Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned
Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health promotion practice 2013-11, Vol.14 (6), p.901-908 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 908 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 901 |
container_title | Health promotion practice |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Kuiper, Nicole M. Frantz, Kate E. Cotant, Molly Babb, Stephen Jordan, Jerelyn Phelan, Matthew |
description | Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or online editions of Michigan newspapers the month immediately before and after the law took effect were identified and were coded for tone, positive messages contained in media outreach materials, and negative messages commonly disseminated by smoke-free law opponents. Results. A total of 303 print and online articles were identified; the majority were coded as "both positive and negative" (34%) or "mainly positive" in tone (32%). Of 303 articles, 75% contained at least one pro-law message and 56% contained at least one anti-law message. The most common pro-law messages were information about enforcement of the law (52%) and the benefits of smoke-free air (48%); the most common anti-law messages were about potential negative economic impact (36%), government intrusion/overreach (31%), and difficulties with enforcement (28%). Conclusions. Public health departments and partners play an important role in implementation of smoke-free laws by providing the public, businesses, and other stakeholders with clear and accurate rationale, provisions, and impacts of these policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1524839913476300 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4539232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26740807</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1524839913476300</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26740807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-869c687a96c113e3546878333ea6497df1f02931546fe0bd24cbf8d6428d32a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EoqXlzoUqRy4B2zOxYw5IaNVCpS0cWs6WN5nsZpvEwc626r_Hqy39OlBOY88882o8rxl7J_hHIbT-JAqJJRgjALUCzl-wfVEUMleg5cvtWWK-re-xNzGuOedaI3_N9iQgGqXUPrv4QddxdCOFbOavKLglZb7JTvuxo56GyU2tH7aZaUXZWVut2qUbsvPeX1J-Eoiyubv-nM0pRj_EFF0YqD5krxrXRXp7Gw_Yr5Pji9n3fP7z2-ns6zyvEGDKS2UqVWpnVCUEEBSYbiUAkFNodN2IhksDIuUb4otaYrVoylqhLGuQroAD9mWnO24WPdVVmje4zo6h7V24sd619nFlaFd26a8sFmAkyCTw4VYg-N8bipPt21hR17mB_CbatExuTNqt-Q8UhdFGSfE8ioil4lJhQvkOrYKPMVBzN7zgdmuxfWpxajl6-Oi7hr-eJiDfATGZadd-E4Zkwr8E3-_4dZx8uNdT6a-UXMMf_di2PQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1444860264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kuiper, Nicole M. ; Frantz, Kate E. ; Cotant, Molly ; Babb, Stephen ; Jordan, Jerelyn ; Phelan, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Nicole M. ; Frantz, Kate E. ; Cotant, Molly ; Babb, Stephen ; Jordan, Jerelyn ; Phelan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or online editions of Michigan newspapers the month immediately before and after the law took effect were identified and were coded for tone, positive messages contained in media outreach materials, and negative messages commonly disseminated by smoke-free law opponents. Results. A total of 303 print and online articles were identified; the majority were coded as "both positive and negative" (34%) or "mainly positive" in tone (32%). Of 303 articles, 75% contained at least one pro-law message and 56% contained at least one anti-law message. The most common pro-law messages were information about enforcement of the law (52%) and the benefits of smoke-free air (48%); the most common anti-law messages were about potential negative economic impact (36%), government intrusion/overreach (31%), and difficulties with enforcement (28%). Conclusions. Public health departments and partners play an important role in implementation of smoke-free laws by providing the public, businesses, and other stakeholders with clear and accurate rationale, provisions, and impacts of these policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-8399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1524839913476300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23449666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bans ; Benefits ; Business ; Coverage ; Economics ; Health policy ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Internet ; Law ; Law Enforcement ; Michigan ; Newspapers as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Public health ; Public health departments ; Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Smoking</subject><ispartof>Health promotion practice, 2013-11, Vol.14 (6), p.901-908</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Society for Public Health Education</rights><rights>2013 Society for Public Health Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-869c687a96c113e3546878333ea6497df1f02931546fe0bd24cbf8d6428d32a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26740807$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26740807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,21819,27865,27924,27925,31000,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23449666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frantz, Kate E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotant, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babb, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Jerelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned</title><title>Health promotion practice</title><addtitle>Health Promot Pract</addtitle><description>Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or online editions of Michigan newspapers the month immediately before and after the law took effect were identified and were coded for tone, positive messages contained in media outreach materials, and negative messages commonly disseminated by smoke-free law opponents. Results. A total of 303 print and online articles were identified; the majority were coded as "both positive and negative" (34%) or "mainly positive" in tone (32%). Of 303 articles, 75% contained at least one pro-law message and 56% contained at least one anti-law message. The most common pro-law messages were information about enforcement of the law (52%) and the benefits of smoke-free air (48%); the most common anti-law messages were about potential negative economic impact (36%), government intrusion/overreach (31%), and difficulties with enforcement (28%). Conclusions. Public health departments and partners play an important role in implementation of smoke-free laws by providing the public, businesses, and other stakeholders with clear and accurate rationale, provisions, and impacts of these policies.</description><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Coverage</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law Enforcement</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Newspapers as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health departments</subject><subject>Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><issn>1524-8399</issn><issn>1552-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EoqXlzoUqRy4B2zOxYw5IaNVCpS0cWs6WN5nsZpvEwc626r_Hqy39OlBOY88882o8rxl7J_hHIbT-JAqJJRgjALUCzl-wfVEUMleg5cvtWWK-re-xNzGuOedaI3_N9iQgGqXUPrv4QddxdCOFbOavKLglZb7JTvuxo56GyU2tH7aZaUXZWVut2qUbsvPeX1J-Eoiyubv-nM0pRj_EFF0YqD5krxrXRXp7Gw_Yr5Pji9n3fP7z2-ns6zyvEGDKS2UqVWpnVCUEEBSYbiUAkFNodN2IhksDIuUb4otaYrVoylqhLGuQroAD9mWnO24WPdVVmje4zo6h7V24sd619nFlaFd26a8sFmAkyCTw4VYg-N8bipPt21hR17mB_CbatExuTNqt-Q8UhdFGSfE8ioil4lJhQvkOrYKPMVBzN7zgdmuxfWpxajl6-Oi7hr-eJiDfATGZadd-E4Zkwr8E3-_4dZx8uNdT6a-UXMMf_di2PQ</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Kuiper, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Frantz, Kate E.</creator><creator>Cotant, Molly</creator><creator>Babb, Stephen</creator><creator>Jordan, Jerelyn</creator><creator>Phelan, Matthew</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned</title><author>Kuiper, Nicole M. ; Frantz, Kate E. ; Cotant, Molly ; Babb, Stephen ; Jordan, Jerelyn ; Phelan, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-869c687a96c113e3546878333ea6497df1f02931546fe0bd24cbf8d6428d32a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Coverage</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law Enforcement</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Newspapers as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health departments</topic><topic>Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frantz, Kate E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotant, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babb, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Jerelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health promotion practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuiper, Nicole M.</au><au>Frantz, Kate E.</au><au>Cotant, Molly</au><au>Babb, Stephen</au><au>Jordan, Jerelyn</au><au>Phelan, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned</atitle><jtitle>Health promotion practice</jtitle><addtitle>Health Promot Pract</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>901</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>901-908</pages><issn>1524-8399</issn><eissn>1552-6372</eissn><abstract>Objective. To examine whether newspaper coverage of the Michigan smoke-free law was favorable or hostile, contained positive messages that had been disseminated by public health groups, contained negative messages, and differed across regions. Method. Articles about the smoke-free law in print or online editions of Michigan newspapers the month immediately before and after the law took effect were identified and were coded for tone, positive messages contained in media outreach materials, and negative messages commonly disseminated by smoke-free law opponents. Results. A total of 303 print and online articles were identified; the majority were coded as "both positive and negative" (34%) or "mainly positive" in tone (32%). Of 303 articles, 75% contained at least one pro-law message and 56% contained at least one anti-law message. The most common pro-law messages were information about enforcement of the law (52%) and the benefits of smoke-free air (48%); the most common anti-law messages were about potential negative economic impact (36%), government intrusion/overreach (31%), and difficulties with enforcement (28%). Conclusions. Public health departments and partners play an important role in implementation of smoke-free laws by providing the public, businesses, and other stakeholders with clear and accurate rationale, provisions, and impacts of these policies.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23449666</pmid><doi>10.1177/1524839913476300</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-8399 |
ispartof | Health promotion practice, 2013-11, Vol.14 (6), p.901-908 |
issn | 1524-8399 1552-6372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4539232 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Bans Benefits Business Coverage Economics Health policy Humans Information Dissemination Internet Law Law Enforcement Michigan Newspapers as Topic - statistics & numerical data Public health Public health departments Smoke-Free Policy - legislation & jurisprudence Smoking |
title | Newspaper Coverage of Implementation of the Michigan Smoke-Free Law: Lessons Learned |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A57%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Newspaper%20Coverage%20of%20Implementation%20of%20the%20Michigan%20Smoke-Free%20Law:%20Lessons%20Learned&rft.jtitle=Health%20promotion%20practice&rft.au=Kuiper,%20Nicole%20M.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=901&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=901-908&rft.issn=1524-8399&rft.eissn=1552-6372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1524839913476300&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26740807%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1444860264&rft_id=info:pmid/23449666&rft_jstor_id=26740807&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1524839913476300&rfr_iscdi=true |