On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial
We examined the efficacy and mediation of Being Responsible for Ourselves (BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIDS and behavior 2015-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1247-1262 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1262 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1247 |
container_title | AIDS and behavior |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Jemmott III, John B. Jemmott, Loretta Sweet O’Leary, Ann Icard, Larry D. Rutledge, Scott E. Stevens, Robin Hsu, Janet Stephens, Alisa J. |
description | We examined the efficacy and mediation of
Being Responsible for Ourselves
(BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions: BRO HIV/STI risk-reduction, targeting condom use; or attention-matched control, targeting physical activity and healthy diet. The interventions were based on social cognitive theory, the reasoned-action approach, and qualitative research. Men reporting anal intercourse with other men in the past 90 days were eligible and completed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention surveys. Of 595 participants, 503 (85 %) completed the 12-month follow-up. Generalized-estimating-equations analysis indicated that, compared with the attention-matched control intervention, the BRO intervention did not increase consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, which was the primary outcome. Although BRO did not affect the proportion of condom-protected intercourse acts, unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple partners, or insertive anal intercourse, it did reduce receptive anal intercourse compared with the control, a behavior linked to incident HIV infection. Mediation analysis using the product-of-coefficients approach revealed that although BRO increased seven of nine theoretical constructs it was designed to affect, it increased only one of three theoretical constructs that predicted consistent condom use: condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. Thus, BRO indirectly increased consistent condom use through condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. In conclusion, although BRO increased several theoretical constructs, most of those constructs did not predict consistent condom use; hence, the intervention did not increase it. Theoretical constructs that interventions should target to increase African American MSM’s condom use are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4503868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709180014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-6cfaea24a7a3764d24b50340ba72e896ccd9f7b6afe87c38bb3f19070fc14c3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAFyQJS5cAnbi2DEHpNWqsCu1WmkpcLQcZ9x1SezWThbKq_CyOE2pChLiNGPP5__32JNlzwl-TTDmbyLBlJEcE5pjkZLiQXZIKl7mZVHRhynHAuecsOogexLjBcaJ4uJxdpDKVFRVcZj93Dg07AAdG2O10tdIuRadQmvVYL1D3iCFNg5y7_IU0Gr9GW1t_JpvoR31DbJ2A4Q9uJuF8QEtTEhSDi16mJNTcOjLzqOV2gP6CN_RNzvspt23aIG2ydD39ge0aOndEHzXpfQsWNU9zR4Z1UV4dhuPsk_vj8-Wq_xk82G9XJzkOvU65EwbBaqgiquSM9oWtKlwSXGjeAG1YFq3wvCGKQM112XdNKUhAnNsNKG6VOVR9m7WvRybHlqdegmqk5fB9ipcS6-s_LPi7E6e-72kyadmdRJ4dSsQ_NUIcZC9jRq6TjnwY5SEY0FqnP7p_ygTvMBC0En15V_ohR-DSy8xUYwVrMIkUWSmdPAxBjB39yZYTlMi5ymRyV1OUyKLdObF_YbvTvweiwQUMxBTyZ1DuGf9T9VfDxLICQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696626501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Jemmott III, John B. ; Jemmott, Loretta Sweet ; O’Leary, Ann ; Icard, Larry D. ; Rutledge, Scott E. ; Stevens, Robin ; Hsu, Janet ; Stephens, Alisa J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jemmott III, John B. ; Jemmott, Loretta Sweet ; O’Leary, Ann ; Icard, Larry D. ; Rutledge, Scott E. ; Stevens, Robin ; Hsu, Janet ; Stephens, Alisa J.</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the efficacy and mediation of
Being Responsible for Ourselves
(BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions: BRO HIV/STI risk-reduction, targeting condom use; or attention-matched control, targeting physical activity and healthy diet. The interventions were based on social cognitive theory, the reasoned-action approach, and qualitative research. Men reporting anal intercourse with other men in the past 90 days were eligible and completed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention surveys. Of 595 participants, 503 (85 %) completed the 12-month follow-up. Generalized-estimating-equations analysis indicated that, compared with the attention-matched control intervention, the BRO intervention did not increase consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, which was the primary outcome. Although BRO did not affect the proportion of condom-protected intercourse acts, unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple partners, or insertive anal intercourse, it did reduce receptive anal intercourse compared with the control, a behavior linked to incident HIV infection. Mediation analysis using the product-of-coefficients approach revealed that although BRO increased seven of nine theoretical constructs it was designed to affect, it increased only one of three theoretical constructs that predicted consistent condom use: condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. Thus, BRO indirectly increased consistent condom use through condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. In conclusion, although BRO increased several theoretical constructs, most of those constructs did not predict consistent condom use; hence, the intervention did not increase it. Theoretical constructs that interventions should target to increase African American MSM’s condom use are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-7165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25449552</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AIBEFC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Action research ; Adult ; African Americans ; African Americans - psychology ; AIDS ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Condoms - utilization ; Data collection ; Diet ; Effectiveness ; Empowerment ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Promotion - methods ; Health Psychology ; Health risks ; HIV ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; HIV Infections - prevention & control ; Homosexuality ; Homosexuality, Male ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Infectious Diseases ; Intervention ; Male ; Males ; Mediation ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Men ; Models, Psychological ; Negotiating ; Original Paper ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Predictive control ; Public Health ; Qualitative reasoning ; Qualitative research ; Randomization ; Reduction ; Research methodology ; Risk ; Risk Reduction Behavior ; Risk-Taking ; Safe Sex ; Sex ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Sexual intercourse ; Sexual orientation ; Sexual Partners ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; United States ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>AIDS and behavior, 2015-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1247-1262</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>AIDS and Behavior is a copyright of Springer, 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-6cfaea24a7a3764d24b50340ba72e896ccd9f7b6afe87c38bb3f19070fc14c3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-6cfaea24a7a3764d24b50340ba72e896ccd9f7b6afe87c38bb3f19070fc14c3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27323,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25449552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jemmott III, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jemmott, Loretta Sweet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icard, Larry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Alisa J.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>AIDS and behavior</title><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><description>We examined the efficacy and mediation of
Being Responsible for Ourselves
(BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions: BRO HIV/STI risk-reduction, targeting condom use; or attention-matched control, targeting physical activity and healthy diet. The interventions were based on social cognitive theory, the reasoned-action approach, and qualitative research. Men reporting anal intercourse with other men in the past 90 days were eligible and completed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention surveys. Of 595 participants, 503 (85 %) completed the 12-month follow-up. Generalized-estimating-equations analysis indicated that, compared with the attention-matched control intervention, the BRO intervention did not increase consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, which was the primary outcome. Although BRO did not affect the proportion of condom-protected intercourse acts, unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple partners, or insertive anal intercourse, it did reduce receptive anal intercourse compared with the control, a behavior linked to incident HIV infection. Mediation analysis using the product-of-coefficients approach revealed that although BRO increased seven of nine theoretical constructs it was designed to affect, it increased only one of three theoretical constructs that predicted consistent condom use: condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. Thus, BRO indirectly increased consistent condom use through condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. In conclusion, although BRO increased several theoretical constructs, most of those constructs did not predict consistent condom use; hence, the intervention did not increase it. Theoretical constructs that interventions should target to increase African American MSM’s condom use are discussed.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>African Americans - psychology</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Condoms - utilization</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Homosexuality</subject><subject>Homosexuality, Male</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Negotiating</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative reasoning</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Reduction Behavior</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Safe Sex</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Sexual intercourse</subject><subject>Sexual orientation</subject><subject>Sexual Partners</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1090-7165</issn><issn>1573-3254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAFyQJS5cAnbi2DEHpNWqsCu1WmkpcLQcZ9x1SezWThbKq_CyOE2pChLiNGPP5__32JNlzwl-TTDmbyLBlJEcE5pjkZLiQXZIKl7mZVHRhynHAuecsOogexLjBcaJ4uJxdpDKVFRVcZj93Dg07AAdG2O10tdIuRadQmvVYL1D3iCFNg5y7_IU0Gr9GW1t_JpvoR31DbJ2A4Q9uJuF8QEtTEhSDi16mJNTcOjLzqOV2gP6CN_RNzvspt23aIG2ydD39ge0aOndEHzXpfQsWNU9zR4Z1UV4dhuPsk_vj8-Wq_xk82G9XJzkOvU65EwbBaqgiquSM9oWtKlwSXGjeAG1YFq3wvCGKQM112XdNKUhAnNsNKG6VOVR9m7WvRybHlqdegmqk5fB9ipcS6-s_LPi7E6e-72kyadmdRJ4dSsQ_NUIcZC9jRq6TjnwY5SEY0FqnP7p_ygTvMBC0En15V_ohR-DSy8xUYwVrMIkUWSmdPAxBjB39yZYTlMi5ymRyV1OUyKLdObF_YbvTvweiwQUMxBTyZ1DuGf9T9VfDxLICQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Jemmott III, John B.</creator><creator>Jemmott, Loretta Sweet</creator><creator>O’Leary, Ann</creator><creator>Icard, Larry D.</creator><creator>Rutledge, Scott E.</creator><creator>Stevens, Robin</creator><creator>Hsu, Janet</creator><creator>Stephens, Alisa J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Jemmott III, John B. ; Jemmott, Loretta Sweet ; O’Leary, Ann ; Icard, Larry D. ; Rutledge, Scott E. ; Stevens, Robin ; Hsu, Janet ; Stephens, Alisa J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-6cfaea24a7a3764d24b50340ba72e896ccd9f7b6afe87c38bb3f19070fc14c3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>African Americans - psychology</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Condoms - utilization</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Homosexuality</topic><topic>Homosexuality, Male</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Negotiating</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative reasoning</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Reduction Behavior</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Safe Sex</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Sexual intercourse</topic><topic>Sexual orientation</topic><topic>Sexual Partners</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jemmott III, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jemmott, Loretta Sweet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icard, Larry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Alisa J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AIDS and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jemmott III, John B.</au><au>Jemmott, Loretta Sweet</au><au>O’Leary, Ann</au><au>Icard, Larry D.</au><au>Rutledge, Scott E.</au><au>Stevens, Robin</au><au>Hsu, Janet</au><au>Stephens, Alisa J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>AIDS and behavior</jtitle><stitle>AIDS Behav</stitle><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1247</spage><epage>1262</epage><pages>1247-1262</pages><issn>1090-7165</issn><eissn>1573-3254</eissn><coden>AIBEFC</coden><abstract>We examined the efficacy and mediation of
Being Responsible for Ourselves
(BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions: BRO HIV/STI risk-reduction, targeting condom use; or attention-matched control, targeting physical activity and healthy diet. The interventions were based on social cognitive theory, the reasoned-action approach, and qualitative research. Men reporting anal intercourse with other men in the past 90 days were eligible and completed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention surveys. Of 595 participants, 503 (85 %) completed the 12-month follow-up. Generalized-estimating-equations analysis indicated that, compared with the attention-matched control intervention, the BRO intervention did not increase consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, which was the primary outcome. Although BRO did not affect the proportion of condom-protected intercourse acts, unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple partners, or insertive anal intercourse, it did reduce receptive anal intercourse compared with the control, a behavior linked to incident HIV infection. Mediation analysis using the product-of-coefficients approach revealed that although BRO increased seven of nine theoretical constructs it was designed to affect, it increased only one of three theoretical constructs that predicted consistent condom use: condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. Thus, BRO indirectly increased consistent condom use through condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. In conclusion, although BRO increased several theoretical constructs, most of those constructs did not predict consistent condom use; hence, the intervention did not increase it. Theoretical constructs that interventions should target to increase African American MSM’s condom use are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25449552</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-7165 |
ispartof | AIDS and behavior, 2015-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1247-1262 |
issn | 1090-7165 1573-3254 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4503868 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Acquired immune deficiency syndrome Action research Adult African Americans African Americans - psychology AIDS Cognition Cognitive ability Condoms - utilization Data collection Diet Effectiveness Empowerment Follow-Up Studies Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health Promotion - methods Health Psychology Health risks HIV HIV Infections - epidemiology HIV Infections - prevention & control Homosexuality Homosexuality, Male Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Infectious Diseases Intervention Male Males Mediation Medicine Medicine & Public Health Men Models, Psychological Negotiating Original Paper Physical activity Physical fitness Predictive control Public Health Qualitative reasoning Qualitative research Randomization Reduction Research methodology Risk Risk Reduction Behavior Risk-Taking Safe Sex Sex Sexual behavior Sexual Behavior - psychology Sexual intercourse Sexual orientation Sexual Partners Sexually transmitted diseases STD United States Young Adult |
title | On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A37%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Efficacy%20and%20Mediation%20of%20a%20One-on-One%20HIV%20Risk-Reduction%20Intervention%20for%20African%20American%20Men%20Who%20Have%20Sex%20with%20Men:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=AIDS%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Jemmott%20III,%20John%20B.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1247&rft.epage=1262&rft.pages=1247-1262&rft.issn=1090-7165&rft.eissn=1573-3254&rft.coden=AIBEFC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1709180014%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696626501&rft_id=info:pmid/25449552&rfr_iscdi=true |