Clinical experience with generic levetiracetam in people with epilepsy

Summary Purpose:  To describe the clinical outcomes of a compulsory switch from branded to generic levetiracetam (LEV) among people with epilepsy (PWE) in an outpatient setting. Methods:  We conducted a retrospective chart review of 760 unduplicated consecutive adult patients attending a tertiary ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsia (Copenhagen) 2011-04, Vol.52 (4), p.810-815
Hauptverfasser: Chaluvadi, Siresha, Chiang, Sharon, Tran, Larry, Goldsmith, Corey E., Friedman, David E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Purpose:  To describe the clinical outcomes of a compulsory switch from branded to generic levetiracetam (LEV) among people with epilepsy (PWE) in an outpatient setting. Methods:  We conducted a retrospective chart review of 760 unduplicated consecutive adult patients attending a tertiary care epilepsy clinic at Ben Taub General Hospital. On November 1, 2008 hospital policy required all patients receiving branded LEV to be automatically switched to generic LEV. We calculated the proportion of patients switching back to branded LEV and reasons for the switch back. Key Findings:  Of the 260 patients (34%) being prescribed LEV (generic and brand name) during the study period, 105 (42.9%) were switched back to brand name LEV by their treating physicians. Reasons for switch back included increase in seizure frequency (19.6% vs. 1.6%; p 
ISSN:0013-9580
1528-1167
DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03025.x