Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens

Genomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program for a sex-l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics selection evolution (Paris) 2015-07, Vol.47 (1), p.59-59, Article 59
Hauptverfasser: Wolc, Anna, Zhao, Honghua H, Arango, Jesus, Settar, Petek, Fulton, Janet E, O'Sullivan, Neil P, Preisinger, Rudolf, Stricker, Chris, Habier, David, Fernando, Rohan L, Garrick, Dorian J, Lamont, Susan J, Dekkers, Jack C M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 59
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Genetics selection evolution (Paris)
container_volume 47
creator Wolc, Anna
Zhao, Honghua H
Arango, Jesus
Settar, Petek
Fulton, Janet E
O'Sullivan, Neil P
Preisinger, Rudolf
Stricker, Chris
Habier, David
Fernando, Rohan L
Garrick, Dorian J
Lamont, Susan J
Dekkers, Jack C M
description Genomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program for a sex-limited trait in layer chickens, which was developed by deterministic predictions under different scenarios. Later, one of the possible schemes was implemented in a real population of layer chicken. In the simulation, the aim was to double the response to selection per year by reducing the generation interval by 50 %, while maintaining the same rate of inbreeding per year. We found that GS with retraining could achieve the set objectives while requiring 75 % fewer reared birds and 82 % fewer phenotyped birds per year. A multi-trait GS scenario was subsequently implemented in a real population of brown egg laying hens. The population was split into two sub-lines, one was submitted to conventional phenotypic selection, and one was selected based on genomic prediction. At the end of the 3-year experiment, the two sub-lines were compared for multiple performance traits that are relevant for commercial egg production. Birds that were selected based on genomic prediction outperformed those that were submitted to conventional selection for most of the 16 traits that were included in the index used for selection. However, although the two programs were designed to achieve the same rate of inbreeding per year, the realized inbreeding per year assessed from pedigree was higher in the genomic selected line than in the conventionally selected line. The results demonstrate that GS is a promising alternative to conventional breeding for genetic improvement of layer chickens.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4492088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541358010</galeid><sourcerecordid>A541358010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c750t-266d297d5de5a618c1fcb10a952acd009b6204a6fc48266e2b37a58e3cd616403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiNERUvhB3BBkbi0hxSP44_kgrSqgFZahFTgbDnOJOuS2IudVO2_x9GWtlshy7I1ft7x-PVk2TsgZwCV-BiBSoCCAE-zLAv-IjsCWsuiFpV4-WR_mL2O8ZoQIphgr7JDKoDVtZRH2bcrjFvvIubatbl1TUBsrevzLvgx13mPzo_W5BEHNJP1LsfbLQY7opsSng_6DkNuNtb8RhffZAedHiK-vV-Ps19fPv88vyjW379enq_WhZGcTAUVok2ltbxFrgVUBjrTANE1p9q0hNSNoIRp0RlWJRZpU0rNKyxNK0AwUh5nn3Z5t3MzYmtSMUEPapvq0uFOeW3V_omzG9X7G8VYTUlVpQSnuwSbZ7KL1VotseQnS_aJG0jsyf1lwf-ZMU5qtNHgMGiHfo4KRM1BirJa0A_P0Gs_B5esUJRLTqWQjD1SvR5QWdf5VKNZkqoVZ1DyisDyxrP_UGm0mD7EO-xsiu8JTvcEiZnwdur1HKO6_HG1z8KONcHHGLB7MAGIWnpL7Xor-cAXL0rFk-b9U9MfFP-aqfwLVJ3Gqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575276744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wolc, Anna ; Zhao, Honghua H ; Arango, Jesus ; Settar, Petek ; Fulton, Janet E ; O'Sullivan, Neil P ; Preisinger, Rudolf ; Stricker, Chris ; Habier, David ; Fernando, Rohan L ; Garrick, Dorian J ; Lamont, Susan J ; Dekkers, Jack C M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolc, Anna ; Zhao, Honghua H ; Arango, Jesus ; Settar, Petek ; Fulton, Janet E ; O'Sullivan, Neil P ; Preisinger, Rudolf ; Stricker, Chris ; Habier, David ; Fernando, Rohan L ; Garrick, Dorian J ; Lamont, Susan J ; Dekkers, Jack C M</creatorcontrib><description>Genomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program for a sex-limited trait in layer chickens, which was developed by deterministic predictions under different scenarios. Later, one of the possible schemes was implemented in a real population of layer chicken. In the simulation, the aim was to double the response to selection per year by reducing the generation interval by 50 %, while maintaining the same rate of inbreeding per year. We found that GS with retraining could achieve the set objectives while requiring 75 % fewer reared birds and 82 % fewer phenotyped birds per year. A multi-trait GS scenario was subsequently implemented in a real population of brown egg laying hens. The population was split into two sub-lines, one was submitted to conventional phenotypic selection, and one was selected based on genomic prediction. At the end of the 3-year experiment, the two sub-lines were compared for multiple performance traits that are relevant for commercial egg production. Birds that were selected based on genomic prediction outperformed those that were submitted to conventional selection for most of the 16 traits that were included in the index used for selection. However, although the two programs were designed to achieve the same rate of inbreeding per year, the realized inbreeding per year assessed from pedigree was higher in the genomic selected line than in the conventionally selected line. The results demonstrate that GS is a promising alternative to conventional breeding for genetic improvement of layer chickens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1297-9686</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0999-193X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1297-9686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26149977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Animal husbandry ; Animals ; Birds ; Cattle ; Chickens ; Chickens - genetics ; Chickens - physiology ; Egg industry ; Egg laying ; Egg production ; Eggs ; Females ; Genetic improvement ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Inbreeding ; Life Sciences ; Livestock breeding ; Livestock industry ; Males ; Models, Genetic ; Mutation ; Pedigree ; Phenotype ; Population ; Poultry ; Predictions ; Quantitative Trait Loci ; Selection, Genetic ; Selective Breeding - genetics ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>Genetics selection evolution (Paris), 2015-07, Vol.47 (1), p.59-59, Article 59</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2015. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>Wolc et al. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c750t-266d297d5de5a618c1fcb10a952acd009b6204a6fc48266e2b37a58e3cd616403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c750t-266d297d5de5a618c1fcb10a952acd009b6204a6fc48266e2b37a58e3cd616403</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1190-5713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492088/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492088/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01341296$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolc, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Honghua H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arango, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Settar, Petek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Janet E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Neil P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preisinger, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stricker, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habier, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Rohan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrick, Dorian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamont, Susan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekkers, Jack C M</creatorcontrib><title>Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens</title><title>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</title><addtitle>Genet Sel Evol</addtitle><description>Genomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program for a sex-limited trait in layer chickens, which was developed by deterministic predictions under different scenarios. Later, one of the possible schemes was implemented in a real population of layer chicken. In the simulation, the aim was to double the response to selection per year by reducing the generation interval by 50 %, while maintaining the same rate of inbreeding per year. We found that GS with retraining could achieve the set objectives while requiring 75 % fewer reared birds and 82 % fewer phenotyped birds per year. A multi-trait GS scenario was subsequently implemented in a real population of brown egg laying hens. The population was split into two sub-lines, one was submitted to conventional phenotypic selection, and one was selected based on genomic prediction. At the end of the 3-year experiment, the two sub-lines were compared for multiple performance traits that are relevant for commercial egg production. Birds that were selected based on genomic prediction outperformed those that were submitted to conventional selection for most of the 16 traits that were included in the index used for selection. However, although the two programs were designed to achieve the same rate of inbreeding per year, the realized inbreeding per year assessed from pedigree was higher in the genomic selected line than in the conventionally selected line. The results demonstrate that GS is a promising alternative to conventional breeding for genetic improvement of layer chickens.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Animal husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Chickens - genetics</subject><subject>Chickens - physiology</subject><subject>Egg industry</subject><subject>Egg laying</subject><subject>Egg production</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Genetic improvement</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock breeding</subject><subject>Livestock industry</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Pedigree</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Quantitative Trait Loci</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Selective Breeding - genetics</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>1297-9686</issn><issn>0999-193X</issn><issn>1297-9686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiNERUvhB3BBkbi0hxSP44_kgrSqgFZahFTgbDnOJOuS2IudVO2_x9GWtlshy7I1ft7x-PVk2TsgZwCV-BiBSoCCAE-zLAv-IjsCWsuiFpV4-WR_mL2O8ZoQIphgr7JDKoDVtZRH2bcrjFvvIubatbl1TUBsrevzLvgx13mPzo_W5BEHNJP1LsfbLQY7opsSng_6DkNuNtb8RhffZAedHiK-vV-Ps19fPv88vyjW379enq_WhZGcTAUVok2ltbxFrgVUBjrTANE1p9q0hNSNoIRp0RlWJRZpU0rNKyxNK0AwUh5nn3Z5t3MzYmtSMUEPapvq0uFOeW3V_omzG9X7G8VYTUlVpQSnuwSbZ7KL1VotseQnS_aJG0jsyf1lwf-ZMU5qtNHgMGiHfo4KRM1BirJa0A_P0Gs_B5esUJRLTqWQjD1SvR5QWdf5VKNZkqoVZ1DyisDyxrP_UGm0mD7EO-xsiu8JTvcEiZnwdur1HKO6_HG1z8KONcHHGLB7MAGIWnpL7Xor-cAXL0rFk-b9U9MfFP-aqfwLVJ3Gqw</recordid><startdate>20150707</startdate><enddate>20150707</enddate><creator>Wolc, Anna</creator><creator>Zhao, Honghua H</creator><creator>Arango, Jesus</creator><creator>Settar, Petek</creator><creator>Fulton, Janet E</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Neil P</creator><creator>Preisinger, Rudolf</creator><creator>Stricker, Chris</creator><creator>Habier, David</creator><creator>Fernando, Rohan L</creator><creator>Garrick, Dorian J</creator><creator>Lamont, Susan J</creator><creator>Dekkers, Jack C M</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1190-5713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150707</creationdate><title>Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens</title><author>Wolc, Anna ; Zhao, Honghua H ; Arango, Jesus ; Settar, Petek ; Fulton, Janet E ; O'Sullivan, Neil P ; Preisinger, Rudolf ; Stricker, Chris ; Habier, David ; Fernando, Rohan L ; Garrick, Dorian J ; Lamont, Susan J ; Dekkers, Jack C M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c750t-266d297d5de5a618c1fcb10a952acd009b6204a6fc48266e2b37a58e3cd616403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Animal husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Chickens - genetics</topic><topic>Chickens - physiology</topic><topic>Egg industry</topic><topic>Egg laying</topic><topic>Egg production</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Genetic improvement</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock breeding</topic><topic>Livestock industry</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Pedigree</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Quantitative Trait Loci</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Selective Breeding - genetics</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolc, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Honghua H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arango, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Settar, Petek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Janet E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Neil P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preisinger, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stricker, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habier, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Rohan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrick, Dorian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamont, Susan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekkers, Jack C M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolc, Anna</au><au>Zhao, Honghua H</au><au>Arango, Jesus</au><au>Settar, Petek</au><au>Fulton, Janet E</au><au>O'Sullivan, Neil P</au><au>Preisinger, Rudolf</au><au>Stricker, Chris</au><au>Habier, David</au><au>Fernando, Rohan L</au><au>Garrick, Dorian J</au><au>Lamont, Susan J</au><au>Dekkers, Jack C M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens</atitle><jtitle>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</jtitle><addtitle>Genet Sel Evol</addtitle><date>2015-07-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>59-59</pages><artnum>59</artnum><issn>1297-9686</issn><issn>0999-193X</issn><eissn>1297-9686</eissn><abstract>Genomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program for a sex-limited trait in layer chickens, which was developed by deterministic predictions under different scenarios. Later, one of the possible schemes was implemented in a real population of layer chicken. In the simulation, the aim was to double the response to selection per year by reducing the generation interval by 50 %, while maintaining the same rate of inbreeding per year. We found that GS with retraining could achieve the set objectives while requiring 75 % fewer reared birds and 82 % fewer phenotyped birds per year. A multi-trait GS scenario was subsequently implemented in a real population of brown egg laying hens. The population was split into two sub-lines, one was submitted to conventional phenotypic selection, and one was selected based on genomic prediction. At the end of the 3-year experiment, the two sub-lines were compared for multiple performance traits that are relevant for commercial egg production. Birds that were selected based on genomic prediction outperformed those that were submitted to conventional selection for most of the 16 traits that were included in the index used for selection. However, although the two programs were designed to achieve the same rate of inbreeding per year, the realized inbreeding per year assessed from pedigree was higher in the genomic selected line than in the conventionally selected line. The results demonstrate that GS is a promising alternative to conventional breeding for genetic improvement of layer chickens.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26149977</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1190-5713</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1297-9686
ispartof Genetics selection evolution (Paris), 2015-07, Vol.47 (1), p.59-59, Article 59
issn 1297-9686
0999-193X
1297-9686
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4492088
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Animal husbandry
Animals
Birds
Cattle
Chickens
Chickens - genetics
Chickens - physiology
Egg industry
Egg laying
Egg production
Eggs
Females
Genetic improvement
Genomes
Genomics
Genotype & phenotype
Inbreeding
Life Sciences
Livestock breeding
Livestock industry
Males
Models, Genetic
Mutation
Pedigree
Phenotype
Population
Poultry
Predictions
Quantitative Trait Loci
Selection, Genetic
Selective Breeding - genetics
Simulation
title Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A07%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20and%20inbreeding%20from%20a%20genomic%20selection%20experiment%20in%20layer%20chickens&rft.jtitle=Genetics%20selection%20evolution%20(Paris)&rft.au=Wolc,%20Anna&rft.date=2015-07-07&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=59-59&rft.artnum=59&rft.issn=1297-9686&rft.eissn=1297-9686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA541358010%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575276744&rft_id=info:pmid/26149977&rft_galeid=A541358010&rfr_iscdi=true