Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr)

Abstract Objective This study examines the impact of Family Healthware™ on communication behaviors; specifically, communication with family members and health care providers about family health history. Methods A total of 3786 participants were enrolled in the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive medicine 2015-08, Vol.77, p.28-34
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Catharine, Sen, Ananda, Plegue, Melissa, Ruffin, Mack T, O'Neill, Suzanne M, Rubinstein, Wendy S, Acheson, Louise S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue
container_start_page 28
container_title Preventive medicine
container_volume 77
creator Wang, Catharine
Sen, Ananda
Plegue, Melissa
Ruffin, Mack T
O'Neill, Suzanne M
Rubinstein, Wendy S
Acheson, Louise S
description Abstract Objective This study examines the impact of Family Healthware™ on communication behaviors; specifically, communication with family members and health care providers about family health history. Methods A total of 3786 participants were enrolled in the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) in the United States from 2005–7. The trial employed a two-arm cluster-randomized design, with primary care practices serving as the unit of randomization. Using generalized estimating equations (GEE), analyses focused on communication behaviors at 6 month follow-up, adjusting for age, site and practice clustering. Results A significant interaction was observed between study arm and baseline communication status for the family communication outcomes (p's < .01), indicating that intervention had effects of different magnitude between those already communicating at baseline and those who were not. Among participants who were not communicating at baseline, intervention participants had higher odds of communicating with family members about family history risk (OR = 1.24, p = 0.042) and actively collecting family history information at follow-up (OR = 2.67, p = 0.026). Family Healthware™ did not have a significant effect on family communication among those already communicating at baseline, or on provider communication, regardless of baseline communication status. Greater communication was observed among those at increased familial risk for a greater number of diseases. Conclusion Family Healthware™ prompted more communication about family history with family members, among those who were not previously communicating. Efforts are needed to identify approaches to encourage greater sharing of family history information, particularly with health care providers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4508012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0091743515001139</els_id><sourcerecordid>1692751415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-93010d0331efd0705f54327c49de85b98df6043f9ffd056de39ce51f282a2e523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsGO0zAQtRCILQtfgIR8XA4N4zhOGyRWWq0orbQSB8rZcp0xdYnjYCdd9c5_IPFpfAnOtrsCLpws670382beEPKSQcaAlW922aFzWGc5MJFBkQHMHpEJg6qcQl7CYzIBqNh0VnBxRp7FuANgrITiKTnLRQWsEHxCfqxcp3RPvaFGOdsc6NbG3ocDVTFijA7bBLZUe-eG1mrV2_S7tf32nu_QbTBEqtqablE1CdEqIO2C39s6IW_pFQ3Y-dBTE7yj_Rbp4qhd3vFvE_3X95_0ZGUdrGroxWK5WofXz8kTo5qIL07vOfm8eL--Xk5vPn5YXV_dTLVgRT-tODCogXOGpoYZCCMKns90UdU4F5tqXps0OTeVSbAoa-SVRsFMPs9VjiLn5-TyWLcbNmmpOo0dVCO7YJ0KB-mVlX8jrd3KL34vCwFzYGOBi1OB4L8NGHvpbNTYNKpFP0TJyiqfJa9MJCo_UnXwMQY0D20YyDFauZN30coxWgmFTNEm1as_HT5o7rNMhHdHAqY97S0GGbXFVmNtA-pe1t7-p8HlP3rd2DHy5iseMO78ENoUgWQy5hLkp_G6xuNiYjwsXvHfzSDPBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1692751415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wang, Catharine ; Sen, Ananda ; Plegue, Melissa ; Ruffin, Mack T ; O'Neill, Suzanne M ; Rubinstein, Wendy S ; Acheson, Louise S</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Catharine ; Sen, Ananda ; Plegue, Melissa ; Ruffin, Mack T ; O'Neill, Suzanne M ; Rubinstein, Wendy S ; Acheson, Louise S ; The FHITr group consists of the following collaborators ; the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) Group ; Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) Group ; Family Healthware Impact Trial FHITr Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective This study examines the impact of Family Healthware™ on communication behaviors; specifically, communication with family members and health care providers about family health history. Methods A total of 3786 participants were enrolled in the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) in the United States from 2005–7. The trial employed a two-arm cluster-randomized design, with primary care practices serving as the unit of randomization. Using generalized estimating equations (GEE), analyses focused on communication behaviors at 6 month follow-up, adjusting for age, site and practice clustering. Results A significant interaction was observed between study arm and baseline communication status for the family communication outcomes (p's &lt; .01), indicating that intervention had effects of different magnitude between those already communicating at baseline and those who were not. Among participants who were not communicating at baseline, intervention participants had higher odds of communicating with family members about family history risk (OR = 1.24, p = 0.042) and actively collecting family history information at follow-up (OR = 2.67, p = 0.026). Family Healthware™ did not have a significant effect on family communication among those already communicating at baseline, or on provider communication, regardless of baseline communication status. Greater communication was observed among those at increased familial risk for a greater number of diseases. Conclusion Family Healthware™ prompted more communication about family history with family members, among those who were not previously communicating. Efforts are needed to identify approaches to encourage greater sharing of family history information, particularly with health care providers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25901453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Attitude to Health ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) ; Chronic disease ; Cluster Analysis ; Communication ; Dose effects ; Family ; Family communication ; Family Health ; Family history assessment ; Female ; Health Behavior ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Internet ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Provider communication ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Software ; United States</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 2015-08, Vol.77, p.28-34</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-93010d0331efd0705f54327c49de85b98df6043f9ffd056de39ce51f282a2e523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-93010d0331efd0705f54327c49de85b98df6043f9ffd056de39ce51f282a2e523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743515001139$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plegue, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruffin, Mack T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinstein, Wendy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acheson, Louise S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The FHITr group consists of the following collaborators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Family Healthware Impact Trial FHITr Group</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr)</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective This study examines the impact of Family Healthware™ on communication behaviors; specifically, communication with family members and health care providers about family health history. Methods A total of 3786 participants were enrolled in the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) in the United States from 2005–7. The trial employed a two-arm cluster-randomized design, with primary care practices serving as the unit of randomization. Using generalized estimating equations (GEE), analyses focused on communication behaviors at 6 month follow-up, adjusting for age, site and practice clustering. Results A significant interaction was observed between study arm and baseline communication status for the family communication outcomes (p's &lt; .01), indicating that intervention had effects of different magnitude between those already communicating at baseline and those who were not. Among participants who were not communicating at baseline, intervention participants had higher odds of communicating with family members about family history risk (OR = 1.24, p = 0.042) and actively collecting family history information at follow-up (OR = 2.67, p = 0.026). Family Healthware™ did not have a significant effect on family communication among those already communicating at baseline, or on provider communication, regardless of baseline communication status. Greater communication was observed among those at increased familial risk for a greater number of diseases. Conclusion Family Healthware™ prompted more communication about family history with family members, among those who were not previously communicating. Efforts are needed to identify approaches to encourage greater sharing of family history information, particularly with health care providers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)</subject><subject>Chronic disease</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Dose effects</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family communication</subject><subject>Family Health</subject><subject>Family history assessment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Provider communication</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsGO0zAQtRCILQtfgIR8XA4N4zhOGyRWWq0orbQSB8rZcp0xdYnjYCdd9c5_IPFpfAnOtrsCLpws670382beEPKSQcaAlW922aFzWGc5MJFBkQHMHpEJg6qcQl7CYzIBqNh0VnBxRp7FuANgrITiKTnLRQWsEHxCfqxcp3RPvaFGOdsc6NbG3ocDVTFijA7bBLZUe-eG1mrV2_S7tf32nu_QbTBEqtqablE1CdEqIO2C39s6IW_pFQ3Y-dBTE7yj_Rbp4qhd3vFvE_3X95_0ZGUdrGroxWK5WofXz8kTo5qIL07vOfm8eL--Xk5vPn5YXV_dTLVgRT-tODCogXOGpoYZCCMKns90UdU4F5tqXps0OTeVSbAoa-SVRsFMPs9VjiLn5-TyWLcbNmmpOo0dVCO7YJ0KB-mVlX8jrd3KL34vCwFzYGOBi1OB4L8NGHvpbNTYNKpFP0TJyiqfJa9MJCo_UnXwMQY0D20YyDFauZN30coxWgmFTNEm1as_HT5o7rNMhHdHAqY97S0GGbXFVmNtA-pe1t7-p8HlP3rd2DHy5iseMO78ENoUgWQy5hLkp_G6xuNiYjwsXvHfzSDPBA</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Wang, Catharine</creator><creator>Sen, Ananda</creator><creator>Plegue, Melissa</creator><creator>Ruffin, Mack T</creator><creator>O'Neill, Suzanne M</creator><creator>Rubinstein, Wendy S</creator><creator>Acheson, Louise S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr)</title><author>Wang, Catharine ; Sen, Ananda ; Plegue, Melissa ; Ruffin, Mack T ; O'Neill, Suzanne M ; Rubinstein, Wendy S ; Acheson, Louise S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-93010d0331efd0705f54327c49de85b98df6043f9ffd056de39ce51f282a2e523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)</topic><topic>Chronic disease</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Dose effects</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family communication</topic><topic>Family Health</topic><topic>Family history assessment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Provider communication</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plegue, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruffin, Mack T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinstein, Wendy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acheson, Louise S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The FHITr group consists of the following collaborators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Family Healthware Impact Trial FHITr Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Catharine</au><au>Sen, Ananda</au><au>Plegue, Melissa</au><au>Ruffin, Mack T</au><au>O'Neill, Suzanne M</au><au>Rubinstein, Wendy S</au><au>Acheson, Louise S</au><aucorp>The FHITr group consists of the following collaborators</aucorp><aucorp>the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) Group</aucorp><aucorp>Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) Group</aucorp><aucorp>Family Healthware Impact Trial FHITr Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr)</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>77</volume><spage>28</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>28-34</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective This study examines the impact of Family Healthware™ on communication behaviors; specifically, communication with family members and health care providers about family health history. Methods A total of 3786 participants were enrolled in the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr) in the United States from 2005–7. The trial employed a two-arm cluster-randomized design, with primary care practices serving as the unit of randomization. Using generalized estimating equations (GEE), analyses focused on communication behaviors at 6 month follow-up, adjusting for age, site and practice clustering. Results A significant interaction was observed between study arm and baseline communication status for the family communication outcomes (p's &lt; .01), indicating that intervention had effects of different magnitude between those already communicating at baseline and those who were not. Among participants who were not communicating at baseline, intervention participants had higher odds of communicating with family members about family history risk (OR = 1.24, p = 0.042) and actively collecting family history information at follow-up (OR = 2.67, p = 0.026). Family Healthware™ did not have a significant effect on family communication among those already communicating at baseline, or on provider communication, regardless of baseline communication status. Greater communication was observed among those at increased familial risk for a greater number of diseases. Conclusion Family Healthware™ prompted more communication about family history with family members, among those who were not previously communicating. Efforts are needed to identify approaches to encourage greater sharing of family history information, particularly with health care providers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25901453</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7435
ispartof Preventive medicine, 2015-08, Vol.77, p.28-34
issn 0091-7435
1096-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4508012
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Attitude to Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Chronic disease
Cluster Analysis
Communication
Dose effects
Family
Family communication
Family Health
Family history assessment
Female
Health Behavior
Health Personnel
Humans
Internal Medicine
Internet
Male
Middle Aged
Professional-Patient Relations
Provider communication
Risk Assessment - methods
Software
United States
title Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A35%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20family%20history%20assessment%20on%20communication%20with%20family%20members%20and%20health%20care%20providers:%20A%20report%20from%20the%20Family%20Healthware%E2%84%A2%20Impact%20Trial%20(FHITr)&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Wang,%20Catharine&rft.aucorp=The%20FHITr%20group%20consists%20of%20the%20following%20collaborators&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=77&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=28-34&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1692751415%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1692751415&rft_id=info:pmid/25901453&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0091743515001139&rfr_iscdi=true