Osteochondral lesions of the talus: clinical and functional assessment of conservative vs scope treatment

Introduction: Osteochondral injuries involving the ankle joint are unusual (incidence of 0.09% according to Berndt and Harty), third in frequency after knee and elbow location. They are described as a cause of chronic pain after ankle sprains in the active population (thought to occur in 2-6% of spr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2015-01, Vol.2 (4_suppl)
Hauptverfasser: Ibáñez, Maximiliano, Calvo, Ana Belén, Alvarez, Victoria, Lépore, Salvador
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4_suppl
container_start_page
container_title Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
container_volume 2
creator Ibáñez, Maximiliano
Calvo, Ana Belén
Alvarez, Victoria
Lépore, Salvador
description Introduction: Osteochondral injuries involving the ankle joint are unusual (incidence of 0.09% according to Berndt and Harty), third in frequency after knee and elbow location. They are described as a cause of chronic pain after ankle sprains in the active population (thought to occur in 2-6% of sprains). MRI is the gold standard diagnostic method. Therapeutic strategies include both conservative and surgical treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome of patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus treated in our department between January 2007 and December 2012. Sixty per cent were male with an average age of 42 years. Eleven patients were treated conservatively, one of them had clear surgical indication (LOC G III, as classified by Ferkel and Sgaglione) but refused to perform the procedure. Nine patients underwent arthroscopic surgery (debridement and microfracture), one of the procedures was a review of an arthroscopy performed in another service. No open surgery was performed. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the AOFAS score, Freiburg and VAS Score System. Results: Non-surgical treatment group had a pretreatment average AOFAS score of 58, which improved to 74.8 points; a Freiburg Score System that ranged from 65 to 79.3 points and a VAS average of 5,4. AOFAS surgical treatment group improved from 54.3 to 84.8 points, Freiburg Score System ranged from 60.6 to 81.4 points and VAS average was of 5,8. Discussion: It is difficult to compare our results with other series of patients, because we made a comparison between conservative versus artrhoscopic treatment, while other authors show results obtained when performing certain surgical technique Although surgical treatment has better results, we agree with the literature that conservative treatment presents acceptable results and should always be considered as the first option.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2325967114S00247
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4595880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2325967114S00247</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_2325967114S00247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2467-d8a990bcc669f0a29e6d20099c2db8b7877ef28a47358d58905bbc95973f656e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouOjePeYLVNO0aRIPgiz-g4U9qOeQptPdLN1myXQLfntTVkQFc5lk5v1emEfIVc6u81zKG15woSuZ5-UrY7yUJ2Q2tbKpd_rjfk7miFuWjhK5LuSM-BUOENwm9E20He0AfeiRhpYOG6CD7Q54S13ne-_S2PYNbQ-9G5JoeiIC4g76YQJcAiGOdvAj0BEpurBPFhHsMEkuyVlrO4T5V70g748Pb4vnbLl6elncLzPHy0pmjbJas9q5qtIts1xD1XDGtHa8qVUtlZTQcmVLWQjVCKWZqGunhZZFW4kKigtyd_TdH-odNC59nTYz--h3Nn6YYL35Pen9xqzDaEqhhVIsGbCjgYsBMUL7zebMTHGbv3EnJDsiaNdgtuEQUzz4v_4T2S-C0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Osteochondral lesions of the talus: clinical and functional assessment of conservative vs scope treatment</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ibáñez, Maximiliano ; Calvo, Ana Belén ; Alvarez, Victoria ; Lépore, Salvador</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez, Maximiliano ; Calvo, Ana Belén ; Alvarez, Victoria ; Lépore, Salvador</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Osteochondral injuries involving the ankle joint are unusual (incidence of 0.09% according to Berndt and Harty), third in frequency after knee and elbow location. They are described as a cause of chronic pain after ankle sprains in the active population (thought to occur in 2-6% of sprains). MRI is the gold standard diagnostic method. Therapeutic strategies include both conservative and surgical treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome of patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus treated in our department between January 2007 and December 2012. Sixty per cent were male with an average age of 42 years. Eleven patients were treated conservatively, one of them had clear surgical indication (LOC G III, as classified by Ferkel and Sgaglione) but refused to perform the procedure. Nine patients underwent arthroscopic surgery (debridement and microfracture), one of the procedures was a review of an arthroscopy performed in another service. No open surgery was performed. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the AOFAS score, Freiburg and VAS Score System. Results: Non-surgical treatment group had a pretreatment average AOFAS score of 58, which improved to 74.8 points; a Freiburg Score System that ranged from 65 to 79.3 points and a VAS average of 5,4. AOFAS surgical treatment group improved from 54.3 to 84.8 points, Freiburg Score System ranged from 60.6 to 81.4 points and VAS average was of 5,8. Discussion: It is difficult to compare our results with other series of patients, because we made a comparison between conservative versus artrhoscopic treatment, while other authors show results obtained when performing certain surgical technique Although surgical treatment has better results, we agree with the literature that conservative treatment presents acceptable results and should always be considered as the first option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2325967114S00247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2015-01, Vol.2 (4_suppl)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2014 2014 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595880/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595880/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,21965,27852,27923,27924,44944,45332,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez, Maximiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Ana Belén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lépore, Salvador</creatorcontrib><title>Osteochondral lesions of the talus: clinical and functional assessment of conservative vs scope treatment</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><description>Introduction: Osteochondral injuries involving the ankle joint are unusual (incidence of 0.09% according to Berndt and Harty), third in frequency after knee and elbow location. They are described as a cause of chronic pain after ankle sprains in the active population (thought to occur in 2-6% of sprains). MRI is the gold standard diagnostic method. Therapeutic strategies include both conservative and surgical treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome of patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus treated in our department between January 2007 and December 2012. Sixty per cent were male with an average age of 42 years. Eleven patients were treated conservatively, one of them had clear surgical indication (LOC G III, as classified by Ferkel and Sgaglione) but refused to perform the procedure. Nine patients underwent arthroscopic surgery (debridement and microfracture), one of the procedures was a review of an arthroscopy performed in another service. No open surgery was performed. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the AOFAS score, Freiburg and VAS Score System. Results: Non-surgical treatment group had a pretreatment average AOFAS score of 58, which improved to 74.8 points; a Freiburg Score System that ranged from 65 to 79.3 points and a VAS average of 5,4. AOFAS surgical treatment group improved from 54.3 to 84.8 points, Freiburg Score System ranged from 60.6 to 81.4 points and VAS average was of 5,8. Discussion: It is difficult to compare our results with other series of patients, because we made a comparison between conservative versus artrhoscopic treatment, while other authors show results obtained when performing certain surgical technique Although surgical treatment has better results, we agree with the literature that conservative treatment presents acceptable results and should always be considered as the first option.</description><issn>2325-9671</issn><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouOjePeYLVNO0aRIPgiz-g4U9qOeQptPdLN1myXQLfntTVkQFc5lk5v1emEfIVc6u81zKG15woSuZ5-UrY7yUJ2Q2tbKpd_rjfk7miFuWjhK5LuSM-BUOENwm9E20He0AfeiRhpYOG6CD7Q54S13ne-_S2PYNbQ-9G5JoeiIC4g76YQJcAiGOdvAj0BEpurBPFhHsMEkuyVlrO4T5V70g748Pb4vnbLl6elncLzPHy0pmjbJas9q5qtIts1xD1XDGtHa8qVUtlZTQcmVLWQjVCKWZqGunhZZFW4kKigtyd_TdH-odNC59nTYz--h3Nn6YYL35Pen9xqzDaEqhhVIsGbCjgYsBMUL7zebMTHGbv3EnJDsiaNdgtuEQUzz4v_4T2S-C0Q</recordid><startdate>20150105</startdate><enddate>20150105</enddate><creator>Ibáñez, Maximiliano</creator><creator>Calvo, Ana Belén</creator><creator>Alvarez, Victoria</creator><creator>Lépore, Salvador</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150105</creationdate><title>Osteochondral lesions of the talus: clinical and functional assessment of conservative vs scope treatment</title><author>Ibáñez, Maximiliano ; Calvo, Ana Belén ; Alvarez, Victoria ; Lépore, Salvador</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2467-d8a990bcc669f0a29e6d20099c2db8b7877ef28a47358d58905bbc95973f656e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez, Maximiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Ana Belén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lépore, Salvador</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibáñez, Maximiliano</au><au>Calvo, Ana Belén</au><au>Alvarez, Victoria</au><au>Lépore, Salvador</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Osteochondral lesions of the talus: clinical and functional assessment of conservative vs scope treatment</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2015-01-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4_suppl</issue><issn>2325-9671</issn><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Osteochondral injuries involving the ankle joint are unusual (incidence of 0.09% according to Berndt and Harty), third in frequency after knee and elbow location. They are described as a cause of chronic pain after ankle sprains in the active population (thought to occur in 2-6% of sprains). MRI is the gold standard diagnostic method. Therapeutic strategies include both conservative and surgical treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome of patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus treated in our department between January 2007 and December 2012. Sixty per cent were male with an average age of 42 years. Eleven patients were treated conservatively, one of them had clear surgical indication (LOC G III, as classified by Ferkel and Sgaglione) but refused to perform the procedure. Nine patients underwent arthroscopic surgery (debridement and microfracture), one of the procedures was a review of an arthroscopy performed in another service. No open surgery was performed. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the AOFAS score, Freiburg and VAS Score System. Results: Non-surgical treatment group had a pretreatment average AOFAS score of 58, which improved to 74.8 points; a Freiburg Score System that ranged from 65 to 79.3 points and a VAS average of 5,4. AOFAS surgical treatment group improved from 54.3 to 84.8 points, Freiburg Score System ranged from 60.6 to 81.4 points and VAS average was of 5,8. Discussion: It is difficult to compare our results with other series of patients, because we made a comparison between conservative versus artrhoscopic treatment, while other authors show results obtained when performing certain surgical technique Although surgical treatment has better results, we agree with the literature that conservative treatment presents acceptable results and should always be considered as the first option.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2325967114S00247</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2325-9671
ispartof Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2015-01, Vol.2 (4_suppl)
issn 2325-9671
2325-9671
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4595880
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title Osteochondral lesions of the talus: clinical and functional assessment of conservative vs scope treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A26%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Osteochondral%20lesions%20of%20the%20talus:%20clinical%20and%20functional%20assessment%20of%20conservative%20vs%20scope%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Ib%C3%A1%C3%B1ez,%20Maximiliano&rft.date=2015-01-05&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4_suppl&rft.issn=2325-9671&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2325967114S00247&rft_dat=%3Csage_pubme%3E10.1177_2325967114S00247%3C/sage_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2325967114S00247&rfr_iscdi=true