Geographic and Facility Variation in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multilevel Analysis of Functional Status

Abstract Objective To examine geographic and facility variation in cognitive and motor functional outcomes after postacute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Design Retrospective cohort design using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) claims files. Records from 1209 rehab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1248-1254
Hauptverfasser: Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR, Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD, Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR, Eschbach, Karl, PhD, Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH, Freeman, Jean L., PhD, Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1254
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1248
container_title Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
container_volume 96
creator Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR
Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD
Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR
Eschbach, Karl, PhD
Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH
Freeman, Jean L., PhD
Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR
description Abstract Objective To examine geographic and facility variation in cognitive and motor functional outcomes after postacute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Design Retrospective cohort design using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) claims files. Records from 1209 rehabilitation facilities in 298 hospital referral regions (HRRs) were examined. Patient records were analyzed using linear mixed models. Multilevel models were used to calculate the variation in outcomes attributable to facilities and geographic regions. Setting Inpatient rehabilitation units and facilities. Participants Patients (N=145,460) with stroke discharged from inpatient rehabilitation from 2006 through 2009. Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Cognitive and motor functional status at discharge measured by items in the CMS Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility–Patient Assessment Instrument. Results Variation profiles indicated that 19.1% of rehabilitation facilities were significantly below the mean functional status rating (mean ± SD, 81.58±22.30), with 221 facilities (18.3%) above the mean. Total discharge functional status ratings varied by 3.57 points across regions. Across facilities, functional status values varied by 29.2 points, with a 9.1-point difference between the top and bottom deciles. Variation in discharge motor function attributable to HRR was reduced by 82% after controlling for cluster effects at the facility level. Conclusions Our findings suggest that variation in motor and cognitive function at discharge after postacute rehabilitation in patients with stroke is accounted for more by facility than geographic location.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4599713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003999315002105</els_id><sourcerecordid>1691597822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-765edf46c41fa8e20b26e935fd2c8098a54e9c951e07823a2eda11cc28409e9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9klFrFDEQx4Mo9qx-AR8kj77smWQ3uxuRQileLVQEq-JbmMvO9nLNJWuye3Df3qxXi_ogDCQhv__MJP8h5CVnS854_Wa7hGEXl4JxuWQiB3tEFlyWomgF__6YLBhjZaGUKk_Is5S2-VjLkj8lJ0I2VSMlXxB_ieE2wrCxhoLv6AqMdXY80G8QLYw2eGo9vfJD3qMf6c0Ywx3Sz7iB9Qz-Qt7Sj5MbrcM9OnruwR2STTT0dDV5MwPgshDGKT0nT3pwCV_cr6fk6-r9l4sPxfWny6uL8-vCyJaNRVNL7PqqNhXvoUXB1qJGVcq-E6ZlqgVZoTJKcmRNK0oQ2AHnxoi2YgoVlqfk7Jh3mNY77ExuPYLTQ7Q7iAcdwOq_b7zd6Nuw15VUquFlTvD6PkEMPyZMo97ZZNA58BimpHmtuFS5uMioOKImhpQi9g9lONOzUXqrZ6P0bJRmIgfLold_Nvgg-e1MBt4dAczftLcYdTLZAYOdjWhG3QX7__xn_8iNs94acHd4wLQNU8yu5HfolAX6Zh6VeVK4ZExwJsufIvq8Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691597822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geographic and Facility Variation in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multilevel Analysis of Functional Status</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR ; Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD ; Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR ; Eschbach, Karl, PhD ; Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH ; Freeman, Jean L., PhD ; Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR</creator><creatorcontrib>Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR ; Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD ; Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR ; Eschbach, Karl, PhD ; Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH ; Freeman, Jean L., PhD ; Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To examine geographic and facility variation in cognitive and motor functional outcomes after postacute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Design Retrospective cohort design using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) claims files. Records from 1209 rehabilitation facilities in 298 hospital referral regions (HRRs) were examined. Patient records were analyzed using linear mixed models. Multilevel models were used to calculate the variation in outcomes attributable to facilities and geographic regions. Setting Inpatient rehabilitation units and facilities. Participants Patients (N=145,460) with stroke discharged from inpatient rehabilitation from 2006 through 2009. Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Cognitive and motor functional status at discharge measured by items in the CMS Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility–Patient Assessment Instrument. Results Variation profiles indicated that 19.1% of rehabilitation facilities were significantly below the mean functional status rating (mean ± SD, 81.58±22.30), with 221 facilities (18.3%) above the mean. Total discharge functional status ratings varied by 3.57 points across regions. Across facilities, functional status values varied by 29.2 points, with a 9.1-point difference between the top and bottom deciles. Variation in discharge motor function attributable to HRR was reduced by 82% after controlling for cluster effects at the facility level. Conclusions Our findings suggest that variation in motor and cognitive function at discharge after postacute rehabilitation in patients with stroke is accounted for more by facility than geographic location.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25747551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cognition ; Female ; Health policy ; Health services ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Insurance Claim Review - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Multilevel Analysis ; Outcome assessment (health care) ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Quality indicators, health care ; Recovery of Function ; Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation Centers - organization &amp; administration ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; United States</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1248-1254</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-765edf46c41fa8e20b26e935fd2c8098a54e9c951e07823a2eda11cc28409e9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-765edf46c41fa8e20b26e935fd2c8098a54e9c951e07823a2eda11cc28409e9e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2818-840X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999315002105$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25747551$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eschbach, Karl, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jean L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR</creatorcontrib><title>Geographic and Facility Variation in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multilevel Analysis of Functional Status</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To examine geographic and facility variation in cognitive and motor functional outcomes after postacute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Design Retrospective cohort design using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) claims files. Records from 1209 rehabilitation facilities in 298 hospital referral regions (HRRs) were examined. Patient records were analyzed using linear mixed models. Multilevel models were used to calculate the variation in outcomes attributable to facilities and geographic regions. Setting Inpatient rehabilitation units and facilities. Participants Patients (N=145,460) with stroke discharged from inpatient rehabilitation from 2006 through 2009. Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Cognitive and motor functional status at discharge measured by items in the CMS Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility–Patient Assessment Instrument. Results Variation profiles indicated that 19.1% of rehabilitation facilities were significantly below the mean functional status rating (mean ± SD, 81.58±22.30), with 221 facilities (18.3%) above the mean. Total discharge functional status ratings varied by 3.57 points across regions. Across facilities, functional status values varied by 29.2 points, with a 9.1-point difference between the top and bottom deciles. Variation in discharge motor function attributable to HRR was reduced by 82% after controlling for cluster effects at the facility level. Conclusions Our findings suggest that variation in motor and cognitive function at discharge after postacute rehabilitation in patients with stroke is accounted for more by facility than geographic location.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Insurance Claim Review - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Multilevel Analysis</subject><subject>Outcome assessment (health care)</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Quality indicators, health care</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Centers - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9klFrFDEQx4Mo9qx-AR8kj77smWQ3uxuRQileLVQEq-JbmMvO9nLNJWuye3Df3qxXi_ogDCQhv__MJP8h5CVnS854_Wa7hGEXl4JxuWQiB3tEFlyWomgF__6YLBhjZaGUKk_Is5S2-VjLkj8lJ0I2VSMlXxB_ieE2wrCxhoLv6AqMdXY80G8QLYw2eGo9vfJD3qMf6c0Ywx3Sz7iB9Qz-Qt7Sj5MbrcM9OnruwR2STTT0dDV5MwPgshDGKT0nT3pwCV_cr6fk6-r9l4sPxfWny6uL8-vCyJaNRVNL7PqqNhXvoUXB1qJGVcq-E6ZlqgVZoTJKcmRNK0oQ2AHnxoi2YgoVlqfk7Jh3mNY77ExuPYLTQ7Q7iAcdwOq_b7zd6Nuw15VUquFlTvD6PkEMPyZMo97ZZNA58BimpHmtuFS5uMioOKImhpQi9g9lONOzUXqrZ6P0bJRmIgfLold_Nvgg-e1MBt4dAczftLcYdTLZAYOdjWhG3QX7__xn_8iNs94acHd4wLQNU8yu5HfolAX6Zh6VeVK4ZExwJsufIvq8Qw</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR</creator><creator>Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD</creator><creator>Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR</creator><creator>Eschbach, Karl, PhD</creator><creator>Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH</creator><creator>Freeman, Jean L., PhD</creator><creator>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-840X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Geographic and Facility Variation in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multilevel Analysis of Functional Status</title><author>Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR ; Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD ; Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR ; Eschbach, Karl, PhD ; Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH ; Freeman, Jean L., PhD ; Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-765edf46c41fa8e20b26e935fd2c8098a54e9c951e07823a2eda11cc28409e9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Insurance Claim Review - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Multilevel Analysis</topic><topic>Outcome assessment (health care)</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Quality indicators, health care</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Centers - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eschbach, Karl, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jean L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reistetter, Timothy A., PhD, OTR</au><au>Kuo, Yong-Fang, PhD</au><au>Karmarkar, Amol M., PhD, MPH, OTR</au><au>Eschbach, Karl, PhD</au><au>Teppala, Srinivas, MBBS, MPH</au><au>Freeman, Jean L., PhD</au><au>Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., PhD, OTR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geographic and Facility Variation in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multilevel Analysis of Functional Status</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1248</spage><epage>1254</epage><pages>1248-1254</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To examine geographic and facility variation in cognitive and motor functional outcomes after postacute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Design Retrospective cohort design using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) claims files. Records from 1209 rehabilitation facilities in 298 hospital referral regions (HRRs) were examined. Patient records were analyzed using linear mixed models. Multilevel models were used to calculate the variation in outcomes attributable to facilities and geographic regions. Setting Inpatient rehabilitation units and facilities. Participants Patients (N=145,460) with stroke discharged from inpatient rehabilitation from 2006 through 2009. Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Cognitive and motor functional status at discharge measured by items in the CMS Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility–Patient Assessment Instrument. Results Variation profiles indicated that 19.1% of rehabilitation facilities were significantly below the mean functional status rating (mean ± SD, 81.58±22.30), with 221 facilities (18.3%) above the mean. Total discharge functional status ratings varied by 3.57 points across regions. Across facilities, functional status values varied by 29.2 points, with a 9.1-point difference between the top and bottom deciles. Variation in discharge motor function attributable to HRR was reduced by 82% after controlling for cluster effects at the facility level. Conclusions Our findings suggest that variation in motor and cognitive function at discharge after postacute rehabilitation in patients with stroke is accounted for more by facility than geographic location.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25747551</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.020</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-840X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9993
ispartof Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015-07, Vol.96 (7), p.1248-1254
issn 0003-9993
1532-821X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4599713
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cognition
Female
Health policy
Health services
Humans
Inpatients
Insurance Claim Review - statistics & numerical data
Length of Stay
Male
Medicare - statistics & numerical data
Multilevel Analysis
Outcome assessment (health care)
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Quality indicators, health care
Recovery of Function
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Centers - organization & administration
Retrospective Studies
Stroke Rehabilitation
United States
title Geographic and Facility Variation in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multilevel Analysis of Functional Status
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A54%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geographic%20and%20Facility%20Variation%20in%20Inpatient%20Stroke%20Rehabilitation:%20Multilevel%20Analysis%20of%20Functional%20Status&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Reistetter,%20Timothy%20A.,%20PhD,%20OTR&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1248&rft.epage=1254&rft.pages=1248-1254&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1691597822%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691597822&rft_id=info:pmid/25747551&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003999315002105&rfr_iscdi=true