The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department
Objectives The goal of this study was to determine the association of first pass success with the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during emergency department (ED) intubations. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected continuous quality improvement data based on orotrach...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic emergency medicine 2013-01, Vol.20 (1), p.71-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | Academic emergency medicine |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Sakles, John C. Chiu, Stephen Mosier, Jarrod Walker, Corrine Stolz, Uwe Reardon, Robert F. |
description | Objectives
The goal of this study was to determine the association of first pass success with the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during emergency department (ED) intubations.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected continuous quality improvement data based on orotracheal intubations performed in an academic ED over a 4‐year period. Following each intubation, the operator completed a data form regarding multiple aspects of the intubation, including patient and operator characteristics, method of intubation, device used, the number of attempts required, and AEs. Numerous AEs were tracked and included events such as witnessed aspiration, oxygen desaturation, esophageal intubation, hypotension, dysrhythmia, and cardiac arrest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the primary predictor variable of interest, first pass success, and the outcome variable, the presence of one or more AEs, after controlling for various other potential risk factors and confounders.
Results
Over the 4‐year study period, there were 1,828 orotracheal intubations. If the intubation was successful on the first attempt, the incidence of one or more AEs was 14.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.4% to 16.2%). In cases requiring two attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 47.2% (95% CI = 41.8% to 52.7%); in cases requiring three attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 63.6% (95% CI = 53.7% to 72.6%); and in cases requiring four or more attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 70.6% (95% CI = 56.2.3% to 82.5%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that more than one attempt at tracheal intubation was a significant predictor of one or more AEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.52, 95% CI = 5.86 to 9.63).
Conclusions
When performing orotracheal intubation in the ED, first pass success is associated with a relatively small incidence of AEs. As the number of attempts increases, the incidence of AEs increases substantially.
Resumen
La Importancia del Éxito del Primer Intento Cuando Se Realiza la Intubación Orotraqueal en el Servicio de Urgencias
Objectivos
El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la asociación entre el éxito del primer intento con la incidencia de eventos adversos (EA) durante las intubaciones en el servicio de urgencias (SU).
Método
Análisis retrospectivo con una recogida de forma prospectiva continua de datos de mejora de la calidad, basados en intubaciones orotraqueales realizadas |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/acem.12055 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4530518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2865852811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5145-e3053db908ff50c543cab509902ca5ac4c9f14f461ffea3befee86e4d07da4573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFDEQxxex2Fp98QNIwBcRtiabzOb2RSjnVQ9aWrDiY8jmJncpu8k1ySr37U29tlgfnJcZyI_fTPhX1RtGT1ipj9rgeMIaCvCsOmIAvG4ka56XmbZd3ULLD6uXKd1QSkF28kV12HCQQkg4qtbXGyTLcRti1t4gCZacuZgyudIpkW-TMVj6jw16coXRhjg6vyaXMeSozQb1QJY-T73OLnjiPMlFtxgxrtGbHfmMWx3ziD6_qg6sHhK-vu_H1fezxfX8a31--WU5Pz2vDTABNXIKfNV3dGYtUAOCG90D7TraGA3aCNNZJqxombWoeY8WcdaiWFG50gIkP64-7b3bqR9xZcrqqAe1jW7UcaeCdurpi3cbtQ4_lYCyms2K4P29IIbbCVNWo0sGh0F7DFNSjDet5LTloqDv_kFvwhR9-Z5iTdsBg5lkhfqwp0wMKUW0j8cwqu7yU3f5qT_5Ffjt3-c_og-BFYDtgV9uwN1_VOp0vrjYS38DMXinPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1269515871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sakles, John C. ; Chiu, Stephen ; Mosier, Jarrod ; Walker, Corrine ; Stolz, Uwe ; Reardon, Robert F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakles, John C. ; Chiu, Stephen ; Mosier, Jarrod ; Walker, Corrine ; Stolz, Uwe ; Reardon, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The goal of this study was to determine the association of first pass success with the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during emergency department (ED) intubations.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected continuous quality improvement data based on orotracheal intubations performed in an academic ED over a 4‐year period. Following each intubation, the operator completed a data form regarding multiple aspects of the intubation, including patient and operator characteristics, method of intubation, device used, the number of attempts required, and AEs. Numerous AEs were tracked and included events such as witnessed aspiration, oxygen desaturation, esophageal intubation, hypotension, dysrhythmia, and cardiac arrest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the primary predictor variable of interest, first pass success, and the outcome variable, the presence of one or more AEs, after controlling for various other potential risk factors and confounders.
Results
Over the 4‐year study period, there were 1,828 orotracheal intubations. If the intubation was successful on the first attempt, the incidence of one or more AEs was 14.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.4% to 16.2%). In cases requiring two attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 47.2% (95% CI = 41.8% to 52.7%); in cases requiring three attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 63.6% (95% CI = 53.7% to 72.6%); and in cases requiring four or more attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 70.6% (95% CI = 56.2.3% to 82.5%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that more than one attempt at tracheal intubation was a significant predictor of one or more AEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.52, 95% CI = 5.86 to 9.63).
Conclusions
When performing orotracheal intubation in the ED, first pass success is associated with a relatively small incidence of AEs. As the number of attempts increases, the incidence of AEs increases substantially.
Resumen
La Importancia del Éxito del Primer Intento Cuando Se Realiza la Intubación Orotraqueal en el Servicio de Urgencias
Objectivos
El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la asociación entre el éxito del primer intento con la incidencia de eventos adversos (EA) durante las intubaciones en el servicio de urgencias (SU).
Método
Análisis retrospectivo con una recogida de forma prospectiva continua de datos de mejora de la calidad, basados en intubaciones orotraqueales realizadas en un SU universitario en un periodo de cuatro años. Tras cada intubación, el operador completó un informe de datos sobre aspectos de la intubación que incluyeron: las características del paciente y el operador, el método de intubación, el dispositivo empleado, el número de intentos requeridos y los EA. Se monitorizaron numerosos EA, e incluyeron eventos como la aspiración presenciada, la desaturación de oxígeno, la intubación esofágica, la hipotensión, las arritmias y la parada cardiorrespiratoria. Se realizó un análisis multivariable mediante regresión logística para evaluar la relación entre la principal variable predictora de interés, éxito del primer paso, y la variable resultado, la presencia de uno o más EA, tras controlar por otros posibles factores de riesgo potenciales y de confusión.
Resultados
Durante el periodo de estudio de cuatro años, se realizaron 1.828 intubaciones orotraqueales. Si la intubación fue exitosa en el primer intento, la incidencia de uno o más EA fue del 14,2% (IC 95% = 12,4% a 16,2%). En caso de requerir dos intentos, la incidencia de uno o más EA fue del 47,2% (IC 95% = 41,8% a 52,7%), en caso de requerir tres, la incidencia fue del 63,6% (IC 95% = 53,7% a 72,6%), y en caso de requerir cuatro o más, la incidencia fue del 70.6% (IC 95% = 56,2% a 82,5%). El análisis de regresión multivariable mediante regresión logística mostró que más de un intento de intubación orotraqueal fue un factor predictor significativo de uno o más EA (OR ajustada 7,52, IC 95% = 5,86 a 9,63).
Conclusiones
Cuando la intubación orotraqueal se realiza en el SU, el éxito del primer intento se asocia con una incidencia relativamente baja de eventos adversos. Conforme aumenta el número de intentos, la incidencia de eventos adversos se incrementa de forma substancial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-6563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-2712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acem.12055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23574475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Clinical Competence ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine - standards ; Emergency Medicine - trends ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Quality Improvement ; Quality of care ; Regression analysis ; Retreatment ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Side effects ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Academic emergency medicine, 2013-01, Vol.20 (1), p.71-78</ispartof><rights>2013 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</rights><rights>2013 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.</rights><rights>Copyright Hanley & Belfus, Inc. Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5145-e3053db908ff50c543cab509902ca5ac4c9f14f461ffea3befee86e4d07da4573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5145-e3053db908ff50c543cab509902ca5ac4c9f14f461ffea3befee86e4d07da4573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Facem.12055$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Facem.12055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23574475$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakles, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosier, Jarrod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Corrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolz, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reardon, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department</title><title>Academic emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Objectives
The goal of this study was to determine the association of first pass success with the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during emergency department (ED) intubations.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected continuous quality improvement data based on orotracheal intubations performed in an academic ED over a 4‐year period. Following each intubation, the operator completed a data form regarding multiple aspects of the intubation, including patient and operator characteristics, method of intubation, device used, the number of attempts required, and AEs. Numerous AEs were tracked and included events such as witnessed aspiration, oxygen desaturation, esophageal intubation, hypotension, dysrhythmia, and cardiac arrest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the primary predictor variable of interest, first pass success, and the outcome variable, the presence of one or more AEs, after controlling for various other potential risk factors and confounders.
Results
Over the 4‐year study period, there were 1,828 orotracheal intubations. If the intubation was successful on the first attempt, the incidence of one or more AEs was 14.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.4% to 16.2%). In cases requiring two attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 47.2% (95% CI = 41.8% to 52.7%); in cases requiring three attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 63.6% (95% CI = 53.7% to 72.6%); and in cases requiring four or more attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 70.6% (95% CI = 56.2.3% to 82.5%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that more than one attempt at tracheal intubation was a significant predictor of one or more AEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.52, 95% CI = 5.86 to 9.63).
Conclusions
When performing orotracheal intubation in the ED, first pass success is associated with a relatively small incidence of AEs. As the number of attempts increases, the incidence of AEs increases substantially.
Resumen
La Importancia del Éxito del Primer Intento Cuando Se Realiza la Intubación Orotraqueal en el Servicio de Urgencias
Objectivos
El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la asociación entre el éxito del primer intento con la incidencia de eventos adversos (EA) durante las intubaciones en el servicio de urgencias (SU).
Método
Análisis retrospectivo con una recogida de forma prospectiva continua de datos de mejora de la calidad, basados en intubaciones orotraqueales realizadas en un SU universitario en un periodo de cuatro años. Tras cada intubación, el operador completó un informe de datos sobre aspectos de la intubación que incluyeron: las características del paciente y el operador, el método de intubación, el dispositivo empleado, el número de intentos requeridos y los EA. Se monitorizaron numerosos EA, e incluyeron eventos como la aspiración presenciada, la desaturación de oxígeno, la intubación esofágica, la hipotensión, las arritmias y la parada cardiorrespiratoria. Se realizó un análisis multivariable mediante regresión logística para evaluar la relación entre la principal variable predictora de interés, éxito del primer paso, y la variable resultado, la presencia de uno o más EA, tras controlar por otros posibles factores de riesgo potenciales y de confusión.
Resultados
Durante el periodo de estudio de cuatro años, se realizaron 1.828 intubaciones orotraqueales. Si la intubación fue exitosa en el primer intento, la incidencia de uno o más EA fue del 14,2% (IC 95% = 12,4% a 16,2%). En caso de requerir dos intentos, la incidencia de uno o más EA fue del 47,2% (IC 95% = 41,8% a 52,7%), en caso de requerir tres, la incidencia fue del 63,6% (IC 95% = 53,7% a 72,6%), y en caso de requerir cuatro o más, la incidencia fue del 70.6% (IC 95% = 56,2% a 82,5%). El análisis de regresión multivariable mediante regresión logística mostró que más de un intento de intubación orotraqueal fue un factor predictor significativo de uno o más EA (OR ajustada 7,52, IC 95% = 5,86 a 9,63).
Conclusiones
Cuando la intubación orotraqueal se realiza en el SU, el éxito del primer intento se asocia con una incidencia relativamente baja de eventos adversos. Conforme aumenta el número de intentos, la incidencia de eventos adversos se incrementa de forma substancial.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retreatment</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1069-6563</issn><issn>1553-2712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFrFDEQxxex2Fp98QNIwBcRtiabzOb2RSjnVQ9aWrDiY8jmJncpu8k1ySr37U29tlgfnJcZyI_fTPhX1RtGT1ipj9rgeMIaCvCsOmIAvG4ka56XmbZd3ULLD6uXKd1QSkF28kV12HCQQkg4qtbXGyTLcRti1t4gCZacuZgyudIpkW-TMVj6jw16coXRhjg6vyaXMeSozQb1QJY-T73OLnjiPMlFtxgxrtGbHfmMWx3ziD6_qg6sHhK-vu_H1fezxfX8a31--WU5Pz2vDTABNXIKfNV3dGYtUAOCG90D7TraGA3aCNNZJqxombWoeY8WcdaiWFG50gIkP64-7b3bqR9xZcrqqAe1jW7UcaeCdurpi3cbtQ4_lYCyms2K4P29IIbbCVNWo0sGh0F7DFNSjDet5LTloqDv_kFvwhR9-Z5iTdsBg5lkhfqwp0wMKUW0j8cwqu7yU3f5qT_5Ffjt3-c_og-BFYDtgV9uwN1_VOp0vrjYS38DMXinPA</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Sakles, John C.</creator><creator>Chiu, Stephen</creator><creator>Mosier, Jarrod</creator><creator>Walker, Corrine</creator><creator>Stolz, Uwe</creator><creator>Reardon, Robert F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department</title><author>Sakles, John C. ; Chiu, Stephen ; Mosier, Jarrod ; Walker, Corrine ; Stolz, Uwe ; Reardon, Robert F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5145-e3053db908ff50c543cab509902ca5ac4c9f14f461ffea3befee86e4d07da4573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retreatment</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakles, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosier, Jarrod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Corrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolz, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reardon, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakles, John C.</au><au>Chiu, Stephen</au><au>Mosier, Jarrod</au><au>Walker, Corrine</au><au>Stolz, Uwe</au><au>Reardon, Robert F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department</atitle><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>71-78</pages><issn>1069-6563</issn><eissn>1553-2712</eissn><abstract>Objectives
The goal of this study was to determine the association of first pass success with the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during emergency department (ED) intubations.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected continuous quality improvement data based on orotracheal intubations performed in an academic ED over a 4‐year period. Following each intubation, the operator completed a data form regarding multiple aspects of the intubation, including patient and operator characteristics, method of intubation, device used, the number of attempts required, and AEs. Numerous AEs were tracked and included events such as witnessed aspiration, oxygen desaturation, esophageal intubation, hypotension, dysrhythmia, and cardiac arrest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the primary predictor variable of interest, first pass success, and the outcome variable, the presence of one or more AEs, after controlling for various other potential risk factors and confounders.
Results
Over the 4‐year study period, there were 1,828 orotracheal intubations. If the intubation was successful on the first attempt, the incidence of one or more AEs was 14.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.4% to 16.2%). In cases requiring two attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 47.2% (95% CI = 41.8% to 52.7%); in cases requiring three attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 63.6% (95% CI = 53.7% to 72.6%); and in cases requiring four or more attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 70.6% (95% CI = 56.2.3% to 82.5%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that more than one attempt at tracheal intubation was a significant predictor of one or more AEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.52, 95% CI = 5.86 to 9.63).
Conclusions
When performing orotracheal intubation in the ED, first pass success is associated with a relatively small incidence of AEs. As the number of attempts increases, the incidence of AEs increases substantially.
Resumen
La Importancia del Éxito del Primer Intento Cuando Se Realiza la Intubación Orotraqueal en el Servicio de Urgencias
Objectivos
El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la asociación entre el éxito del primer intento con la incidencia de eventos adversos (EA) durante las intubaciones en el servicio de urgencias (SU).
Método
Análisis retrospectivo con una recogida de forma prospectiva continua de datos de mejora de la calidad, basados en intubaciones orotraqueales realizadas en un SU universitario en un periodo de cuatro años. Tras cada intubación, el operador completó un informe de datos sobre aspectos de la intubación que incluyeron: las características del paciente y el operador, el método de intubación, el dispositivo empleado, el número de intentos requeridos y los EA. Se monitorizaron numerosos EA, e incluyeron eventos como la aspiración presenciada, la desaturación de oxígeno, la intubación esofágica, la hipotensión, las arritmias y la parada cardiorrespiratoria. Se realizó un análisis multivariable mediante regresión logística para evaluar la relación entre la principal variable predictora de interés, éxito del primer paso, y la variable resultado, la presencia de uno o más EA, tras controlar por otros posibles factores de riesgo potenciales y de confusión.
Resultados
Durante el periodo de estudio de cuatro años, se realizaron 1.828 intubaciones orotraqueales. Si la intubación fue exitosa en el primer intento, la incidencia de uno o más EA fue del 14,2% (IC 95% = 12,4% a 16,2%). En caso de requerir dos intentos, la incidencia de uno o más EA fue del 47,2% (IC 95% = 41,8% a 52,7%), en caso de requerir tres, la incidencia fue del 63,6% (IC 95% = 53,7% a 72,6%), y en caso de requerir cuatro o más, la incidencia fue del 70.6% (IC 95% = 56,2% a 82,5%). El análisis de regresión multivariable mediante regresión logística mostró que más de un intento de intubación orotraqueal fue un factor predictor significativo de uno o más EA (OR ajustada 7,52, IC 95% = 5,86 a 9,63).
Conclusiones
Cuando la intubación orotraqueal se realiza en el SU, el éxito del primer intento se asocia con una incidencia relativamente baja de eventos adversos. Conforme aumenta el número de intentos, la incidencia de eventos adversos se incrementa de forma substancial.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>23574475</pmid><doi>10.1111/acem.12055</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-6563 |
ispartof | Academic emergency medicine, 2013-01, Vol.20 (1), p.71-78 |
issn | 1069-6563 1553-2712 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4530518 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Clinical Competence Cohort Studies Confidence Intervals Emergency medical care Emergency Medicine - standards Emergency Medicine - trends Emergency Service, Hospital Female Humans Intubation Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation Intubation, Intratracheal - methods Male Middle Aged Odds Ratio Quality Improvement Quality of care Regression analysis Retreatment Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Side effects Time Factors |
title | The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T11%3A00%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Importance%20of%20First%20Pass%20Success%20When%20Performing%20Orotracheal%20Intubation%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department&rft.jtitle=Academic%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Sakles,%20John%20C.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=71-78&rft.issn=1069-6563&rft.eissn=1553-2712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acem.12055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2865852811%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1269515871&rft_id=info:pmid/23574475&rfr_iscdi=true |