Monaural and binaural contributions to interaural-level-difference sensitivity in human auditory cortex

Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in human auditory cortex (AC) to sounds with intensity varying independently in the left and right ears. Echoplanar images were acquired at 3 Tesla with sparse image acquisition o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2015-10, Vol.120, p.456-466
Hauptverfasser: Stecker, G. Christopher, McLaughlin, Susan A., Higgins, Nathan C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 466
container_issue
container_start_page 456
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 120
creator Stecker, G. Christopher
McLaughlin, Susan A.
Higgins, Nathan C.
description Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in human auditory cortex (AC) to sounds with intensity varying independently in the left and right ears. Echoplanar images were acquired at 3 Tesla with sparse image acquisition once per 12-second block of sound stimulation. Combinations of binaural intensity and stimulus presentation rate were varied between blocks, and selected to allow measurement of response-intensity functions in three configurations: monaural 55–85 dB SPL, binaural 55–85 dB SPL with intensity equal in both ears, and binaural with average binaural level of 70 dB SPL and interaural level differences (ILD) ranging ±30 dB (i.e., favoring the left or right ear). Comparison of response functions equated for contralateral intensity revealed that BOLD-response magnitudes (1) generally increased with contralateral intensity, consistent with positive drive of the BOLD response by the contralateral ear, (2) were larger for contralateral monaural stimulation than for binaural stimulation, consistent with negative effects (e.g., inhibition) of ipsilateral input, which were strongest in the left hemisphere, and (3) also increased with ipsilateral intensity when contralateral input was weak, consistent with additional, positive, effects of ipsilateral stimulation. Hemispheric asymmetries in the spatial extent and overall magnitude of BOLD responses were generally consistent with previous studies demonstrating greater bilaterality of responses in the right hemisphere and stricter contralaterality in the left hemisphere. Finally, comparison of responses to fast (40/s) and slow (5/s) stimulus presentation rates revealed significant rate-dependent adaptation of the BOLD response that varied across ILD values. [Display omitted] •BOLD responses in human auditory cortex (AC) are tuned to interaural level differences (ILD).•Graded preference for contralateral ILD reflects ipsilateral inhibition of binaural responses.•Hemispheric asymmetry supports greater contralaterality in left than right AC.•Rate-dependent adaptation of AC BOLD responses varied with ILD.•Data support opponent-channel representation of ILD within each AC hemisphere.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4589528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811915006163</els_id><sourcerecordid>1718076296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-bde40facba86654d080d875be9dbb6ef42d9b38bb29cd705a1baf1dabaa637323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctuFDEQRVsIRELgF1BLbNj0UO5uvzZIEEFACmIDa8uP6olHPXaw3SPm7_FkhvDYwMq26tQt171N0xJYESDs1WYVcEnRb_UaVz0QugK-AuAPmnMCknaS8v7h4U6HThAiz5onOW8AQJJRPG7OekbYIICeN-tPMegl6bnVwbXGnx42hpK8WYqPIbcltj4UTHe1bsYdzp3z04QJg8U2Y8i--J0v-8q1N8tWh1YvzpeY9lUqFfz-tHk06Tnjs9N50Xx9_-7L5Yfu-vPVx8s3151lwEpnHI4waWu0YIyODgQ4walB6YxhOI29k2YQxvTSOg5UE6Mn4rTRmg186IeL5vVR93YxW3QW6x56VrepepX2Kmqv_qwEf6PWcadGKiTtRRV4eRJI8duCuaitzxbnWQeMS1aEU9JXF5n8D5QI4KyXrKIv_kI3cUmhOqGIEAAjJZJXShwpm2LOCaf7fxNQh-DVRv0KXh2CV8BVDb62Pv997_vGn0lX4O0RwOr-zmNS2fpDfM4ntEW56P895Qf2gciR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880045197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monaural and binaural contributions to interaural-level-difference sensitivity in human auditory cortex</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Stecker, G. Christopher ; McLaughlin, Susan A. ; Higgins, Nathan C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stecker, G. Christopher ; McLaughlin, Susan A. ; Higgins, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><description>Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in human auditory cortex (AC) to sounds with intensity varying independently in the left and right ears. Echoplanar images were acquired at 3 Tesla with sparse image acquisition once per 12-second block of sound stimulation. Combinations of binaural intensity and stimulus presentation rate were varied between blocks, and selected to allow measurement of response-intensity functions in three configurations: monaural 55–85 dB SPL, binaural 55–85 dB SPL with intensity equal in both ears, and binaural with average binaural level of 70 dB SPL and interaural level differences (ILD) ranging ±30 dB (i.e., favoring the left or right ear). Comparison of response functions equated for contralateral intensity revealed that BOLD-response magnitudes (1) generally increased with contralateral intensity, consistent with positive drive of the BOLD response by the contralateral ear, (2) were larger for contralateral monaural stimulation than for binaural stimulation, consistent with negative effects (e.g., inhibition) of ipsilateral input, which were strongest in the left hemisphere, and (3) also increased with ipsilateral intensity when contralateral input was weak, consistent with additional, positive, effects of ipsilateral stimulation. Hemispheric asymmetries in the spatial extent and overall magnitude of BOLD responses were generally consistent with previous studies demonstrating greater bilaterality of responses in the right hemisphere and stricter contralaterality in the left hemisphere. Finally, comparison of responses to fast (40/s) and slow (5/s) stimulus presentation rates revealed significant rate-dependent adaptation of the BOLD response that varied across ILD values. [Display omitted] •BOLD responses in human auditory cortex (AC) are tuned to interaural level differences (ILD).•Graded preference for contralateral ILD reflects ipsilateral inhibition of binaural responses.•Hemispheric asymmetry supports greater contralaterality in left than right AC.•Rate-dependent adaptation of AC BOLD responses varied with ILD.•Data support opponent-channel representation of ILD within each AC hemisphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26163805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adaptation ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Auditory Cortex - physiology ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Bias ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Echo-Planar Imaging ; Female ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Functional Neuroimaging - methods ; Human subjects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Population ; Sound ; Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2015-10, Vol.120, p.456-466</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 15, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-bde40facba86654d080d875be9dbb6ef42d9b38bb29cd705a1baf1dabaa637323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-bde40facba86654d080d875be9dbb6ef42d9b38bb29cd705a1baf1dabaa637323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1880045197?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000,64390,64392,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stecker, G. Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><title>Monaural and binaural contributions to interaural-level-difference sensitivity in human auditory cortex</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in human auditory cortex (AC) to sounds with intensity varying independently in the left and right ears. Echoplanar images were acquired at 3 Tesla with sparse image acquisition once per 12-second block of sound stimulation. Combinations of binaural intensity and stimulus presentation rate were varied between blocks, and selected to allow measurement of response-intensity functions in three configurations: monaural 55–85 dB SPL, binaural 55–85 dB SPL with intensity equal in both ears, and binaural with average binaural level of 70 dB SPL and interaural level differences (ILD) ranging ±30 dB (i.e., favoring the left or right ear). Comparison of response functions equated for contralateral intensity revealed that BOLD-response magnitudes (1) generally increased with contralateral intensity, consistent with positive drive of the BOLD response by the contralateral ear, (2) were larger for contralateral monaural stimulation than for binaural stimulation, consistent with negative effects (e.g., inhibition) of ipsilateral input, which were strongest in the left hemisphere, and (3) also increased with ipsilateral intensity when contralateral input was weak, consistent with additional, positive, effects of ipsilateral stimulation. Hemispheric asymmetries in the spatial extent and overall magnitude of BOLD responses were generally consistent with previous studies demonstrating greater bilaterality of responses in the right hemisphere and stricter contralaterality in the left hemisphere. Finally, comparison of responses to fast (40/s) and slow (5/s) stimulus presentation rates revealed significant rate-dependent adaptation of the BOLD response that varied across ILD values. [Display omitted] •BOLD responses in human auditory cortex (AC) are tuned to interaural level differences (ILD).•Graded preference for contralateral ILD reflects ipsilateral inhibition of binaural responses.•Hemispheric asymmetry supports greater contralaterality in left than right AC.•Rate-dependent adaptation of AC BOLD responses varied with ILD.•Data support opponent-channel representation of ILD within each AC hemisphere.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Functional Neuroimaging - methods</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctuFDEQRVsIRELgF1BLbNj0UO5uvzZIEEFACmIDa8uP6olHPXaw3SPm7_FkhvDYwMq26tQt171N0xJYESDs1WYVcEnRb_UaVz0QugK-AuAPmnMCknaS8v7h4U6HThAiz5onOW8AQJJRPG7OekbYIICeN-tPMegl6bnVwbXGnx42hpK8WYqPIbcltj4UTHe1bsYdzp3z04QJg8U2Y8i--J0v-8q1N8tWh1YvzpeY9lUqFfz-tHk06Tnjs9N50Xx9_-7L5Yfu-vPVx8s3151lwEpnHI4waWu0YIyODgQ4walB6YxhOI29k2YQxvTSOg5UE6Mn4rTRmg186IeL5vVR93YxW3QW6x56VrepepX2Kmqv_qwEf6PWcadGKiTtRRV4eRJI8duCuaitzxbnWQeMS1aEU9JXF5n8D5QI4KyXrKIv_kI3cUmhOqGIEAAjJZJXShwpm2LOCaf7fxNQh-DVRv0KXh2CV8BVDb62Pv997_vGn0lX4O0RwOr-zmNS2fpDfM4ntEW56P895Qf2gciR</recordid><startdate>20151015</startdate><enddate>20151015</enddate><creator>Stecker, G. Christopher</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Susan A.</creator><creator>Higgins, Nathan C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151015</creationdate><title>Monaural and binaural contributions to interaural-level-difference sensitivity in human auditory cortex</title><author>Stecker, G. Christopher ; McLaughlin, Susan A. ; Higgins, Nathan C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-bde40facba86654d080d875be9dbb6ef42d9b38bb29cd705a1baf1dabaa637323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Functional Neuroimaging - methods</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stecker, G. Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Nathan C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stecker, G. Christopher</au><au>McLaughlin, Susan A.</au><au>Higgins, Nathan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monaural and binaural contributions to interaural-level-difference sensitivity in human auditory cortex</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2015-10-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><spage>456</spage><epage>466</epage><pages>456-466</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in human auditory cortex (AC) to sounds with intensity varying independently in the left and right ears. Echoplanar images were acquired at 3 Tesla with sparse image acquisition once per 12-second block of sound stimulation. Combinations of binaural intensity and stimulus presentation rate were varied between blocks, and selected to allow measurement of response-intensity functions in three configurations: monaural 55–85 dB SPL, binaural 55–85 dB SPL with intensity equal in both ears, and binaural with average binaural level of 70 dB SPL and interaural level differences (ILD) ranging ±30 dB (i.e., favoring the left or right ear). Comparison of response functions equated for contralateral intensity revealed that BOLD-response magnitudes (1) generally increased with contralateral intensity, consistent with positive drive of the BOLD response by the contralateral ear, (2) were larger for contralateral monaural stimulation than for binaural stimulation, consistent with negative effects (e.g., inhibition) of ipsilateral input, which were strongest in the left hemisphere, and (3) also increased with ipsilateral intensity when contralateral input was weak, consistent with additional, positive, effects of ipsilateral stimulation. Hemispheric asymmetries in the spatial extent and overall magnitude of BOLD responses were generally consistent with previous studies demonstrating greater bilaterality of responses in the right hemisphere and stricter contralaterality in the left hemisphere. Finally, comparison of responses to fast (40/s) and slow (5/s) stimulus presentation rates revealed significant rate-dependent adaptation of the BOLD response that varied across ILD values. [Display omitted] •BOLD responses in human auditory cortex (AC) are tuned to interaural level differences (ILD).•Graded preference for contralateral ILD reflects ipsilateral inhibition of binaural responses.•Hemispheric asymmetry supports greater contralaterality in left than right AC.•Rate-dependent adaptation of AC BOLD responses varied with ILD.•Data support opponent-channel representation of ILD within each AC hemisphere.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26163805</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.007</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2015-10, Vol.120, p.456-466
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4589528
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Adaptation
Adolescent
Adult
Auditory Cortex - physiology
Auditory Perception - physiology
Bias
Ears & hearing
Echo-Planar Imaging
Female
Functional Laterality - physiology
Functional Neuroimaging - methods
Human subjects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Population
Sound
Studies
Young Adult
title Monaural and binaural contributions to interaural-level-difference sensitivity in human auditory cortex
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T03%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monaural%20and%20binaural%20contributions%20to%20interaural-level-difference%20sensitivity%20in%20human%20auditory%20cortex&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Stecker,%20G.%20Christopher&rft.date=2015-10-15&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=456&rft.epage=466&rft.pages=456-466&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1718076296%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880045197&rft_id=info:pmid/26163805&rft_els_id=S1053811915006163&rfr_iscdi=true