Can Signal Enhancement Ratio (SER) Reduce the Number of Recommended Biopsies without Affecting Cancer Yield in Occult MRI-detected Lesions?
Rationale and Objectives We retrospectively determined if signal enhancement ratio (SER), a quantitative measure of contrast kinetics using volumetric parameters, could reduce the number of biopsy recommendations without decreasing the number of cancers detected when applied to suspicious lesions se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic radiology 2011-06, Vol.18 (6), p.716-721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 721 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 716 |
container_title | Academic radiology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Arasu, Vignesh A., MD Chen, Ryan C-Y., BS Newitt, David N., PhD Chang, C. Belinda, MD Tso, Hilda, MD Hylton, Nola M., PhD Joe, Bonnie N., MD, PhD |
description | Rationale and Objectives We retrospectively determined if signal enhancement ratio (SER), a quantitative measure of contrast kinetics using volumetric parameters, could reduce the number of biopsy recommendations without decreasing the number of cancers detected when applied to suspicious lesions seen on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods A retrospective review of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4 or 5 lesions seen on breast MRI in 2008 that were clinically and mammographically occult yielded a final sample size of 73 lesions in 65 patients. Images were processed with in-house software. Parameters used to predict benignity/malignancy included SER total tumor volume (lesion volume above a 70% initial enhancement level), SER partial tumor volume (volume with “washout” and “plateau” kinetics), SER washout tumor volume, peak SER, and peak percent enhancement. Thresholds were determined to retrospectively discriminate benign from malignant histopathology. Clinical impact was assessed through the reduction in the number of biopsies recommended (by eliminating benign lesions discriminated by SER). Results Based on the original radiologist interpretations, 73 occult lesions were called suspicious and biopsied with a predictive value of biopsies (PPV3 ) of 18/73 (25%). SER parameters were found to be significantly associated with histopathology ( P < .05). Biopsy recommendations could be reduced using SER parameters of SER partial tumor volume (73 to 40), SER total tumor volume (73 to 45), and peak percent enhancement (73 to 55) without removing true positives. Conclusion The adjunctive use of SER parameters may reduce the number of recommended biopsies without reducing the number of cancers detected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4506794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1076633211000882</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1076633211000882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-be69a61fb94e00b71a1d2c57771a27ec320e4dc3c9bbcf3742eb90a7ab2822fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9u1DAQxiNERUvhBTggH-GQdGxn80dCrcpqWyotVNqFAyfLsSe7XhJ7ZSdFfYa-dB0tVMCBk0f29_usmW-S5A2FjAItznaZVF5mDCjNgGUA1bPkhFZlleaQF89jDWWRFpyz4-RlCDsAOisq_iI5ZjRnwDk_SR7m0pK12VjZkYXdSquwRzuQlRyMI-_Wi9V7skI9KiTDFsmXsW_QE9fGS-X6KNWoyUfj9sFgID_NsHXjQC7bFtVg7IbMJ0dPvhvsNDGW3Co1dgP5vLpJNQ5RFPElBuNsuHiVHLWyC_j613mafLtafJ1_Spe31zfzy2WqZlAPaYNFLQvaNnWOAE1JJdVMzcoyVqxExRlgrhVXddOolpc5w6YGWcqGVYy1kp8m5wff_dj0qFXs18tO7L3ppb8XThrx94s1W7FxdyKfQVHWeTRgBwPlXQge2yeWgpiiETsxRSOmaAQwEaOJ0Ns_f31CfmcRBR8OAoy93xn0IiiDcXza-DgooZ35v__5P7jqjDVKdj_wHsPOjT6GHAQVIQJiPS3HtBuUQsQrxh8B8O22yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Signal Enhancement Ratio (SER) Reduce the Number of Recommended Biopsies without Affecting Cancer Yield in Occult MRI-detected Lesions?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Arasu, Vignesh A., MD ; Chen, Ryan C-Y., BS ; Newitt, David N., PhD ; Chang, C. Belinda, MD ; Tso, Hilda, MD ; Hylton, Nola M., PhD ; Joe, Bonnie N., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Arasu, Vignesh A., MD ; Chen, Ryan C-Y., BS ; Newitt, David N., PhD ; Chang, C. Belinda, MD ; Tso, Hilda, MD ; Hylton, Nola M., PhD ; Joe, Bonnie N., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale and Objectives We retrospectively determined if signal enhancement ratio (SER), a quantitative measure of contrast kinetics using volumetric parameters, could reduce the number of biopsy recommendations without decreasing the number of cancers detected when applied to suspicious lesions seen on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods A retrospective review of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4 or 5 lesions seen on breast MRI in 2008 that were clinically and mammographically occult yielded a final sample size of 73 lesions in 65 patients. Images were processed with in-house software. Parameters used to predict benignity/malignancy included SER total tumor volume (lesion volume above a 70% initial enhancement level), SER partial tumor volume (volume with “washout” and “plateau” kinetics), SER washout tumor volume, peak SER, and peak percent enhancement. Thresholds were determined to retrospectively discriminate benign from malignant histopathology. Clinical impact was assessed through the reduction in the number of biopsies recommended (by eliminating benign lesions discriminated by SER). Results Based on the original radiologist interpretations, 73 occult lesions were called suspicious and biopsied with a predictive value of biopsies (PPV3 ) of 18/73 (25%). SER parameters were found to be significantly associated with histopathology ( P < .05). Biopsy recommendations could be reduced using SER parameters of SER partial tumor volume (73 to 40), SER total tumor volume (73 to 45), and peak percent enhancement (73 to 55) without removing true positives. Conclusion The adjunctive use of SER parameters may reduce the number of recommended biopsies without reducing the number of cancers detected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21420333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Contrast Media - pharmacokinetics ; Female ; Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacokinetics ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Academic radiology, 2011-06, Vol.18 (6), p.716-721</ispartof><rights>AUR</rights><rights>2011 AUR</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>AUR, 2011 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-be69a61fb94e00b71a1d2c57771a27ec320e4dc3c9bbcf3742eb90a7ab2822fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-be69a61fb94e00b71a1d2c57771a27ec320e4dc3c9bbcf3742eb90a7ab2822fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633211000882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21420333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arasu, Vignesh A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ryan C-Y., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newitt, David N., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, C. Belinda, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tso, Hilda, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hylton, Nola M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joe, Bonnie N., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Can Signal Enhancement Ratio (SER) Reduce the Number of Recommended Biopsies without Affecting Cancer Yield in Occult MRI-detected Lesions?</title><title>Academic radiology</title><addtitle>Acad Radiol</addtitle><description>Rationale and Objectives We retrospectively determined if signal enhancement ratio (SER), a quantitative measure of contrast kinetics using volumetric parameters, could reduce the number of biopsy recommendations without decreasing the number of cancers detected when applied to suspicious lesions seen on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods A retrospective review of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4 or 5 lesions seen on breast MRI in 2008 that were clinically and mammographically occult yielded a final sample size of 73 lesions in 65 patients. Images were processed with in-house software. Parameters used to predict benignity/malignancy included SER total tumor volume (lesion volume above a 70% initial enhancement level), SER partial tumor volume (volume with “washout” and “plateau” kinetics), SER washout tumor volume, peak SER, and peak percent enhancement. Thresholds were determined to retrospectively discriminate benign from malignant histopathology. Clinical impact was assessed through the reduction in the number of biopsies recommended (by eliminating benign lesions discriminated by SER). Results Based on the original radiologist interpretations, 73 occult lesions were called suspicious and biopsied with a predictive value of biopsies (PPV3 ) of 18/73 (25%). SER parameters were found to be significantly associated with histopathology ( P < .05). Biopsy recommendations could be reduced using SER parameters of SER partial tumor volume (73 to 40), SER total tumor volume (73 to 45), and peak percent enhancement (73 to 55) without removing true positives. Conclusion The adjunctive use of SER parameters may reduce the number of recommended biopsies without reducing the number of cancers detected.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Contrast Media - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1076-6332</issn><issn>1878-4046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9u1DAQxiNERUvhBTggH-GQdGxn80dCrcpqWyotVNqFAyfLsSe7XhJ7ZSdFfYa-dB0tVMCBk0f29_usmW-S5A2FjAItznaZVF5mDCjNgGUA1bPkhFZlleaQF89jDWWRFpyz4-RlCDsAOisq_iI5ZjRnwDk_SR7m0pK12VjZkYXdSquwRzuQlRyMI-_Wi9V7skI9KiTDFsmXsW_QE9fGS-X6KNWoyUfj9sFgID_NsHXjQC7bFtVg7IbMJ0dPvhvsNDGW3Co1dgP5vLpJNQ5RFPElBuNsuHiVHLWyC_j613mafLtafJ1_Spe31zfzy2WqZlAPaYNFLQvaNnWOAE1JJdVMzcoyVqxExRlgrhVXddOolpc5w6YGWcqGVYy1kp8m5wff_dj0qFXs18tO7L3ppb8XThrx94s1W7FxdyKfQVHWeTRgBwPlXQge2yeWgpiiETsxRSOmaAQwEaOJ0Ns_f31CfmcRBR8OAoy93xn0IiiDcXza-DgooZ35v__5P7jqjDVKdj_wHsPOjT6GHAQVIQJiPS3HtBuUQsQrxh8B8O22yg</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Arasu, Vignesh A., MD</creator><creator>Chen, Ryan C-Y., BS</creator><creator>Newitt, David N., PhD</creator><creator>Chang, C. Belinda, MD</creator><creator>Tso, Hilda, MD</creator><creator>Hylton, Nola M., PhD</creator><creator>Joe, Bonnie N., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Can Signal Enhancement Ratio (SER) Reduce the Number of Recommended Biopsies without Affecting Cancer Yield in Occult MRI-detected Lesions?</title><author>Arasu, Vignesh A., MD ; Chen, Ryan C-Y., BS ; Newitt, David N., PhD ; Chang, C. Belinda, MD ; Tso, Hilda, MD ; Hylton, Nola M., PhD ; Joe, Bonnie N., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-be69a61fb94e00b71a1d2c57771a27ec320e4dc3c9bbcf3742eb90a7ab2822fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Contrast Media - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arasu, Vignesh A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ryan C-Y., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newitt, David N., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, C. Belinda, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tso, Hilda, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hylton, Nola M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joe, Bonnie N., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arasu, Vignesh A., MD</au><au>Chen, Ryan C-Y., BS</au><au>Newitt, David N., PhD</au><au>Chang, C. Belinda, MD</au><au>Tso, Hilda, MD</au><au>Hylton, Nola M., PhD</au><au>Joe, Bonnie N., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Signal Enhancement Ratio (SER) Reduce the Number of Recommended Biopsies without Affecting Cancer Yield in Occult MRI-detected Lesions?</atitle><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Radiol</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>716</spage><epage>721</epage><pages>716-721</pages><issn>1076-6332</issn><eissn>1878-4046</eissn><abstract>Rationale and Objectives We retrospectively determined if signal enhancement ratio (SER), a quantitative measure of contrast kinetics using volumetric parameters, could reduce the number of biopsy recommendations without decreasing the number of cancers detected when applied to suspicious lesions seen on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods A retrospective review of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4 or 5 lesions seen on breast MRI in 2008 that were clinically and mammographically occult yielded a final sample size of 73 lesions in 65 patients. Images were processed with in-house software. Parameters used to predict benignity/malignancy included SER total tumor volume (lesion volume above a 70% initial enhancement level), SER partial tumor volume (volume with “washout” and “plateau” kinetics), SER washout tumor volume, peak SER, and peak percent enhancement. Thresholds were determined to retrospectively discriminate benign from malignant histopathology. Clinical impact was assessed through the reduction in the number of biopsies recommended (by eliminating benign lesions discriminated by SER). Results Based on the original radiologist interpretations, 73 occult lesions were called suspicious and biopsied with a predictive value of biopsies (PPV3 ) of 18/73 (25%). SER parameters were found to be significantly associated with histopathology ( P < .05). Biopsy recommendations could be reduced using SER parameters of SER partial tumor volume (73 to 40), SER total tumor volume (73 to 45), and peak percent enhancement (73 to 55) without removing true positives. Conclusion The adjunctive use of SER parameters may reduce the number of recommended biopsies without reducing the number of cancers detected.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21420333</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-6332 |
ispartof | Academic radiology, 2011-06, Vol.18 (6), p.716-721 |
issn | 1076-6332 1878-4046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4506794 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biopsy Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Contrast Media - pharmacokinetics Female Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacokinetics Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Radiology Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Can Signal Enhancement Ratio (SER) Reduce the Number of Recommended Biopsies without Affecting Cancer Yield in Occult MRI-detected Lesions? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A25%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Signal%20Enhancement%20Ratio%20(SER)%20Reduce%20the%20Number%20of%20Recommended%20Biopsies%20without%20Affecting%20Cancer%20Yield%20in%20Occult%20MRI-detected%20Lesions?&rft.jtitle=Academic%20radiology&rft.au=Arasu,%20Vignesh%20A.,%20MD&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=721&rft.pages=716-721&rft.issn=1076-6332&rft.eissn=1878-4046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.008&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES1076633211000882%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/21420333&rft_els_id=S1076633211000882&rfr_iscdi=true |