Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care
Objective To synthesize the perspectives of a broad range of pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians and parents, to formulate a consensus on prioritization of the PPC research agenda. Study design A 4-round modified Delphi online survey was administered to PPC experts and to parents of children...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of pediatrics 2015-08, Vol.167 (2), p.467-470.e3 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 470.e3 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 467 |
container_title | The Journal of pediatrics |
container_volume | 167 |
creator | Baker, Justin N., MD Levine, Deena R., MD Hinds, Pamela S., PhD, RN, FAAN Weaver, Meaghann S., MD Cunningham, Melody J., MD Johnson, Liza, MD Anghelescu, Doralina, MD Mandrell, Belinda, PhD Gibson, Deborah V., MA Jones, Barbara, MSW Wolfe, Joanne, MD Feudtner, Chris, MD, PhD, MPH Friebert, Sarah, MD Carter, Brian, MD Kane, Javier R., MD |
description | Objective To synthesize the perspectives of a broad range of pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians and parents, to formulate a consensus on prioritization of the PPC research agenda. Study design A 4-round modified Delphi online survey was administered to PPC experts and to parents of children who had received PPC. In round 1, research priorities were generated spontaneously. Rounds 2 and 3 then served as convergence rounds to synthesize priorities. In round 4, participants were asked to rank the research priorities that had reached at least 80% consensus. Results A total of 3093 concepts were spontaneously generated by 170 experts and 72 parents in round 1 (65.8% response rate [RR]). These concepts were thematically organized into 78 priorities and recirculated for round 2 ratings (n = 130; 53.7% RR). Round 3 achieved response stability, with 31 consensus priorities oscillating within 10% of the mode (n = 98; 75.4% RR). Round 4 resulted in consensus recognition of 20 research priorities, which were thematically grouped as decision making, care coordination, symptom management, quality improvement, and education. Conclusions This modified Delphi survey used professional and parental consensus to identify preeminent PPC research priorities. Attentiveness to these priorities may help direct resources and efforts toward building a formative evidence base. Investigating PPC implementation approaches and outcomes can help improve the quality of care services for children and families. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4516589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022347615004709</els_id><sourcerecordid>1699493389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-d4bca13ce67fdf3c0278ca60879bac159d2358c97e62f0b6d87072338e502bf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUVuL1DAUDqK44-ovEKSPvnT2JGlzeXBBhlUXFhy8PB_S9NRN7bRj0hnYf2_qrIv6IhxIOPku4fsYe8lhzYGri37d76lNawG8XkMeEI_YioPVpTJSPmarvBGlrLQ6Y89S6gHAVgBP2ZlQIIww1YrBJ0rkor8ttjFMMcyBUhHGYkttcHMMvti6YcjXcKRi4yI9Z086NyR6cX-es6_vrr5sPpQ3H99fb97elL6u9Fy2VeMdl56U7tpOehDaeKfAaNs4z2vbClkbbzUp0UGjWqNBCykN1SCaTstzdnnS3R-aHbWexjm6Afcx7Fy8w8kF_PtlDLf4bTpiVXNVG5sFXt8LxOnHgdKMu5A8DYMbaTok5MraymbHBSpPUB-nlCJ1DzYccMkae_yVNS5ZI-QBkVmv_vzhA-d3uBnw5gSgnNMxUMTkA40-RxvJz9hO4T8Gl__w_RDG4N3wne4o9dMhjrkC5JgEAn5e6l7a5jVApcHKnxvVpcc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1699493389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Baker, Justin N., MD ; Levine, Deena R., MD ; Hinds, Pamela S., PhD, RN, FAAN ; Weaver, Meaghann S., MD ; Cunningham, Melody J., MD ; Johnson, Liza, MD ; Anghelescu, Doralina, MD ; Mandrell, Belinda, PhD ; Gibson, Deborah V., MA ; Jones, Barbara, MSW ; Wolfe, Joanne, MD ; Feudtner, Chris, MD, PhD, MPH ; Friebert, Sarah, MD ; Carter, Brian, MD ; Kane, Javier R., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Justin N., MD ; Levine, Deena R., MD ; Hinds, Pamela S., PhD, RN, FAAN ; Weaver, Meaghann S., MD ; Cunningham, Melody J., MD ; Johnson, Liza, MD ; Anghelescu, Doralina, MD ; Mandrell, Belinda, PhD ; Gibson, Deborah V., MA ; Jones, Barbara, MSW ; Wolfe, Joanne, MD ; Feudtner, Chris, MD, PhD, MPH ; Friebert, Sarah, MD ; Carter, Brian, MD ; Kane, Javier R., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To synthesize the perspectives of a broad range of pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians and parents, to formulate a consensus on prioritization of the PPC research agenda. Study design A 4-round modified Delphi online survey was administered to PPC experts and to parents of children who had received PPC. In round 1, research priorities were generated spontaneously. Rounds 2 and 3 then served as convergence rounds to synthesize priorities. In round 4, participants were asked to rank the research priorities that had reached at least 80% consensus. Results A total of 3093 concepts were spontaneously generated by 170 experts and 72 parents in round 1 (65.8% response rate [RR]). These concepts were thematically organized into 78 priorities and recirculated for round 2 ratings (n = 130; 53.7% RR). Round 3 achieved response stability, with 31 consensus priorities oscillating within 10% of the mode (n = 98; 75.4% RR). Round 4 resulted in consensus recognition of 20 research priorities, which were thematically grouped as decision making, care coordination, symptom management, quality improvement, and education. Conclusions This modified Delphi survey used professional and parental consensus to identify preeminent PPC research priorities. Attentiveness to these priorities may help direct resources and efforts toward building a formative evidence base. Investigating PPC implementation approaches and outcomes can help improve the quality of care services for children and families.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3476</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26028284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Delphi Technique ; Humans ; Palliative Care ; Parents - psychology ; Pediatrics ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pediatrics, 2015-08, Vol.167 (2), p.467-470.e3</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2015 Published by Elsevier Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-d4bca13ce67fdf3c0278ca60879bac159d2358c97e62f0b6d87072338e502bf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-d4bca13ce67fdf3c0278ca60879bac159d2358c97e62f0b6d87072338e502bf73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6584-6483 ; 0000-0002-7209-1525</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347615004709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Justin N., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Deena R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinds, Pamela S., PhD, RN, FAAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Meaghann S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Melody J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Liza, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anghelescu, Doralina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandrell, Belinda, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Deborah V., MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Barbara, MSW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Joanne, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feudtner, Chris, MD, PhD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friebert, Sarah, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Javier R., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care</title><title>The Journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><description>Objective To synthesize the perspectives of a broad range of pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians and parents, to formulate a consensus on prioritization of the PPC research agenda. Study design A 4-round modified Delphi online survey was administered to PPC experts and to parents of children who had received PPC. In round 1, research priorities were generated spontaneously. Rounds 2 and 3 then served as convergence rounds to synthesize priorities. In round 4, participants were asked to rank the research priorities that had reached at least 80% consensus. Results A total of 3093 concepts were spontaneously generated by 170 experts and 72 parents in round 1 (65.8% response rate [RR]). These concepts were thematically organized into 78 priorities and recirculated for round 2 ratings (n = 130; 53.7% RR). Round 3 achieved response stability, with 31 consensus priorities oscillating within 10% of the mode (n = 98; 75.4% RR). Round 4 resulted in consensus recognition of 20 research priorities, which were thematically grouped as decision making, care coordination, symptom management, quality improvement, and education. Conclusions This modified Delphi survey used professional and parental consensus to identify preeminent PPC research priorities. Attentiveness to these priorities may help direct resources and efforts toward building a formative evidence base. Investigating PPC implementation approaches and outcomes can help improve the quality of care services for children and families.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUVuL1DAUDqK44-ovEKSPvnT2JGlzeXBBhlUXFhy8PB_S9NRN7bRj0hnYf2_qrIv6IhxIOPku4fsYe8lhzYGri37d76lNawG8XkMeEI_YioPVpTJSPmarvBGlrLQ6Y89S6gHAVgBP2ZlQIIww1YrBJ0rkor8ttjFMMcyBUhHGYkttcHMMvti6YcjXcKRi4yI9Z086NyR6cX-es6_vrr5sPpQ3H99fb97elL6u9Fy2VeMdl56U7tpOehDaeKfAaNs4z2vbClkbbzUp0UGjWqNBCykN1SCaTstzdnnS3R-aHbWexjm6Afcx7Fy8w8kF_PtlDLf4bTpiVXNVG5sFXt8LxOnHgdKMu5A8DYMbaTok5MraymbHBSpPUB-nlCJ1DzYccMkae_yVNS5ZI-QBkVmv_vzhA-d3uBnw5gSgnNMxUMTkA40-RxvJz9hO4T8Gl__w_RDG4N3wne4o9dMhjrkC5JgEAn5e6l7a5jVApcHKnxvVpcc</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Baker, Justin N., MD</creator><creator>Levine, Deena R., MD</creator><creator>Hinds, Pamela S., PhD, RN, FAAN</creator><creator>Weaver, Meaghann S., MD</creator><creator>Cunningham, Melody J., MD</creator><creator>Johnson, Liza, MD</creator><creator>Anghelescu, Doralina, MD</creator><creator>Mandrell, Belinda, PhD</creator><creator>Gibson, Deborah V., MA</creator><creator>Jones, Barbara, MSW</creator><creator>Wolfe, Joanne, MD</creator><creator>Feudtner, Chris, MD, PhD, MPH</creator><creator>Friebert, Sarah, MD</creator><creator>Carter, Brian, MD</creator><creator>Kane, Javier R., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6584-6483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-1525</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care</title><author>Baker, Justin N., MD ; Levine, Deena R., MD ; Hinds, Pamela S., PhD, RN, FAAN ; Weaver, Meaghann S., MD ; Cunningham, Melody J., MD ; Johnson, Liza, MD ; Anghelescu, Doralina, MD ; Mandrell, Belinda, PhD ; Gibson, Deborah V., MA ; Jones, Barbara, MSW ; Wolfe, Joanne, MD ; Feudtner, Chris, MD, PhD, MPH ; Friebert, Sarah, MD ; Carter, Brian, MD ; Kane, Javier R., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-d4bca13ce67fdf3c0278ca60879bac159d2358c97e62f0b6d87072338e502bf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Justin N., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Deena R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinds, Pamela S., PhD, RN, FAAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Meaghann S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Melody J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Liza, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anghelescu, Doralina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandrell, Belinda, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Deborah V., MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Barbara, MSW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Joanne, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feudtner, Chris, MD, PhD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friebert, Sarah, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Javier R., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Justin N., MD</au><au>Levine, Deena R., MD</au><au>Hinds, Pamela S., PhD, RN, FAAN</au><au>Weaver, Meaghann S., MD</au><au>Cunningham, Melody J., MD</au><au>Johnson, Liza, MD</au><au>Anghelescu, Doralina, MD</au><au>Mandrell, Belinda, PhD</au><au>Gibson, Deborah V., MA</au><au>Jones, Barbara, MSW</au><au>Wolfe, Joanne, MD</au><au>Feudtner, Chris, MD, PhD, MPH</au><au>Friebert, Sarah, MD</au><au>Carter, Brian, MD</au><au>Kane, Javier R., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>167</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>470.e3</epage><pages>467-470.e3</pages><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><eissn>1097-6833</eissn><abstract>Objective To synthesize the perspectives of a broad range of pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians and parents, to formulate a consensus on prioritization of the PPC research agenda. Study design A 4-round modified Delphi online survey was administered to PPC experts and to parents of children who had received PPC. In round 1, research priorities were generated spontaneously. Rounds 2 and 3 then served as convergence rounds to synthesize priorities. In round 4, participants were asked to rank the research priorities that had reached at least 80% consensus. Results A total of 3093 concepts were spontaneously generated by 170 experts and 72 parents in round 1 (65.8% response rate [RR]). These concepts were thematically organized into 78 priorities and recirculated for round 2 ratings (n = 130; 53.7% RR). Round 3 achieved response stability, with 31 consensus priorities oscillating within 10% of the mode (n = 98; 75.4% RR). Round 4 resulted in consensus recognition of 20 research priorities, which were thematically grouped as decision making, care coordination, symptom management, quality improvement, and education. Conclusions This modified Delphi survey used professional and parental consensus to identify preeminent PPC research priorities. Attentiveness to these priorities may help direct resources and efforts toward building a formative evidence base. Investigating PPC implementation approaches and outcomes can help improve the quality of care services for children and families.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26028284</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6584-6483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-1525</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3476 |
ispartof | The Journal of pediatrics, 2015-08, Vol.167 (2), p.467-470.e3 |
issn | 0022-3476 1097-6833 1097-6833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4516589 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Delphi Technique Humans Palliative Care Parents - psychology Pediatrics United States |
title | Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T13%3A23%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20Priorities%20in%20Pediatric%20Palliative%20Care&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=Baker,%20Justin%20N.,%20MD&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=167&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=470.e3&rft.pages=467-470.e3&rft.issn=0022-3476&rft.eissn=1097-6833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1699493389%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1699493389&rft_id=info:pmid/26028284&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022347615004709&rfr_iscdi=true |