Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
The aim of this study was to determine whether baseline right ventricular (RV) function assessed by standard echocardiography may indicate patients who will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The data of 57 patients (54 men, 95%), aged 66.4 ±8.7 years with heart failure (HF) having...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of medical science 2015-08, Vol.11 (4), p.736-742 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 742 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 736 |
container_title | Archives of medical science |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Kusiak, Aleksander Wiliński, Jerzy Wojciechowska, Wiktoria Jastrzębski, Marek Sondej, Tomasz Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata Czarnecka, Danuta M |
description | The aim of this study was to determine whether baseline right ventricular (RV) function assessed by standard echocardiography may indicate patients who will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
The data of 57 patients (54 men, 95%), aged 66.4 ±8.7 years with heart failure (HF) having a CRT device implanted were collected. All patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and QRS complex duration ≥ 120 ms. Echocardiographic examination with tissue Doppler imaging techniques and complex RV evaluation were performed at baseline and three months after CRT onset.
Three months after CRT implantation, patients responding to CRT, defined as a reduction of left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) of at least 10% (n = 34), compared to patients with a reduction of LVESV of less than 10% (n = 23), had at baseline a smaller right atrium diameter (47.85 ±11.33 mm vs. 52.65 ±8.69 mm; p = 0.028), higher TAPSE (14.56 ±2.57 mm vs. 13.04 ±2.93 mm; p = 0.030) and lower grade of tricuspid valve regurgitation (1.82 ±0.97 vs. 2.3 ±0.88; p = 0.033).
This study showed that there are differences in baseline right ventricular function between responders and non-responders to CRT. Yet in our study, none of the baseline RV parameters provided any value in identifying patients who would respond to CRT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5114/aoms.2015.53292 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4548031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1708896014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-1aae1976a023af561be4bee5015f9e26f8b843a812b63773c4bf1c4e2954ff6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJadK059yCIJdevNXow7YugRDSDwj00p7NWCutFWzJkezA9tSfXm2alqSn0YyeeTWvhpAzYBsFID9inPKGM1AbJbjmr8gJtLquNCg4KudGyAo058fkbc53jMlSgTfkmNeCc9bKE_LrxgzRYNr6uEs4D95QzNnmPNmw0Oho8rthoQ8lS96sIybq1mAWHwP1gSab5xi2NmWKYUtDDNWz0hLpozSaA7gPZkgx-J_42L0Mtjy4f0deOxyzff8UT8mPTzffr79Ut98-f72-uq1mruVSAaIF3dTIuECnauit7K1VxbrTlteu7VspsAXe16JphJG9AyMt10o6V1txSi7_6M5rP9mtORjCsZuTnzDtu4i-e3kT_NDt4kMnlWyZgCLw4UkgxfvV5qWbfDZ2HDHYuOYOGtaWv2cgC3rxH3oX1xSKvQMllKq10oU6fz7Rv1H-Lkf8Bu7Jllw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1703556959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kusiak, Aleksander ; Wiliński, Jerzy ; Wojciechowska, Wiktoria ; Jastrzębski, Marek ; Sondej, Tomasz ; Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata ; Czarnecka, Danuta M</creator><creatorcontrib>Kusiak, Aleksander ; Wiliński, Jerzy ; Wojciechowska, Wiktoria ; Jastrzębski, Marek ; Sondej, Tomasz ; Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata ; Czarnecka, Danuta M</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to determine whether baseline right ventricular (RV) function assessed by standard echocardiography may indicate patients who will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
The data of 57 patients (54 men, 95%), aged 66.4 ±8.7 years with heart failure (HF) having a CRT device implanted were collected. All patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and QRS complex duration ≥ 120 ms. Echocardiographic examination with tissue Doppler imaging techniques and complex RV evaluation were performed at baseline and three months after CRT onset.
Three months after CRT implantation, patients responding to CRT, defined as a reduction of left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) of at least 10% (n = 34), compared to patients with a reduction of LVESV of less than 10% (n = 23), had at baseline a smaller right atrium diameter (47.85 ±11.33 mm vs. 52.65 ±8.69 mm; p = 0.028), higher TAPSE (14.56 ±2.57 mm vs. 13.04 ±2.93 mm; p = 0.030) and lower grade of tricuspid valve regurgitation (1.82 ±0.97 vs. 2.3 ±0.88; p = 0.033).
This study showed that there are differences in baseline right ventricular function between responders and non-responders to CRT. Yet in our study, none of the baseline RV parameters provided any value in identifying patients who would respond to CRT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1734-1922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1896-9151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.53292</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26322084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><subject>Clinical Research</subject><ispartof>Archives of medical science, 2015-08, Vol.11 (4), p.736-742</ispartof><rights>Copyright Termedia Publishing House 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Termedia & Banach 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548031/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548031/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26322084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kusiak, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiliński, Jerzy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojciechowska, Wiktoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jastrzębski, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sondej, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czarnecka, Danuta M</creatorcontrib><title>Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><title>Archives of medical science</title><addtitle>Arch Med Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to determine whether baseline right ventricular (RV) function assessed by standard echocardiography may indicate patients who will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
The data of 57 patients (54 men, 95%), aged 66.4 ±8.7 years with heart failure (HF) having a CRT device implanted were collected. All patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and QRS complex duration ≥ 120 ms. Echocardiographic examination with tissue Doppler imaging techniques and complex RV evaluation were performed at baseline and three months after CRT onset.
Three months after CRT implantation, patients responding to CRT, defined as a reduction of left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) of at least 10% (n = 34), compared to patients with a reduction of LVESV of less than 10% (n = 23), had at baseline a smaller right atrium diameter (47.85 ±11.33 mm vs. 52.65 ±8.69 mm; p = 0.028), higher TAPSE (14.56 ±2.57 mm vs. 13.04 ±2.93 mm; p = 0.030) and lower grade of tricuspid valve regurgitation (1.82 ±0.97 vs. 2.3 ±0.88; p = 0.033).
This study showed that there are differences in baseline right ventricular function between responders and non-responders to CRT. Yet in our study, none of the baseline RV parameters provided any value in identifying patients who would respond to CRT.</description><subject>Clinical Research</subject><issn>1734-1922</issn><issn>1896-9151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJadK059yCIJdevNXow7YugRDSDwj00p7NWCutFWzJkezA9tSfXm2alqSn0YyeeTWvhpAzYBsFID9inPKGM1AbJbjmr8gJtLquNCg4KudGyAo058fkbc53jMlSgTfkmNeCc9bKE_LrxgzRYNr6uEs4D95QzNnmPNmw0Oho8rthoQ8lS96sIybq1mAWHwP1gSab5xi2NmWKYUtDDNWz0hLpozSaA7gPZkgx-J_42L0Mtjy4f0deOxyzff8UT8mPTzffr79Ut98-f72-uq1mruVSAaIF3dTIuECnauit7K1VxbrTlteu7VspsAXe16JphJG9AyMt10o6V1txSi7_6M5rP9mtORjCsZuTnzDtu4i-e3kT_NDt4kMnlWyZgCLw4UkgxfvV5qWbfDZ2HDHYuOYOGtaWv2cgC3rxH3oX1xSKvQMllKq10oU6fz7Rv1H-Lkf8Bu7Jllw</recordid><startdate>20150812</startdate><enddate>20150812</enddate><creator>Kusiak, Aleksander</creator><creator>Wiliński, Jerzy</creator><creator>Wojciechowska, Wiktoria</creator><creator>Jastrzębski, Marek</creator><creator>Sondej, Tomasz</creator><creator>Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata</creator><creator>Czarnecka, Danuta M</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150812</creationdate><title>Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><author>Kusiak, Aleksander ; Wiliński, Jerzy ; Wojciechowska, Wiktoria ; Jastrzębski, Marek ; Sondej, Tomasz ; Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata ; Czarnecka, Danuta M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-1aae1976a023af561be4bee5015f9e26f8b843a812b63773c4bf1c4e2954ff6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Clinical Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kusiak, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiliński, Jerzy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojciechowska, Wiktoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jastrzębski, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sondej, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czarnecka, Danuta M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kusiak, Aleksander</au><au>Wiliński, Jerzy</au><au>Wojciechowska, Wiktoria</au><au>Jastrzębski, Marek</au><au>Sondej, Tomasz</au><au>Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata</au><au>Czarnecka, Danuta M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy</atitle><jtitle>Archives of medical science</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Med Sci</addtitle><date>2015-08-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>736</spage><epage>742</epage><pages>736-742</pages><issn>1734-1922</issn><eissn>1896-9151</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine whether baseline right ventricular (RV) function assessed by standard echocardiography may indicate patients who will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
The data of 57 patients (54 men, 95%), aged 66.4 ±8.7 years with heart failure (HF) having a CRT device implanted were collected. All patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and QRS complex duration ≥ 120 ms. Echocardiographic examination with tissue Doppler imaging techniques and complex RV evaluation were performed at baseline and three months after CRT onset.
Three months after CRT implantation, patients responding to CRT, defined as a reduction of left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) of at least 10% (n = 34), compared to patients with a reduction of LVESV of less than 10% (n = 23), had at baseline a smaller right atrium diameter (47.85 ±11.33 mm vs. 52.65 ±8.69 mm; p = 0.028), higher TAPSE (14.56 ±2.57 mm vs. 13.04 ±2.93 mm; p = 0.030) and lower grade of tricuspid valve regurgitation (1.82 ±0.97 vs. 2.3 ±0.88; p = 0.033).
This study showed that there are differences in baseline right ventricular function between responders and non-responders to CRT. Yet in our study, none of the baseline RV parameters provided any value in identifying patients who would respond to CRT.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><pmid>26322084</pmid><doi>10.5114/aoms.2015.53292</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1734-1922 |
ispartof | Archives of medical science, 2015-08, Vol.11 (4), p.736-742 |
issn | 1734-1922 1896-9151 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4548031 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Clinical Research |
title | Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A00%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Echocardiographic%20assessment%20of%20right%20ventricular%20function%20in%20responders%20and%20non-responders%20to%20cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20medical%20science&rft.au=Kusiak,%20Aleksander&rft.date=2015-08-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=736&rft.epage=742&rft.pages=736-742&rft.issn=1734-1922&rft.eissn=1896-9151&rft_id=info:doi/10.5114/aoms.2015.53292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1708896014%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1703556959&rft_id=info:pmid/26322084&rfr_iscdi=true |