Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study

Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study

To compare early-term effects of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis (D-STLDG) with conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). Clinical data of 24 patients who received D-STLDG from April 2013 to April 2014, and 45 patients who received LADG from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical and experimental medicine 2015-01, Vol.8 (6), p.9967-9972
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Bo, Tu, Jian-Cheng, Fang, Jian, Zhou, Liang, Liu, Ye-Lu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Original
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9972
container_issue 6
container_start_page 9967
container_title International journal of clinical and experimental medicine
container_volume 8
creator Zhang, Bo
Tu, Jian-Cheng
Fang, Jian
Zhou, Liang
Liu, Ye-Lu
description To compare early-term effects of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis (D-STLDG) with conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). Clinical data of 24 patients who received D-STLDG from April 2013 to April 2014, and 45 patients who received LADG from March 2010 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative recovery time of intestinal function, post-operative pain, the length of post-operative hospital stay and the incidence of post-operative complications (infection, obstruction and delayed gastric emptying) were compared between the two groups. All procedures were completed successfully and all patients of both groups were discharged smoothly from hospital. Compared with LADG, D-STLDG had shorter operative time (175.3±64.7 min vs. 205.8±42.2 min, P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4538117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1708162824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-3ba639cecbe132461f53874c529f205414a2aba806e5673c88d29c3cb71ff9883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkc9KxDAQh4sorq6-guTopdAkbZp6EGTxHyx40XOZptPdSNrUJLtLn85XM-AqK54yzHzz_QZylJzRKs_Sosro8UE9S869f88yQRmvTpMZEzyrhMzPks-F7Udw2tuB2I4gODOlAV1PsOtQBU8aDDvEgQQbwJiJGIi89cqOWpFW-9glK_DBRdr2E9npsCYtmgCpX8OILYEhjm1vvfaxbomywxaHoO0QVw91KfjIhLjy33tDgDgMER1jQ2-R-LBpp4vkpAPj8XL_zpO3h_vXxVO6fHl8Xtwt05EJEVLegOCVQtUg5SwXtCu4LHNVsKpjWZHTHBg0IDOBhSi5krJlleKqKWnXVVLyeXL77R03TY-tivc7MPXodA9uqi3o-u9k0Ot6Zbd1HoMoLaPgei9w9mODPtS99gqNgQHtxte0zCQVTLI8oleHWb8hP7_GvwBv750P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1708162824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhang, Bo ; Tu, Jian-Cheng ; Fang, Jian ; Zhou, Liang ; Liu, Ye-Lu</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bo ; Tu, Jian-Cheng ; Fang, Jian ; Zhou, Liang ; Liu, Ye-Lu</creatorcontrib><description>To compare early-term effects of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis (D-STLDG) with conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). Clinical data of 24 patients who received D-STLDG from April 2013 to April 2014, and 45 patients who received LADG from March 2010 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative recovery time of intestinal function, post-operative pain, the length of post-operative hospital stay and the incidence of post-operative complications (infection, obstruction and delayed gastric emptying) were compared between the two groups. All procedures were completed successfully and all patients of both groups were discharged smoothly from hospital. Compared with LADG, D-STLDG had shorter operative time (175.3±64.7 min vs. 205.8±42.2 min, P&lt;0.05), less intra-operative blood (50.8±25.3 ml vs. 75.2±22.5 ml, P&lt;0.05), shorter post-operative recovery time of intestinal function (1.2±0.5 d vs. 2.1±0.8 d, P&lt;0.05), less post-operative pain (5.6±0.7 vs. 7.8±0.5, P&lt;0.05), shorter post-operative hospital stay (8.5±2.2 d vs. 10.5±3.5 d, P&lt;0.05). There were no significant difference in surgical margins achieved, the number of lymph nodes retrieved or the incidence of post-operative complications (infection, obstruction and delayed gastric emptying) (P&gt;0.05). The delta-shaped anastomosis of reconstructing the digestive tract in TLDG appears to be safe, feasible and associated to faster recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-5901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-5901</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26309684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: e-Century Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015-01, Vol.8 (6), p.9967-9972</ispartof><rights>IJCEM Copyright © 2015 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538117/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538117/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Jian-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ye-Lu</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study</title><title>International journal of clinical and experimental medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Exp Med</addtitle><description>To compare early-term effects of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis (D-STLDG) with conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). Clinical data of 24 patients who received D-STLDG from April 2013 to April 2014, and 45 patients who received LADG from March 2010 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative recovery time of intestinal function, post-operative pain, the length of post-operative hospital stay and the incidence of post-operative complications (infection, obstruction and delayed gastric emptying) were compared between the two groups. All procedures were completed successfully and all patients of both groups were discharged smoothly from hospital. Compared with LADG, D-STLDG had shorter operative time (175.3±64.7 min vs. 205.8±42.2 min, P&lt;0.05), less intra-operative blood (50.8±25.3 ml vs. 75.2±22.5 ml, P&lt;0.05), shorter post-operative recovery time of intestinal function (1.2±0.5 d vs. 2.1±0.8 d, P&lt;0.05), less post-operative pain (5.6±0.7 vs. 7.8±0.5, P&lt;0.05), shorter post-operative hospital stay (8.5±2.2 d vs. 10.5±3.5 d, P&lt;0.05). There were no significant difference in surgical margins achieved, the number of lymph nodes retrieved or the incidence of post-operative complications (infection, obstruction and delayed gastric emptying) (P&gt;0.05). The delta-shaped anastomosis of reconstructing the digestive tract in TLDG appears to be safe, feasible and associated to faster recovery.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>1940-5901</issn><issn>1940-5901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkc9KxDAQh4sorq6-guTopdAkbZp6EGTxHyx40XOZptPdSNrUJLtLn85XM-AqK54yzHzz_QZylJzRKs_Sosro8UE9S869f88yQRmvTpMZEzyrhMzPks-F7Udw2tuB2I4gODOlAV1PsOtQBU8aDDvEgQQbwJiJGIi89cqOWpFW-9glK_DBRdr2E9npsCYtmgCpX8OILYEhjm1vvfaxbomywxaHoO0QVw91KfjIhLjy33tDgDgMER1jQ2-R-LBpp4vkpAPj8XL_zpO3h_vXxVO6fHl8Xtwt05EJEVLegOCVQtUg5SwXtCu4LHNVsKpjWZHTHBg0IDOBhSi5krJlleKqKWnXVVLyeXL77R03TY-tivc7MPXodA9uqi3o-u9k0Ot6Zbd1HoMoLaPgei9w9mODPtS99gqNgQHtxte0zCQVTLI8oleHWb8hP7_GvwBv750P</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Zhang, Bo</creator><creator>Tu, Jian-Cheng</creator><creator>Fang, Jian</creator><creator>Zhou, Liang</creator><creator>Liu, Ye-Lu</creator><general>e-Century Publishing Corporation</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study</title><author>Zhang, Bo ; Tu, Jian-Cheng ; Fang, Jian ; Zhou, Liang ; Liu, Ye-Lu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-3ba639cecbe132461f53874c529f205414a2aba806e5673c88d29c3cb71ff9883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Jian-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ye-Lu</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical and experimental medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Bo</au><au>Tu, Jian-Cheng</au><au>Fang, Jian</au><au>Zhou, Liang</au><au>Liu, Ye-Lu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical and experimental medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Exp Med</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>9967</spage><epage>9972</epage><pages>9967-9972</pages><issn>1940-5901</issn><eissn>1940-5901</eissn><abstract>To compare early-term effects of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis (D-STLDG) with conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). Clinical data of 24 patients who received D-STLDG from April 2013 to April 2014, and 45 patients who received LADG from March 2010 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative recovery time of intestinal function, post-operative pain, the length of post-operative hospital stay and the incidence of post-operative complications (infection, obstruction and delayed gastric emptying) were compared between the two groups. All procedures were completed successfully and all patients of both groups were discharged smoothly from hospital. Compared with LADG, D-STLDG had shorter operative time (175.3±64.7 min vs. 205.8±42.2 min, P&lt;0.05), less intra-operative blood (50.8±25.3 ml vs. 75.2±22.5 ml, P&lt;0.05), shorter post-operative recovery time of intestinal function (1.2±0.5 d vs. 2.1±0.8 d, P&lt;0.05), less post-operative pain (5.6±0.7 vs. 7.8±0.5, P&lt;0.05), shorter post-operative hospital stay (8.5±2.2 d vs. 10.5±3.5 d, P&lt;0.05). There were no significant difference in surgical margins achieved, the number of lymph nodes retrieved or the incidence of post-operative complications (infection, obstruction and delayed gastric emptying) (P&gt;0.05). The delta-shaped anastomosis of reconstructing the digestive tract in TLDG appears to be safe, feasible and associated to faster recovery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>e-Century Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>26309684</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1940-5901
ispartof International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015-01, Vol.8 (6), p.9967-9972
issn 1940-5901
1940-5901
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4538117
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A40%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20early-term%20effects%20between%20totally%20laparoscopic%20distal%20gastrectomy%20with%20delta-shaped%20anastomosis%20and%20conventional%20laparoscopic-assisted%20distal%20gastrectomy:%20a%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20medicine&rft.au=Zhang,%20Bo&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=9967&rft.epage=9972&rft.pages=9967-9972&rft.issn=1940-5901&rft.eissn=1940-5901&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1708162824%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1708162824&rft_id=info:pmid/26309684&rfr_iscdi=true