Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)
Surveying persons with disabilities is challenging, as targeted subjects may experience specific barriers to survey participation. Here we report on participation rates and response behaviour in a community survey of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The cross-sectional survey was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC medical research methodology 2015-10, Vol.15 (1), p.80-80, Article 80 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 80 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | BMC medical research methodology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Fekete, Christine Segerer, Wolfgang Gemperli, Armin Brinkhof, Martin W G |
description | Surveying persons with disabilities is challenging, as targeted subjects may experience specific barriers to survey participation. Here we report on participation rates and response behaviour in a community survey of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The cross-sectional survey was implemented as part of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) and represents the largest population-based SCI survey in Europe including nearly 2000 persons. Design features to enhance participation rates included the division of the questionnaire volume over three successive modules; recurrent and mixed-mode reminding of non-responders; and mixed-mode options for response.
We describe participation rates of the SwiSCI community survey (absolute and cumulative cooperation, contact, response, and attrition rates) and report on response rates in relation to recruitment efforts. Potential non-response bias and the association between responders' characteristics and response behaviour (response speed: reminding until participation; response mode: paper-pencil vs. online completion) were assessed using regression modelling.
Over the successive modules, absolute response rates were 61.1, 80.6 and 87.3% which resulted in cumulative response rates of 49.3 and 42.6% for the second and third modules. Written reminders effectively increased response rates, with the first reminder showing the largest impact. Telephone reminders, partly with direct telephone interviewing, enhanced response rate to the first module, but were essentially redundant in subsequent modules. Non-response to the main module was related to current age, membership of Swiss Paraplegic Association (SPA) and time since injury, but not to gender, lesion level and preferred language of response. Response speed increased with household income, but was not associated to other sociodemographic factors, lesion characteristics or health indicators. We found significant associations between online completion and male gender, younger age, higher education, higher income, SPA membership, tetraplegia, longer time since injury, higher quality of life, and more participation restrictions.
In this sample with little non-response bias, recurrent and mixed-mode reminding and mixed-mode options for response were key features of optimizing survey design. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12874-015-0076-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4599658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541379260</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541379260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-885fd7f0a62a9ff0636fef47684de6605e4e4d48867a19662870545a459fe363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUt1qFDEYHUSx7eoDeCMBb1pwajKT35tCWfxZKChs70M686WbZSYZk5mVfQMf24xb61YkkHycnHNCDqco3hB8SYjkHxKppKAlJqzEWPASPytOCRWkrCopnx_NJ8VZSluMiZA1f1mcVJwyLHB1Wvz8ZuLoGjeY0QWPohkhvUcR0hB8AnTnTELGt0cIbMzOhSkm5DwaN4Ca0PeTd-MepSnuYI-C_Y2vf7iU0Hpw3nRoGWKLVn47xX2eNyGOaD1O7R6dZ9p6ubp4Vbywpkvw-uFcFLefPt4uv5Q3Xz-vltc3ZUMVHUspmW2FxYZXRlmLec0tWCq4pC1wjhlQoC2VkgtDFOc5IMwoM5QpCzWvF8XVwXaY7npoG_BjNJ0eoutN3OtgnH56491G34edzgaKM5kNzh8MYvg-QRp171IDXWc8hClpIipSM6Lyvije_UPd5txyGjNLKC6VquVf1r3pQDtvQ363mU31NaOkFqriOLMu_8PKq4XeNcGDdRl_IiAHQRNDShHs4x8J1nN79KE9OrdHz-3Rs-btcTiPij91qX8Bp02__A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779689938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Fekete, Christine ; Segerer, Wolfgang ; Gemperli, Armin ; Brinkhof, Martin W G</creator><creatorcontrib>Fekete, Christine ; Segerer, Wolfgang ; Gemperli, Armin ; Brinkhof, Martin W G ; SwiSCI Study Group ; for the SwiSCI Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Surveying persons with disabilities is challenging, as targeted subjects may experience specific barriers to survey participation. Here we report on participation rates and response behaviour in a community survey of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The cross-sectional survey was implemented as part of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) and represents the largest population-based SCI survey in Europe including nearly 2000 persons. Design features to enhance participation rates included the division of the questionnaire volume over three successive modules; recurrent and mixed-mode reminding of non-responders; and mixed-mode options for response.
We describe participation rates of the SwiSCI community survey (absolute and cumulative cooperation, contact, response, and attrition rates) and report on response rates in relation to recruitment efforts. Potential non-response bias and the association between responders' characteristics and response behaviour (response speed: reminding until participation; response mode: paper-pencil vs. online completion) were assessed using regression modelling.
Over the successive modules, absolute response rates were 61.1, 80.6 and 87.3% which resulted in cumulative response rates of 49.3 and 42.6% for the second and third modules. Written reminders effectively increased response rates, with the first reminder showing the largest impact. Telephone reminders, partly with direct telephone interviewing, enhanced response rate to the first module, but were essentially redundant in subsequent modules. Non-response to the main module was related to current age, membership of Swiss Paraplegic Association (SPA) and time since injury, but not to gender, lesion level and preferred language of response. Response speed increased with household income, but was not associated to other sociodemographic factors, lesion characteristics or health indicators. We found significant associations between online completion and male gender, younger age, higher education, higher income, SPA membership, tetraplegia, longer time since injury, higher quality of life, and more participation restrictions.
In this sample with little non-response bias, recurrent and mixed-mode reminding and mixed-mode options for response were key features of optimizing survey design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0076-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26450702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disabled persons ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Selection ; Research Design ; Spinal Cord Injuries ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Switzerland</subject><ispartof>BMC medical research methodology, 2015-10, Vol.15 (1), p.80-80, Article 80</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2015</rights><rights>Fekete et al. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-885fd7f0a62a9ff0636fef47684de6605e4e4d48867a19662870545a459fe363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-885fd7f0a62a9ff0636fef47684de6605e4e4d48867a19662870545a459fe363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599658/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599658/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26450702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fekete, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segerer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemperli, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkhof, Martin W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SwiSCI Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the SwiSCI Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)</title><title>BMC medical research methodology</title><addtitle>BMC Med Res Methodol</addtitle><description>Surveying persons with disabilities is challenging, as targeted subjects may experience specific barriers to survey participation. Here we report on participation rates and response behaviour in a community survey of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The cross-sectional survey was implemented as part of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) and represents the largest population-based SCI survey in Europe including nearly 2000 persons. Design features to enhance participation rates included the division of the questionnaire volume over three successive modules; recurrent and mixed-mode reminding of non-responders; and mixed-mode options for response.
We describe participation rates of the SwiSCI community survey (absolute and cumulative cooperation, contact, response, and attrition rates) and report on response rates in relation to recruitment efforts. Potential non-response bias and the association between responders' characteristics and response behaviour (response speed: reminding until participation; response mode: paper-pencil vs. online completion) were assessed using regression modelling.
Over the successive modules, absolute response rates were 61.1, 80.6 and 87.3% which resulted in cumulative response rates of 49.3 and 42.6% for the second and third modules. Written reminders effectively increased response rates, with the first reminder showing the largest impact. Telephone reminders, partly with direct telephone interviewing, enhanced response rate to the first module, but were essentially redundant in subsequent modules. Non-response to the main module was related to current age, membership of Swiss Paraplegic Association (SPA) and time since injury, but not to gender, lesion level and preferred language of response. Response speed increased with household income, but was not associated to other sociodemographic factors, lesion characteristics or health indicators. We found significant associations between online completion and male gender, younger age, higher education, higher income, SPA membership, tetraplegia, longer time since injury, higher quality of life, and more participation restrictions.
In this sample with little non-response bias, recurrent and mixed-mode reminding and mixed-mode options for response were key features of optimizing survey design.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disabled persons</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><issn>1471-2288</issn><issn>1471-2288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptUt1qFDEYHUSx7eoDeCMBb1pwajKT35tCWfxZKChs70M686WbZSYZk5mVfQMf24xb61YkkHycnHNCDqco3hB8SYjkHxKppKAlJqzEWPASPytOCRWkrCopnx_NJ8VZSluMiZA1f1mcVJwyLHB1Wvz8ZuLoGjeY0QWPohkhvUcR0hB8AnTnTELGt0cIbMzOhSkm5DwaN4Ca0PeTd-MepSnuYI-C_Y2vf7iU0Hpw3nRoGWKLVn47xX2eNyGOaD1O7R6dZ9p6ubp4Vbywpkvw-uFcFLefPt4uv5Q3Xz-vltc3ZUMVHUspmW2FxYZXRlmLec0tWCq4pC1wjhlQoC2VkgtDFOc5IMwoM5QpCzWvF8XVwXaY7npoG_BjNJ0eoutN3OtgnH56491G34edzgaKM5kNzh8MYvg-QRp171IDXWc8hClpIipSM6Lyvije_UPd5txyGjNLKC6VquVf1r3pQDtvQ363mU31NaOkFqriOLMu_8PKq4XeNcGDdRl_IiAHQRNDShHs4x8J1nN79KE9OrdHz-3Rs-btcTiPij91qX8Bp02__A</recordid><startdate>20151008</startdate><enddate>20151008</enddate><creator>Fekete, Christine</creator><creator>Segerer, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Gemperli, Armin</creator><creator>Brinkhof, Martin W G</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151008</creationdate><title>Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)</title><author>Fekete, Christine ; Segerer, Wolfgang ; Gemperli, Armin ; Brinkhof, Martin W G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-885fd7f0a62a9ff0636fef47684de6605e4e4d48867a19662870545a459fe363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disabled persons</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fekete, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segerer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemperli, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkhof, Martin W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SwiSCI Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the SwiSCI Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC medical research methodology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fekete, Christine</au><au>Segerer, Wolfgang</au><au>Gemperli, Armin</au><au>Brinkhof, Martin W G</au><aucorp>SwiSCI Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>for the SwiSCI Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical research methodology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Med Res Methodol</addtitle><date>2015-10-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>80-80</pages><artnum>80</artnum><issn>1471-2288</issn><eissn>1471-2288</eissn><abstract>Surveying persons with disabilities is challenging, as targeted subjects may experience specific barriers to survey participation. Here we report on participation rates and response behaviour in a community survey of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The cross-sectional survey was implemented as part of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) and represents the largest population-based SCI survey in Europe including nearly 2000 persons. Design features to enhance participation rates included the division of the questionnaire volume over three successive modules; recurrent and mixed-mode reminding of non-responders; and mixed-mode options for response.
We describe participation rates of the SwiSCI community survey (absolute and cumulative cooperation, contact, response, and attrition rates) and report on response rates in relation to recruitment efforts. Potential non-response bias and the association between responders' characteristics and response behaviour (response speed: reminding until participation; response mode: paper-pencil vs. online completion) were assessed using regression modelling.
Over the successive modules, absolute response rates were 61.1, 80.6 and 87.3% which resulted in cumulative response rates of 49.3 and 42.6% for the second and third modules. Written reminders effectively increased response rates, with the first reminder showing the largest impact. Telephone reminders, partly with direct telephone interviewing, enhanced response rate to the first module, but were essentially redundant in subsequent modules. Non-response to the main module was related to current age, membership of Swiss Paraplegic Association (SPA) and time since injury, but not to gender, lesion level and preferred language of response. Response speed increased with household income, but was not associated to other sociodemographic factors, lesion characteristics or health indicators. We found significant associations between online completion and male gender, younger age, higher education, higher income, SPA membership, tetraplegia, longer time since injury, higher quality of life, and more participation restrictions.
In this sample with little non-response bias, recurrent and mixed-mode reminding and mixed-mode options for response were key features of optimizing survey design.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26450702</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12874-015-0076-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2288 |
ispartof | BMC medical research methodology, 2015-10, Vol.15 (1), p.80-80, Article 80 |
issn | 1471-2288 1471-2288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4599658 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Adult Analysis Cohort Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Disabled persons Female Humans Male Middle Aged Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data Patient Selection Research Design Spinal Cord Injuries Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Switzerland |
title | Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A33%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participation%20rates,%20response%20bias%20and%20response%20behaviours%20in%20the%20community%20survey%20of%20the%20Swiss%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury%20Cohort%20Study%20(SwiSCI)&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20research%20methodology&rft.au=Fekete,%20Christine&rft.aucorp=SwiSCI%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2015-10-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=80-80&rft.artnum=80&rft.issn=1471-2288&rft.eissn=1471-2288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12874-015-0076-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541379260%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779689938&rft_id=info:pmid/26450702&rft_galeid=A541379260&rfr_iscdi=true |