Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis

We compared the frequency of usage and success of minimally invasive approaches in the management of pediatric urolithiasis in our clinic. Data from pediatric patients (≤16 years of age) who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and extracorporeal shock wave litho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkish journal of urology 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.111-115
Hauptverfasser: Altıntaş, Ramazan, Beytur, Ali, Oğuz, Fatih, Çimen, Serhan, Akdemir, Ender, Güneş, Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 115
container_issue 2
container_start_page 111
container_title Turkish journal of urology
container_volume 39
creator Altıntaş, Ramazan
Beytur, Ali
Oğuz, Fatih
Çimen, Serhan
Akdemir, Ender
Güneş, Ali
description We compared the frequency of usage and success of minimally invasive approaches in the management of pediatric urolithiasis in our clinic. Data from pediatric patients (≤16 years of age) who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) between January 2001 and December 2011 were retrospectively investigated. In this study, 415 pediatric patients, who were treated for 291 renal, and 124 ureteral stones, were evaluated. The patients were treated with PNL (n=148; 82 boys, 66 girls), URS (n=99; 58 boys, and 41 girls) or ESWL (n=168; 91 boys, and 77 girls). The mean patient ages were 7.3 (1-16), 9.1 (1-16), and 8.8 (1-16) years in the PNL, URS, and ESWL groups, respectively. The stone-free rates after treatment with PNL, URS, and ESWL were 77, 83.8 and 88.7%, respectively. It is important that selected therapies are properly planned, and the use of minimally invasive approaches is important in pediatric patients due to potentially high recurrence rates. Currently, ESWL, PNL and URS are performed with high success rates for the treatment of stones, and open surgery is rarely used due to the success obtained with minimally invasive approaches.
doi_str_mv 10.5152/tud.2013.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4548596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709393079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c965b0a5269e77d28bc479a784c9fa208f160a6fc4a8d9a6c1befd4465e7ec933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkT1PwzAQhi0EolXpxowyMpDi79gLEqr4VBELzNbFcYilNAl2Uqn_nlQtFUwe7rn3fPcgdEnwQhBBb_uhWFBM2AITdYKmhGGVcsnIKZpSwnXKKBMTNI_R55jzTDKh8DmaUMmowppM0eubb_wa6nqb-GYD0W9cAl0XWrCViwk0RdJXzofElaW3YHdY0rnCQx-8TYbQ1r6v_NgYL9BZCXV088M7Q5-PDx_L53T1_vSyvF-llinep1ZLkWMQVGqXZQVVueWZhkxxq0ugWJVEYpCl5aAKDdKS3JUF51K4zFnN2Azd7XO7IV-7wrqmD1CbLox7hK1pwZv_lcZX5qvdGC64ElqOAdeHgNB-Dy72Zu2jdXUNjWuHaEiGNdMMZ3pEb_aoDW2MwZXHMQSbnQEzGjA7A2Y0MOJXf792hH_vzX4Agq6D9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709393079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Altıntaş, Ramazan ; Beytur, Ali ; Oğuz, Fatih ; Çimen, Serhan ; Akdemir, Ender ; Güneş, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Altıntaş, Ramazan ; Beytur, Ali ; Oğuz, Fatih ; Çimen, Serhan ; Akdemir, Ender ; Güneş, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the frequency of usage and success of minimally invasive approaches in the management of pediatric urolithiasis in our clinic. Data from pediatric patients (≤16 years of age) who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) between January 2001 and December 2011 were retrospectively investigated. In this study, 415 pediatric patients, who were treated for 291 renal, and 124 ureteral stones, were evaluated. The patients were treated with PNL (n=148; 82 boys, 66 girls), URS (n=99; 58 boys, and 41 girls) or ESWL (n=168; 91 boys, and 77 girls). The mean patient ages were 7.3 (1-16), 9.1 (1-16), and 8.8 (1-16) years in the PNL, URS, and ESWL groups, respectively. The stone-free rates after treatment with PNL, URS, and ESWL were 77, 83.8 and 88.7%, respectively. It is important that selected therapies are properly planned, and the use of minimally invasive approaches is important in pediatric patients due to potentially high recurrence rates. Currently, ESWL, PNL and URS are performed with high success rates for the treatment of stones, and open surgery is rarely used due to the success obtained with minimally invasive approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-3235</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1300-5804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1308-4631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-3057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5152/tud.2013.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26328091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Turkish Association of Urology</publisher><subject>Endourology</subject><ispartof>Turkish journal of urology, 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.111-115</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2013 by Turkish Association of Urology 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c965b0a5269e77d28bc479a784c9fa208f160a6fc4a8d9a6c1befd4465e7ec933</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548596/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548596/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altıntaş, Ramazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beytur, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oğuz, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çimen, Serhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdemir, Ender</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güneş, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis</title><title>Turkish journal of urology</title><addtitle>Turk J Urol</addtitle><description>We compared the frequency of usage and success of minimally invasive approaches in the management of pediatric urolithiasis in our clinic. Data from pediatric patients (≤16 years of age) who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) between January 2001 and December 2011 were retrospectively investigated. In this study, 415 pediatric patients, who were treated for 291 renal, and 124 ureteral stones, were evaluated. The patients were treated with PNL (n=148; 82 boys, 66 girls), URS (n=99; 58 boys, and 41 girls) or ESWL (n=168; 91 boys, and 77 girls). The mean patient ages were 7.3 (1-16), 9.1 (1-16), and 8.8 (1-16) years in the PNL, URS, and ESWL groups, respectively. The stone-free rates after treatment with PNL, URS, and ESWL were 77, 83.8 and 88.7%, respectively. It is important that selected therapies are properly planned, and the use of minimally invasive approaches is important in pediatric patients due to potentially high recurrence rates. Currently, ESWL, PNL and URS are performed with high success rates for the treatment of stones, and open surgery is rarely used due to the success obtained with minimally invasive approaches.</description><subject>Endourology</subject><issn>2149-3235</issn><issn>1300-5804</issn><issn>1308-4631</issn><issn>2149-3057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkT1PwzAQhi0EolXpxowyMpDi79gLEqr4VBELzNbFcYilNAl2Uqn_nlQtFUwe7rn3fPcgdEnwQhBBb_uhWFBM2AITdYKmhGGVcsnIKZpSwnXKKBMTNI_R55jzTDKh8DmaUMmowppM0eubb_wa6nqb-GYD0W9cAl0XWrCViwk0RdJXzofElaW3YHdY0rnCQx-8TYbQ1r6v_NgYL9BZCXV088M7Q5-PDx_L53T1_vSyvF-llinep1ZLkWMQVGqXZQVVueWZhkxxq0ugWJVEYpCl5aAKDdKS3JUF51K4zFnN2Azd7XO7IV-7wrqmD1CbLox7hK1pwZv_lcZX5qvdGC64ElqOAdeHgNB-Dy72Zu2jdXUNjWuHaEiGNdMMZ3pEb_aoDW2MwZXHMQSbnQEzGjA7A2Y0MOJXf792hH_vzX4Agq6D9Q</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Altıntaş, Ramazan</creator><creator>Beytur, Ali</creator><creator>Oğuz, Fatih</creator><creator>Çimen, Serhan</creator><creator>Akdemir, Ender</creator><creator>Güneş, Ali</creator><general>Turkish Association of Urology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis</title><author>Altıntaş, Ramazan ; Beytur, Ali ; Oğuz, Fatih ; Çimen, Serhan ; Akdemir, Ender ; Güneş, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c965b0a5269e77d28bc479a784c9fa208f160a6fc4a8d9a6c1befd4465e7ec933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Endourology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altıntaş, Ramazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beytur, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oğuz, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çimen, Serhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdemir, Ender</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güneş, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Turkish journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altıntaş, Ramazan</au><au>Beytur, Ali</au><au>Oğuz, Fatih</au><au>Çimen, Serhan</au><au>Akdemir, Ender</au><au>Güneş, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis</atitle><jtitle>Turkish journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Urol</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>111-115</pages><issn>2149-3235</issn><issn>1300-5804</issn><eissn>1308-4631</eissn><eissn>2149-3057</eissn><abstract>We compared the frequency of usage and success of minimally invasive approaches in the management of pediatric urolithiasis in our clinic. Data from pediatric patients (≤16 years of age) who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) between January 2001 and December 2011 were retrospectively investigated. In this study, 415 pediatric patients, who were treated for 291 renal, and 124 ureteral stones, were evaluated. The patients were treated with PNL (n=148; 82 boys, 66 girls), URS (n=99; 58 boys, and 41 girls) or ESWL (n=168; 91 boys, and 77 girls). The mean patient ages were 7.3 (1-16), 9.1 (1-16), and 8.8 (1-16) years in the PNL, URS, and ESWL groups, respectively. The stone-free rates after treatment with PNL, URS, and ESWL were 77, 83.8 and 88.7%, respectively. It is important that selected therapies are properly planned, and the use of minimally invasive approaches is important in pediatric patients due to potentially high recurrence rates. Currently, ESWL, PNL and URS are performed with high success rates for the treatment of stones, and open surgery is rarely used due to the success obtained with minimally invasive approaches.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Turkish Association of Urology</pub><pmid>26328091</pmid><doi>10.5152/tud.2013.018</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-3235
ispartof Turkish journal of urology, 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.111-115
issn 2149-3235
1300-5804
1308-4631
2149-3057
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4548596
source PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Endourology
title Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A13%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally%20invasive%20approaches%20and%20their%20efficacy%20in%20pediatric%20urolithiasis&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Alt%C4%B1nta%C5%9F,%20Ramazan&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=111-115&rft.issn=2149-3235&rft.eissn=1308-4631&rft_id=info:doi/10.5152/tud.2013.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1709393079%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709393079&rft_id=info:pmid/26328091&rfr_iscdi=true