MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants
Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiographics 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1483-1501 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1501 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1483 |
container_title | Radiographics |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Fritz, Jan Lurie, Brett Potter, Hollis G |
description | Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1148/rg.2015140216 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4613886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1713532201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1e069ec69733bb1d358711303d9c1b0f14a82cd0002fd0d08021a53b0ff1f3013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUE1Lw0AQXUSxtXr0Kjn2kjqzk002F6GUqsWKIHpeNskmjeSj7qZC_73R1qqnGXiP98XYJcIEMZDXtphwQIEBcAyP2BAFj3wkTsdsCDxCXxDRgJ059waAgZDhKRvwkMdCxDhk48dnb1HromwKr829h8YYb2q7lW3XlXbdtgf7p-ncOTvJdeXMxf6O2Ovt_GV27y-f7haz6dJPSUadjwbC2KRhHBElCWYkZIRIQFmcYgI5BlryNAMAnmeQgexja0E9kmNOgDRiNzvd9SapTZaaprO6Umtb1tpuVatL9R9pypUq2g8VhEhShr3AeC9g2_eNcZ2qS5eaqm9h2o1TGCEJ4vzby99RU9s6Z01-sEFQX-sqW6jfdXv-1d9sB_bPnPQJwmpzqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1713532201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fritz, Jan ; Lurie, Brett ; Potter, Hollis G</creator><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan ; Lurie, Brett ; Potter, Hollis G</creatorcontrib><description>Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-5333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26295591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Bone Resorption ; Hemarthrosis - etiology ; Hemarthrosis - pathology ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Metals ; Musculoskeletal Imaging ; Osteolysis - etiology ; Osteolysis - pathology ; Osteonecrosis - etiology ; Osteonecrosis - pathology ; Pain, Postoperative - pathology ; Pain, Postoperative - surgery ; Patient Positioning ; Polyethylene ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - pathology ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology ; Reoperation ; Synovitis - etiology ; Synovitis - pathology ; Tendinopathy - etiology ; Tendinopathy - pathology</subject><ispartof>Radiographics, 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1483-1501</ispartof><rights>(©)RSNA, 2015.</rights><rights>2015 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1e069ec69733bb1d358711303d9c1b0f14a82cd0002fd0d08021a53b0ff1f3013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1e069ec69733bb1d358711303d9c1b0f14a82cd0002fd0d08021a53b0ff1f3013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26295591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurie, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Hollis G</creatorcontrib><title>MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants</title><title>Radiographics</title><addtitle>Radiographics</addtitle><description>Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Bone Resorption</subject><subject>Hemarthrosis - etiology</subject><subject>Hemarthrosis - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Imaging</subject><subject>Osteolysis - etiology</subject><subject>Osteolysis - pathology</subject><subject>Osteonecrosis - etiology</subject><subject>Osteonecrosis - pathology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - pathology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Positioning</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - pathology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Synovitis - etiology</subject><subject>Synovitis - pathology</subject><subject>Tendinopathy - etiology</subject><subject>Tendinopathy - pathology</subject><issn>0271-5333</issn><issn>1527-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUE1Lw0AQXUSxtXr0Kjn2kjqzk002F6GUqsWKIHpeNskmjeSj7qZC_73R1qqnGXiP98XYJcIEMZDXtphwQIEBcAyP2BAFj3wkTsdsCDxCXxDRgJ059waAgZDhKRvwkMdCxDhk48dnb1HromwKr829h8YYb2q7lW3XlXbdtgf7p-ncOTvJdeXMxf6O2Ovt_GV27y-f7haz6dJPSUadjwbC2KRhHBElCWYkZIRIQFmcYgI5BlryNAMAnmeQgexja0E9kmNOgDRiNzvd9SapTZaaprO6Umtb1tpuVatL9R9pypUq2g8VhEhShr3AeC9g2_eNcZ2qS5eaqm9h2o1TGCEJ4vzby99RU9s6Z01-sEFQX-sqW6jfdXv-1d9sB_bPnPQJwmpzqA</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Fritz, Jan</creator><creator>Lurie, Brett</creator><creator>Potter, Hollis G</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants</title><author>Fritz, Jan ; Lurie, Brett ; Potter, Hollis G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1e069ec69733bb1d358711303d9c1b0f14a82cd0002fd0d08021a53b0ff1f3013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Bone Resorption</topic><topic>Hemarthrosis - etiology</topic><topic>Hemarthrosis - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Imaging</topic><topic>Osteolysis - etiology</topic><topic>Osteolysis - pathology</topic><topic>Osteonecrosis - etiology</topic><topic>Osteonecrosis - pathology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - pathology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Positioning</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - pathology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Synovitis - etiology</topic><topic>Synovitis - pathology</topic><topic>Tendinopathy - etiology</topic><topic>Tendinopathy - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurie, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Hollis G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fritz, Jan</au><au>Lurie, Brett</au><au>Potter, Hollis G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants</atitle><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle><addtitle>Radiographics</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1483</spage><epage>1501</epage><pages>1483-1501</pages><issn>0271-5333</issn><eissn>1527-1323</eissn><abstract>Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>26295591</pmid><doi>10.1148/rg.2015140216</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0271-5333 |
ispartof | Radiographics, 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1483-1501 |
issn | 0271-5333 1527-1323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4613886 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Bone Resorption Hemarthrosis - etiology Hemarthrosis - pathology Humans Knee Prosthesis Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Metals Musculoskeletal Imaging Osteolysis - etiology Osteolysis - pathology Osteonecrosis - etiology Osteonecrosis - pathology Pain, Postoperative - pathology Pain, Postoperative - surgery Patient Positioning Polyethylene Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - pathology Prosthesis Failure Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology Reoperation Synovitis - etiology Synovitis - pathology Tendinopathy - etiology Tendinopathy - pathology |
title | MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A13%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20Imaging%20of%20Knee%20Arthroplasty%20Implants&rft.jtitle=Radiographics&rft.au=Fritz,%20Jan&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1483&rft.epage=1501&rft.pages=1483-1501&rft.issn=0271-5333&rft.eissn=1527-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/rg.2015140216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1713532201%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1713532201&rft_id=info:pmid/26295591&rfr_iscdi=true |