically ill patients is controversial. Our aim was to analyze its potential effect in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).We performed a systematic literature review through Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane-Controlled Trials Register searching for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1983 to 2014 and comparing GLN supplementation to no supplementation in patients admitted to ICU. A random-effect meta-analysis for each outcome (hospital and ICU mortality and rate of infections) of interest was carried out. The effect size was estimated by the risk ratio (RR).Thirty RCTs were analyzed with a total of 3696 patients, 1825 (49.4%) receiving GLN and 1859 (50.6%) no GLN (control groups). Hospital mortality rate was 27.6% in the GLN patients and 28.6% in controls with an RR of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.81-1.07; P = 0.325, I = 10.7%). ICU mortality was 18.0 % in the patients receiving GLN and 17.6% in controls with an RR of 1.01 (95% CI = 0.86-1.19; P = 0.932, I = 0%). The incidence of infections was 39.7% in GLN group versus 41.7% in controls. The effect of GLN was not significant (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.76-1.03; P = 0.108, I = 56.1%).These results do not allow to recommend GLN supplementation in a generic population of critically ills. Further RCTs are needed to explore the effect of GLN in more specific cohort of patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26252319</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000001319</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7974 |
ispartof | Medicine (Baltimore), 2015-08, Vol.94 (31), p.e1319-e1319 |
issn | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4616616 |
source | Wolters Kluwer Open Health; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; IngentaConnect Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Critical Care Critical Illness - therapy Dietary Supplements Glutamine - therapeutic use Humans Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Glutamine Supplementation in Intensive Care Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A08%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glutamine%20Supplementation%20in%20Intensive%20Care%20Patients:%20A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Oldani,%20Massimo&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=31&rft.spage=e1319&rft.epage=e1319&rft.pages=e1319-e1319&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000001319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1702651102%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1702651102&rft_id=info:pmid/26252319&rfr_iscdi=true |