On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial

We examined the efficacy and mediation of Being Responsible for Ourselves (BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIDS and behavior 2015-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1247-1262
Hauptverfasser: Jemmott III, John B., Jemmott, Loretta Sweet, O’Leary, Ann, Icard, Larry D., Rutledge, Scott E., Stevens, Robin, Hsu, Janet, Stephens, Alisa J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1262
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1247
container_title AIDS and behavior
container_volume 19
creator Jemmott III, John B.
Jemmott, Loretta Sweet
O’Leary, Ann
Icard, Larry D.
Rutledge, Scott E.
Stevens, Robin
Hsu, Janet
Stephens, Alisa J.
description We examined the efficacy and mediation of Being Responsible for Ourselves (BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions: BRO HIV/STI risk-reduction, targeting condom use; or attention-matched control, targeting physical activity and healthy diet. The interventions were based on social cognitive theory, the reasoned-action approach, and qualitative research. Men reporting anal intercourse with other men in the past 90 days were eligible and completed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention surveys. Of 595 participants, 503 (85 %) completed the 12-month follow-up. Generalized-estimating-equations analysis indicated that, compared with the attention-matched control intervention, the BRO intervention did not increase consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, which was the primary outcome. Although BRO did not affect the proportion of condom-protected intercourse acts, unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple partners, or insertive anal intercourse, it did reduce receptive anal intercourse compared with the control, a behavior linked to incident HIV infection. Mediation analysis using the product-of-coefficients approach revealed that although BRO increased seven of nine theoretical constructs it was designed to affect, it increased only one of three theoretical constructs that predicted consistent condom use: condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. Thus, BRO indirectly increased consistent condom use through condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. In conclusion, although BRO increased several theoretical constructs, most of those constructs did not predict consistent condom use; hence, the intervention did not increase it. Theoretical constructs that interventions should target to increase African American MSM’s condom use are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4503868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709180014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-6cfaea24a7a3764d24b50340ba72e896ccd9f7b6afe87c38bb3f19070fc14c3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAFyQJS5cAnbi2DEHpNWqsCu1WmkpcLQcZ9x1SezWThbKq_CyOE2pChLiNGPP5__32JNlzwl-TTDmbyLBlJEcE5pjkZLiQXZIKl7mZVHRhynHAuecsOogexLjBcaJ4uJxdpDKVFRVcZj93Dg07AAdG2O10tdIuRadQmvVYL1D3iCFNg5y7_IU0Gr9GW1t_JpvoR31DbJ2A4Q9uJuF8QEtTEhSDi16mJNTcOjLzqOV2gP6CN_RNzvspt23aIG2ydD39ge0aOndEHzXpfQsWNU9zR4Z1UV4dhuPsk_vj8-Wq_xk82G9XJzkOvU65EwbBaqgiquSM9oWtKlwSXGjeAG1YFq3wvCGKQM112XdNKUhAnNsNKG6VOVR9m7WvRybHlqdegmqk5fB9ipcS6-s_LPi7E6e-72kyadmdRJ4dSsQ_NUIcZC9jRq6TjnwY5SEY0FqnP7p_ygTvMBC0En15V_ohR-DSy8xUYwVrMIkUWSmdPAxBjB39yZYTlMi5ymRyV1OUyKLdObF_YbvTvweiwQUMxBTyZ1DuGf9T9VfDxLICQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696626501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Jemmott III, John B. ; Jemmott, Loretta Sweet ; O’Leary, Ann ; Icard, Larry D. ; Rutledge, Scott E. ; Stevens, Robin ; Hsu, Janet ; Stephens, Alisa J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jemmott III, John B. ; Jemmott, Loretta Sweet ; O’Leary, Ann ; Icard, Larry D. ; Rutledge, Scott E. ; Stevens, Robin ; Hsu, Janet ; Stephens, Alisa J.</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the efficacy and mediation of Being Responsible for Ourselves (BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions: BRO HIV/STI risk-reduction, targeting condom use; or attention-matched control, targeting physical activity and healthy diet. The interventions were based on social cognitive theory, the reasoned-action approach, and qualitative research. Men reporting anal intercourse with other men in the past 90 days were eligible and completed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention surveys. Of 595 participants, 503 (85 %) completed the 12-month follow-up. Generalized-estimating-equations analysis indicated that, compared with the attention-matched control intervention, the BRO intervention did not increase consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, which was the primary outcome. Although BRO did not affect the proportion of condom-protected intercourse acts, unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple partners, or insertive anal intercourse, it did reduce receptive anal intercourse compared with the control, a behavior linked to incident HIV infection. Mediation analysis using the product-of-coefficients approach revealed that although BRO increased seven of nine theoretical constructs it was designed to affect, it increased only one of three theoretical constructs that predicted consistent condom use: condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. Thus, BRO indirectly increased consistent condom use through condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. In conclusion, although BRO increased several theoretical constructs, most of those constructs did not predict consistent condom use; hence, the intervention did not increase it. Theoretical constructs that interventions should target to increase African American MSM’s condom use are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-7165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25449552</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AIBEFC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Action research ; Adult ; African Americans ; African Americans - psychology ; AIDS ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Condoms - utilization ; Data collection ; Diet ; Effectiveness ; Empowerment ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Promotion - methods ; Health Psychology ; Health risks ; HIV ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Homosexuality ; Homosexuality, Male ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Infectious Diseases ; Intervention ; Male ; Males ; Mediation ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Men ; Models, Psychological ; Negotiating ; Original Paper ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Predictive control ; Public Health ; Qualitative reasoning ; Qualitative research ; Randomization ; Reduction ; Research methodology ; Risk ; Risk Reduction Behavior ; Risk-Taking ; Safe Sex ; Sex ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Sexual intercourse ; Sexual orientation ; Sexual Partners ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; United States ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>AIDS and behavior, 2015-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1247-1262</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>AIDS and Behavior is a copyright of Springer, 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-6cfaea24a7a3764d24b50340ba72e896ccd9f7b6afe87c38bb3f19070fc14c3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-6cfaea24a7a3764d24b50340ba72e896ccd9f7b6afe87c38bb3f19070fc14c3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27323,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25449552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jemmott III, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jemmott, Loretta Sweet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icard, Larry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Alisa J.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>AIDS and behavior</title><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><description>We examined the efficacy and mediation of Being Responsible for Ourselves (BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions: BRO HIV/STI risk-reduction, targeting condom use; or attention-matched control, targeting physical activity and healthy diet. The interventions were based on social cognitive theory, the reasoned-action approach, and qualitative research. Men reporting anal intercourse with other men in the past 90 days were eligible and completed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention surveys. Of 595 participants, 503 (85 %) completed the 12-month follow-up. Generalized-estimating-equations analysis indicated that, compared with the attention-matched control intervention, the BRO intervention did not increase consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, which was the primary outcome. Although BRO did not affect the proportion of condom-protected intercourse acts, unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple partners, or insertive anal intercourse, it did reduce receptive anal intercourse compared with the control, a behavior linked to incident HIV infection. Mediation analysis using the product-of-coefficients approach revealed that although BRO increased seven of nine theoretical constructs it was designed to affect, it increased only one of three theoretical constructs that predicted consistent condom use: condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. Thus, BRO indirectly increased consistent condom use through condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. In conclusion, although BRO increased several theoretical constructs, most of those constructs did not predict consistent condom use; hence, the intervention did not increase it. Theoretical constructs that interventions should target to increase African American MSM’s condom use are discussed.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>African Americans - psychology</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Condoms - utilization</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Homosexuality</subject><subject>Homosexuality, Male</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Negotiating</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative reasoning</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Reduction Behavior</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Safe Sex</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Sexual intercourse</subject><subject>Sexual orientation</subject><subject>Sexual Partners</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1090-7165</issn><issn>1573-3254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAFyQJS5cAnbi2DEHpNWqsCu1WmkpcLQcZ9x1SezWThbKq_CyOE2pChLiNGPP5__32JNlzwl-TTDmbyLBlJEcE5pjkZLiQXZIKl7mZVHRhynHAuecsOogexLjBcaJ4uJxdpDKVFRVcZj93Dg07AAdG2O10tdIuRadQmvVYL1D3iCFNg5y7_IU0Gr9GW1t_JpvoR31DbJ2A4Q9uJuF8QEtTEhSDi16mJNTcOjLzqOV2gP6CN_RNzvspt23aIG2ydD39ge0aOndEHzXpfQsWNU9zR4Z1UV4dhuPsk_vj8-Wq_xk82G9XJzkOvU65EwbBaqgiquSM9oWtKlwSXGjeAG1YFq3wvCGKQM112XdNKUhAnNsNKG6VOVR9m7WvRybHlqdegmqk5fB9ipcS6-s_LPi7E6e-72kyadmdRJ4dSsQ_NUIcZC9jRq6TjnwY5SEY0FqnP7p_ygTvMBC0En15V_ohR-DSy8xUYwVrMIkUWSmdPAxBjB39yZYTlMi5ymRyV1OUyKLdObF_YbvTvweiwQUMxBTyZ1DuGf9T9VfDxLICQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Jemmott III, John B.</creator><creator>Jemmott, Loretta Sweet</creator><creator>O’Leary, Ann</creator><creator>Icard, Larry D.</creator><creator>Rutledge, Scott E.</creator><creator>Stevens, Robin</creator><creator>Hsu, Janet</creator><creator>Stephens, Alisa J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Jemmott III, John B. ; Jemmott, Loretta Sweet ; O’Leary, Ann ; Icard, Larry D. ; Rutledge, Scott E. ; Stevens, Robin ; Hsu, Janet ; Stephens, Alisa J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-6cfaea24a7a3764d24b50340ba72e896ccd9f7b6afe87c38bb3f19070fc14c3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>African Americans - psychology</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Condoms - utilization</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Homosexuality</topic><topic>Homosexuality, Male</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Negotiating</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative reasoning</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Reduction Behavior</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Safe Sex</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Sexual intercourse</topic><topic>Sexual orientation</topic><topic>Sexual Partners</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jemmott III, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jemmott, Loretta Sweet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icard, Larry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Alisa J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AIDS and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jemmott III, John B.</au><au>Jemmott, Loretta Sweet</au><au>O’Leary, Ann</au><au>Icard, Larry D.</au><au>Rutledge, Scott E.</au><au>Stevens, Robin</au><au>Hsu, Janet</au><au>Stephens, Alisa J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>AIDS and behavior</jtitle><stitle>AIDS Behav</stitle><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1247</spage><epage>1262</epage><pages>1247-1262</pages><issn>1090-7165</issn><eissn>1573-3254</eissn><coden>AIBEFC</coden><abstract>We examined the efficacy and mediation of Being Responsible for Ourselves (BRO), an HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention for African American men who have sex with men (MSM), the population with the highest HIV-diagnosis rate in the US. We randomized African American MSM to one of two interventions: BRO HIV/STI risk-reduction, targeting condom use; or attention-matched control, targeting physical activity and healthy diet. The interventions were based on social cognitive theory, the reasoned-action approach, and qualitative research. Men reporting anal intercourse with other men in the past 90 days were eligible and completed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention surveys. Of 595 participants, 503 (85 %) completed the 12-month follow-up. Generalized-estimating-equations analysis indicated that, compared with the attention-matched control intervention, the BRO intervention did not increase consistent condom use averaged over the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, which was the primary outcome. Although BRO did not affect the proportion of condom-protected intercourse acts, unprotected sexual intercourse, multiple partners, or insertive anal intercourse, it did reduce receptive anal intercourse compared with the control, a behavior linked to incident HIV infection. Mediation analysis using the product-of-coefficients approach revealed that although BRO increased seven of nine theoretical constructs it was designed to affect, it increased only one of three theoretical constructs that predicted consistent condom use: condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. Thus, BRO indirectly increased consistent condom use through condom-use impulse-control self-efficacy. In conclusion, although BRO increased several theoretical constructs, most of those constructs did not predict consistent condom use; hence, the intervention did not increase it. Theoretical constructs that interventions should target to increase African American MSM’s condom use are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25449552</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-7165
ispartof AIDS and behavior, 2015-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1247-1262
issn 1090-7165
1573-3254
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4503868
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Action research
Adult
African Americans
African Americans - psychology
AIDS
Cognition
Cognitive ability
Condoms - utilization
Data collection
Diet
Effectiveness
Empowerment
Follow-Up Studies
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Promotion - methods
Health Psychology
Health risks
HIV
HIV Infections - epidemiology
HIV Infections - prevention & control
Homosexuality
Homosexuality, Male
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Infectious Diseases
Intervention
Male
Males
Mediation
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Men
Models, Psychological
Negotiating
Original Paper
Physical activity
Physical fitness
Predictive control
Public Health
Qualitative reasoning
Qualitative research
Randomization
Reduction
Research methodology
Risk
Risk Reduction Behavior
Risk-Taking
Safe Sex
Sex
Sexual behavior
Sexual Behavior - psychology
Sexual intercourse
Sexual orientation
Sexual Partners
Sexually transmitted diseases
STD
United States
Young Adult
title On the Efficacy and Mediation of a One-on-One HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A37%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Efficacy%20and%20Mediation%20of%20a%20One-on-One%20HIV%20Risk-Reduction%20Intervention%20for%20African%20American%20Men%20Who%20Have%20Sex%20with%20Men:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=AIDS%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Jemmott%20III,%20John%20B.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1247&rft.epage=1262&rft.pages=1247-1262&rft.issn=1090-7165&rft.eissn=1573-3254&rft.coden=AIBEFC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10461-014-0961-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1709180014%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696626501&rft_id=info:pmid/25449552&rfr_iscdi=true