Genetic Risk Assessment for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Referral Patterns and Outcomes in a University Gynecologic Oncology Clinic

Little is known about genetic service utilization and ovarian cancer. We identified the frequency and outcome of genetic counseling referral, predictors of referral, and referral uptake for ovarian cancer patients. Using pathology reports, we identified all epithelial ovarian cancer patients seen in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of genetic counseling 2013-10, Vol.22 (5), p.662-673
Hauptverfasser: Petzel, Sue V., Vogel, Rachel Isaksson, Bensend, Tracy, Leininger, Anna, Argenta, Peter A., Geller, Melissa A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 673
container_issue 5
container_start_page 662
container_title Journal of genetic counseling
container_volume 22
creator Petzel, Sue V.
Vogel, Rachel Isaksson
Bensend, Tracy
Leininger, Anna
Argenta, Peter A.
Geller, Melissa A.
description Little is known about genetic service utilization and ovarian cancer. We identified the frequency and outcome of genetic counseling referral, predictors of referral, and referral uptake for ovarian cancer patients. Using pathology reports, we identified all epithelial ovarian cancer patients seen in a university gynecologic oncology clinic (1/04–8/06). Electronic medical records (EMR) were used to document genetic service referral, time from diagnosis-to-referral, point-in-treatment at referral, personal/family cancer history, demographics, and genetic test results. Groups were compared using chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. The study population consisted of 376 women with ovarian cancer, 72 (19 %) of who were referred for genetic counseling/testing, primarily during surveillance. Of those referred, 42 (58 %) had personal or family genetic counseling and 34 (47 %) were ultimately tested or identified due to known family mutation. Family history and prior cancer were associated with referral. Family history, living in a larger community, higher-stage disease, and serous histology were associated with undergoing genetic counseling. Risk assessment identified 20 BRCA1/2 (5.3 %) and 1 HNPCC (0.3 %) mutation carriers. Based on recent estimates that 11.7–16.6 % of women with ovarian cancer are BRCA carriers and 2 % are HNPCC carriers, results suggest under-identification of carriers and under-utilization of genetic services by providers and patients. Interventions to increase medical providers’ referrals, even in a specialized oncology clinic, are necessary and may include innovations in educating these providers using web-based methods. Ease of referral by the introduction of an electronic cancer genetic referral form represents another new direction that may increase genetic risk assessment for high-risk women with ovarian cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10897-013-9598-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4589274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1558995904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5842-38eb784739a4e49910b01dc4b54746acb8bcc686b8f82fba75562f8f4e08514d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AG8k4I03o8nk2wuhDHVVCivF4mXIZM9sU2cz22Rmy_wHf7TZTi1VEHuTHDjPez6StyheEvyWYCzfJYKVliUmtNRcq3J6VBwSLmlJudaPc4y5LqXE-KB4ltIlxlgrTp4WBxUVUnLKD4ufCwgweIfOfPqBjlOClDYQBtT2EX3vc4iu_XCBTrb5hM7bDi13NnobUG2Dg_genUELMebEVzsMEENCNqzQchxclifkA7LoPPgdxOSHCS2mAK7v-nVuugw30YTqzgfvnhdPWtsleHF7HxXnH0--1Z_K0-Xic318WjquWFVSBY1UTFJtGTCtCW4wWTnWcCaZsK5RjXNCiUa1qmobKzkXVataBjivz1b0qPgw192OzQZWLu-b5zfb6Dc2Tqa33vyZCf7CrPudYVzpSrJc4M1tgdhfjZAGs_HJQdfZAP2YDOEZzF-CH4AyRqkQQuEHoJRywrWgGX39F3rZjzHkR7uhsJSM73uTmXKxTylCe7ciwWbvIDM7yGQHmb2DzJQ1r-6_zZ3it2UyIGfg2ncw_b-i-bKoGRaiyspqVqYsCmuI94b-5zy_AGAG47o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433077454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic Risk Assessment for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Referral Patterns and Outcomes in a University Gynecologic Oncology Clinic</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Petzel, Sue V. ; Vogel, Rachel Isaksson ; Bensend, Tracy ; Leininger, Anna ; Argenta, Peter A. ; Geller, Melissa A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Petzel, Sue V. ; Vogel, Rachel Isaksson ; Bensend, Tracy ; Leininger, Anna ; Argenta, Peter A. ; Geller, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known about genetic service utilization and ovarian cancer. We identified the frequency and outcome of genetic counseling referral, predictors of referral, and referral uptake for ovarian cancer patients. Using pathology reports, we identified all epithelial ovarian cancer patients seen in a university gynecologic oncology clinic (1/04–8/06). Electronic medical records (EMR) were used to document genetic service referral, time from diagnosis-to-referral, point-in-treatment at referral, personal/family cancer history, demographics, and genetic test results. Groups were compared using chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. The study population consisted of 376 women with ovarian cancer, 72 (19 %) of who were referred for genetic counseling/testing, primarily during surveillance. Of those referred, 42 (58 %) had personal or family genetic counseling and 34 (47 %) were ultimately tested or identified due to known family mutation. Family history and prior cancer were associated with referral. Family history, living in a larger community, higher-stage disease, and serous histology were associated with undergoing genetic counseling. Risk assessment identified 20 BRCA1/2 (5.3 %) and 1 HNPCC (0.3 %) mutation carriers. Based on recent estimates that 11.7–16.6 % of women with ovarian cancer are BRCA carriers and 2 % are HNPCC carriers, results suggest under-identification of carriers and under-utilization of genetic services by providers and patients. Interventions to increase medical providers’ referrals, even in a specialized oncology clinic, are necessary and may include innovations in educating these providers using web-based methods. Ease of referral by the introduction of an electronic cancer genetic referral form represents another new direction that may increase genetic risk assessment for high-risk women with ovarian cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9598-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23677535</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JGCOET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; BRCA ; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial ; Carriers ; Clinical Psychology ; Ethics ; Female ; Genetic counseling ; Genetic counselling ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genetic risk assessment ; Genetic screening ; Genetic testing ; Gynecology ; Hospitals, University - organization &amp; administration ; HPNCC ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - genetics ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - therapy ; Original Research ; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Ovarian cancer ; Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics ; Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy ; Public Health ; Referral and Consultation ; Referrals ; Risk Assessment ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of genetic counseling, 2013-10, Vol.22 (5), p.662-673</ispartof><rights>National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2013</rights><rights>2013 National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5842-38eb784739a4e49910b01dc4b54746acb8bcc686b8f82fba75562f8f4e08514d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5842-38eb784739a4e49910b01dc4b54746acb8bcc686b8f82fba75562f8f4e08514d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10897-013-9598-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10897-013-9598-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,12825,27901,27902,30976,30977,41464,42533,45550,45551,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23677535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petzel, Sue V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Rachel Isaksson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensend, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leininger, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argenta, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic Risk Assessment for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Referral Patterns and Outcomes in a University Gynecologic Oncology Clinic</title><title>Journal of genetic counseling</title><addtitle>J Genet Counsel</addtitle><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><description>Little is known about genetic service utilization and ovarian cancer. We identified the frequency and outcome of genetic counseling referral, predictors of referral, and referral uptake for ovarian cancer patients. Using pathology reports, we identified all epithelial ovarian cancer patients seen in a university gynecologic oncology clinic (1/04–8/06). Electronic medical records (EMR) were used to document genetic service referral, time from diagnosis-to-referral, point-in-treatment at referral, personal/family cancer history, demographics, and genetic test results. Groups were compared using chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. The study population consisted of 376 women with ovarian cancer, 72 (19 %) of who were referred for genetic counseling/testing, primarily during surveillance. Of those referred, 42 (58 %) had personal or family genetic counseling and 34 (47 %) were ultimately tested or identified due to known family mutation. Family history and prior cancer were associated with referral. Family history, living in a larger community, higher-stage disease, and serous histology were associated with undergoing genetic counseling. Risk assessment identified 20 BRCA1/2 (5.3 %) and 1 HNPCC (0.3 %) mutation carriers. Based on recent estimates that 11.7–16.6 % of women with ovarian cancer are BRCA carriers and 2 % are HNPCC carriers, results suggest under-identification of carriers and under-utilization of genetic services by providers and patients. Interventions to increase medical providers’ referrals, even in a specialized oncology clinic, are necessary and may include innovations in educating these providers using web-based methods. Ease of referral by the introduction of an electronic cancer genetic referral form represents another new direction that may increase genetic risk assessment for high-risk women with ovarian cancer.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>BRCA</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial</subject><subject>Carriers</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetic counselling</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Genetic risk assessment</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals, University - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>HPNCC</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - genetics</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - therapy</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1059-7700</issn><issn>1573-3599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AG8k4I03o8nk2wuhDHVVCivF4mXIZM9sU2cz22Rmy_wHf7TZTi1VEHuTHDjPez6StyheEvyWYCzfJYKVliUmtNRcq3J6VBwSLmlJudaPc4y5LqXE-KB4ltIlxlgrTp4WBxUVUnLKD4ufCwgweIfOfPqBjlOClDYQBtT2EX3vc4iu_XCBTrb5hM7bDi13NnobUG2Dg_genUELMebEVzsMEENCNqzQchxclifkA7LoPPgdxOSHCS2mAK7v-nVuugw30YTqzgfvnhdPWtsleHF7HxXnH0--1Z_K0-Xic318WjquWFVSBY1UTFJtGTCtCW4wWTnWcCaZsK5RjXNCiUa1qmobKzkXVataBjivz1b0qPgw192OzQZWLu-b5zfb6Dc2Tqa33vyZCf7CrPudYVzpSrJc4M1tgdhfjZAGs_HJQdfZAP2YDOEZzF-CH4AyRqkQQuEHoJRywrWgGX39F3rZjzHkR7uhsJSM73uTmXKxTylCe7ciwWbvIDM7yGQHmb2DzJQ1r-6_zZ3it2UyIGfg2ncw_b-i-bKoGRaiyspqVqYsCmuI94b-5zy_AGAG47o</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Petzel, Sue V.</creator><creator>Vogel, Rachel Isaksson</creator><creator>Bensend, Tracy</creator><creator>Leininger, Anna</creator><creator>Argenta, Peter A.</creator><creator>Geller, Melissa A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Genetic Risk Assessment for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Referral Patterns and Outcomes in a University Gynecologic Oncology Clinic</title><author>Petzel, Sue V. ; Vogel, Rachel Isaksson ; Bensend, Tracy ; Leininger, Anna ; Argenta, Peter A. ; Geller, Melissa A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5842-38eb784739a4e49910b01dc4b54746acb8bcc686b8f82fba75562f8f4e08514d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>BRCA</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial</topic><topic>Carriers</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetic counselling</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Genetic risk assessment</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals, University - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>HPNCC</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - genetics</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - therapy</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petzel, Sue V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Rachel Isaksson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensend, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leininger, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argenta, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petzel, Sue V.</au><au>Vogel, Rachel Isaksson</au><au>Bensend, Tracy</au><au>Leininger, Anna</au><au>Argenta, Peter A.</au><au>Geller, Melissa A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic Risk Assessment for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Referral Patterns and Outcomes in a University Gynecologic Oncology Clinic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle><stitle>J Genet Counsel</stitle><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>662</spage><epage>673</epage><pages>662-673</pages><issn>1059-7700</issn><eissn>1573-3599</eissn><coden>JGCOET</coden><abstract>Little is known about genetic service utilization and ovarian cancer. We identified the frequency and outcome of genetic counseling referral, predictors of referral, and referral uptake for ovarian cancer patients. Using pathology reports, we identified all epithelial ovarian cancer patients seen in a university gynecologic oncology clinic (1/04–8/06). Electronic medical records (EMR) were used to document genetic service referral, time from diagnosis-to-referral, point-in-treatment at referral, personal/family cancer history, demographics, and genetic test results. Groups were compared using chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. The study population consisted of 376 women with ovarian cancer, 72 (19 %) of who were referred for genetic counseling/testing, primarily during surveillance. Of those referred, 42 (58 %) had personal or family genetic counseling and 34 (47 %) were ultimately tested or identified due to known family mutation. Family history and prior cancer were associated with referral. Family history, living in a larger community, higher-stage disease, and serous histology were associated with undergoing genetic counseling. Risk assessment identified 20 BRCA1/2 (5.3 %) and 1 HNPCC (0.3 %) mutation carriers. Based on recent estimates that 11.7–16.6 % of women with ovarian cancer are BRCA carriers and 2 % are HNPCC carriers, results suggest under-identification of carriers and under-utilization of genetic services by providers and patients. Interventions to increase medical providers’ referrals, even in a specialized oncology clinic, are necessary and may include innovations in educating these providers using web-based methods. Ease of referral by the introduction of an electronic cancer genetic referral form represents another new direction that may increase genetic risk assessment for high-risk women with ovarian cancer.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23677535</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10897-013-9598-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-7700
ispartof Journal of genetic counseling, 2013-10, Vol.22 (5), p.662-673
issn 1059-7700
1573-3599
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4589274
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
BRCA
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
Carriers
Clinical Psychology
Ethics
Female
Genetic counseling
Genetic counselling
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic risk assessment
Genetic screening
Genetic testing
Gynecology
Hospitals, University - organization & administration
HPNCC
Human Genetics
Humans
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - genetics
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - therapy
Original Research
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - statistics & numerical data
Ovarian cancer
Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics
Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy
Public Health
Referral and Consultation
Referrals
Risk Assessment
Women
title Genetic Risk Assessment for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Referral Patterns and Outcomes in a University Gynecologic Oncology Clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20Risk%20Assessment%20for%20Women%20with%20Epithelial%20Ovarian%20Cancer:%20Referral%20Patterns%20and%20Outcomes%20in%20a%20University%20Gynecologic%20Oncology%20Clinic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20genetic%20counseling&rft.au=Petzel,%20Sue%20V.&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=662&rft.epage=673&rft.pages=662-673&rft.issn=1059-7700&rft.eissn=1573-3599&rft.coden=JGCOET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10897-013-9598-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1558995904%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433077454&rft_id=info:pmid/23677535&rfr_iscdi=true