Optimization of time to initial vancomycin target trough improves clinical outcomes

Background Outcomes data for the efficacy of interventions designed to decrease the time to initial target vancomycin troughs are sparse. Objective A vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program was initiated to reduce the time to initial target troughs and to examine the impact on clinical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SpringerPlus 2015-07, Vol.4 (1), p.364-364, Article 364
Hauptverfasser: Cardile, Anthony P, Tan, Christopher, Lustik, Michael B, Stratton, Amy N, Madar, Cristian S, Elegino, Jun, Hsue, Günther
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Outcomes data for the efficacy of interventions designed to decrease the time to initial target vancomycin troughs are sparse. Objective A vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program was initiated to reduce the time to initial target troughs and to examine the impact on clinical outcomes. Methods Single-center, pre- and post-intervention observational study in a 250 bed teaching facility. Adult inpatients treated with physician-guided, vancomycin therapy (historical control, CTRL) were compared to high trough, pharmacist-guided vancomycin therapy (TDM). Nephrotoxicity analyses were conducted to the ensure safety of the TDM. Clinical outcome analysis was limited to patients with normal renal function and culture-confirmed gram positive infections and a pre-defined MRSA subset. Results 340 patients met initial inclusion criteria for the nephrotoxicity analysis (TDM, n = 173; CTRL, n = 167). Acute kidney injury occurrence was similar between the CTRL (n = 20) and TDM (n = 23) groups (p = 0.7). Further exclusions yielded 145 patients with gram positive infections for clinical outcomes evaluation (TDM, n = 66; CTRL, n = 75). The time to initial target trough was shorter in the TDM group (3 vs. 5 days, p 
ISSN:2193-1801
2193-1801
DOI:10.1186/s40064-015-1146-9