Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?
This article reviews some of our research on how gender stereotypes and their accompanying assumptions and expectations can influence the careers of male and female physicians and scientists in a myriad of subtle ways. Although stereotype-based cognitive biases may be invisible and unintentional, th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association 2015, Vol.126, p.197-214 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 214 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 197 |
| container_title | Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association |
| container_volume | 126 |
| creator | Carnes, Molly Bartels, Christie M Kaatz, Anna Kolehmainen, Christine |
| description | This article reviews some of our research on how gender stereotypes and their accompanying assumptions and expectations can influence the careers of male and female physicians and scientists in a myriad of subtle ways. Although stereotype-based cognitive biases may be invisible and unintentional, they nevertheless shape the experiences of women in academic medicine in ways that frequently constrain their opportunities. We present research on the following: 1) subtle differences in the evaluation of male and female medical students as revealed through text analysis of written evaluations at a critical career juncture, 2) how cultural assumptions about the way men and women should and should not behave influence medical residents' experiences as leaders, and 3) how approaching gender bias among faculty in academic medicine, science, and engineering as a remedial habit can be successful in changing individual behaviors and in improving department climate. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4530686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709395189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-41f9691b6de4d11a07dda8494e09a7e1140ce0c4b1201acb7dc3b62d489131d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRb0A0VL4BeQlm0h24_qxAZXyrIrYFLG0HHtKDIkd7BSpf08kCoLVXczVOTNzgMaE8FkhhJAjdJzzGyGMS6KO0GjKy5JwwcZo_lLvsM94GeuAH2MCvPLv0OxwH_EV2NgCvobOpL6F0ONFbXzC69oEvIQQ_AbS5Qk63Jgmw-k-J-j59ma9uC9WT3cPi_mq6KikfcHoRnFFK-6AOUoNEc4ZyRQDoowAShmxQCyr6JRQYyvhbFnxqWNS0ZI6WU7QxTe321YtODvsk0yju-Rbk3Y6Gq__T4Kv9Wv81Gw23Cr5ADjfA1L82ELudeuzhaYxAeI2ayqIKtWMSjVUz_66fiU_fyu_AN5NaDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709395189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carnes, Molly ; Bartels, Christie M ; Kaatz, Anna ; Kolehmainen, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Carnes, Molly ; Bartels, Christie M ; Kaatz, Anna ; Kolehmainen, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews some of our research on how gender stereotypes and their accompanying assumptions and expectations can influence the careers of male and female physicians and scientists in a myriad of subtle ways. Although stereotype-based cognitive biases may be invisible and unintentional, they nevertheless shape the experiences of women in academic medicine in ways that frequently constrain their opportunities. We present research on the following: 1) subtle differences in the evaluation of male and female medical students as revealed through text analysis of written evaluations at a critical career juncture, 2) how cultural assumptions about the way men and women should and should not behave influence medical residents' experiences as leaders, and 3) how approaching gender bias among faculty in academic medicine, science, and engineering as a remedial habit can be successful in changing individual behaviors and in improving department climate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0065-7778</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26330674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Clinical and Climatological Association</publisher><subject>Career Choice ; Career Mobility ; Faculty, Medical ; Female ; Gender Identity ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Interpersonal Relations ; Job Description ; Leadership ; Male ; Physicians, Women - psychology ; Sex Factors ; Sexism ; Specialization ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Women's Rights ; Women, Working - psychology</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2015, Vol.126, p.197-214</ispartof><rights>2015 The American Clinical and Climatological Association 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530686/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530686/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carnes, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Christie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaatz, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolehmainen, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?</title><title>Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association</title><addtitle>Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc</addtitle><description>This article reviews some of our research on how gender stereotypes and their accompanying assumptions and expectations can influence the careers of male and female physicians and scientists in a myriad of subtle ways. Although stereotype-based cognitive biases may be invisible and unintentional, they nevertheless shape the experiences of women in academic medicine in ways that frequently constrain their opportunities. We present research on the following: 1) subtle differences in the evaluation of male and female medical students as revealed through text analysis of written evaluations at a critical career juncture, 2) how cultural assumptions about the way men and women should and should not behave influence medical residents' experiences as leaders, and 3) how approaching gender bias among faculty in academic medicine, science, and engineering as a remedial habit can be successful in changing individual behaviors and in improving department climate.</description><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Career Mobility</subject><subject>Faculty, Medical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Job Description</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physicians, Women - psychology</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sexism</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Women's Rights</subject><subject>Women, Working - psychology</subject><issn>0065-7778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRb0A0VL4BeQlm0h24_qxAZXyrIrYFLG0HHtKDIkd7BSpf08kCoLVXczVOTNzgMaE8FkhhJAjdJzzGyGMS6KO0GjKy5JwwcZo_lLvsM94GeuAH2MCvPLv0OxwH_EV2NgCvobOpL6F0ONFbXzC69oEvIQQ_AbS5Qk63Jgmw-k-J-j59ma9uC9WT3cPi_mq6KikfcHoRnFFK-6AOUoNEc4ZyRQDoowAShmxQCyr6JRQYyvhbFnxqWNS0ZI6WU7QxTe321YtODvsk0yju-Rbk3Y6Gq__T4Kv9Wv81Gw23Cr5ADjfA1L82ELudeuzhaYxAeI2ayqIKtWMSjVUz_66fiU_fyu_AN5NaDQ</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Carnes, Molly</creator><creator>Bartels, Christie M</creator><creator>Kaatz, Anna</creator><creator>Kolehmainen, Christine</creator><general>American Clinical and Climatological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?</title><author>Carnes, Molly ; Bartels, Christie M ; Kaatz, Anna ; Kolehmainen, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-41f9691b6de4d11a07dda8494e09a7e1140ce0c4b1201acb7dc3b62d489131d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Career Mobility</topic><topic>Faculty, Medical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Job Description</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physicians, Women - psychology</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sexism</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Women's Rights</topic><topic>Women, Working - psychology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carnes, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Christie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaatz, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolehmainen, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carnes, Molly</au><au>Bartels, Christie M</au><au>Kaatz, Anna</au><au>Kolehmainen, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association</jtitle><addtitle>Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>126</volume><spage>197</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>197-214</pages><issn>0065-7778</issn><abstract>This article reviews some of our research on how gender stereotypes and their accompanying assumptions and expectations can influence the careers of male and female physicians and scientists in a myriad of subtle ways. Although stereotype-based cognitive biases may be invisible and unintentional, they nevertheless shape the experiences of women in academic medicine in ways that frequently constrain their opportunities. We present research on the following: 1) subtle differences in the evaluation of male and female medical students as revealed through text analysis of written evaluations at a critical career juncture, 2) how cultural assumptions about the way men and women should and should not behave influence medical residents' experiences as leaders, and 3) how approaching gender bias among faculty in academic medicine, science, and engineering as a remedial habit can be successful in changing individual behaviors and in improving department climate.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Clinical and Climatological Association</pub><pmid>26330674</pmid><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0065-7778 |
| ispartof | Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2015, Vol.126, p.197-214 |
| issn | 0065-7778 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4530686 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Career Choice Career Mobility Faculty, Medical Female Gender Identity Humans Internship and Residency Interpersonal Relations Job Description Leadership Male Physicians, Women - psychology Sex Factors Sexism Specialization Students, Medical - psychology Women's Rights Women, Working - psychology |
| title | Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A57%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20is%20John%20More%20Likely%20to%20Become%20Department%20Chair%20Than%20Jennifer?&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20American%20Clinical%20and%20Climatological%20Association&rft.au=Carnes,%20Molly&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=126&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=197-214&rft.issn=0065-7778&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1709395189%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709395189&rft_id=info:pmid/26330674&rfr_iscdi=true |