Population-based estimates of survival and cost for metastatic melanoma
Fewer than half of all patients with metastatic melanoma survive more than 1 year. Standard treatments have had little success, but recent therapeutic advances offer the potential for an improved prognosis. In the present study, we used population-based administrative data to establish real-world ba...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current oncology (Toronto) 2015-10, Vol.22 (5), p.326-332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 332 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | Current oncology (Toronto) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | McCarron, C E Ernst, S Cao, J Q Zaric, G S |
description | Fewer than half of all patients with metastatic melanoma survive more than 1 year. Standard treatments have had little success, but recent therapeutic advances offer the potential for an improved prognosis. In the present study, we used population-based administrative data to establish real-world baseline estimates of survival outcomes and costs against which new treatments can be compared.
Data from administrative databases and patient registries were used to find a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma in Ontario. To identify individuals most likely to receive new treatments, we focused on patients eligible for second-line treatment. The identified cohort had two characteristics: no surgical resection beyond primary skin excision, and receipt of first-line systemic therapy.
Patient characteristics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and mean costs are reported. Of the 33,585 patients diagnosed with melanoma in Ontario from 1 January 1991 to 31 December 2010, 278 met the study inclusion criteria. Average age was 63 years, and 62% of the patients were men. Overall survival was estimated to be 19%, 12%, and 6% at 12, 24, and 60 months respectively. Mean survival time was 11.5 months, and mean cost was $30,685.
Our baseline estimates indicate that survival outcomes are poor and costs are high for patients receiving standard treatment. Understanding the relative improvement accruing from any new treatment requires a comparison with the existing standard of care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3747/co.22.2557 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4608398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1749599630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e3100a79c49d1ce76a58ee2dace0dba3f3d62db2880e65e1d7751cca813c1e123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUE1LxDAUDKK4unrxB0iPInTNR9skF0EWXYUFPeg5pMmrVtpmTdIF_71Zdl309AbevHkzg9AFwTPGC35j3IzSGS1LfoBOCCci55zKw4SJFDnGJZ2g0xA-MWaMc36MJrSqqBBVeYIWL241djq2bshrHcBmEGLb6wghc00WRr9u17rL9GAz40LMGuezHqIOMR2ZBDs9uF6foaNGdwHOd3OK3h7uX-eP-fJ58TS_W-aGcRFzYARjzaUppCUGeKVLAUCtNoBtrVnDbEVtncxhqEoglvOSGKMFYYYAoWyKbre6q7HuwRoYotedWvnk2X8rp1v1fzO0H-rdrVVRYcGkSAJXOwHvvsYUVvVtMNClGODGoAgvZCllxXCiXm-pxrsQPDT7NwSrTfPKOEWp2jSfyJd_je2pv1WzH45AgPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1749599630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population-based estimates of survival and cost for metastatic melanoma</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>McCarron, C E ; Ernst, S ; Cao, J Q ; Zaric, G S</creator><creatorcontrib>McCarron, C E ; Ernst, S ; Cao, J Q ; Zaric, G S</creatorcontrib><description>Fewer than half of all patients with metastatic melanoma survive more than 1 year. Standard treatments have had little success, but recent therapeutic advances offer the potential for an improved prognosis. In the present study, we used population-based administrative data to establish real-world baseline estimates of survival outcomes and costs against which new treatments can be compared.
Data from administrative databases and patient registries were used to find a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma in Ontario. To identify individuals most likely to receive new treatments, we focused on patients eligible for second-line treatment. The identified cohort had two characteristics: no surgical resection beyond primary skin excision, and receipt of first-line systemic therapy.
Patient characteristics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and mean costs are reported. Of the 33,585 patients diagnosed with melanoma in Ontario from 1 January 1991 to 31 December 2010, 278 met the study inclusion criteria. Average age was 63 years, and 62% of the patients were men. Overall survival was estimated to be 19%, 12%, and 6% at 12, 24, and 60 months respectively. Mean survival time was 11.5 months, and mean cost was $30,685.
Our baseline estimates indicate that survival outcomes are poor and costs are high for patients receiving standard treatment. Understanding the relative improvement accruing from any new treatment requires a comparison with the existing standard of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1198-0052</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1718-7729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1718-7729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2557</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26628865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Multimed Inc</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Current oncology (Toronto), 2015-10, Vol.22 (5), p.326-332</ispartof><rights>2015 Multimed Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e3100a79c49d1ce76a58ee2dace0dba3f3d62db2880e65e1d7751cca813c1e123</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608398/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608398/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,27933,27934,53800,53802</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26628865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCarron, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, J Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaric, G S</creatorcontrib><title>Population-based estimates of survival and cost for metastatic melanoma</title><title>Current oncology (Toronto)</title><addtitle>Curr Oncol</addtitle><description>Fewer than half of all patients with metastatic melanoma survive more than 1 year. Standard treatments have had little success, but recent therapeutic advances offer the potential for an improved prognosis. In the present study, we used population-based administrative data to establish real-world baseline estimates of survival outcomes and costs against which new treatments can be compared.
Data from administrative databases and patient registries were used to find a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma in Ontario. To identify individuals most likely to receive new treatments, we focused on patients eligible for second-line treatment. The identified cohort had two characteristics: no surgical resection beyond primary skin excision, and receipt of first-line systemic therapy.
Patient characteristics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and mean costs are reported. Of the 33,585 patients diagnosed with melanoma in Ontario from 1 January 1991 to 31 December 2010, 278 met the study inclusion criteria. Average age was 63 years, and 62% of the patients were men. Overall survival was estimated to be 19%, 12%, and 6% at 12, 24, and 60 months respectively. Mean survival time was 11.5 months, and mean cost was $30,685.
Our baseline estimates indicate that survival outcomes are poor and costs are high for patients receiving standard treatment. Understanding the relative improvement accruing from any new treatment requires a comparison with the existing standard of care.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>1198-0052</issn><issn>1718-7729</issn><issn>1718-7729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUE1LxDAUDKK4unrxB0iPInTNR9skF0EWXYUFPeg5pMmrVtpmTdIF_71Zdl309AbevHkzg9AFwTPGC35j3IzSGS1LfoBOCCci55zKw4SJFDnGJZ2g0xA-MWaMc36MJrSqqBBVeYIWL241djq2bshrHcBmEGLb6wghc00WRr9u17rL9GAz40LMGuezHqIOMR2ZBDs9uF6foaNGdwHOd3OK3h7uX-eP-fJ58TS_W-aGcRFzYARjzaUppCUGeKVLAUCtNoBtrVnDbEVtncxhqEoglvOSGKMFYYYAoWyKbre6q7HuwRoYotedWvnk2X8rp1v1fzO0H-rdrVVRYcGkSAJXOwHvvsYUVvVtMNClGODGoAgvZCllxXCiXm-pxrsQPDT7NwSrTfPKOEWp2jSfyJd_je2pv1WzH45AgPk</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>McCarron, C E</creator><creator>Ernst, S</creator><creator>Cao, J Q</creator><creator>Zaric, G S</creator><general>Multimed Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Population-based estimates of survival and cost for metastatic melanoma</title><author>McCarron, C E ; Ernst, S ; Cao, J Q ; Zaric, G S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e3100a79c49d1ce76a58ee2dace0dba3f3d62db2880e65e1d7751cca813c1e123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCarron, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, J Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaric, G S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current oncology (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCarron, C E</au><au>Ernst, S</au><au>Cao, J Q</au><au>Zaric, G S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population-based estimates of survival and cost for metastatic melanoma</atitle><jtitle>Current oncology (Toronto)</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Oncol</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>326-332</pages><issn>1198-0052</issn><issn>1718-7729</issn><eissn>1718-7729</eissn><abstract>Fewer than half of all patients with metastatic melanoma survive more than 1 year. Standard treatments have had little success, but recent therapeutic advances offer the potential for an improved prognosis. In the present study, we used population-based administrative data to establish real-world baseline estimates of survival outcomes and costs against which new treatments can be compared.
Data from administrative databases and patient registries were used to find a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma in Ontario. To identify individuals most likely to receive new treatments, we focused on patients eligible for second-line treatment. The identified cohort had two characteristics: no surgical resection beyond primary skin excision, and receipt of first-line systemic therapy.
Patient characteristics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and mean costs are reported. Of the 33,585 patients diagnosed with melanoma in Ontario from 1 January 1991 to 31 December 2010, 278 met the study inclusion criteria. Average age was 63 years, and 62% of the patients were men. Overall survival was estimated to be 19%, 12%, and 6% at 12, 24, and 60 months respectively. Mean survival time was 11.5 months, and mean cost was $30,685.
Our baseline estimates indicate that survival outcomes are poor and costs are high for patients receiving standard treatment. Understanding the relative improvement accruing from any new treatment requires a comparison with the existing standard of care.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Multimed Inc</pub><pmid>26628865</pmid><doi>10.3747/co.22.2557</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1198-0052 |
ispartof | Current oncology (Toronto), 2015-10, Vol.22 (5), p.326-332 |
issn | 1198-0052 1718-7729 1718-7729 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4608398 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Original |
title | Population-based estimates of survival and cost for metastatic melanoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T05%3A57%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population-based%20estimates%20of%20survival%20and%20cost%20for%20metastatic%20melanoma&rft.jtitle=Current%20oncology%20(Toronto)&rft.au=McCarron,%20C%20E&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=326-332&rft.issn=1198-0052&rft.eissn=1718-7729&rft_id=info:doi/10.3747/co.22.2557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1749599630%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1749599630&rft_id=info:pmid/26628865&rfr_iscdi=true |