MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants

Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiographics 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1483-1501
Hauptverfasser: Fritz, Jan, Lurie, Brett, Potter, Hollis G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1501
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1483
container_title Radiographics
container_volume 35
creator Fritz, Jan
Lurie, Brett
Potter, Hollis G
description Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/rg.2015140216
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4613886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1713532201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1e069ec69733bb1d358711303d9c1b0f14a82cd0002fd0d08021a53b0ff1f3013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUE1Lw0AQXUSxtXr0Kjn2kjqzk002F6GUqsWKIHpeNskmjeSj7qZC_73R1qqnGXiP98XYJcIEMZDXtphwQIEBcAyP2BAFj3wkTsdsCDxCXxDRgJ059waAgZDhKRvwkMdCxDhk48dnb1HromwKr829h8YYb2q7lW3XlXbdtgf7p-ncOTvJdeXMxf6O2Ovt_GV27y-f7haz6dJPSUadjwbC2KRhHBElCWYkZIRIQFmcYgI5BlryNAMAnmeQgexja0E9kmNOgDRiNzvd9SapTZaaprO6Umtb1tpuVatL9R9pypUq2g8VhEhShr3AeC9g2_eNcZ2qS5eaqm9h2o1TGCEJ4vzby99RU9s6Z01-sEFQX-sqW6jfdXv-1d9sB_bPnPQJwmpzqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1713532201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fritz, Jan ; Lurie, Brett ; Potter, Hollis G</creator><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan ; Lurie, Brett ; Potter, Hollis G</creatorcontrib><description>Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-5333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26295591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Bone Resorption ; Hemarthrosis - etiology ; Hemarthrosis - pathology ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Metals ; Musculoskeletal Imaging ; Osteolysis - etiology ; Osteolysis - pathology ; Osteonecrosis - etiology ; Osteonecrosis - pathology ; Pain, Postoperative - pathology ; Pain, Postoperative - surgery ; Patient Positioning ; Polyethylene ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - pathology ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology ; Reoperation ; Synovitis - etiology ; Synovitis - pathology ; Tendinopathy - etiology ; Tendinopathy - pathology</subject><ispartof>Radiographics, 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1483-1501</ispartof><rights>(©)RSNA, 2015.</rights><rights>2015 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1e069ec69733bb1d358711303d9c1b0f14a82cd0002fd0d08021a53b0ff1f3013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1e069ec69733bb1d358711303d9c1b0f14a82cd0002fd0d08021a53b0ff1f3013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26295591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurie, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Hollis G</creatorcontrib><title>MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants</title><title>Radiographics</title><addtitle>Radiographics</addtitle><description>Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Bone Resorption</subject><subject>Hemarthrosis - etiology</subject><subject>Hemarthrosis - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Imaging</subject><subject>Osteolysis - etiology</subject><subject>Osteolysis - pathology</subject><subject>Osteonecrosis - etiology</subject><subject>Osteonecrosis - pathology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - pathology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Positioning</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - pathology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Synovitis - etiology</subject><subject>Synovitis - pathology</subject><subject>Tendinopathy - etiology</subject><subject>Tendinopathy - pathology</subject><issn>0271-5333</issn><issn>1527-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUE1Lw0AQXUSxtXr0Kjn2kjqzk002F6GUqsWKIHpeNskmjeSj7qZC_73R1qqnGXiP98XYJcIEMZDXtphwQIEBcAyP2BAFj3wkTsdsCDxCXxDRgJ059waAgZDhKRvwkMdCxDhk48dnb1HromwKr829h8YYb2q7lW3XlXbdtgf7p-ncOTvJdeXMxf6O2Ovt_GV27y-f7haz6dJPSUadjwbC2KRhHBElCWYkZIRIQFmcYgI5BlryNAMAnmeQgexja0E9kmNOgDRiNzvd9SapTZaaprO6Umtb1tpuVatL9R9pypUq2g8VhEhShr3AeC9g2_eNcZ2qS5eaqm9h2o1TGCEJ4vzby99RU9s6Z01-sEFQX-sqW6jfdXv-1d9sB_bPnPQJwmpzqA</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Fritz, Jan</creator><creator>Lurie, Brett</creator><creator>Potter, Hollis G</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants</title><author>Fritz, Jan ; Lurie, Brett ; Potter, Hollis G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1e069ec69733bb1d358711303d9c1b0f14a82cd0002fd0d08021a53b0ff1f3013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Bone Resorption</topic><topic>Hemarthrosis - etiology</topic><topic>Hemarthrosis - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Imaging</topic><topic>Osteolysis - etiology</topic><topic>Osteolysis - pathology</topic><topic>Osteonecrosis - etiology</topic><topic>Osteonecrosis - pathology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - pathology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Positioning</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - pathology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Synovitis - etiology</topic><topic>Synovitis - pathology</topic><topic>Tendinopathy - etiology</topic><topic>Tendinopathy - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurie, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Hollis G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fritz, Jan</au><au>Lurie, Brett</au><au>Potter, Hollis G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants</atitle><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle><addtitle>Radiographics</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1483</spage><epage>1501</epage><pages>1483-1501</pages><issn>0271-5333</issn><eissn>1527-1323</eissn><abstract>Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>26295591</pmid><doi>10.1148/rg.2015140216</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-5333
ispartof Radiographics, 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1483-1501
issn 0271-5333
1527-1323
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4613886
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Bone Resorption
Hemarthrosis - etiology
Hemarthrosis - pathology
Humans
Knee Prosthesis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Metals
Musculoskeletal Imaging
Osteolysis - etiology
Osteolysis - pathology
Osteonecrosis - etiology
Osteonecrosis - pathology
Pain, Postoperative - pathology
Pain, Postoperative - surgery
Patient Positioning
Polyethylene
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - pathology
Prosthesis Failure
Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology
Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology
Reoperation
Synovitis - etiology
Synovitis - pathology
Tendinopathy - etiology
Tendinopathy - pathology
title MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A13%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20Imaging%20of%20Knee%20Arthroplasty%20Implants&rft.jtitle=Radiographics&rft.au=Fritz,%20Jan&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1483&rft.epage=1501&rft.pages=1483-1501&rft.issn=0271-5333&rft.eissn=1527-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/rg.2015140216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1713532201%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1713532201&rft_id=info:pmid/26295591&rfr_iscdi=true