Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss

Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2015-08, Vol.16 (4), p.507-521
Hauptverfasser: Mao, Junwen, Koch, Kelly-Jo, Doherty, Karen A., Carney, Laurel H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 521
container_issue 4
container_start_page 507
container_title Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
container_volume 16
creator Mao, Junwen
Koch, Kelly-Jo
Doherty, Karen A.
Carney, Laurel H.
description Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N 0 S 0 ) and dichotic (N 0 S π ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10162-015-0518-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4488163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1693713857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-4e7e697a50af348ee711b8fff04626483a09debe0065ddedeab5b40317e15f363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vEzEQxS0EoiXwAbggS1y4GMbr9Z-9IKEUCFIElwJHy7s7blwldrA3RfTT10tKVZA4eSz_5nnmPUKec3jNAfSbwoGrhgGXDCQ3zDwgp7wVhmmpxcNay0Yy0Sl-Qp6UcgnAtVTdY3LSyE4rMOaUfF8esFCfMj0LaQoDdXGs5bD5fTnDCYcppEiTp45KALa6pucpIg2Rfk6hIP3m8i_6M0wbukKXQ7yg61TKU_LIu23BZ7fngnz98P58uWLrLx8_Ld-t2SBbmFiLGlWnnQTnRWsQNee98d5DqxrVGuGgG7FHACXHEUd0vexbEFwjl14osSBvj7r7Q7_DccA4Zbe1-xx2dS6bXLB_v8SwsRfpyratMVyJKvDqViCnH9WLye5CGXC7dRHToViuOqG5MNXRBXn5D3qZDjnW9WaqUZUx80T8SA25-pDR3w3Dwc6x2WNstsZm59isqT0v7m9x1_Enpwo0R6DsZ4sx3_v6v6o3D6Chag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1692685786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mao, Junwen ; Koch, Kelly-Jo ; Doherty, Karen A. ; Carney, Laurel H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mao, Junwen ; Koch, Kelly-Jo ; Doherty, Karen A. ; Carney, Laurel H.</creatorcontrib><description>Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N 0 S 0 ) and dichotic (N 0 S π ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-7573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0518-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25976088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Case-Control Studies ; Cues ; Dichotic Listening Tests ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neurobiology ; Neurosciences ; Noise ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Research Article</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2015-08, Vol.16 (4), p.507-521</ispartof><rights>Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-4e7e697a50af348ee711b8fff04626483a09debe0065ddedeab5b40317e15f363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-4e7e697a50af348ee711b8fff04626483a09debe0065ddedeab5b40317e15f363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488163/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488163/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25976088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mao, Junwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Kelly-Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Karen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carney, Laurel H.</creatorcontrib><title>Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss</title><title>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology</title><addtitle>JARO</addtitle><addtitle>J Assoc Res Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N 0 S 0 ) and dichotic (N 0 S π ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dichotic Listening Tests</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>1525-3961</issn><issn>1438-7573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9vEzEQxS0EoiXwAbggS1y4GMbr9Z-9IKEUCFIElwJHy7s7blwldrA3RfTT10tKVZA4eSz_5nnmPUKec3jNAfSbwoGrhgGXDCQ3zDwgp7wVhmmpxcNay0Yy0Sl-Qp6UcgnAtVTdY3LSyE4rMOaUfF8esFCfMj0LaQoDdXGs5bD5fTnDCYcppEiTp45KALa6pucpIg2Rfk6hIP3m8i_6M0wbukKXQ7yg61TKU_LIu23BZ7fngnz98P58uWLrLx8_Ld-t2SBbmFiLGlWnnQTnRWsQNee98d5DqxrVGuGgG7FHACXHEUd0vexbEFwjl14osSBvj7r7Q7_DccA4Zbe1-xx2dS6bXLB_v8SwsRfpyratMVyJKvDqViCnH9WLye5CGXC7dRHToViuOqG5MNXRBXn5D3qZDjnW9WaqUZUx80T8SA25-pDR3w3Dwc6x2WNstsZm59isqT0v7m9x1_Enpwo0R6DsZ4sx3_v6v6o3D6Chag</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Mao, Junwen</creator><creator>Koch, Kelly-Jo</creator><creator>Doherty, Karen A.</creator><creator>Carney, Laurel H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss</title><author>Mao, Junwen ; Koch, Kelly-Jo ; Doherty, Karen A. ; Carney, Laurel H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-4e7e697a50af348ee711b8fff04626483a09debe0065ddedeab5b40317e15f363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dichotic Listening Tests</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mao, Junwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Kelly-Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Karen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carney, Laurel H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mao, Junwen</au><au>Koch, Kelly-Jo</au><au>Doherty, Karen A.</au><au>Carney, Laurel H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology</jtitle><stitle>JARO</stitle><addtitle>J Assoc Res Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>521</epage><pages>507-521</pages><issn>1525-3961</issn><eissn>1438-7573</eissn><abstract>Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N 0 S 0 ) and dichotic (N 0 S π ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25976088</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10162-015-0518-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-3961
ispartof Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2015-08, Vol.16 (4), p.507-521
issn 1525-3961
1438-7573
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4488163
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Case-Control Studies
Cues
Dichotic Listening Tests
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neurobiology
Neurosciences
Noise
Otorhinolaryngology
Research Article
title Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A58%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cues%20for%20Diotic%20and%20Dichotic%20Detection%20of%20a%20500-Hz%20Tone%20in%20Noise%20Vary%20with%20Hearing%20Loss&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Association%20for%20Research%20in%20Otolaryngology&rft.au=Mao,%20Junwen&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=521&rft.pages=507-521&rft.issn=1525-3961&rft.eissn=1438-7573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10162-015-0518-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1693713857%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1692685786&rft_id=info:pmid/25976088&rfr_iscdi=true