A Conceptual Framework for Improving Critical Care Patient Flow and Bed Use

High demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services and limited bed availability have prompted hospitals to address capacity planning challenges. Simulation modeling can examine ICU bed assignment policies, accounting for patient acuity, to reduce ICU admission delays. To provide a framework for data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2015-06, Vol.12 (6), p.886-894
Hauptverfasser: Mathews, Kusum S, Long, Elisa F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 894
container_issue 6
container_start_page 886
container_title Annals of the American Thoracic Society
container_volume 12
creator Mathews, Kusum S
Long, Elisa F
description High demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services and limited bed availability have prompted hospitals to address capacity planning challenges. Simulation modeling can examine ICU bed assignment policies, accounting for patient acuity, to reduce ICU admission delays. To provide a framework for data-driven modeling of ICU patient flow, identify key measurable outcomes, and present illustrative analysis demonstrating the impact of various bed allocation scenarios on outcomes. A description of key inputs for constructing a queuing model was outlined, and an illustrative simulation model was developed to reflect current triage protocol within the medical ICU and step-down unit (SDU) at a single tertiary-care hospital. Patient acuity, arrival rate, and unit length of stay, consisting of a "service time" and "time to transfer," were estimated from 12 months of retrospective data (n = 2,710 adult patients) for 36 ICU and 15 SDU staffed beds. Patient priority was based on acuity and whether the patient originated in the emergency department. The model simulated the following hypothetical scenarios: (1) varied ICU/SDU sizes, (2) reserved ICU beds as a triage strategy, (3) lower targets for time to transfer out of the ICU, and (4) ICU expansion by up to four beds. Outcomes included ICU admission wait times and unit occupancy. With current bed allocation, simulated wait time averaged 1.13 (SD, 1.39) hours. Reallocating all SDU beds as ICU decreased overall wait times by 7.2% to 1.06 (SD, 1.39) hours and increased bed occupancy from 80 to 84%. Reserving the last available bed for acute patients reduced wait times for acute patients from 0.84 (SD, 1.12) to 0.31 (SD, 0.30) hours, but tripled subacute patients' wait times from 1.39 (SD, 1.81) to 4.27 (SD, 5.44) hours. Setting transfer times to wards for all ICU/SDU patients to 1 hour decreased wait times for incoming ICU patients, comparable to building one to two additional ICU beds. Hospital queuing and simulation modeling with empiric data inputs can evaluate how changes in ICU bed assignment could impact unit occupancy levels and patient wait times. Trade-offs associated with dedicating resources for acute patients versus expanding capacity for all patients can be examined.
doi_str_mv 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-419OC
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4590022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1689624163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-23d7ca1f9364a64698328616cc36730426d35b693610a1da23242510ffc53a7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9LxDAQxYMoKupXkIAXL9VM_rW5CGtxVRQU1HOIaarVtlmTVvHbG3fXRc1lAvObx5t5CO0DOQIB7HjS96aNk_u7I0qAE5VxUDflGtqmjIpMSgrr87_KpGJsC-3F-ELSKwQUudpEW1QUlPI830ZXE1z63rrZMJoWT4Pp3IcPr7j2AV92s-Dfm_4Jl6EZGpuA0gSHb83QuH7A09Z_YNNX-NRV-CG6XbRRJ19ub1l30MP07L68yK5vzi_LyXVmOadDRlmVWwO1YpIbyaUqGC0kSGuZzBnhVFZMPCbnEoiByqRFOBVA6toKZvKK7aCThe5sfOxcZZOXYFo9C01nwqf2ptF_O33zrJ_8u-ZCEUJpEjhcCgT_Nro46K6J1rWt6Z0fowZZKEk5SJbQg3_oix_D9_kTpWgBAFIkSi4oG3yMwdUrM0D0d2R6FZleRKbnkaXB_d-rrMZ-AmJfMKKSBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1692811165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Conceptual Framework for Improving Critical Care Patient Flow and Bed Use</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Mathews, Kusum S ; Long, Elisa F</creator><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Kusum S ; Long, Elisa F</creatorcontrib><description>High demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services and limited bed availability have prompted hospitals to address capacity planning challenges. Simulation modeling can examine ICU bed assignment policies, accounting for patient acuity, to reduce ICU admission delays. To provide a framework for data-driven modeling of ICU patient flow, identify key measurable outcomes, and present illustrative analysis demonstrating the impact of various bed allocation scenarios on outcomes. A description of key inputs for constructing a queuing model was outlined, and an illustrative simulation model was developed to reflect current triage protocol within the medical ICU and step-down unit (SDU) at a single tertiary-care hospital. Patient acuity, arrival rate, and unit length of stay, consisting of a "service time" and "time to transfer," were estimated from 12 months of retrospective data (n = 2,710 adult patients) for 36 ICU and 15 SDU staffed beds. Patient priority was based on acuity and whether the patient originated in the emergency department. The model simulated the following hypothetical scenarios: (1) varied ICU/SDU sizes, (2) reserved ICU beds as a triage strategy, (3) lower targets for time to transfer out of the ICU, and (4) ICU expansion by up to four beds. Outcomes included ICU admission wait times and unit occupancy. With current bed allocation, simulated wait time averaged 1.13 (SD, 1.39) hours. Reallocating all SDU beds as ICU decreased overall wait times by 7.2% to 1.06 (SD, 1.39) hours and increased bed occupancy from 80 to 84%. Reserving the last available bed for acute patients reduced wait times for acute patients from 0.84 (SD, 1.12) to 0.31 (SD, 0.30) hours, but tripled subacute patients' wait times from 1.39 (SD, 1.81) to 4.27 (SD, 5.44) hours. Setting transfer times to wards for all ICU/SDU patients to 1 hour decreased wait times for incoming ICU patients, comparable to building one to two additional ICU beds. Hospital queuing and simulation modeling with empiric data inputs can evaluate how changes in ICU bed assignment could impact unit occupancy levels and patient wait times. Trade-offs associated with dedicating resources for acute patients versus expanding capacity for all patients can be examined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-6621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-419OC</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25822477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Thoracic Society</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Aged ; Bed Occupancy - statistics & numerical data ; Computer Simulation ; Female ; Health Care Rationing - organization & administration ; Health Services Accessibility - standards ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - organization & administration ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Organizational ; Original Research ; Patient Acuity ; Patient Selection ; Resource Allocation - organization & administration ; Systems Theory ; Triage - methods ; Triage - statistics & numerical data ; United States]]></subject><ispartof>Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2015-06, Vol.12 (6), p.886-894</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Thoracic Society Jun 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-23d7ca1f9364a64698328616cc36730426d35b693610a1da23242510ffc53a7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-23d7ca1f9364a64698328616cc36730426d35b693610a1da23242510ffc53a7d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8810-2794</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25822477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Kusum S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Elisa F</creatorcontrib><title>A Conceptual Framework for Improving Critical Care Patient Flow and Bed Use</title><title>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</title><addtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</addtitle><description>High demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services and limited bed availability have prompted hospitals to address capacity planning challenges. Simulation modeling can examine ICU bed assignment policies, accounting for patient acuity, to reduce ICU admission delays. To provide a framework for data-driven modeling of ICU patient flow, identify key measurable outcomes, and present illustrative analysis demonstrating the impact of various bed allocation scenarios on outcomes. A description of key inputs for constructing a queuing model was outlined, and an illustrative simulation model was developed to reflect current triage protocol within the medical ICU and step-down unit (SDU) at a single tertiary-care hospital. Patient acuity, arrival rate, and unit length of stay, consisting of a "service time" and "time to transfer," were estimated from 12 months of retrospective data (n = 2,710 adult patients) for 36 ICU and 15 SDU staffed beds. Patient priority was based on acuity and whether the patient originated in the emergency department. The model simulated the following hypothetical scenarios: (1) varied ICU/SDU sizes, (2) reserved ICU beds as a triage strategy, (3) lower targets for time to transfer out of the ICU, and (4) ICU expansion by up to four beds. Outcomes included ICU admission wait times and unit occupancy. With current bed allocation, simulated wait time averaged 1.13 (SD, 1.39) hours. Reallocating all SDU beds as ICU decreased overall wait times by 7.2% to 1.06 (SD, 1.39) hours and increased bed occupancy from 80 to 84%. Reserving the last available bed for acute patients reduced wait times for acute patients from 0.84 (SD, 1.12) to 0.31 (SD, 0.30) hours, but tripled subacute patients' wait times from 1.39 (SD, 1.81) to 4.27 (SD, 5.44) hours. Setting transfer times to wards for all ICU/SDU patients to 1 hour decreased wait times for incoming ICU patients, comparable to building one to two additional ICU beds. Hospital queuing and simulation modeling with empiric data inputs can evaluate how changes in ICU bed assignment could impact unit occupancy levels and patient wait times. Trade-offs associated with dedicating resources for acute patients versus expanding capacity for all patients can be examined.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bed Occupancy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Rationing - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - standards</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Organizational</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patient Acuity</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Resource Allocation - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>Triage - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2329-6933</issn><issn>2325-6621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9LxDAQxYMoKupXkIAXL9VM_rW5CGtxVRQU1HOIaarVtlmTVvHbG3fXRc1lAvObx5t5CO0DOQIB7HjS96aNk_u7I0qAE5VxUDflGtqmjIpMSgrr87_KpGJsC-3F-ELSKwQUudpEW1QUlPI830ZXE1z63rrZMJoWT4Pp3IcPr7j2AV92s-Dfm_4Jl6EZGpuA0gSHb83QuH7A09Z_YNNX-NRV-CG6XbRRJ19ub1l30MP07L68yK5vzi_LyXVmOadDRlmVWwO1YpIbyaUqGC0kSGuZzBnhVFZMPCbnEoiByqRFOBVA6toKZvKK7aCThe5sfOxcZZOXYFo9C01nwqf2ptF_O33zrJ_8u-ZCEUJpEjhcCgT_Nro46K6J1rWt6Z0fowZZKEk5SJbQg3_oix_D9_kTpWgBAFIkSi4oG3yMwdUrM0D0d2R6FZleRKbnkaXB_d-rrMZ-AmJfMKKSBQ</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Mathews, Kusum S</creator><creator>Long, Elisa F</creator><general>American Thoracic Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8810-2794</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>A Conceptual Framework for Improving Critical Care Patient Flow and Bed Use</title><author>Mathews, Kusum S ; Long, Elisa F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-23d7ca1f9364a64698328616cc36730426d35b693610a1da23242510ffc53a7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bed Occupancy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Rationing - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - standards</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Organizational</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patient Acuity</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Resource Allocation - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>Triage - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Kusum S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Elisa F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathews, Kusum S</au><au>Long, Elisa F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Conceptual Framework for Improving Critical Care Patient Flow and Bed Use</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</addtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>886</spage><epage>894</epage><pages>886-894</pages><issn>2329-6933</issn><eissn>2325-6621</eissn><abstract>High demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services and limited bed availability have prompted hospitals to address capacity planning challenges. Simulation modeling can examine ICU bed assignment policies, accounting for patient acuity, to reduce ICU admission delays. To provide a framework for data-driven modeling of ICU patient flow, identify key measurable outcomes, and present illustrative analysis demonstrating the impact of various bed allocation scenarios on outcomes. A description of key inputs for constructing a queuing model was outlined, and an illustrative simulation model was developed to reflect current triage protocol within the medical ICU and step-down unit (SDU) at a single tertiary-care hospital. Patient acuity, arrival rate, and unit length of stay, consisting of a "service time" and "time to transfer," were estimated from 12 months of retrospective data (n = 2,710 adult patients) for 36 ICU and 15 SDU staffed beds. Patient priority was based on acuity and whether the patient originated in the emergency department. The model simulated the following hypothetical scenarios: (1) varied ICU/SDU sizes, (2) reserved ICU beds as a triage strategy, (3) lower targets for time to transfer out of the ICU, and (4) ICU expansion by up to four beds. Outcomes included ICU admission wait times and unit occupancy. With current bed allocation, simulated wait time averaged 1.13 (SD, 1.39) hours. Reallocating all SDU beds as ICU decreased overall wait times by 7.2% to 1.06 (SD, 1.39) hours and increased bed occupancy from 80 to 84%. Reserving the last available bed for acute patients reduced wait times for acute patients from 0.84 (SD, 1.12) to 0.31 (SD, 0.30) hours, but tripled subacute patients' wait times from 1.39 (SD, 1.81) to 4.27 (SD, 5.44) hours. Setting transfer times to wards for all ICU/SDU patients to 1 hour decreased wait times for incoming ICU patients, comparable to building one to two additional ICU beds. Hospital queuing and simulation modeling with empiric data inputs can evaluate how changes in ICU bed assignment could impact unit occupancy levels and patient wait times. Trade-offs associated with dedicating resources for acute patients versus expanding capacity for all patients can be examined.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>25822477</pmid><doi>10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-419OC</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8810-2794</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2329-6933
ispartof Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2015-06, Vol.12 (6), p.886-894
issn 2329-6933
2325-6621
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4590022
source MEDLINE; American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Bed Occupancy - statistics & numerical data
Computer Simulation
Female
Health Care Rationing - organization & administration
Health Services Accessibility - standards
Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Intensive Care Units - organization & administration
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Organizational
Original Research
Patient Acuity
Patient Selection
Resource Allocation - organization & administration
Systems Theory
Triage - methods
Triage - statistics & numerical data
United States
title A Conceptual Framework for Improving Critical Care Patient Flow and Bed Use
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A48%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Conceptual%20Framework%20for%20Improving%20Critical%20Care%20Patient%20Flow%20and%20Bed%20Use&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Thoracic%20Society&rft.au=Mathews,%20Kusum%20S&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=886&rft.epage=894&rft.pages=886-894&rft.issn=2329-6933&rft.eissn=2325-6621&rft_id=info:doi/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-419OC&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1689624163%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1692811165&rft_id=info:pmid/25822477&rfr_iscdi=true