Gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ProGas): a prospective cohort study

Summary Background Gastrostomy feeding is commonly used to support patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who develop severe dysphagia. Although recommended by both the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies, currently little evidence indicates the o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lancet neurology 2015-07, Vol.14 (7), p.702-709
1. Verfasser: Anon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 709
container_issue 7
container_start_page 702
container_title Lancet neurology
container_volume 14
creator Anon
description Summary Background Gastrostomy feeding is commonly used to support patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who develop severe dysphagia. Although recommended by both the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies, currently little evidence indicates the optimum method and timing for gastrostomy insertion. We aimed to compare gastrostomy insertion approaches in terms of safety and clinical outcomes. Methods In this large, longitudinal, prospective cohort study (ProGas), we enrolled patients with a diagnosis of definite, probable, laboratory supported, or possible amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who had agreed with their treating clinicians to undergo gastrostomy at 24 motor neuron disease care centres or clinics in the UK. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after gastrostomy. This study was registered on the UK Clinical Research Network database, identification number 9923. Findings Between Nov 2, 2010, and Jan 31, 2014, 345 patients were recruited of whom 330 had gastrostomy. 163 (49%) patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, 121 (37%) underwent radiologically inserted gastrostomy, 43 (13%) underwent per-oral image-guided gastrostomy, and three (1%) underwent surgical gastrostomy. 12 patients (4%, 95% CI 2·1–6·2) died within the first 30 days after gastrostomy: five (3%) of 163 after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, four (3%) of 121 after radiologically inserted gastrostomy, and three (7%) of 43 after per-oral image-guided gastrostomy (p=0·46). Including repeat attempts in 14 patients, 21 (6%) of 344 gastrostomy procedures could not be completed: 11 (6%) of 171 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies, seven (6%) of 121 radiologically inserted gastrostomies, and three (6%) of 45 per-oral image-guided gastrostomies (p=0·947). Interpretation The three methods of gastrostomy seemed to be as safe as each other in relation to survival and procedural complications. In the absence of data from randomised trials, our findings could inform clinicians and patients in reaching decisions about gastrostomy and will stimulate further research into the nutritional management in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Funding Motor Neurone Disease Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (MNDA) and the Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00104-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4578147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1474442215001040</els_id><sourcerecordid>3708942911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b0faea1764e4017627ba642403250ff40f03f8b07591d555d341c3da8d7670983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQjRCIlsJPAFnisj2kHTv-Wg5FqIIWqRJIwNnyOg7rksSp7SzKv8fZXRbaS09jed57M_NeUbzGcIYB8_NvmApaUkrIArNTAAy0hCfF8f6bs6eHNyFHxYsYbwEIphI_L44IByKWtDou1JWOKfiYfDch16NBJ2f7FNFvl9ZId5PP3WHtDGp1skG3KJrWZoKLaPE1-Ew_fYc0GvLXYE1yG4uMX_uQUExjPb0snjW6jfbVvp4UPz59_H55Xd58ufp8-eGmNBzzVK6g0VZjwamlkAsRK80poVARBk1DoYGqkSsQbIlrxlhdUWyqWstacAFLWZ0UFzvdYVx1tjb5hrysGoLrdJiU107d7_RurX76jaJMyOxTFljsBYK_G21MqnPR2LbVvfVjVFhQLqWQ21mPQDMQgC8py9C3D6C3fgx9dmJGcckYZ7Mg26FMdjEG2xz2xqDmtNU2bTVHqTBT27QVZN6b_48-sP7GmwHvdwCbrd84G1Q0OV5jaxdyWKr27tERFw8UTOt6Z3T7y042_rtGRaJgJzJrYLZVgOoPPITOVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686855658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ProGas): a prospective cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Anon</creator><creatorcontrib>Anon ; ProGas Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Gastrostomy feeding is commonly used to support patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who develop severe dysphagia. Although recommended by both the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies, currently little evidence indicates the optimum method and timing for gastrostomy insertion. We aimed to compare gastrostomy insertion approaches in terms of safety and clinical outcomes. Methods In this large, longitudinal, prospective cohort study (ProGas), we enrolled patients with a diagnosis of definite, probable, laboratory supported, or possible amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who had agreed with their treating clinicians to undergo gastrostomy at 24 motor neuron disease care centres or clinics in the UK. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after gastrostomy. This study was registered on the UK Clinical Research Network database, identification number 9923. Findings Between Nov 2, 2010, and Jan 31, 2014, 345 patients were recruited of whom 330 had gastrostomy. 163 (49%) patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, 121 (37%) underwent radiologically inserted gastrostomy, 43 (13%) underwent per-oral image-guided gastrostomy, and three (1%) underwent surgical gastrostomy. 12 patients (4%, 95% CI 2·1–6·2) died within the first 30 days after gastrostomy: five (3%) of 163 after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, four (3%) of 121 after radiologically inserted gastrostomy, and three (7%) of 43 after per-oral image-guided gastrostomy (p=0·46). Including repeat attempts in 14 patients, 21 (6%) of 344 gastrostomy procedures could not be completed: 11 (6%) of 171 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies, seven (6%) of 121 radiologically inserted gastrostomies, and three (6%) of 45 per-oral image-guided gastrostomies (p=0·947). Interpretation The three methods of gastrostomy seemed to be as safe as each other in relation to survival and procedural complications. In the absence of data from randomised trials, our findings could inform clinicians and patients in reaching decisions about gastrostomy and will stimulate further research into the nutritional management in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Funding Motor Neurone Disease Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (MNDA) and the Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-4422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00104-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26027943</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - diagnosis ; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - mortality ; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Data collection ; Dysphagia ; Endoscopy ; Enteral Nutrition - methods ; Enteral Nutrition - mortality ; Female ; Gastrostomy - methods ; Gastrostomy - mortality ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neurology ; Ostomy ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of life ; Survival Rate - trends ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Lancet neurology, 2015-07, Vol.14 (7), p.702-709</ispartof><rights>ProGas Study Group. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY</rights><rights>2015 ProGas Study Group. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 ProGas Study Group. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul 2015</rights><rights>2015 ProGas Study Group. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b0faea1764e4017627ba642403250ff40f03f8b07591d555d341c3da8d7670983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b0faea1764e4017627ba642403250ff40f03f8b07591d555d341c3da8d7670983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1686855658?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974,64362,64364,64366,72216</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26027943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ProGas Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ProGas): a prospective cohort study</title><title>Lancet neurology</title><addtitle>Lancet Neurol</addtitle><description>Summary Background Gastrostomy feeding is commonly used to support patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who develop severe dysphagia. Although recommended by both the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies, currently little evidence indicates the optimum method and timing for gastrostomy insertion. We aimed to compare gastrostomy insertion approaches in terms of safety and clinical outcomes. Methods In this large, longitudinal, prospective cohort study (ProGas), we enrolled patients with a diagnosis of definite, probable, laboratory supported, or possible amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who had agreed with their treating clinicians to undergo gastrostomy at 24 motor neuron disease care centres or clinics in the UK. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after gastrostomy. This study was registered on the UK Clinical Research Network database, identification number 9923. Findings Between Nov 2, 2010, and Jan 31, 2014, 345 patients were recruited of whom 330 had gastrostomy. 163 (49%) patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, 121 (37%) underwent radiologically inserted gastrostomy, 43 (13%) underwent per-oral image-guided gastrostomy, and three (1%) underwent surgical gastrostomy. 12 patients (4%, 95% CI 2·1–6·2) died within the first 30 days after gastrostomy: five (3%) of 163 after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, four (3%) of 121 after radiologically inserted gastrostomy, and three (7%) of 43 after per-oral image-guided gastrostomy (p=0·46). Including repeat attempts in 14 patients, 21 (6%) of 344 gastrostomy procedures could not be completed: 11 (6%) of 171 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies, seven (6%) of 121 radiologically inserted gastrostomies, and three (6%) of 45 per-oral image-guided gastrostomies (p=0·947). Interpretation The three methods of gastrostomy seemed to be as safe as each other in relation to survival and procedural complications. In the absence of data from randomised trials, our findings could inform clinicians and patients in reaching decisions about gastrostomy and will stimulate further research into the nutritional management in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Funding Motor Neurone Disease Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (MNDA) and the Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis</subject><subject>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - mortality</subject><subject>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - methods</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - mortality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - methods</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>1474-4422</issn><issn>1474-4465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQjRCIlsJPAFnisj2kHTv-Wg5FqIIWqRJIwNnyOg7rksSp7SzKv8fZXRbaS09jed57M_NeUbzGcIYB8_NvmApaUkrIArNTAAy0hCfF8f6bs6eHNyFHxYsYbwEIphI_L44IByKWtDou1JWOKfiYfDch16NBJ2f7FNFvl9ZId5PP3WHtDGp1skG3KJrWZoKLaPE1-Ew_fYc0GvLXYE1yG4uMX_uQUExjPb0snjW6jfbVvp4UPz59_H55Xd58ufp8-eGmNBzzVK6g0VZjwamlkAsRK80poVARBk1DoYGqkSsQbIlrxlhdUWyqWstacAFLWZ0UFzvdYVx1tjb5hrysGoLrdJiU107d7_RurX76jaJMyOxTFljsBYK_G21MqnPR2LbVvfVjVFhQLqWQ21mPQDMQgC8py9C3D6C3fgx9dmJGcckYZ7Mg26FMdjEG2xz2xqDmtNU2bTVHqTBT27QVZN6b_48-sP7GmwHvdwCbrd84G1Q0OV5jaxdyWKr27tERFw8UTOt6Z3T7y042_rtGRaJgJzJrYLZVgOoPPITOVQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Anon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Lancet Pub. Group</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ProGas): a prospective cohort study</title><author>Anon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b0faea1764e4017627ba642403250ff40f03f8b07591d555d341c3da8d7670983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis</topic><topic>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - mortality</topic><topic>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - methods</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - mortality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - methods</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ProGas Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Lancet neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anon</au><aucorp>ProGas Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ProGas): a prospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Lancet neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Neurol</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>702</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>702-709</pages><issn>1474-4422</issn><eissn>1474-4465</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Gastrostomy feeding is commonly used to support patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who develop severe dysphagia. Although recommended by both the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies, currently little evidence indicates the optimum method and timing for gastrostomy insertion. We aimed to compare gastrostomy insertion approaches in terms of safety and clinical outcomes. Methods In this large, longitudinal, prospective cohort study (ProGas), we enrolled patients with a diagnosis of definite, probable, laboratory supported, or possible amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who had agreed with their treating clinicians to undergo gastrostomy at 24 motor neuron disease care centres or clinics in the UK. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after gastrostomy. This study was registered on the UK Clinical Research Network database, identification number 9923. Findings Between Nov 2, 2010, and Jan 31, 2014, 345 patients were recruited of whom 330 had gastrostomy. 163 (49%) patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, 121 (37%) underwent radiologically inserted gastrostomy, 43 (13%) underwent per-oral image-guided gastrostomy, and three (1%) underwent surgical gastrostomy. 12 patients (4%, 95% CI 2·1–6·2) died within the first 30 days after gastrostomy: five (3%) of 163 after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, four (3%) of 121 after radiologically inserted gastrostomy, and three (7%) of 43 after per-oral image-guided gastrostomy (p=0·46). Including repeat attempts in 14 patients, 21 (6%) of 344 gastrostomy procedures could not be completed: 11 (6%) of 171 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies, seven (6%) of 121 radiologically inserted gastrostomies, and three (6%) of 45 per-oral image-guided gastrostomies (p=0·947). Interpretation The three methods of gastrostomy seemed to be as safe as each other in relation to survival and procedural complications. In the absence of data from randomised trials, our findings could inform clinicians and patients in reaching decisions about gastrostomy and will stimulate further research into the nutritional management in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Funding Motor Neurone Disease Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (MNDA) and the Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26027943</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00104-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1474-4422
ispartof Lancet neurology, 2015-07, Vol.14 (7), p.702-709
issn 1474-4422
1474-4465
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4578147
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Aged
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - diagnosis
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - mortality
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - surgery
Cohort Studies
Data collection
Dysphagia
Endoscopy
Enteral Nutrition - methods
Enteral Nutrition - mortality
Female
Gastrostomy - methods
Gastrostomy - mortality
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Mortality
Neurology
Ostomy
Prospective Studies
Quality of life
Survival Rate - trends
United Kingdom - epidemiology
title Gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ProGas): a prospective cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T21%3A06%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gastrostomy%20in%20patients%20with%20amyotrophic%20lateral%20sclerosis%20(ProGas):%20a%20prospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Lancet%20neurology&rft.au=Anon&rft.aucorp=ProGas%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=702&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=702-709&rft.issn=1474-4422&rft.eissn=1474-4465&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00104-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3708942911%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686855658&rft_id=info:pmid/26027943&rft_els_id=S1474442215001040&rfr_iscdi=true