Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States
Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont. Medical students w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) N.Z.), 2015-01, Vol.9, p.1883-1887 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1887 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1883 |
container_title | Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Tsui, Edmund Siedlecki, Andrew N Deng, Jie Pollard, Margaret C Cha, Sandolsam Pepin, Susan M Salcone, Erin M |
description | Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont.
Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed.
Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0-50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients' last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1-54 years).
This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2147/OPTH.S90321 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4605244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A445736725</galeid><sourcerecordid>A445736725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-1744f3b5a514143a4081ee9e92ef53af0570bb79b8c11abeca99cf966a5db1913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt1rFDEUxQdRbK0--S4BQQSZNd-ZvAilqC0UWmj7HDLZm92UmWRNZgr-92bZunbFB8lDQvK7h5tzT9O8JXhBCVefr65vzxc3GjNKnjXHhCjVCt6x5_uzVEfNq1LuMZYUd-plc0SlwJwpetxcX4ybAUaIk51Ciih5ZNFDKPXcFpcBYogrtMlple2IQkR5znZAMeVpDbZMkCO6i2GCJbqpElBeNy-8HQq8edxPmrtvX2_PztvLq-8XZ6eXrROYTS1RnHvWCysIJ5xZjjsCoEFT8IJZj4XCfa903zlCbA_Oau28ltKKZU80YSfNl53uZu5HWLr6g9qY2eQw2vzTJBvM4UsMa7NKD4ZLLCjnVeDjo0BOP2YokxlDcTAMNkKai6neYaqqUeQ_UKq0xlriir7_C71Pc47VCUMpFVTyrtN_qJUdwIToU23RbUXNKedCMamoqNTiH1RdSxiDSxF8qPcHBR-eFNT5DNO6pGHeTrYcgp92oMuplAx-7xvBZhsqsw2V2YWq0u-eWr1nf6eI_QLb48Ws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2225264889</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOVE Medical Press Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tsui, Edmund ; Siedlecki, Andrew N ; Deng, Jie ; Pollard, Margaret C ; Cha, Sandolsam ; Pepin, Susan M ; Salcone, Erin M</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Edmund ; Siedlecki, Andrew N ; Deng, Jie ; Pollard, Margaret C ; Cha, Sandolsam ; Pepin, Susan M ; Salcone, Erin M</creatorcontrib><description>Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont.
Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed.
Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0-50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients' last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1-54 years).
This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1177-5467</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1177-5483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1177-5483</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S90321</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26504372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Barriers ; Cataracts ; Census of Population ; Communities ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Economic indicators ; Glaucoma ; Hampshire ; Health aspects ; Management ; Medical ; Medical care ; Medical screening ; Medical students ; Ophthalmology ; Original Research ; Patients ; Populations ; Rural ; Rural areas ; Rural population ; Screening ; Students ; Uninsured people ; United States ; Vision tests ; Visual impairment</subject><ispartof>Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2015-01, Vol.9, p.1883-1887</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2015. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Tsui et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-1744f3b5a514143a4081ee9e92ef53af0570bb79b8c11abeca99cf966a5db1913</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605244/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605244/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,3862,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siedlecki, Andrew N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Margaret C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Sandolsam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepin, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salcone, Erin M</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States</title><title>Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)</title><addtitle>Clin Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont.
Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed.
Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0-50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients' last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1-54 years).
This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Census of Population</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Hampshire</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Rural</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural population</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Uninsured people</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vision tests</subject><subject>Visual impairment</subject><issn>1177-5467</issn><issn>1177-5483</issn><issn>1177-5483</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt1rFDEUxQdRbK0--S4BQQSZNd-ZvAilqC0UWmj7HDLZm92UmWRNZgr-92bZunbFB8lDQvK7h5tzT9O8JXhBCVefr65vzxc3GjNKnjXHhCjVCt6x5_uzVEfNq1LuMZYUd-plc0SlwJwpetxcX4ybAUaIk51Ciih5ZNFDKPXcFpcBYogrtMlple2IQkR5znZAMeVpDbZMkCO6i2GCJbqpElBeNy-8HQq8edxPmrtvX2_PztvLq-8XZ6eXrROYTS1RnHvWCysIJ5xZjjsCoEFT8IJZj4XCfa903zlCbA_Oau28ltKKZU80YSfNl53uZu5HWLr6g9qY2eQw2vzTJBvM4UsMa7NKD4ZLLCjnVeDjo0BOP2YokxlDcTAMNkKai6neYaqqUeQ_UKq0xlriir7_C71Pc47VCUMpFVTyrtN_qJUdwIToU23RbUXNKedCMamoqNTiH1RdSxiDSxF8qPcHBR-eFNT5DNO6pGHeTrYcgp92oMuplAx-7xvBZhsqsw2V2YWq0u-eWr1nf6eI_QLb48Ws</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Tsui, Edmund</creator><creator>Siedlecki, Andrew N</creator><creator>Deng, Jie</creator><creator>Pollard, Margaret C</creator><creator>Cha, Sandolsam</creator><creator>Pepin, Susan M</creator><creator>Salcone, Erin M</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States</title><author>Tsui, Edmund ; Siedlecki, Andrew N ; Deng, Jie ; Pollard, Margaret C ; Cha, Sandolsam ; Pepin, Susan M ; Salcone, Erin M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-1744f3b5a514143a4081ee9e92ef53af0570bb79b8c11abeca99cf966a5db1913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Census of Population</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Hampshire</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Rural</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural population</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Uninsured people</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vision tests</topic><topic>Visual impairment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siedlecki, Andrew N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Margaret C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Sandolsam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepin, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salcone, Erin M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsui, Edmund</au><au>Siedlecki, Andrew N</au><au>Deng, Jie</au><au>Pollard, Margaret C</au><au>Cha, Sandolsam</au><au>Pepin, Susan M</au><au>Salcone, Erin M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States</atitle><jtitle>Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>1883</spage><epage>1887</epage><pages>1883-1887</pages><issn>1177-5467</issn><issn>1177-5483</issn><eissn>1177-5483</eissn><abstract>Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont.
Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed.
Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0-50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients' last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1-54 years).
This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>26504372</pmid><doi>10.2147/OPTH.S90321</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1177-5467 |
ispartof | Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2015-01, Vol.9, p.1883-1887 |
issn | 1177-5467 1177-5483 1177-5483 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4605244 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOVE Medical Press Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Barriers Cataracts Census of Population Communities Diabetes Diabetic retinopathy Economic indicators Glaucoma Hampshire Health aspects Management Medical Medical care Medical screening Medical students Ophthalmology Original Research Patients Populations Rural Rural areas Rural population Screening Students Uninsured people United States Vision tests Visual impairment |
title | Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A23%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20vision-screening%20program%20in%20rural%20northeastern%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20ophthalmology%20(Auckland,%20N.Z.)&rft.au=Tsui,%20Edmund&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=1883&rft.epage=1887&rft.pages=1883-1887&rft.issn=1177-5467&rft.eissn=1177-5483&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/OPTH.S90321&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA445736725%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2225264889&rft_id=info:pmid/26504372&rft_galeid=A445736725&rfr_iscdi=true |