Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions

Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is challenging because of the complex interaction of multiple factors, including motion arising from respiration and bowel peristalsis, susceptibility effects secondary to bowel gas, and the need to cover a large field of view. The combination of these factors ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiographics 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1439-1460
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Susie Y, Seethamraju, Ravi T, Patel, Pritesh, Hahn, Peter F, Kirsch, John E, Guimaraes, Alexander R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1460
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1439
container_title Radiographics
container_volume 35
creator Huang, Susie Y
Seethamraju, Ravi T
Patel, Pritesh
Hahn, Peter F
Kirsch, John E
Guimaraes, Alexander R
description Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is challenging because of the complex interaction of multiple factors, including motion arising from respiration and bowel peristalsis, susceptibility effects secondary to bowel gas, and the need to cover a large field of view. The combination of these factors makes body MR imaging more prone to artifacts, compared with imaging of other anatomic regions. Understanding the basic MR physics underlying artifacts is crucial to recognizing the trade-offs involved in mitigating artifacts and improving image quality. Artifacts can be classified into three main groups: (a) artifacts related to magnetic field imperfections, including the static magnetic field, the radiofrequency (RF) field, and gradient fields; (b) artifacts related to motion; and (c) artifacts arising from methods used to sample the MR signal. Static magnetic field homogeneity is essential for many MR techniques, such as fat saturation and balanced steady-state free precession. Susceptibility effects become more pronounced at higher field strengths and can be ameliorated by using spin-echo sequences when possible, increasing the receiver bandwidth, and aligning the phase-encoding gradient with the strongest susceptibility gradients, among other strategies. Nonuniformities in the RF transmit field, including dielectric effects, can be minimized by applying dielectric pads or imaging at lower field strength. Motion artifacts can be overcome through respiratory synchronization, alternative k-space sampling schemes, and parallel imaging. Aliasing and truncation artifacts derive from limitations in digital sampling of the MR signal and can be rectified by adjusting the sampling parameters. Understanding the causes of artifacts and their possible solutions will enable practitioners of body MR imaging to meet the challenges of novel pulse sequence design, parallel imaging, and increasing field strength.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/rg.2015140289
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4613875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1713531156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-d818df514cd8b6218c673c35b434a1f0a9fab7fcd23ca5904a1629cf9020cdb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM9LwzAUx4Mobk6PXqVHD-vMS5o29SDM4Y_BRHB6Dmma1GrbzKQV9t9b2Zx6evDeh-_78kHoFPAEIOIXrpgQDAwiTHi6h4bASBICJXQfDTFJIGSU0gE68v4NY4gYjw_RgMQEJ4zDEJFrm6-Dh6dgXsuibIrLYOra0kjV-nHwHi5XUulxIJs8WNqqa0vb-GN0YGTl9cl2jtDL7c3z7D5cPN7NZ9NFqChP2jDnwHPTF1M5z2ICXMUJVZRlEY0kGCxTI7PEqJxQJVmK-2VMUmVSTLDKM0JH6GqTu-qyWudKN62TlVi5spZuLawsxf9LU76Kwn6KKIa-AesDzrcBzn502reiLr3SVSUbbTsvIAHKKACLezTcoMpZ7502uzeAxbdn4Qrx67nnz_5229E_YukX-Xl3iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1713531156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Huang, Susie Y ; Seethamraju, Ravi T ; Patel, Pritesh ; Hahn, Peter F ; Kirsch, John E ; Guimaraes, Alexander R</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Susie Y ; Seethamraju, Ravi T ; Patel, Pritesh ; Hahn, Peter F ; Kirsch, John E ; Guimaraes, Alexander R</creatorcontrib><description>Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is challenging because of the complex interaction of multiple factors, including motion arising from respiration and bowel peristalsis, susceptibility effects secondary to bowel gas, and the need to cover a large field of view. The combination of these factors makes body MR imaging more prone to artifacts, compared with imaging of other anatomic regions. Understanding the basic MR physics underlying artifacts is crucial to recognizing the trade-offs involved in mitigating artifacts and improving image quality. Artifacts can be classified into three main groups: (a) artifacts related to magnetic field imperfections, including the static magnetic field, the radiofrequency (RF) field, and gradient fields; (b) artifacts related to motion; and (c) artifacts arising from methods used to sample the MR signal. Static magnetic field homogeneity is essential for many MR techniques, such as fat saturation and balanced steady-state free precession. Susceptibility effects become more pronounced at higher field strengths and can be ameliorated by using spin-echo sequences when possible, increasing the receiver bandwidth, and aligning the phase-encoding gradient with the strongest susceptibility gradients, among other strategies. Nonuniformities in the RF transmit field, including dielectric effects, can be minimized by applying dielectric pads or imaging at lower field strength. Motion artifacts can be overcome through respiratory synchronization, alternative k-space sampling schemes, and parallel imaging. Aliasing and truncation artifacts derive from limitations in digital sampling of the MR signal and can be rectified by adjusting the sampling parameters. Understanding the causes of artifacts and their possible solutions will enable practitioners of body MR imaging to meet the challenges of novel pulse sequence design, parallel imaging, and increasing field strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-5333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140289</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26207581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - pathology ; Analog-Digital Conversion ; Echo-Planar Imaging - instrumentation ; Echo-Planar Imaging - methods ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure ; Humans ; Imaging Physics ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods ; Magnetics ; Motion ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Viscera - pathology</subject><ispartof>Radiographics, 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1439-1460</ispartof><rights>(©)RSNA, 2015.</rights><rights>2015 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-d818df514cd8b6218c673c35b434a1f0a9fab7fcd23ca5904a1629cf9020cdb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-d818df514cd8b6218c673c35b434a1f0a9fab7fcd23ca5904a1629cf9020cdb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Susie Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seethamraju, Ravi T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pritesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Peter F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsch, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimaraes, Alexander R</creatorcontrib><title>Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions</title><title>Radiographics</title><addtitle>Radiographics</addtitle><description>Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is challenging because of the complex interaction of multiple factors, including motion arising from respiration and bowel peristalsis, susceptibility effects secondary to bowel gas, and the need to cover a large field of view. The combination of these factors makes body MR imaging more prone to artifacts, compared with imaging of other anatomic regions. Understanding the basic MR physics underlying artifacts is crucial to recognizing the trade-offs involved in mitigating artifacts and improving image quality. Artifacts can be classified into three main groups: (a) artifacts related to magnetic field imperfections, including the static magnetic field, the radiofrequency (RF) field, and gradient fields; (b) artifacts related to motion; and (c) artifacts arising from methods used to sample the MR signal. Static magnetic field homogeneity is essential for many MR techniques, such as fat saturation and balanced steady-state free precession. Susceptibility effects become more pronounced at higher field strengths and can be ameliorated by using spin-echo sequences when possible, increasing the receiver bandwidth, and aligning the phase-encoding gradient with the strongest susceptibility gradients, among other strategies. Nonuniformities in the RF transmit field, including dielectric effects, can be minimized by applying dielectric pads or imaging at lower field strength. Motion artifacts can be overcome through respiratory synchronization, alternative k-space sampling schemes, and parallel imaging. Aliasing and truncation artifacts derive from limitations in digital sampling of the MR signal and can be rectified by adjusting the sampling parameters. Understanding the causes of artifacts and their possible solutions will enable practitioners of body MR imaging to meet the challenges of novel pulse sequence design, parallel imaging, and increasing field strength.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - pathology</subject><subject>Analog-Digital Conversion</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging Physics</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Magnetics</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Viscera - pathology</subject><issn>0271-5333</issn><issn>1527-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM9LwzAUx4Mobk6PXqVHD-vMS5o29SDM4Y_BRHB6Dmma1GrbzKQV9t9b2Zx6evDeh-_78kHoFPAEIOIXrpgQDAwiTHi6h4bASBICJXQfDTFJIGSU0gE68v4NY4gYjw_RgMQEJ4zDEJFrm6-Dh6dgXsuibIrLYOra0kjV-nHwHi5XUulxIJs8WNqqa0vb-GN0YGTl9cl2jtDL7c3z7D5cPN7NZ9NFqChP2jDnwHPTF1M5z2ICXMUJVZRlEY0kGCxTI7PEqJxQJVmK-2VMUmVSTLDKM0JH6GqTu-qyWudKN62TlVi5spZuLawsxf9LU76Kwn6KKIa-AesDzrcBzn502reiLr3SVSUbbTsvIAHKKACLezTcoMpZ7502uzeAxbdn4Qrx67nnz_5229E_YukX-Xl3iw</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Huang, Susie Y</creator><creator>Seethamraju, Ravi T</creator><creator>Patel, Pritesh</creator><creator>Hahn, Peter F</creator><creator>Kirsch, John E</creator><creator>Guimaraes, Alexander R</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions</title><author>Huang, Susie Y ; Seethamraju, Ravi T ; Patel, Pritesh ; Hahn, Peter F ; Kirsch, John E ; Guimaraes, Alexander R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-d818df514cd8b6218c673c35b434a1f0a9fab7fcd23ca5904a1629cf9020cdb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - pathology</topic><topic>Analog-Digital Conversion</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging Physics</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Magnetics</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Viscera - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Susie Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seethamraju, Ravi T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pritesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Peter F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsch, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimaraes, Alexander R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Susie Y</au><au>Seethamraju, Ravi T</au><au>Patel, Pritesh</au><au>Hahn, Peter F</au><au>Kirsch, John E</au><au>Guimaraes, Alexander R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions</atitle><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle><addtitle>Radiographics</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1439</spage><epage>1460</epage><pages>1439-1460</pages><issn>0271-5333</issn><eissn>1527-1323</eissn><abstract>Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is challenging because of the complex interaction of multiple factors, including motion arising from respiration and bowel peristalsis, susceptibility effects secondary to bowel gas, and the need to cover a large field of view. The combination of these factors makes body MR imaging more prone to artifacts, compared with imaging of other anatomic regions. Understanding the basic MR physics underlying artifacts is crucial to recognizing the trade-offs involved in mitigating artifacts and improving image quality. Artifacts can be classified into three main groups: (a) artifacts related to magnetic field imperfections, including the static magnetic field, the radiofrequency (RF) field, and gradient fields; (b) artifacts related to motion; and (c) artifacts arising from methods used to sample the MR signal. Static magnetic field homogeneity is essential for many MR techniques, such as fat saturation and balanced steady-state free precession. Susceptibility effects become more pronounced at higher field strengths and can be ameliorated by using spin-echo sequences when possible, increasing the receiver bandwidth, and aligning the phase-encoding gradient with the strongest susceptibility gradients, among other strategies. Nonuniformities in the RF transmit field, including dielectric effects, can be minimized by applying dielectric pads or imaging at lower field strength. Motion artifacts can be overcome through respiratory synchronization, alternative k-space sampling schemes, and parallel imaging. Aliasing and truncation artifacts derive from limitations in digital sampling of the MR signal and can be rectified by adjusting the sampling parameters. Understanding the causes of artifacts and their possible solutions will enable practitioners of body MR imaging to meet the challenges of novel pulse sequence design, parallel imaging, and increasing field strength.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>26207581</pmid><doi>10.1148/rg.2015140289</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-5333
ispartof Radiographics, 2015-09, Vol.35 (5), p.1439-1460
issn 0271-5333
1527-1323
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4613875
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adipose Tissue - pathology
Analog-Digital Conversion
Echo-Planar Imaging - instrumentation
Echo-Planar Imaging - methods
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure
Humans
Imaging Physics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - instrumentation
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods
Magnetics
Motion
Sensitivity and Specificity
Viscera - pathology
title Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A23%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Body%20MR%20Imaging:%20Artifacts,%20k-Space,%20and%20Solutions&rft.jtitle=Radiographics&rft.au=Huang,%20Susie%20Y&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1439&rft.epage=1460&rft.pages=1439-1460&rft.issn=0271-5333&rft.eissn=1527-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/rg.2015140289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1713531156%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1713531156&rft_id=info:pmid/26207581&rfr_iscdi=true