Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers
The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable in vitro performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the tes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The AAPS journal 2015-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1105-1116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1116 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1105 |
container_title | The AAPS journal |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Shur, Jagdeep Saluja, Bhawana Lee, Sau Tibbatts, James Price, Robert |
description | The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable
in vitro
performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the test and reference DPI devices were modelled
via
computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Micronized fluticasone propionate (FP) was characterized to determine particle size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA) and surface interfacial properties using cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB). CFD simulations suggested that the pressure drop and airflow velocity in the MultiHaler® were greater than Accuhaler®. Two modified test devices (MOD MH 1 and MOD MH 2) were manufactured with the introduction of by-pass channels in the airflow path, which achieved comparable specific resistance and airflow path between the test and reference devices. Assessment of reference product formulation in modified test devices suggested that MOD MH 2 achieved comparable
in vitro
performance to the reference product. CAB analysis suggested that adhesion of all FP batches to lactose was different, with batch D showing greatest and batch A least adhesion to lactose. Test DPI formulations were manufactured using four different batches of FP with milled or sieved lactose, and showed that batch A FP formulated with sieved lactose in MOD MH 2 device demonstrated the highest degree of similarity to the Accuhaler®
in vitro
deposition. Application of CFD modelling and material characterization of formulation raw materials enabled the modification of device and formulation critical material attributes to create an
in vitro
comparable device/formulation system to the reference product. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1208/s12248-015-9775-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4540741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1705735334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cebcb2816f91801d1062052a2e922b827d82dd14b6947d606a0ee783434a7ee93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LJDEQhsOirDruD9iL5OilNZ-d7ouwjJ-guIfVa0h3V89EupPZJK2Mv97IqOhFCFSg3vepol6EflNyRBmpjiNlTFQFobKolZLF8w-0S6UkhRK03Pr030F7MT4Qwhmn9CfaYbKWJa_4LhrP-h7ahH2PT-HRtpBLtAuHjevwuQ_jNJhkvcP5pSXgK4fvbQoez_24MsE0drBpjXsf8M00JFvcOZvwqY8ZFNb4r3_qIGTX0gwQ4j7a7s0Q4ddbnaG787N_88vi-vbiav7numiFYKlooWkbVtGyr2lFaEdJyYhkhkHNWFMx1VWs66hoylqoriSlIQCq4oILowBqPkMnG-5qakboWnApmEGvgh1NWGtvrP7acXapF_5RCylIPlgGHL4Bgv8_QUx6tLGFYTAO_BQ1VUQqLnkeOUN0I22DjzFA_zGGEv0ak97EpHNM-jUm_Zw9B5_3-3C855IFbCOIueUWEPSDn4LLN_uG-gKFh573</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705735334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shur, Jagdeep ; Saluja, Bhawana ; Lee, Sau ; Tibbatts, James ; Price, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Shur, Jagdeep ; Saluja, Bhawana ; Lee, Sau ; Tibbatts, James ; Price, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable
in vitro
performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the test and reference DPI devices were modelled
via
computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Micronized fluticasone propionate (FP) was characterized to determine particle size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA) and surface interfacial properties using cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB). CFD simulations suggested that the pressure drop and airflow velocity in the MultiHaler® were greater than Accuhaler®. Two modified test devices (MOD MH 1 and MOD MH 2) were manufactured with the introduction of by-pass channels in the airflow path, which achieved comparable specific resistance and airflow path between the test and reference devices. Assessment of reference product formulation in modified test devices suggested that MOD MH 2 achieved comparable
in vitro
performance to the reference product. CAB analysis suggested that adhesion of all FP batches to lactose was different, with batch D showing greatest and batch A least adhesion to lactose. Test DPI formulations were manufactured using four different batches of FP with milled or sieved lactose, and showed that batch A FP formulated with sieved lactose in MOD MH 2 device demonstrated the highest degree of similarity to the Accuhaler®
in vitro
deposition. Application of CFD modelling and material characterization of formulation raw materials enabled the modification of device and formulation critical material attributes to create an
in vitro
comparable device/formulation system to the reference product.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-7416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1208/s12248-015-9775-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25956383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical ; Dry Powder Inhalers ; Equipment Design ; Excipients - chemistry ; Fluticasone - administration & dosage ; Hydrodynamics ; In Vitro Techniques ; Lactose - chemistry ; Particle Size ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacy ; Research Article ; Surface Properties ; Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products</subject><ispartof>The AAPS journal, 2015-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1105-1116</ispartof><rights>American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cebcb2816f91801d1062052a2e922b827d82dd14b6947d606a0ee783434a7ee93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cebcb2816f91801d1062052a2e922b827d82dd14b6947d606a0ee783434a7ee93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540741/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540741/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shur, Jagdeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saluja, Bhawana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibbatts, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers</title><title>The AAPS journal</title><addtitle>AAPS J</addtitle><addtitle>AAPS J</addtitle><description>The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable
in vitro
performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the test and reference DPI devices were modelled
via
computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Micronized fluticasone propionate (FP) was characterized to determine particle size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA) and surface interfacial properties using cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB). CFD simulations suggested that the pressure drop and airflow velocity in the MultiHaler® were greater than Accuhaler®. Two modified test devices (MOD MH 1 and MOD MH 2) were manufactured with the introduction of by-pass channels in the airflow path, which achieved comparable specific resistance and airflow path between the test and reference devices. Assessment of reference product formulation in modified test devices suggested that MOD MH 2 achieved comparable
in vitro
performance to the reference product. CAB analysis suggested that adhesion of all FP batches to lactose was different, with batch D showing greatest and batch A least adhesion to lactose. Test DPI formulations were manufactured using four different batches of FP with milled or sieved lactose, and showed that batch A FP formulated with sieved lactose in MOD MH 2 device demonstrated the highest degree of similarity to the Accuhaler®
in vitro
deposition. Application of CFD modelling and material characterization of formulation raw materials enabled the modification of device and formulation critical material attributes to create an
in vitro
comparable device/formulation system to the reference product.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Dry Powder Inhalers</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Excipients - chemistry</subject><subject>Fluticasone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Lactose - chemistry</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products</subject><issn>1550-7416</issn><issn>1550-7416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LJDEQhsOirDruD9iL5OilNZ-d7ouwjJ-guIfVa0h3V89EupPZJK2Mv97IqOhFCFSg3vepol6EflNyRBmpjiNlTFQFobKolZLF8w-0S6UkhRK03Pr030F7MT4Qwhmn9CfaYbKWJa_4LhrP-h7ahH2PT-HRtpBLtAuHjevwuQ_jNJhkvcP5pSXgK4fvbQoez_24MsE0drBpjXsf8M00JFvcOZvwqY8ZFNb4r3_qIGTX0gwQ4j7a7s0Q4ddbnaG787N_88vi-vbiav7numiFYKlooWkbVtGyr2lFaEdJyYhkhkHNWFMx1VWs66hoylqoriSlIQCq4oILowBqPkMnG-5qakboWnApmEGvgh1NWGtvrP7acXapF_5RCylIPlgGHL4Bgv8_QUx6tLGFYTAO_BQ1VUQqLnkeOUN0I22DjzFA_zGGEv0ak97EpHNM-jUm_Zw9B5_3-3C855IFbCOIueUWEPSDn4LLN_uG-gKFh573</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Shur, Jagdeep</creator><creator>Saluja, Bhawana</creator><creator>Lee, Sau</creator><creator>Tibbatts, James</creator><creator>Price, Robert</creator><general>Springer US</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers</title><author>Shur, Jagdeep ; Saluja, Bhawana ; Lee, Sau ; Tibbatts, James ; Price, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-cebcb2816f91801d1062052a2e922b827d82dd14b6947d606a0ee783434a7ee93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Dry Powder Inhalers</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Excipients - chemistry</topic><topic>Fluticasone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Lactose - chemistry</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shur, Jagdeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saluja, Bhawana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibbatts, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The AAPS journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shur, Jagdeep</au><au>Saluja, Bhawana</au><au>Lee, Sau</au><au>Tibbatts, James</au><au>Price, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers</atitle><jtitle>The AAPS journal</jtitle><stitle>AAPS J</stitle><addtitle>AAPS J</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1105</spage><epage>1116</epage><pages>1105-1116</pages><issn>1550-7416</issn><eissn>1550-7416</eissn><abstract>The focus of this investigation was to understand the design space to achieve comparable
in vitro
performance of two multi-unit dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs)—Flixotide® Accuhaler® (reference product) and MultiHaler® (test product). Flow field, pressure drop and particle trajectories within the test and reference DPI devices were modelled
via
computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Micronized fluticasone propionate (FP) was characterized to determine particle size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA) and surface interfacial properties using cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB). CFD simulations suggested that the pressure drop and airflow velocity in the MultiHaler® were greater than Accuhaler®. Two modified test devices (MOD MH 1 and MOD MH 2) were manufactured with the introduction of by-pass channels in the airflow path, which achieved comparable specific resistance and airflow path between the test and reference devices. Assessment of reference product formulation in modified test devices suggested that MOD MH 2 achieved comparable
in vitro
performance to the reference product. CAB analysis suggested that adhesion of all FP batches to lactose was different, with batch D showing greatest and batch A least adhesion to lactose. Test DPI formulations were manufactured using four different batches of FP with milled or sieved lactose, and showed that batch A FP formulated with sieved lactose in MOD MH 2 device demonstrated the highest degree of similarity to the Accuhaler®
in vitro
deposition. Application of CFD modelling and material characterization of formulation raw materials enabled the modification of device and formulation critical material attributes to create an
in vitro
comparable device/formulation system to the reference product.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25956383</pmid><doi>10.1208/s12248-015-9775-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-7416 |
ispartof | The AAPS journal, 2015-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1105-1116 |
issn | 1550-7416 1550-7416 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4540741 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Administration, Inhalation Biochemistry Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Biotechnology Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Dry Powder Inhalers Equipment Design Excipients - chemistry Fluticasone - administration & dosage Hydrodynamics In Vitro Techniques Lactose - chemistry Particle Size Pharmacology/Toxicology Pharmacy Research Article Surface Properties Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products |
title | Effect of Device Design and Formulation on the In Vitro Comparability for Multi-Unit Dose Dry Powder Inhalers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A06%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Device%20Design%20and%20Formulation%20on%20the%20In%20Vitro%20Comparability%20for%20Multi-Unit%20Dose%20Dry%20Powder%20Inhalers&rft.jtitle=The%20AAPS%20journal&rft.au=Shur,%20Jagdeep&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1105&rft.epage=1116&rft.pages=1105-1116&rft.issn=1550-7416&rft.eissn=1550-7416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1208/s12248-015-9775-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1705735334%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705735334&rft_id=info:pmid/25956383&rfr_iscdi=true |