Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned

Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health promotion practice 2013-11, Vol.14 (6), p.901-908
Hauptverfasser: Kuiper, Nicole M., Frantz, Kate E., Cotant, Molly, Babb, Stephen, Jordan, Jerelyn, Phelan, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 908
container_issue 6
container_start_page 901
container_title Health promotion practice
container_volume 14
creator Kuiper, Nicole M.
Frantz, Kate E.
Cotant, Molly
Babb, Stephen
Jordan, Jerelyn
Phelan, Matthew
description Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or online editions of Michigan newspapers the month immediately before and after the law took effect were identified and were coded for tone, positive messages contained in media outreach materials, and negative messages commonly disseminated by smoke-free law opponents. Results. A total of 303 print and online articles were identified; the majority were coded as "both positive and negative" (34%) or "mainly positive" in tone (32%). Of 303 articles, 75% contained at least one pro-law message and 56% contained at least one anti-law message. The most common pro-law messages were information about enforcement of the law (52%) and the benefits of smoke-free air (48%); the most common anti-law messages were about potential negative economic impact (36%), government intrusion/overreach (31%), and difficulties with enforcement (28%). Conclusions. Public health departments and partners play an important role in implementation of smoke-free laws by providing the public, businesses, and other stakeholders with clear and accurate rationale, provisions, and impacts of these policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1524839913476300
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4539232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26740807</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1524839913476300</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26740807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-869c687a96c113e3546878333ea6497df1f02931546fe0bd24cbf8d6428d32a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EoqXlzoUqRy4B2zOxYw5IaNVCpS0cWs6WN5nsZpvEwc626r_Hqy39OlBOY88882o8rxl7J_hHIbT-JAqJJRgjALUCzl-wfVEUMleg5cvtWWK-re-xNzGuOedaI3_N9iQgGqXUPrv4QddxdCOFbOavKLglZb7JTvuxo56GyU2tH7aZaUXZWVut2qUbsvPeX1J-Eoiyubv-nM0pRj_EFF0YqD5krxrXRXp7Gw_Yr5Pji9n3fP7z2-ns6zyvEGDKS2UqVWpnVCUEEBSYbiUAkFNodN2IhksDIuUb4otaYrVoylqhLGuQroAD9mWnO24WPdVVmje4zo6h7V24sd619nFlaFd26a8sFmAkyCTw4VYg-N8bipPt21hR17mB_CbatExuTNqt-Q8UhdFGSfE8ioil4lJhQvkOrYKPMVBzN7zgdmuxfWpxajl6-Oi7hr-eJiDfATGZadd-E4Zkwr8E3-_4dZx8uNdT6a-UXMMf_di2PQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1444860264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kuiper, Nicole M. ; Frantz, Kate E. ; Cotant, Molly ; Babb, Stephen ; Jordan, Jerelyn ; Phelan, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Nicole M. ; Frantz, Kate E. ; Cotant, Molly ; Babb, Stephen ; Jordan, Jerelyn ; Phelan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or online editions of Michigan newspapers the month immediately before and after the law took effect were identified and were coded for tone, positive messages contained in media outreach materials, and negative messages commonly disseminated by smoke-free law opponents. Results. A total of 303 print and online articles were identified; the majority were coded as "both positive and negative" (34%) or "mainly positive" in tone (32%). Of 303 articles, 75% contained at least one pro-law message and 56% contained at least one anti-law message. The most common pro-law messages were information about enforcement of the law (52%) and the benefits of smoke-free air (48%); the most common anti-law messages were about potential negative economic impact (36%), government intrusion/overreach (31%), and difficulties with enforcement (28%). Conclusions. Public health departments and partners play an important role in implementation of smoke-free laws by providing the public, businesses, and other stakeholders with clear and accurate rationale, provisions, and impacts of these policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-8399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1524839913476300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23449666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bans ; Benefits ; Business ; Coverage ; Economics ; Health policy ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Internet ; Law ; Law Enforcement ; Michigan ; Newspapers as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Public health ; Public health departments ; Smoke-Free Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Smoking</subject><ispartof>Health promotion practice, 2013-11, Vol.14 (6), p.901-908</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Society for Public Health Education</rights><rights>2013 Society for Public Health Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-869c687a96c113e3546878333ea6497df1f02931546fe0bd24cbf8d6428d32a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26740807$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26740807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,21819,27865,27924,27925,31000,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23449666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frantz, Kate E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotant, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babb, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Jerelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned</title><title>Health promotion practice</title><addtitle>Health Promot Pract</addtitle><description>Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or online editions of Michigan newspapers the month immediately before and after the law took effect were identified and were coded for tone, positive messages contained in media outreach materials, and negative messages commonly disseminated by smoke-free law opponents. Results. A total of 303 print and online articles were identified; the majority were coded as "both positive and negative" (34%) or "mainly positive" in tone (32%). Of 303 articles, 75% contained at least one pro-law message and 56% contained at least one anti-law message. The most common pro-law messages were information about enforcement of the law (52%) and the benefits of smoke-free air (48%); the most common anti-law messages were about potential negative economic impact (36%), government intrusion/overreach (31%), and difficulties with enforcement (28%). Conclusions. Public health departments and partners play an important role in implementation of smoke-free laws by providing the public, businesses, and other stakeholders with clear and accurate rationale, provisions, and impacts of these policies.</description><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Coverage</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law Enforcement</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Newspapers as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health departments</subject><subject>Smoke-Free Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><issn>1524-8399</issn><issn>1552-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EoqXlzoUqRy4B2zOxYw5IaNVCpS0cWs6WN5nsZpvEwc626r_Hqy39OlBOY88882o8rxl7J_hHIbT-JAqJJRgjALUCzl-wfVEUMleg5cvtWWK-re-xNzGuOedaI3_N9iQgGqXUPrv4QddxdCOFbOavKLglZb7JTvuxo56GyU2tH7aZaUXZWVut2qUbsvPeX1J-Eoiyubv-nM0pRj_EFF0YqD5krxrXRXp7Gw_Yr5Pji9n3fP7z2-ns6zyvEGDKS2UqVWpnVCUEEBSYbiUAkFNodN2IhksDIuUb4otaYrVoylqhLGuQroAD9mWnO24WPdVVmje4zo6h7V24sd619nFlaFd26a8sFmAkyCTw4VYg-N8bipPt21hR17mB_CbatExuTNqt-Q8UhdFGSfE8ioil4lJhQvkOrYKPMVBzN7zgdmuxfWpxajl6-Oi7hr-eJiDfATGZadd-E4Zkwr8E3-_4dZx8uNdT6a-UXMMf_di2PQ</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Kuiper, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Frantz, Kate E.</creator><creator>Cotant, Molly</creator><creator>Babb, Stephen</creator><creator>Jordan, Jerelyn</creator><creator>Phelan, Matthew</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned</title><author>Kuiper, Nicole M. ; Frantz, Kate E. ; Cotant, Molly ; Babb, Stephen ; Jordan, Jerelyn ; Phelan, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-869c687a96c113e3546878333ea6497df1f02931546fe0bd24cbf8d6428d32a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Coverage</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law Enforcement</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Newspapers as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health departments</topic><topic>Smoke-Free Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frantz, Kate E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotant, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babb, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Jerelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health promotion practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuiper, Nicole M.</au><au>Frantz, Kate E.</au><au>Cotant, Molly</au><au>Babb, Stephen</au><au>Jordan, Jerelyn</au><au>Phelan, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned</atitle><jtitle>Health promotion practice</jtitle><addtitle>Health Promot Pract</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>901</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>901-908</pages><issn>1524-8399</issn><eissn>1552-6372</eissn><abstract>Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or online editions of Michigan newspapers the month immediately before and after the law took effect were identified and were coded for tone, positive messages contained in media outreach materials, and negative messages commonly disseminated by smoke-free law opponents. Results. A total of 303 print and online articles were identified; the majority were coded as "both positive and negative" (34%) or "mainly positive" in tone (32%). Of 303 articles, 75% contained at least one pro-law message and 56% contained at least one anti-law message. The most common pro-law messages were information about enforcement of the law (52%) and the benefits of smoke-free air (48%); the most common anti-law messages were about potential negative economic impact (36%), government intrusion/overreach (31%), and difficulties with enforcement (28%). Conclusions. Public health departments and partners play an important role in implementation of smoke-free laws by providing the public, businesses, and other stakeholders with clear and accurate rationale, provisions, and impacts of these policies.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23449666</pmid><doi>10.1177/1524839913476300</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1524-8399
ispartof Health promotion practice, 2013-11, Vol.14 (6), p.901-908
issn 1524-8399
1552-6372
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4539232
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Bans
Benefits
Business
Coverage
Economics
Health policy
Humans
Information Dissemination
Internet
Law
Law Enforcement
Michigan
Newspapers as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Public health
Public health departments
Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence
Smoking
title Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A57%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Newspaper%20Coverage%20of%20Implementation%20of%20the%20Michigan%20Smoke-Free%20Law:%20Lessons%20Learned&rft.jtitle=Health%20promotion%20practice&rft.au=Kuiper,%20Nicole%20M.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=901&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=901-908&rft.issn=1524-8399&rft.eissn=1552-6372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1524839913476300&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26740807%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1444860264&rft_id=info:pmid/23449666&rft_jstor_id=26740807&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1524839913476300&rfr_iscdi=true