Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers

The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable in vitro performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the tes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The AAPS journal 2015-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1105-1116
Hauptverfasser: Shur, Jagdeep, Saluja, Bhawana, Lee, Sau, Tibbatts, James, Price, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1116
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1105
container_title The AAPS journal
container_volume 17
creator Shur, Jagdeep
Saluja, Bhawana
Lee, Sau
Tibbatts, James
Price, Robert
description The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable in vitro performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the test and reference DPI devices were modelled via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Micronized fluticasone propionate (FP) was characterized to determine particle size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA) and surface interfacial properties using cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB). CFD simulations suggested that the pressure drop and airflow velocity in the MultiHaler® were greater than Accuhaler®. Two modified test devices (MOD MH 1 and MOD MH 2) were manufactured with the introduction of by-pass channels in the airflow path, which achieved comparable specific resistance and airflow path between the test and reference devices. Assessment of reference product formulation in modified test devices suggested that MOD MH 2 achieved comparable in vitro performance to the reference product. CAB analysis suggested that adhesion of all FP batches to lactose was different, with batch D showing greatest and batch A least adhesion to lactose. Test DPI formulations were manufactured using four different batches of FP with milled or sieved lactose, and showed that batch A FP formulated with sieved lactose in MOD MH 2 device demonstrated the highest degree of similarity to the Accuhaler® in vitro deposition. Application of CFD modelling and material characterization of formulation raw materials enabled the modification of device and formulation critical material attributes to create an in vitro comparable device/formulation system to the reference product.
doi_str_mv 10.1208/s12248-015-9775-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4540741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1705735334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cebcb2816f91801d1062052a2e922b827d82dd14b6947d606a0ee783434a7ee93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LJDEQhsOirDruD9iL5OilNZ-d7ouwjJ-guIfVa0h3V89EupPZJK2Mv97IqOhFCFSg3vepol6EflNyRBmpjiNlTFQFobKolZLF8w-0S6UkhRK03Pr030F7MT4Qwhmn9CfaYbKWJa_4LhrP-h7ahH2PT-HRtpBLtAuHjevwuQ_jNJhkvcP5pSXgK4fvbQoez_24MsE0drBpjXsf8M00JFvcOZvwqY8ZFNb4r3_qIGTX0gwQ4j7a7s0Q4ddbnaG787N_88vi-vbiav7numiFYKlooWkbVtGyr2lFaEdJyYhkhkHNWFMx1VWs66hoylqoriSlIQCq4oILowBqPkMnG-5qakboWnApmEGvgh1NWGtvrP7acXapF_5RCylIPlgGHL4Bgv8_QUx6tLGFYTAO_BQ1VUQqLnkeOUN0I22DjzFA_zGGEv0ak97EpHNM-jUm_Zw9B5_3-3C855IFbCOIueUWEPSDn4LLN_uG-gKFh573</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705735334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shur, Jagdeep ; Saluja, Bhawana ; Lee, Sau ; Tibbatts, James ; Price, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Shur, Jagdeep ; Saluja, Bhawana ; Lee, Sau ; Tibbatts, James ; Price, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable in vitro performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the test and reference DPI devices were modelled via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Micronized fluticasone propionate (FP) was characterized to determine particle size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA) and surface interfacial properties using cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB). CFD simulations suggested that the pressure drop and airflow velocity in the MultiHaler® were greater than Accuhaler®. Two modified test devices (MOD MH 1 and MOD MH 2) were manufactured with the introduction of by-pass channels in the airflow path, which achieved comparable specific resistance and airflow path between the test and reference devices. Assessment of reference product formulation in modified test devices suggested that MOD MH 2 achieved comparable in vitro performance to the reference product. CAB analysis suggested that adhesion of all FP batches to lactose was different, with batch D showing greatest and batch A least adhesion to lactose. Test DPI formulations were manufactured using four different batches of FP with milled or sieved lactose, and showed that batch A FP formulated with sieved lactose in MOD MH 2 device demonstrated the highest degree of similarity to the Accuhaler® in vitro deposition. Application of CFD modelling and material characterization of formulation raw materials enabled the modification of device and formulation critical material attributes to create an in vitro comparable device/formulation system to the reference product.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-7416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1208/s12248-015-9775-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25956383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical ; Dry Powder Inhalers ; Equipment Design ; Excipients - chemistry ; Fluticasone - administration &amp; dosage ; Hydrodynamics ; In Vitro Techniques ; Lactose - chemistry ; Particle Size ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacy ; Research Article ; Surface Properties ; Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products</subject><ispartof>The AAPS journal, 2015-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1105-1116</ispartof><rights>American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cebcb2816f91801d1062052a2e922b827d82dd14b6947d606a0ee783434a7ee93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cebcb2816f91801d1062052a2e922b827d82dd14b6947d606a0ee783434a7ee93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540741/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540741/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shur, Jagdeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saluja, Bhawana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibbatts, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers</title><title>The AAPS journal</title><addtitle>AAPS J</addtitle><addtitle>AAPS J</addtitle><description>The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable in vitro performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the test and reference DPI devices were modelled via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Micronized fluticasone propionate (FP) was characterized to determine particle size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA) and surface interfacial properties using cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB). CFD simulations suggested that the pressure drop and airflow velocity in the MultiHaler® were greater than Accuhaler®. Two modified test devices (MOD MH 1 and MOD MH 2) were manufactured with the introduction of by-pass channels in the airflow path, which achieved comparable specific resistance and airflow path between the test and reference devices. Assessment of reference product formulation in modified test devices suggested that MOD MH 2 achieved comparable in vitro performance to the reference product. CAB analysis suggested that adhesion of all FP batches to lactose was different, with batch D showing greatest and batch A least adhesion to lactose. Test DPI formulations were manufactured using four different batches of FP with milled or sieved lactose, and showed that batch A FP formulated with sieved lactose in MOD MH 2 device demonstrated the highest degree of similarity to the Accuhaler® in vitro deposition. Application of CFD modelling and material characterization of formulation raw materials enabled the modification of device and formulation critical material attributes to create an in vitro comparable device/formulation system to the reference product.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Dry Powder Inhalers</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Excipients - chemistry</subject><subject>Fluticasone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Lactose - chemistry</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products</subject><issn>1550-7416</issn><issn>1550-7416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LJDEQhsOirDruD9iL5OilNZ-d7ouwjJ-guIfVa0h3V89EupPZJK2Mv97IqOhFCFSg3vepol6EflNyRBmpjiNlTFQFobKolZLF8w-0S6UkhRK03Pr030F7MT4Qwhmn9CfaYbKWJa_4LhrP-h7ahH2PT-HRtpBLtAuHjevwuQ_jNJhkvcP5pSXgK4fvbQoez_24MsE0drBpjXsf8M00JFvcOZvwqY8ZFNb4r3_qIGTX0gwQ4j7a7s0Q4ddbnaG787N_88vi-vbiav7numiFYKlooWkbVtGyr2lFaEdJyYhkhkHNWFMx1VWs66hoylqoriSlIQCq4oILowBqPkMnG-5qakboWnApmEGvgh1NWGtvrP7acXapF_5RCylIPlgGHL4Bgv8_QUx6tLGFYTAO_BQ1VUQqLnkeOUN0I22DjzFA_zGGEv0ak97EpHNM-jUm_Zw9B5_3-3C855IFbCOIueUWEPSDn4LLN_uG-gKFh573</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Shur, Jagdeep</creator><creator>Saluja, Bhawana</creator><creator>Lee, Sau</creator><creator>Tibbatts, James</creator><creator>Price, Robert</creator><general>Springer US</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers</title><author>Shur, Jagdeep ; Saluja, Bhawana ; Lee, Sau ; Tibbatts, James ; Price, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cebcb2816f91801d1062052a2e922b827d82dd14b6947d606a0ee783434a7ee93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Dry Powder Inhalers</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Excipients - chemistry</topic><topic>Fluticasone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Lactose - chemistry</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shur, Jagdeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saluja, Bhawana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibbatts, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The AAPS journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shur, Jagdeep</au><au>Saluja, Bhawana</au><au>Lee, Sau</au><au>Tibbatts, James</au><au>Price, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers</atitle><jtitle>The AAPS journal</jtitle><stitle>AAPS J</stitle><addtitle>AAPS J</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1105</spage><epage>1116</epage><pages>1105-1116</pages><issn>1550-7416</issn><eissn>1550-7416</eissn><abstract>The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable in vitro performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the test and reference DPI devices were modelled via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Micronized fluticasone propionate (FP) was characterized to determine particle size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA) and surface interfacial properties using cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB). CFD simulations suggested that the pressure drop and airflow velocity in the MultiHaler® were greater than Accuhaler®. Two modified test devices (MOD MH 1 and MOD MH 2) were manufactured with the introduction of by-pass channels in the airflow path, which achieved comparable specific resistance and airflow path between the test and reference devices. Assessment of reference product formulation in modified test devices suggested that MOD MH 2 achieved comparable in vitro performance to the reference product. CAB analysis suggested that adhesion of all FP batches to lactose was different, with batch D showing greatest and batch A least adhesion to lactose. Test DPI formulations were manufactured using four different batches of FP with milled or sieved lactose, and showed that batch A FP formulated with sieved lactose in MOD MH 2 device demonstrated the highest degree of similarity to the Accuhaler® in vitro deposition. Application of CFD modelling and material characterization of formulation raw materials enabled the modification of device and formulation critical material attributes to create an in vitro comparable device/formulation system to the reference product.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25956383</pmid><doi>10.1208/s12248-015-9775-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-7416
ispartof The AAPS journal, 2015-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1105-1116
issn 1550-7416
1550-7416
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4540741
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Biochemistry
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Biotechnology
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
Dry Powder Inhalers
Equipment Design
Excipients - chemistry
Fluticasone - administration & dosage
Hydrodynamics
In Vitro Techniques
Lactose - chemistry
Particle Size
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Pharmacy
Research Article
Surface Properties
Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products
title Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A06%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Device%20Design%20and%20Formulation%20on%20the%20In%20Vitro%20Comparability%20for%20Multi-Unit%20Dose%20Dry%20Powder%20Inhalers&rft.jtitle=The%20AAPS%20journal&rft.au=Shur,%20Jagdeep&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1105&rft.epage=1116&rft.pages=1105-1116&rft.issn=1550-7416&rft.eissn=1550-7416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1208/s12248-015-9775-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1705735334%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705735334&rft_id=info:pmid/25956383&rfr_iscdi=true