Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries

Proxy responses are very common when surveys are conducted among the elderly or disabled population. Outcomes reported by proxy may be systematically different from those obtained from patients directly. The objective of the study is to examine the presence, direction, and magnitude of possible diff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC medical research methodology 2015-08, Vol.15 (1), p.62-62, Article 62
Hauptverfasser: Li, Minghui, Harris, Ilene, Lu, Z Kevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title BMC medical research methodology
container_volume 15
creator Li, Minghui
Harris, Ilene
Lu, Z Kevin
description Proxy responses are very common when surveys are conducted among the elderly or disabled population. Outcomes reported by proxy may be systematically different from those obtained from patients directly. The objective of the study is to examine the presence, direction, and magnitude of possible differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes in health and functional status measures among Medicare beneficiaries. This study is a pooled cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries from 2006 to 2011. Survey respondents can respond to the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey either by themselves or via proxies. Health and functional status was assessed across five domains: physical, affective, cognitive, social, and sensory status. Propensity score matching was used to get matched pairs of patient-reports and proxy-reports. After applying the propensity score matching, the study identified 7,780 person-years of patient-reports paired with 7,780 person-years of proxy-reports. Except for the sensory limitation, differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes were present in physical, affective, cognitive, and social limitations. Compared to patient-reports, a question regarding survey respondents' difficulties in managing money was associated with the largest proxy response bias (relative risk, RR = 3.83). With few exceptions, the presence, direction, and magnitude of differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes did not vary much in the subgroup analysis. When there is a difference between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes, proxies tended to report more health and functional limitations among the elderly and disabled population. The extent of proxy response bias depended on the domain being tested and the nature of the question being asked. Researchers should accept proxy reports for sensory status and objective, observable, or easy questions. For physical, affective, cognitive, or social status and private, unobservable, or complex questions, proxy-reported outcomes should be used with caution when patient-reported outcomes are not available.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4534114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541379106</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541379106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-d5cd4fbf23e6e6d19e4de47a5ca705ebede47bea6b7bb3213fa268a7db53bed63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUstu1TAQjRCIlsIHsEGR2LBJ8St2wgKpKk-pEhtYWxNnfK-rxA62g-iOT8fhlj4Q8sKemXPOeEanqp5TckppJ18nyjolGkLbhpCWN-pBdUyFog1jXffwzvuoepLSJSFUdVw-ro6YZFIopo6rX--ctRjRG0y18_USw8-rJuISYsaxBj_WC2SHPt8mw5pNmDG9qSElTMn5Xb1HmPL-D96u3mQXPEx1ypDXVMMcCmTG0RmIWA_o0TrjIDpMT6tHFqaEz67vk-rbh_dfzz81F18-fj4_u2hMK0luxtaMwg6WcZQoR9qjGFEoaA0o0uKAWzQgyEENA2eUW2CyAzUOLS9FyU-qtwfdZR3KT0yZKMKkl-hmiFc6gNP3K97t9S780KLlglJRBF5dC8TwfcWU9eySwWkCj2FNmirCZd9zufV6-Q_0MqyxLGRDdYR2PSfsFrWDCbXzNpS-ZhPVZ62gXPWUbFqn_0GVM-LsTNg2WfL3CPRAMDGkFNHezEiJ3myjD7bRxTZ6s41WhfPi7nJuGH99wn8D3NvBfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780189302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Li, Minghui ; Harris, Ilene ; Lu, Z Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Minghui ; Harris, Ilene ; Lu, Z Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>Proxy responses are very common when surveys are conducted among the elderly or disabled population. Outcomes reported by proxy may be systematically different from those obtained from patients directly. The objective of the study is to examine the presence, direction, and magnitude of possible differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes in health and functional status measures among Medicare beneficiaries. This study is a pooled cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries from 2006 to 2011. Survey respondents can respond to the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey either by themselves or via proxies. Health and functional status was assessed across five domains: physical, affective, cognitive, social, and sensory status. Propensity score matching was used to get matched pairs of patient-reports and proxy-reports. After applying the propensity score matching, the study identified 7,780 person-years of patient-reports paired with 7,780 person-years of proxy-reports. Except for the sensory limitation, differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes were present in physical, affective, cognitive, and social limitations. Compared to patient-reports, a question regarding survey respondents' difficulties in managing money was associated with the largest proxy response bias (relative risk, RR = 3.83). With few exceptions, the presence, direction, and magnitude of differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes did not vary much in the subgroup analysis. When there is a difference between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes, proxies tended to report more health and functional limitations among the elderly and disabled population. The extent of proxy response bias depended on the domain being tested and the nature of the question being asked. Researchers should accept proxy reports for sensory status and objective, observable, or easy questions. For physical, affective, cognitive, or social status and private, unobservable, or complex questions, proxy-reported outcomes should be used with caution when patient-reported outcomes are not available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26264727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis ; Beneficiaries ; Bias ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Status ; Health Surveys - methods ; Health Surveys - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Market surveys ; Medicare ; Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards ; Proxy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report ; Social aspects ; Studies ; Surveys ; United States</subject><ispartof>BMC medical research methodology, 2015-08, Vol.15 (1), p.62-62, Article 62</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2015</rights><rights>Li et al. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-d5cd4fbf23e6e6d19e4de47a5ca705ebede47bea6b7bb3213fa268a7db53bed63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-d5cd4fbf23e6e6d19e4de47a5ca705ebede47bea6b7bb3213fa268a7db53bed63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534114/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534114/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26264727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Minghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Ilene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Z Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries</title><title>BMC medical research methodology</title><addtitle>BMC Med Res Methodol</addtitle><description>Proxy responses are very common when surveys are conducted among the elderly or disabled population. Outcomes reported by proxy may be systematically different from those obtained from patients directly. The objective of the study is to examine the presence, direction, and magnitude of possible differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes in health and functional status measures among Medicare beneficiaries. This study is a pooled cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries from 2006 to 2011. Survey respondents can respond to the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey either by themselves or via proxies. Health and functional status was assessed across five domains: physical, affective, cognitive, social, and sensory status. Propensity score matching was used to get matched pairs of patient-reports and proxy-reports. After applying the propensity score matching, the study identified 7,780 person-years of patient-reports paired with 7,780 person-years of proxy-reports. Except for the sensory limitation, differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes were present in physical, affective, cognitive, and social limitations. Compared to patient-reports, a question regarding survey respondents' difficulties in managing money was associated with the largest proxy response bias (relative risk, RR = 3.83). With few exceptions, the presence, direction, and magnitude of differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes did not vary much in the subgroup analysis. When there is a difference between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes, proxies tended to report more health and functional limitations among the elderly and disabled population. The extent of proxy response bias depended on the domain being tested and the nature of the question being asked. Researchers should accept proxy reports for sensory status and objective, observable, or easy questions. For physical, affective, cognitive, or social status and private, unobservable, or complex questions, proxy-reported outcomes should be used with caution when patient-reported outcomes are not available.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health Surveys - methods</subject><subject>Health Surveys - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Market surveys</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards</subject><subject>Proxy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1471-2288</issn><issn>1471-2288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptUstu1TAQjRCIlsIHsEGR2LBJ8St2wgKpKk-pEhtYWxNnfK-rxA62g-iOT8fhlj4Q8sKemXPOeEanqp5TckppJ18nyjolGkLbhpCWN-pBdUyFog1jXffwzvuoepLSJSFUdVw-ro6YZFIopo6rX--ctRjRG0y18_USw8-rJuISYsaxBj_WC2SHPt8mw5pNmDG9qSElTMn5Xb1HmPL-D96u3mQXPEx1ypDXVMMcCmTG0RmIWA_o0TrjIDpMT6tHFqaEz67vk-rbh_dfzz81F18-fj4_u2hMK0luxtaMwg6WcZQoR9qjGFEoaA0o0uKAWzQgyEENA2eUW2CyAzUOLS9FyU-qtwfdZR3KT0yZKMKkl-hmiFc6gNP3K97t9S780KLlglJRBF5dC8TwfcWU9eySwWkCj2FNmirCZd9zufV6-Q_0MqyxLGRDdYR2PSfsFrWDCbXzNpS-ZhPVZ62gXPWUbFqn_0GVM-LsTNg2WfL3CPRAMDGkFNHezEiJ3myjD7bRxTZ6s41WhfPi7nJuGH99wn8D3NvBfw</recordid><startdate>20150812</startdate><enddate>20150812</enddate><creator>Li, Minghui</creator><creator>Harris, Ilene</creator><creator>Lu, Z Kevin</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150812</creationdate><title>Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries</title><author>Li, Minghui ; Harris, Ilene ; Lu, Z Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-d5cd4fbf23e6e6d19e4de47a5ca705ebede47bea6b7bb3213fa268a7db53bed63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health Surveys - methods</topic><topic>Health Surveys - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Market surveys</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards</topic><topic>Proxy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Minghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Ilene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Z Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC medical research methodology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Minghui</au><au>Harris, Ilene</au><au>Lu, Z Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical research methodology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Med Res Methodol</addtitle><date>2015-08-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>62-62</pages><artnum>62</artnum><issn>1471-2288</issn><eissn>1471-2288</eissn><abstract>Proxy responses are very common when surveys are conducted among the elderly or disabled population. Outcomes reported by proxy may be systematically different from those obtained from patients directly. The objective of the study is to examine the presence, direction, and magnitude of possible differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes in health and functional status measures among Medicare beneficiaries. This study is a pooled cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries from 2006 to 2011. Survey respondents can respond to the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey either by themselves or via proxies. Health and functional status was assessed across five domains: physical, affective, cognitive, social, and sensory status. Propensity score matching was used to get matched pairs of patient-reports and proxy-reports. After applying the propensity score matching, the study identified 7,780 person-years of patient-reports paired with 7,780 person-years of proxy-reports. Except for the sensory limitation, differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes were present in physical, affective, cognitive, and social limitations. Compared to patient-reports, a question regarding survey respondents' difficulties in managing money was associated with the largest proxy response bias (relative risk, RR = 3.83). With few exceptions, the presence, direction, and magnitude of differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes did not vary much in the subgroup analysis. When there is a difference between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes, proxies tended to report more health and functional limitations among the elderly and disabled population. The extent of proxy response bias depended on the domain being tested and the nature of the question being asked. Researchers should accept proxy reports for sensory status and objective, observable, or easy questions. For physical, affective, cognitive, or social status and private, unobservable, or complex questions, proxy-reported outcomes should be used with caution when patient-reported outcomes are not available.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26264727</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2288
ispartof BMC medical research methodology, 2015-08, Vol.15 (1), p.62-62, Article 62
issn 1471-2288
1471-2288
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4534114
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Activities of daily living
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis
Beneficiaries
Bias
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Status
Health Surveys - methods
Health Surveys - standards
Humans
Male
Market surveys
Medicare
Medicare - statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards
Proxy
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report
Social aspects
Studies
Surveys
United States
title Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A05%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20proxy-reported%20and%20patient-reported%20outcomes:%20assessing%20health%20and%20functional%20status%20among%20medicare%20beneficiaries&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20research%20methodology&rft.au=Li,%20Minghui&rft.date=2015-08-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=62-62&rft.artnum=62&rft.issn=1471-2288&rft.eissn=1471-2288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541379106%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780189302&rft_id=info:pmid/26264727&rft_galeid=A541379106&rfr_iscdi=true