Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection
The molecular characterization of tumors using next generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging diagnostic tool that is quickly becoming an integral part of clinical decision making. Cancer genomic profiling involves significant challenges including DNA quality and quantity, tumor heterogeneity, and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancers 2015-07, Vol.7 (3), p.1313-1332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1332 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1313 |
container_title | Cancers |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Gray, Phillip N Dunlop, Charles L M Elliott, Aaron M |
description | The molecular characterization of tumors using next generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging diagnostic tool that is quickly becoming an integral part of clinical decision making. Cancer genomic profiling involves significant challenges including DNA quality and quantity, tumor heterogeneity, and the need to detect a wide variety of complex genetic mutations. Most available comprehensive diagnostic tests rely on primer based amplification or probe based capture methods coupled with NGS to detect hotspot mutation sites or whole regions implicated in disease. These tumor panels utilize highly customized bioinformatics pipelines to perform the difficult task of accurately calling cancer relevant alterations such as single nucleotide variations, small indels or large genomic alterations from the NGS data. In this review, we will discuss the challenges of solid tumor assay design/analysis and report a case study that highlights the need to include complementary technologies (i.e., arrays) and germline analysis in tumor testing to reliably identify copy number alterations and actionable variants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/cancers7030837 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4586770</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1698034028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-7ef93ee4f127af19b9c5b3e3b4e7468291820bff1a1126771506890589a6a5033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1P3DAQtapWBVGuPVaWeullqT-S2O6h0mqXUiS6PSycLceZLEaJDbaDyh_p762jBQT1ZUYzz2_ezEPoIyUnnCvy1RpvISZBOJFcvEGHjAi2aBpVvX2RH6DjlG5IeZxT0Yj36IA1VHHO6CH6uwkZL4cBb-BPxmfgIZrsgsdbuJvAW-d3eO3MzoeUnU3YRMCrCCZDh0_vJjN8w1e-KyKy8d0MzteAN9MsLOHQ420YXIcvpzFEvEzJPOA1JLfzuC-FbRjLMIt_TXk_dA0Z7Jx9QO96MyQ4foxH6OrH6eXq5-Li99n5anmxsBWVeSGgVxyg6ikTpqeqVbZuOfC2AlE1kikqGWn7nhpKWSMErUkjFamlMo2pyz2O0Pc97-3UjtBZ8DmaQd9GN5r4oINx-nXHu2u9C_e6qmXhI4XgyyNBDOVgKevRJQvDYDyEKWnaKEl4RZgs0M__QW_CFH1ZT1PBiiGSyZnwZI-yMaQUoX8WQ4meXdevXS8fPr1c4Rn-5DH_BzOHquE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721938280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gray, Phillip N ; Dunlop, Charles L M ; Elliott, Aaron M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, Phillip N ; Dunlop, Charles L M ; Elliott, Aaron M</creatorcontrib><description>The molecular characterization of tumors using next generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging diagnostic tool that is quickly becoming an integral part of clinical decision making. Cancer genomic profiling involves significant challenges including DNA quality and quantity, tumor heterogeneity, and the need to detect a wide variety of complex genetic mutations. Most available comprehensive diagnostic tests rely on primer based amplification or probe based capture methods coupled with NGS to detect hotspot mutation sites or whole regions implicated in disease. These tumor panels utilize highly customized bioinformatics pipelines to perform the difficult task of accurately calling cancer relevant alterations such as single nucleotide variations, small indels or large genomic alterations from the NGS data. In this review, we will discuss the challenges of solid tumor assay design/analysis and report a case study that highlights the need to include complementary technologies (i.e., arrays) and germline analysis in tumor testing to reliably identify copy number alterations and actionable variants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers7030837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26193321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bioassays ; Cancer ; Medical diagnosis ; Molecular biology ; Mutation ; Review</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2015-07, Vol.7 (3), p.1313-1332</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2015</rights><rights>2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-7ef93ee4f127af19b9c5b3e3b4e7468291820bff1a1126771506890589a6a5033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-7ef93ee4f127af19b9c5b3e3b4e7468291820bff1a1126771506890589a6a5033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586770/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586770/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26193321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, Phillip N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlop, Charles L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Aaron M</creatorcontrib><title>Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>The molecular characterization of tumors using next generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging diagnostic tool that is quickly becoming an integral part of clinical decision making. Cancer genomic profiling involves significant challenges including DNA quality and quantity, tumor heterogeneity, and the need to detect a wide variety of complex genetic mutations. Most available comprehensive diagnostic tests rely on primer based amplification or probe based capture methods coupled with NGS to detect hotspot mutation sites or whole regions implicated in disease. These tumor panels utilize highly customized bioinformatics pipelines to perform the difficult task of accurately calling cancer relevant alterations such as single nucleotide variations, small indels or large genomic alterations from the NGS data. In this review, we will discuss the challenges of solid tumor assay design/analysis and report a case study that highlights the need to include complementary technologies (i.e., arrays) and germline analysis in tumor testing to reliably identify copy number alterations and actionable variants.</description><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1P3DAQtapWBVGuPVaWeullqT-S2O6h0mqXUiS6PSycLceZLEaJDbaDyh_p762jBQT1ZUYzz2_ezEPoIyUnnCvy1RpvISZBOJFcvEGHjAi2aBpVvX2RH6DjlG5IeZxT0Yj36IA1VHHO6CH6uwkZL4cBb-BPxmfgIZrsgsdbuJvAW-d3eO3MzoeUnU3YRMCrCCZDh0_vJjN8w1e-KyKy8d0MzteAN9MsLOHQ420YXIcvpzFEvEzJPOA1JLfzuC-FbRjLMIt_TXk_dA0Z7Jx9QO96MyQ4foxH6OrH6eXq5-Li99n5anmxsBWVeSGgVxyg6ikTpqeqVbZuOfC2AlE1kikqGWn7nhpKWSMErUkjFamlMo2pyz2O0Pc97-3UjtBZ8DmaQd9GN5r4oINx-nXHu2u9C_e6qmXhI4XgyyNBDOVgKevRJQvDYDyEKWnaKEl4RZgs0M__QW_CFH1ZT1PBiiGSyZnwZI-yMaQUoX8WQ4meXdevXS8fPr1c4Rn-5DH_BzOHquE</recordid><startdate>20150717</startdate><enddate>20150717</enddate><creator>Gray, Phillip N</creator><creator>Dunlop, Charles L M</creator><creator>Elliott, Aaron M</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150717</creationdate><title>Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection</title><author>Gray, Phillip N ; Dunlop, Charles L M ; Elliott, Aaron M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-7ef93ee4f127af19b9c5b3e3b4e7468291820bff1a1126771506890589a6a5033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, Phillip N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlop, Charles L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Aaron M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, Phillip N</au><au>Dunlop, Charles L M</au><au>Elliott, Aaron M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2015-07-17</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1313</spage><epage>1332</epage><pages>1313-1332</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>The molecular characterization of tumors using next generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging diagnostic tool that is quickly becoming an integral part of clinical decision making. Cancer genomic profiling involves significant challenges including DNA quality and quantity, tumor heterogeneity, and the need to detect a wide variety of complex genetic mutations. Most available comprehensive diagnostic tests rely on primer based amplification or probe based capture methods coupled with NGS to detect hotspot mutation sites or whole regions implicated in disease. These tumor panels utilize highly customized bioinformatics pipelines to perform the difficult task of accurately calling cancer relevant alterations such as single nucleotide variations, small indels or large genomic alterations from the NGS data. In this review, we will discuss the challenges of solid tumor assay design/analysis and report a case study that highlights the need to include complementary technologies (i.e., arrays) and germline analysis in tumor testing to reliably identify copy number alterations and actionable variants.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>26193321</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers7030837</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6694 |
ispartof | Cancers, 2015-07, Vol.7 (3), p.1313-1332 |
issn | 2072-6694 2072-6694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4586770 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Bioassays Cancer Medical diagnosis Molecular biology Mutation Review |
title | Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A52%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20All%20Next%20Generation%20Sequencing%20Diagnostics%20are%20Created%20Equal:%20Understanding%20the%20Nuances%20of%20Solid%20Tumor%20Assay%20Design%20for%20Somatic%20Mutation%20Detection&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Gray,%20Phillip%20N&rft.date=2015-07-17&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1313&rft.epage=1332&rft.pages=1313-1332&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers7030837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1698034028%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721938280&rft_id=info:pmid/26193321&rfr_iscdi=true |