Men and women have similarly shaped carpometacarpal joint bones
Abstract Characterizing the morphology of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint bones and how they vary across the population is important for understanding the functional anatomy and pathology of the thumb. The purpose of this paper was to develop a statistical shape model of the trapezium and first meta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2015-09, Vol.48 (12), p.3420-3426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3426 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3420 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Schneider, M.T.Y Zhang, J Crisco, J.J Weiss, A.P.C Ladd, A.L Nielsen, P Besier, T |
description | Abstract Characterizing the morphology of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint bones and how they vary across the population is important for understanding the functional anatomy and pathology of the thumb. The purpose of this paper was to develop a statistical shape model of the trapezium and first metacarpal bones to characterize the size and shape of the whole bones across a cohort of 50. We used this shape model to investigate the effects of sex and age on the size and shape of the CMC joint bones and the articulating surface area of the CMC joint. We hypothesized that women have similar shape trapezium and first metacarpal bones compared to men, following scaling for overall size. We also hypothesized that age would be a significant predictor variable for CMC joint bone changes. CT image data and segmented point clouds of 50 CMC bones from healthy adult men and women were obtained from an ongoing study and used to generate two statistical shape models. Statistical analysis of the principal component weights of both models was performed to investigate morphological sex and age differences. We observed sex differences, but were unable to detect any age differences. Between men and women the only difference in morphology of the trapezia and first metacarpal bones was size. These findings confirm our first hypothesis, and suggest that the women have similarly shaped trapezium and first metacarpal bones compared to men. Furthermore, our results reject our second hypothesis, indicating that age is a poor predictor of CMC joint morphology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4592789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929015003206</els_id><sourcerecordid>1718909600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c690t-7fe3b148e57fcc8df59d02dd20de370ffb304bd8926c27305f252973e0879e403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEokvhK1SRuHDJMrbjOL4Uqop_UhEH4Gw59oR1SOzFzi7ab4_DtgV6oZIlW5rfPOvNm6I4I7AmQJqXw3roXJjQbNYUCF9DPow8KFakFayirIWHxQqAkkpSCSfFk5QGABC1kI-LE9oQ0kBNV8Wrj-hL7W35M4v5cqP3WCY3uVHH8VCmjd6iLY2O21ye9fLQYzkE5-eyCx7T0-JRr8eEz67v0-Lr2zdfLt9XV5_efbi8uKpMI2GuRI-sI3WLXPTGtLbn0gK1loJFJqDvOwZ1Z1tJG0MFA95TTqVgCK2QWAM7Lc6PuttdN6E16OeoR7WNbtLxoIJ26t-Kdxv1LexVzSUVrcwCL64FYvixwzSrySWD46g9hl1SRIgWqOBC3APlhBJOGLsHSloJsoHFwfM76BB20eeh_aYIkcB4ppojZWJIKWJ_a5GAWpJXg7pJXi3JK8iHkdx49veAbttuos7A6yOAOaa9w6iScegNWhfRzMoG9_8_zu9ImNF5Z_T4HQ-Y_vhRiSpQn5f9W9aP8OyfQsN-ASrR1h8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718119035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Men and women have similarly shaped carpometacarpal joint bones</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Schneider, M.T.Y ; Zhang, J ; Crisco, J.J ; Weiss, A.P.C ; Ladd, A.L ; Nielsen, P ; Besier, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, M.T.Y ; Zhang, J ; Crisco, J.J ; Weiss, A.P.C ; Ladd, A.L ; Nielsen, P ; Besier, T</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Characterizing the morphology of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint bones and how they vary across the population is important for understanding the functional anatomy and pathology of the thumb. The purpose of this paper was to develop a statistical shape model of the trapezium and first metacarpal bones to characterize the size and shape of the whole bones across a cohort of 50. We used this shape model to investigate the effects of sex and age on the size and shape of the CMC joint bones and the articulating surface area of the CMC joint. We hypothesized that women have similar shape trapezium and first metacarpal bones compared to men, following scaling for overall size. We also hypothesized that age would be a significant predictor variable for CMC joint bone changes. CT image data and segmented point clouds of 50 CMC bones from healthy adult men and women were obtained from an ongoing study and used to generate two statistical shape models. Statistical analysis of the principal component weights of both models was performed to investigate morphological sex and age differences. We observed sex differences, but were unable to detect any age differences. Between men and women the only difference in morphology of the trapezia and first metacarpal bones was size. These findings confirm our first hypothesis, and suggest that the women have similarly shaped trapezium and first metacarpal bones compared to men. Furthermore, our results reject our second hypothesis, indicating that age is a poor predictor of CMC joint morphology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26116042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Arthritis ; Bones ; Carpometacarpal ; Carpometacarpal Joints - anatomy & histology ; Carpometacarpal Joints - diagnostic imaging ; CMC ; Female ; Gender differences ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Kinematics ; Male ; Mathematical models ; Men ; Mens health ; Middle Aged ; Morphology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Population (statistical) ; Principal components analysis ; Radiography ; Sex ; Sex Characteristics ; Sex differences ; SSM ; Statistical shape model ; Studies ; Three dimensional models ; Thumb - anatomy & histology ; Thumb - diagnostic imaging ; Transplants & implants ; Trapezia ; Trapezium ; Trapezium Bone - anatomy & histology ; Trapezium Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2015-09, Vol.48 (12), p.3420-3426</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c690t-7fe3b148e57fcc8df59d02dd20de370ffb304bd8926c27305f252973e0879e403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c690t-7fe3b148e57fcc8df59d02dd20de370ffb304bd8926c27305f252973e0879e403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1718119035?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000,64390,64392,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26116042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, M.T.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crisco, J.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, A.P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, A.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besier, T</creatorcontrib><title>Men and women have similarly shaped carpometacarpal joint bones</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Abstract Characterizing the morphology of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint bones and how they vary across the population is important for understanding the functional anatomy and pathology of the thumb. The purpose of this paper was to develop a statistical shape model of the trapezium and first metacarpal bones to characterize the size and shape of the whole bones across a cohort of 50. We used this shape model to investigate the effects of sex and age on the size and shape of the CMC joint bones and the articulating surface area of the CMC joint. We hypothesized that women have similar shape trapezium and first metacarpal bones compared to men, following scaling for overall size. We also hypothesized that age would be a significant predictor variable for CMC joint bone changes. CT image data and segmented point clouds of 50 CMC bones from healthy adult men and women were obtained from an ongoing study and used to generate two statistical shape models. Statistical analysis of the principal component weights of both models was performed to investigate morphological sex and age differences. We observed sex differences, but were unable to detect any age differences. Between men and women the only difference in morphology of the trapezia and first metacarpal bones was size. These findings confirm our first hypothesis, and suggest that the women have similarly shaped trapezium and first metacarpal bones compared to men. Furthermore, our results reject our second hypothesis, indicating that age is a poor predictor of CMC joint morphology.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Carpometacarpal</subject><subject>Carpometacarpal Joints - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Carpometacarpal Joints - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>CMC</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Population (statistical)</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>SSM</subject><subject>Statistical shape model</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Thumb - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Thumb - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Trapezia</subject><subject>Trapezium</subject><subject>Trapezium Bone - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Trapezium Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEokvhK1SRuHDJMrbjOL4Uqop_UhEH4Gw59oR1SOzFzi7ab4_DtgV6oZIlW5rfPOvNm6I4I7AmQJqXw3roXJjQbNYUCF9DPow8KFakFayirIWHxQqAkkpSCSfFk5QGABC1kI-LE9oQ0kBNV8Wrj-hL7W35M4v5cqP3WCY3uVHH8VCmjd6iLY2O21ye9fLQYzkE5-eyCx7T0-JRr8eEz67v0-Lr2zdfLt9XV5_efbi8uKpMI2GuRI-sI3WLXPTGtLbn0gK1loJFJqDvOwZ1Z1tJG0MFA95TTqVgCK2QWAM7Lc6PuttdN6E16OeoR7WNbtLxoIJ26t-Kdxv1LexVzSUVrcwCL64FYvixwzSrySWD46g9hl1SRIgWqOBC3APlhBJOGLsHSloJsoHFwfM76BB20eeh_aYIkcB4ppojZWJIKWJ_a5GAWpJXg7pJXi3JK8iHkdx49veAbttuos7A6yOAOaa9w6iScegNWhfRzMoG9_8_zu9ImNF5Z_T4HQ-Y_vhRiSpQn5f9W9aP8OyfQsN-ASrR1h8</recordid><startdate>20150918</startdate><enddate>20150918</enddate><creator>Schneider, M.T.Y</creator><creator>Zhang, J</creator><creator>Crisco, J.J</creator><creator>Weiss, A.P.C</creator><creator>Ladd, A.L</creator><creator>Nielsen, P</creator><creator>Besier, T</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150918</creationdate><title>Men and women have similarly shaped carpometacarpal joint bones</title><author>Schneider, M.T.Y ; Zhang, J ; Crisco, J.J ; Weiss, A.P.C ; Ladd, A.L ; Nielsen, P ; Besier, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c690t-7fe3b148e57fcc8df59d02dd20de370ffb304bd8926c27305f252973e0879e403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Carpometacarpal</topic><topic>Carpometacarpal Joints - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Carpometacarpal Joints - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>CMC</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Population (statistical)</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>SSM</topic><topic>Statistical shape model</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Thumb - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Thumb - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Trapezia</topic><topic>Trapezium</topic><topic>Trapezium Bone - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Trapezium Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, M.T.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crisco, J.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, A.P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, A.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besier, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, M.T.Y</au><au>Zhang, J</au><au>Crisco, J.J</au><au>Weiss, A.P.C</au><au>Ladd, A.L</au><au>Nielsen, P</au><au>Besier, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Men and women have similarly shaped carpometacarpal joint bones</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2015-09-18</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3420</spage><epage>3426</epage><pages>3420-3426</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Abstract Characterizing the morphology of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint bones and how they vary across the population is important for understanding the functional anatomy and pathology of the thumb. The purpose of this paper was to develop a statistical shape model of the trapezium and first metacarpal bones to characterize the size and shape of the whole bones across a cohort of 50. We used this shape model to investigate the effects of sex and age on the size and shape of the CMC joint bones and the articulating surface area of the CMC joint. We hypothesized that women have similar shape trapezium and first metacarpal bones compared to men, following scaling for overall size. We also hypothesized that age would be a significant predictor variable for CMC joint bone changes. CT image data and segmented point clouds of 50 CMC bones from healthy adult men and women were obtained from an ongoing study and used to generate two statistical shape models. Statistical analysis of the principal component weights of both models was performed to investigate morphological sex and age differences. We observed sex differences, but were unable to detect any age differences. Between men and women the only difference in morphology of the trapezia and first metacarpal bones was size. These findings confirm our first hypothesis, and suggest that the women have similarly shaped trapezium and first metacarpal bones compared to men. Furthermore, our results reject our second hypothesis, indicating that age is a poor predictor of CMC joint morphology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26116042</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.031</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2015-09, Vol.48 (12), p.3420-3426 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4592789 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adult Age Arthritis Bones Carpometacarpal Carpometacarpal Joints - anatomy & histology Carpometacarpal Joints - diagnostic imaging CMC Female Gender differences Humans Hypotheses Kinematics Male Mathematical models Men Mens health Middle Aged Morphology Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Population (statistical) Principal components analysis Radiography Sex Sex Characteristics Sex differences SSM Statistical shape model Studies Three dimensional models Thumb - anatomy & histology Thumb - diagnostic imaging Transplants & implants Trapezia Trapezium Trapezium Bone - anatomy & histology Trapezium Bone - diagnostic imaging Womens health Young Adult |
title | Men and women have similarly shaped carpometacarpal joint bones |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T16%3A40%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Men%20and%20women%20have%20similarly%20shaped%20carpometacarpal%20joint%20bones&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Schneider,%20M.T.Y&rft.date=2015-09-18&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3420&rft.epage=3426&rft.pages=3420-3426&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1718909600%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718119035&rft_id=info:pmid/26116042&rft_els_id=S0021929015003206&rfr_iscdi=true |