Proximal arm kinematics affect grip force-load force coordination

During object manipulation, grip force is coordinated with load force, which is primarily determined by object kinematics. Proximal arm kinematics may affect grip force control, as proximal segment motion could affect control of distal hand muscles via biomechanical and/or neural pathways. The aim o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 2015-10, Vol.114 (4), p.2265-2277
Hauptverfasser: Vermillion, Billy C, Lum, Peter S, Lee, Sang Wook
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2277
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2265
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 114
creator Vermillion, Billy C
Lum, Peter S
Lee, Sang Wook
description During object manipulation, grip force is coordinated with load force, which is primarily determined by object kinematics. Proximal arm kinematics may affect grip force control, as proximal segment motion could affect control of distal hand muscles via biomechanical and/or neural pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of proximal kinematics on grip force modulation during object manipulation. Fifteen subjects performed three vertical lifting tasks that involved distinct proximal kinematics (elbow/shoulder), but resulted in similar end-point (hand) trajectories. While temporal coordination of grip and load forces remained similar across the tasks, proximal kinematics significantly affected the grip force-to-load force ratio (P = 0.042), intrinsic finger muscle activation (P = 0.045), and flexor-extensor ratio (P < 0.001). Biomechanical coupling between extrinsic hand muscles and the elbow joint cannot fully explain the observed changes, as task-related changes in intrinsic hand muscle activation were greater than in extrinsic hand muscles. Rather, between-task variation in grip force (highest during task 3) appears to contrast to that in shoulder joint velocity/acceleration (lowest during task 3). These results suggest that complex neural coupling between the distal and proximal upper extremity musculature may affect grip force control during movements, also indicated by task-related changes in intermuscular coherence of muscle pairs, including intrinsic finger muscles. Furthermore, examination of the fingertip force showed that the human motor system may attempt to reduce variability in task-relevant motor output (grip force-to-load force ratio), while allowing larger fluctuations in output less relevant to task goal (shear force-to-grip force ratio).
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.00227.2015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4604219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1722425326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-89db9a8ad44e014e60b4ca5872868ac87f4125f4d65c791e0e516ccf6cdd31193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkDlPAzEQhS0EIiFQ0qItaTbYXl_bIEWIS4oEBdSW4yM47NrB3iD492wOIqhmNPPpzZsHwDmCY4QovlqEMYQY8zGGiB6AYT_DJaK1OATD9aKsIOcDcJLzAkLIKcTHYIAZFjVhcAgmzyl--VY1hUpt8e6DbVXndS6Uc1Z3xTz5ZeFi0rZsojLbttAxJuNDT8ZwCo6carI929UReL27fbl5KKdP9483k2mpK8G7UtRmViuhDCEWImIZnBGtqOBYMKG04I4gTB0xjGpeIwstRUxrx7QxFUJ1NQLXW93latZao23okmrkMvXu07eMysv_m-Df5Dx-yv5PgjcClzuBFD9WNney9VnbplHBxlWWiGNMMK0w69Fyi-oUc07W7c8gKNexy0WQm9jlOvaev_jrbU__5lz9AEeNfqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722425326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proximal arm kinematics affect grip force-load force coordination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vermillion, Billy C ; Lum, Peter S ; Lee, Sang Wook</creator><creatorcontrib>Vermillion, Billy C ; Lum, Peter S ; Lee, Sang Wook</creatorcontrib><description>During object manipulation, grip force is coordinated with load force, which is primarily determined by object kinematics. Proximal arm kinematics may affect grip force control, as proximal segment motion could affect control of distal hand muscles via biomechanical and/or neural pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of proximal kinematics on grip force modulation during object manipulation. Fifteen subjects performed three vertical lifting tasks that involved distinct proximal kinematics (elbow/shoulder), but resulted in similar end-point (hand) trajectories. While temporal coordination of grip and load forces remained similar across the tasks, proximal kinematics significantly affected the grip force-to-load force ratio (P = 0.042), intrinsic finger muscle activation (P = 0.045), and flexor-extensor ratio (P &lt; 0.001). Biomechanical coupling between extrinsic hand muscles and the elbow joint cannot fully explain the observed changes, as task-related changes in intrinsic hand muscle activation were greater than in extrinsic hand muscles. Rather, between-task variation in grip force (highest during task 3) appears to contrast to that in shoulder joint velocity/acceleration (lowest during task 3). These results suggest that complex neural coupling between the distal and proximal upper extremity musculature may affect grip force control during movements, also indicated by task-related changes in intermuscular coherence of muscle pairs, including intrinsic finger muscles. Furthermore, examination of the fingertip force showed that the human motor system may attempt to reduce variability in task-relevant motor output (grip force-to-load force ratio), while allowing larger fluctuations in output less relevant to task goal (shear force-to-grip force ratio).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00227.2015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26289460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physiological Society</publisher><subject>Arm - physiology ; Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology ; Control of Movement ; Electromyography ; Female ; Hand - physiology ; Hand Strength - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2015-10, Vol.114 (4), p.2265-2277</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-89db9a8ad44e014e60b4ca5872868ac87f4125f4d65c791e0e516ccf6cdd31193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-89db9a8ad44e014e60b4ca5872868ac87f4125f4d65c791e0e516ccf6cdd31193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26289460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vermillion, Billy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lum, Peter S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Wook</creatorcontrib><title>Proximal arm kinematics affect grip force-load force coordination</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>During object manipulation, grip force is coordinated with load force, which is primarily determined by object kinematics. Proximal arm kinematics may affect grip force control, as proximal segment motion could affect control of distal hand muscles via biomechanical and/or neural pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of proximal kinematics on grip force modulation during object manipulation. Fifteen subjects performed three vertical lifting tasks that involved distinct proximal kinematics (elbow/shoulder), but resulted in similar end-point (hand) trajectories. While temporal coordination of grip and load forces remained similar across the tasks, proximal kinematics significantly affected the grip force-to-load force ratio (P = 0.042), intrinsic finger muscle activation (P = 0.045), and flexor-extensor ratio (P &lt; 0.001). Biomechanical coupling between extrinsic hand muscles and the elbow joint cannot fully explain the observed changes, as task-related changes in intrinsic hand muscle activation were greater than in extrinsic hand muscles. Rather, between-task variation in grip force (highest during task 3) appears to contrast to that in shoulder joint velocity/acceleration (lowest during task 3). These results suggest that complex neural coupling between the distal and proximal upper extremity musculature may affect grip force control during movements, also indicated by task-related changes in intermuscular coherence of muscle pairs, including intrinsic finger muscles. Furthermore, examination of the fingertip force showed that the human motor system may attempt to reduce variability in task-relevant motor output (grip force-to-load force ratio), while allowing larger fluctuations in output less relevant to task goal (shear force-to-grip force ratio).</description><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology</subject><subject>Control of Movement</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hand - physiology</subject><subject>Hand Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkDlPAzEQhS0EIiFQ0qItaTbYXl_bIEWIS4oEBdSW4yM47NrB3iD492wOIqhmNPPpzZsHwDmCY4QovlqEMYQY8zGGiB6AYT_DJaK1OATD9aKsIOcDcJLzAkLIKcTHYIAZFjVhcAgmzyl--VY1hUpt8e6DbVXndS6Uc1Z3xTz5ZeFi0rZsojLbttAxJuNDT8ZwCo6carI929UReL27fbl5KKdP9483k2mpK8G7UtRmViuhDCEWImIZnBGtqOBYMKG04I4gTB0xjGpeIwstRUxrx7QxFUJ1NQLXW93latZao23okmrkMvXu07eMysv_m-Df5Dx-yv5PgjcClzuBFD9WNney9VnbplHBxlWWiGNMMK0w69Fyi-oUc07W7c8gKNexy0WQm9jlOvaev_jrbU__5lz9AEeNfqQ</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Vermillion, Billy C</creator><creator>Lum, Peter S</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Wook</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Proximal arm kinematics affect grip force-load force coordination</title><author>Vermillion, Billy C ; Lum, Peter S ; Lee, Sang Wook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-89db9a8ad44e014e60b4ca5872868ac87f4125f4d65c791e0e516ccf6cdd31193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology</topic><topic>Control of Movement</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hand - physiology</topic><topic>Hand Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vermillion, Billy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lum, Peter S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Wook</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vermillion, Billy C</au><au>Lum, Peter S</au><au>Lee, Sang Wook</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proximal arm kinematics affect grip force-load force coordination</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2265</spage><epage>2277</epage><pages>2265-2277</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>During object manipulation, grip force is coordinated with load force, which is primarily determined by object kinematics. Proximal arm kinematics may affect grip force control, as proximal segment motion could affect control of distal hand muscles via biomechanical and/or neural pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of proximal kinematics on grip force modulation during object manipulation. Fifteen subjects performed three vertical lifting tasks that involved distinct proximal kinematics (elbow/shoulder), but resulted in similar end-point (hand) trajectories. While temporal coordination of grip and load forces remained similar across the tasks, proximal kinematics significantly affected the grip force-to-load force ratio (P = 0.042), intrinsic finger muscle activation (P = 0.045), and flexor-extensor ratio (P &lt; 0.001). Biomechanical coupling between extrinsic hand muscles and the elbow joint cannot fully explain the observed changes, as task-related changes in intrinsic hand muscle activation were greater than in extrinsic hand muscles. Rather, between-task variation in grip force (highest during task 3) appears to contrast to that in shoulder joint velocity/acceleration (lowest during task 3). These results suggest that complex neural coupling between the distal and proximal upper extremity musculature may affect grip force control during movements, also indicated by task-related changes in intermuscular coherence of muscle pairs, including intrinsic finger muscles. Furthermore, examination of the fingertip force showed that the human motor system may attempt to reduce variability in task-relevant motor output (grip force-to-load force ratio), while allowing larger fluctuations in output less relevant to task goal (shear force-to-grip force ratio).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>26289460</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.00227.2015</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2015-10, Vol.114 (4), p.2265-2277
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4604219
source MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arm - physiology
Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology
Control of Movement
Electromyography
Female
Hand - physiology
Hand Strength - physiology
Humans
Male
Motor Activity - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Young Adult
title Proximal arm kinematics affect grip force-load force coordination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A34%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proximal%20arm%20kinematics%20affect%20grip%20force-load%20force%20coordination&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Vermillion,%20Billy%20C&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2265&rft.epage=2277&rft.pages=2265-2277&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00227.2015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1722425326%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722425326&rft_id=info:pmid/26289460&rfr_iscdi=true