Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel

Stemming from breast density notification legislation in Massachusetts effective 2015, we sought to develop a collaborative evidence-based approach to density notification that could be used by practitioners across the state. Our goal was to develop an evidence-based consensus management algorithm t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2015-09, Vol.153 (2), p.455-464
Hauptverfasser: Freer, Phoebe E., Slanetz, Priscilla J., Haas, Jennifer S., Tung, Nadine M., Hughes, Kevin S., Armstrong, Katrina, Semine, A. Alan, Troyan, Susan L., Birdwell, Robyn L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464
container_issue 2
container_start_page 455
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 153
creator Freer, Phoebe E.
Slanetz, Priscilla J.
Haas, Jennifer S.
Tung, Nadine M.
Hughes, Kevin S.
Armstrong, Katrina
Semine, A. Alan
Troyan, Susan L.
Birdwell, Robyn L.
description Stemming from breast density notification legislation in Massachusetts effective 2015, we sought to develop a collaborative evidence-based approach to density notification that could be used by practitioners across the state. Our goal was to develop an evidence-based consensus management algorithm to help patients and health care providers follow best practices to implement a coordinated, evidence-based, cost-effective, sustainable practice and to standardize care in recommendations for supplemental screening. We formed the Massachusetts Breast Risk Education and Assessment Task Force (MA-BREAST) a multi-institutional, multi-disciplinary panel of expert radiologists, surgeons, primary care physicians, and oncologists to develop a collaborative approach to density notification legislation. Using evidence-based data from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, the Cochrane review, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, American Cancer Society recommendations, and American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria, the group collaboratively developed an evidence-based best-practices algorithm. The expert consensus algorithm uses breast density as one element in the risk stratification to determine the need for supplemental screening. Women with dense breasts and otherwise low risk (20 % lifetime) should consider supplemental screening MRI in addition to routine mammography regardless of breast density. We report the development of the multi-disciplinary collaborative approach to density notification. We propose a risk stratification algorithm to assess personal level of risk to determine the need for supplemental screening for an individual woman.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-015-3534-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4592317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A437878026</galeid><sourcerecordid>A437878026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c638t-6fd21f4b6f5e71ff974e6c5bc6df0cc6d9a43a7d9999d9e30c370784ed8876023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxiMEokvhAbggS0iIS4qdP3bCAalUUJCKuMDZ8trjxJVjL7ZTse_IQ-HslnYXQSLFkec333jGX1E8J_iMYMzeRILbpi8xacu6rZuyf1CsSMvqklWEPSxWmFBW0g7Tk-JJjNcY457h_nFxUtGqxw2hq-LX-wAiJiSFkxBQlAHAGTcg41AaAUEQyGukwEWTtsj5ZLSRIhnvkIXBRLv7f4viPE0ibBe4wqRBX0SMQo5zhJQigp8bCAZyDSScyvAwQNyJZF44BDdGLdFyLSIoNAknBpjAJSTs4INJ44TWWzTNNplSmSjNxhq31NspJ7QRDuzT4pEWNsKz2_W0-P7xw7eLT-XV18vPF-dXpaR1l0qqVUV0s6a6BUa07lkDVLZrSZXGMn970dSCqT4_qocay5ph1jWguo5RXNWnxbu97mZeT6BkPmcQlm-CWUbAvTD8OOLMyAd_w5u2r2rCssDrW4Hgf8x5EnzKPYG1uQs_R07yNTHSdIRk9OVf6LWfg8vt7ai6xRVl99QgLHDjtM915SLKz5uadazLWKbO_kHlV8FkpHegTd4_Snh1kDCCsGmM3s7LzcVjkOxBGXyMAfTdMAjmi1f53qs8e5UvXuV9znlxOMW7jD_mzEC1B2IOuQHCQev_Vf0ND3T4Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709350267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Freer, Phoebe E. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J. ; Haas, Jennifer S. ; Tung, Nadine M. ; Hughes, Kevin S. ; Armstrong, Katrina ; Semine, A. Alan ; Troyan, Susan L. ; Birdwell, Robyn L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freer, Phoebe E. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J. ; Haas, Jennifer S. ; Tung, Nadine M. ; Hughes, Kevin S. ; Armstrong, Katrina ; Semine, A. Alan ; Troyan, Susan L. ; Birdwell, Robyn L.</creatorcontrib><description>Stemming from breast density notification legislation in Massachusetts effective 2015, we sought to develop a collaborative evidence-based approach to density notification that could be used by practitioners across the state. Our goal was to develop an evidence-based consensus management algorithm to help patients and health care providers follow best practices to implement a coordinated, evidence-based, cost-effective, sustainable practice and to standardize care in recommendations for supplemental screening. We formed the Massachusetts Breast Risk Education and Assessment Task Force (MA-BREAST) a multi-institutional, multi-disciplinary panel of expert radiologists, surgeons, primary care physicians, and oncologists to develop a collaborative approach to density notification legislation. Using evidence-based data from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, the Cochrane review, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, American Cancer Society recommendations, and American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria, the group collaboratively developed an evidence-based best-practices algorithm. The expert consensus algorithm uses breast density as one element in the risk stratification to determine the need for supplemental screening. Women with dense breasts and otherwise low risk (&lt;15 % lifetime risk), do not routinely require supplemental screening per the expert consensus. Women of high risk (&gt;20 % lifetime) should consider supplemental screening MRI in addition to routine mammography regardless of breast density. We report the development of the multi-disciplinary collaborative approach to density notification. We propose a risk stratification algorithm to assess personal level of risk to determine the need for supplemental screening for an individual woman.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3534-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26290416</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BCTRD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Breast cancer ; Breast Density ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Brief Report ; Cancer ; Cancer research ; Diagnosis ; Disease Management ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - standards ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-Based Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Evidence-Based Medicine - standards ; Experts ; Female ; Health care industry ; Humans ; Legislation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mammary Glands, Human - abnormalities ; Mammography ; Massachusetts ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Oncology ; Risk Assessment ; Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2015-09, Vol.153 (2), p.455-464</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c638t-6fd21f4b6f5e71ff974e6c5bc6df0cc6d9a43a7d9999d9e30c370784ed8876023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c638t-6fd21f4b6f5e71ff974e6c5bc6df0cc6d9a43a7d9999d9e30c370784ed8876023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-015-3534-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-015-3534-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freer, Phoebe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tung, Nadine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Kevin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semine, A. Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troyan, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdwell, Robyn L.</creatorcontrib><title>Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Stemming from breast density notification legislation in Massachusetts effective 2015, we sought to develop a collaborative evidence-based approach to density notification that could be used by practitioners across the state. Our goal was to develop an evidence-based consensus management algorithm to help patients and health care providers follow best practices to implement a coordinated, evidence-based, cost-effective, sustainable practice and to standardize care in recommendations for supplemental screening. We formed the Massachusetts Breast Risk Education and Assessment Task Force (MA-BREAST) a multi-institutional, multi-disciplinary panel of expert radiologists, surgeons, primary care physicians, and oncologists to develop a collaborative approach to density notification legislation. Using evidence-based data from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, the Cochrane review, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, American Cancer Society recommendations, and American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria, the group collaboratively developed an evidence-based best-practices algorithm. The expert consensus algorithm uses breast density as one element in the risk stratification to determine the need for supplemental screening. Women with dense breasts and otherwise low risk (&lt;15 % lifetime risk), do not routinely require supplemental screening per the expert consensus. Women of high risk (&gt;20 % lifetime) should consider supplemental screening MRI in addition to routine mammography regardless of breast density. We report the development of the multi-disciplinary collaborative approach to density notification. We propose a risk stratification algorithm to assess personal level of risk to determine the need for supplemental screening for an individual woman.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Density</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - standards</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mammary Glands, Human - abnormalities</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxiMEokvhAbggS0iIS4qdP3bCAalUUJCKuMDZ8trjxJVjL7ZTse_IQ-HslnYXQSLFkec333jGX1E8J_iMYMzeRILbpi8xacu6rZuyf1CsSMvqklWEPSxWmFBW0g7Tk-JJjNcY457h_nFxUtGqxw2hq-LX-wAiJiSFkxBQlAHAGTcg41AaAUEQyGukwEWTtsj5ZLSRIhnvkIXBRLv7f4viPE0ibBe4wqRBX0SMQo5zhJQigp8bCAZyDSScyvAwQNyJZF44BDdGLdFyLSIoNAknBpjAJSTs4INJ44TWWzTNNplSmSjNxhq31NspJ7QRDuzT4pEWNsKz2_W0-P7xw7eLT-XV18vPF-dXpaR1l0qqVUV0s6a6BUa07lkDVLZrSZXGMn970dSCqT4_qocay5ph1jWguo5RXNWnxbu97mZeT6BkPmcQlm-CWUbAvTD8OOLMyAd_w5u2r2rCssDrW4Hgf8x5EnzKPYG1uQs_R07yNTHSdIRk9OVf6LWfg8vt7ai6xRVl99QgLHDjtM915SLKz5uadazLWKbO_kHlV8FkpHegTd4_Snh1kDCCsGmM3s7LzcVjkOxBGXyMAfTdMAjmi1f53qs8e5UvXuV9znlxOMW7jD_mzEC1B2IOuQHCQev_Vf0ND3T4Lg</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Freer, Phoebe E.</creator><creator>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creator><creator>Haas, Jennifer S.</creator><creator>Tung, Nadine M.</creator><creator>Hughes, Kevin S.</creator><creator>Armstrong, Katrina</creator><creator>Semine, A. Alan</creator><creator>Troyan, Susan L.</creator><creator>Birdwell, Robyn L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel</title><author>Freer, Phoebe E. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J. ; Haas, Jennifer S. ; Tung, Nadine M. ; Hughes, Kevin S. ; Armstrong, Katrina ; Semine, A. Alan ; Troyan, Susan L. ; Birdwell, Robyn L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c638t-6fd21f4b6f5e71ff974e6c5bc6df0cc6d9a43a7d9999d9e30c370784ed8876023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Density</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - standards</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mammary Glands, Human - abnormalities</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freer, Phoebe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tung, Nadine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Kevin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semine, A. Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troyan, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdwell, Robyn L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freer, Phoebe E.</au><au>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</au><au>Haas, Jennifer S.</au><au>Tung, Nadine M.</au><au>Hughes, Kevin S.</au><au>Armstrong, Katrina</au><au>Semine, A. Alan</au><au>Troyan, Susan L.</au><au>Birdwell, Robyn L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>455-464</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><coden>BCTRD6</coden><abstract>Stemming from breast density notification legislation in Massachusetts effective 2015, we sought to develop a collaborative evidence-based approach to density notification that could be used by practitioners across the state. Our goal was to develop an evidence-based consensus management algorithm to help patients and health care providers follow best practices to implement a coordinated, evidence-based, cost-effective, sustainable practice and to standardize care in recommendations for supplemental screening. We formed the Massachusetts Breast Risk Education and Assessment Task Force (MA-BREAST) a multi-institutional, multi-disciplinary panel of expert radiologists, surgeons, primary care physicians, and oncologists to develop a collaborative approach to density notification legislation. Using evidence-based data from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, the Cochrane review, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, American Cancer Society recommendations, and American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria, the group collaboratively developed an evidence-based best-practices algorithm. The expert consensus algorithm uses breast density as one element in the risk stratification to determine the need for supplemental screening. Women with dense breasts and otherwise low risk (&lt;15 % lifetime risk), do not routinely require supplemental screening per the expert consensus. Women of high risk (&gt;20 % lifetime) should consider supplemental screening MRI in addition to routine mammography regardless of breast density. We report the development of the multi-disciplinary collaborative approach to density notification. We propose a risk stratification algorithm to assess personal level of risk to determine the need for supplemental screening for an individual woman.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26290416</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-015-3534-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2015-09, Vol.153 (2), p.455-464
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4592317
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Algorithms
Breast cancer
Breast Density
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Brief Report
Cancer
Cancer research
Diagnosis
Disease Management
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Early Detection of Cancer - standards
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-Based Medicine - legislation & jurisprudence
Evidence-Based Medicine - standards
Experts
Female
Health care industry
Humans
Legislation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mammary Glands, Human - abnormalities
Mammography
Massachusetts
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Risk Assessment
Ultrasonography, Mammary
title Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20cancer%20screening%20in%20the%20era%20of%20density%20notification%20legislation:%20summary%20of%202014%20Massachusetts%20experience%20and%20suggestion%20of%20an%20evidence-based%20management%20algorithm%20by%20multi-disciplinary%20expert%20panel&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Freer,%20Phoebe%20E.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=455-464&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft.coden=BCTRD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-015-3534-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA437878026%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709350267&rft_id=info:pmid/26290416&rft_galeid=A437878026&rfr_iscdi=true