Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs)

Continuous-flow culture models are one tool for studying complex interactions between members of human fecal microbiotas because they allow studies to be completed during an extended period of time under conditions where pH, nutrient availability, and washout of waste products and dead cells can be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbiome 2015-09, Vol.3 (1), p.42-42, Article 42
Hauptverfasser: Auchtung, Jennifer M, Robinson, Catherine D, Britton, Robert A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 42
container_title Microbiome
container_volume 3
creator Auchtung, Jennifer M
Robinson, Catherine D
Britton, Robert A
description Continuous-flow culture models are one tool for studying complex interactions between members of human fecal microbiotas because they allow studies to be completed during an extended period of time under conditions where pH, nutrient availability, and washout of waste products and dead cells can be controlled. Because many of the existing well-validated continuous-flow models are large and complex, we were interested in developing a simpler continuous-flow system that would allow microbial community dynamics to be examined in higher throughput while still maintaining complex microbial communities. To this end, we developed minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs), small volume bioreactors (15 ml) that allow simultaneous cultivation of up to 48 microbial communities in a single anaerobic chamber. We used MBRA to characterize the microbial community dynamics of replicate reactors inoculated from three different human fecal donors and reactors seeded with feces pooled from these three donors. We found that MBRA could be used to efficiently cultivate complex microbial communities that were a subset of the initial fecal inoculum (15-25 % of fecal OTUs initially observed). After an initial acclimation period of approximately 1 week, communities in each reactor stabilized and exhibited day-to-day variation similar to that observed in stable mouse fecal communities. Replicate reactors were predominately populated by shared core microbial communities; variation between replicate reactors was primarily driven by shifts in abundance of shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Consistent with differences between fecal donors, MBRA communities present in reactors seeded with different fecal samples had distinct composition and structure. From these analyses, we conclude that MBRAs can be used to cultivate communities that recapitulate key features of human fecal communities and are a useful tool to facilitate higher-throughput studies of the dynamics of these communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40168-015-0106-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4588258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541663353</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541663353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-d3587909b915fbfd834b04f14407de3cf240277b9591264d1af0d5ab1f2c81d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkltrFDEUxwdRbKn9AL5IwJcW3JozSWYyL8J28VKoCFWfQyaXNWUmWZOZ4n57z7K1dsWEkNvvf04u_6p6CfQCQDZvC6fQyAUFgY02C_GkOq4p7xZ1A_Lpo_FRdVrKLcXSAW-5fF4d1Q2HTjA4rrareZjCnZ5CiiR5UibdD-4NyW6Tk51NwBkZg8mpD3ogJo3jHMMUXCE-p5HY4L3LLk7EO4OATTHlQuYS4hp1MfQhZafNlDLROettIWefL2-W5fxF9czrobjT-_6k-v7h_bfVp8X1l49Xq-X1wohaTgvLhGw72vUdCN97KxnvKffAOW2tY8bXnNZt23eiA7yWBe2pFboHXxsJFthJ9W4fdzP3o7MGz5r1oDY5jDpvVdJBHe7E8EOt053iQspaSAxwdh8gp5-zK5MaQzFuGHR0aS4KWpCMYXKK6Ot_0Ns054jXQ6qtkeKi_kut9eBUiD5hXrMLqpaCQ9MwJhhSF_-hsFqH_5Gi8wHXDwTnBwJkJvdrWuu5FHX19eaQhT2LH1tKdv7hPYCqnb3U3l4K7aV29lICNa8eP-SD4o-Z2G948cn7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772331452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Auchtung, Jennifer M ; Robinson, Catherine D ; Britton, Robert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Auchtung, Jennifer M ; Robinson, Catherine D ; Britton, Robert A</creatorcontrib><description>Continuous-flow culture models are one tool for studying complex interactions between members of human fecal microbiotas because they allow studies to be completed during an extended period of time under conditions where pH, nutrient availability, and washout of waste products and dead cells can be controlled. Because many of the existing well-validated continuous-flow models are large and complex, we were interested in developing a simpler continuous-flow system that would allow microbial community dynamics to be examined in higher throughput while still maintaining complex microbial communities. To this end, we developed minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs), small volume bioreactors (15 ml) that allow simultaneous cultivation of up to 48 microbial communities in a single anaerobic chamber. We used MBRA to characterize the microbial community dynamics of replicate reactors inoculated from three different human fecal donors and reactors seeded with feces pooled from these three donors. We found that MBRA could be used to efficiently cultivate complex microbial communities that were a subset of the initial fecal inoculum (15-25 % of fecal OTUs initially observed). After an initial acclimation period of approximately 1 week, communities in each reactor stabilized and exhibited day-to-day variation similar to that observed in stable mouse fecal communities. Replicate reactors were predominately populated by shared core microbial communities; variation between replicate reactors was primarily driven by shifts in abundance of shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Consistent with differences between fecal donors, MBRA communities present in reactors seeded with different fecal samples had distinct composition and structure. From these analyses, we conclude that MBRAs can be used to cultivate communities that recapitulate key features of human fecal communities and are a useful tool to facilitate higher-throughput studies of the dynamics of these communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-2618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-2618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40168-015-0106-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26419531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biodiversity ; Bioreactors ; Cluster Analysis ; Feces - microbiology ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Growth ; Humans ; Mice ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Microbiome, 2015-09, Vol.3 (1), p.42-42, Article 42</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2015</rights><rights>Auchtung et al. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-d3587909b915fbfd834b04f14407de3cf240277b9591264d1af0d5ab1f2c81d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-d3587909b915fbfd834b04f14407de3cf240277b9591264d1af0d5ab1f2c81d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588258/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588258/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26419531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Auchtung, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Catherine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, Robert A</creatorcontrib><title>Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs)</title><title>Microbiome</title><addtitle>Microbiome</addtitle><description>Continuous-flow culture models are one tool for studying complex interactions between members of human fecal microbiotas because they allow studies to be completed during an extended period of time under conditions where pH, nutrient availability, and washout of waste products and dead cells can be controlled. Because many of the existing well-validated continuous-flow models are large and complex, we were interested in developing a simpler continuous-flow system that would allow microbial community dynamics to be examined in higher throughput while still maintaining complex microbial communities. To this end, we developed minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs), small volume bioreactors (15 ml) that allow simultaneous cultivation of up to 48 microbial communities in a single anaerobic chamber. We used MBRA to characterize the microbial community dynamics of replicate reactors inoculated from three different human fecal donors and reactors seeded with feces pooled from these three donors. We found that MBRA could be used to efficiently cultivate complex microbial communities that were a subset of the initial fecal inoculum (15-25 % of fecal OTUs initially observed). After an initial acclimation period of approximately 1 week, communities in each reactor stabilized and exhibited day-to-day variation similar to that observed in stable mouse fecal communities. Replicate reactors were predominately populated by shared core microbial communities; variation between replicate reactors was primarily driven by shifts in abundance of shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Consistent with differences between fecal donors, MBRA communities present in reactors seeded with different fecal samples had distinct composition and structure. From these analyses, we conclude that MBRAs can be used to cultivate communities that recapitulate key features of human fecal communities and are a useful tool to facilitate higher-throughput studies of the dynamics of these communities.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>2049-2618</issn><issn>2049-2618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkltrFDEUxwdRbKn9AL5IwJcW3JozSWYyL8J28VKoCFWfQyaXNWUmWZOZ4n57z7K1dsWEkNvvf04u_6p6CfQCQDZvC6fQyAUFgY02C_GkOq4p7xZ1A_Lpo_FRdVrKLcXSAW-5fF4d1Q2HTjA4rrareZjCnZ5CiiR5UibdD-4NyW6Tk51NwBkZg8mpD3ogJo3jHMMUXCE-p5HY4L3LLk7EO4OATTHlQuYS4hp1MfQhZafNlDLROettIWefL2-W5fxF9czrobjT-_6k-v7h_bfVp8X1l49Xq-X1wohaTgvLhGw72vUdCN97KxnvKffAOW2tY8bXnNZt23eiA7yWBe2pFboHXxsJFthJ9W4fdzP3o7MGz5r1oDY5jDpvVdJBHe7E8EOt053iQspaSAxwdh8gp5-zK5MaQzFuGHR0aS4KWpCMYXKK6Ot_0Ns054jXQ6qtkeKi_kut9eBUiD5hXrMLqpaCQ9MwJhhSF_-hsFqH_5Gi8wHXDwTnBwJkJvdrWuu5FHX19eaQhT2LH1tKdv7hPYCqnb3U3l4K7aV29lICNa8eP-SD4o-Z2G948cn7</recordid><startdate>20150930</startdate><enddate>20150930</enddate><creator>Auchtung, Jennifer M</creator><creator>Robinson, Catherine D</creator><creator>Britton, Robert A</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150930</creationdate><title>Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs)</title><author>Auchtung, Jennifer M ; Robinson, Catherine D ; Britton, Robert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-d3587909b915fbfd834b04f14407de3cf240277b9591264d1af0d5ab1f2c81d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Auchtung, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Catherine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, Robert A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Microbiome</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Auchtung, Jennifer M</au><au>Robinson, Catherine D</au><au>Britton, Robert A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs)</atitle><jtitle>Microbiome</jtitle><addtitle>Microbiome</addtitle><date>2015-09-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>42-42</pages><artnum>42</artnum><issn>2049-2618</issn><eissn>2049-2618</eissn><abstract>Continuous-flow culture models are one tool for studying complex interactions between members of human fecal microbiotas because they allow studies to be completed during an extended period of time under conditions where pH, nutrient availability, and washout of waste products and dead cells can be controlled. Because many of the existing well-validated continuous-flow models are large and complex, we were interested in developing a simpler continuous-flow system that would allow microbial community dynamics to be examined in higher throughput while still maintaining complex microbial communities. To this end, we developed minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs), small volume bioreactors (15 ml) that allow simultaneous cultivation of up to 48 microbial communities in a single anaerobic chamber. We used MBRA to characterize the microbial community dynamics of replicate reactors inoculated from three different human fecal donors and reactors seeded with feces pooled from these three donors. We found that MBRA could be used to efficiently cultivate complex microbial communities that were a subset of the initial fecal inoculum (15-25 % of fecal OTUs initially observed). After an initial acclimation period of approximately 1 week, communities in each reactor stabilized and exhibited day-to-day variation similar to that observed in stable mouse fecal communities. Replicate reactors were predominately populated by shared core microbial communities; variation between replicate reactors was primarily driven by shifts in abundance of shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Consistent with differences between fecal donors, MBRA communities present in reactors seeded with different fecal samples had distinct composition and structure. From these analyses, we conclude that MBRAs can be used to cultivate communities that recapitulate key features of human fecal communities and are a useful tool to facilitate higher-throughput studies of the dynamics of these communities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26419531</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40168-015-0106-5</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-2618
ispartof Microbiome, 2015-09, Vol.3 (1), p.42-42, Article 42
issn 2049-2618
2049-2618
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4588258
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Animals
Biodiversity
Bioreactors
Cluster Analysis
Feces - microbiology
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Growth
Humans
Mice
Microbiota
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Reproducibility of Results
title Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T20%3A30%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultivation%20of%20stable,%20reproducible%20microbial%20communities%20from%20different%20fecal%20donors%20using%20minibioreactor%20arrays%20(MBRAs)&rft.jtitle=Microbiome&rft.au=Auchtung,%20Jennifer%20M&rft.date=2015-09-30&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=42-42&rft.artnum=42&rft.issn=2049-2618&rft.eissn=2049-2618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40168-015-0106-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541663353%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772331452&rft_id=info:pmid/26419531&rft_galeid=A541663353&rfr_iscdi=true