Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence

Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 2015-06, Vol.23 (3), p.176-183
Hauptverfasser: Dallery, Jesse, Meredith, Steven, Jarvis, Brantley, Nuzzo, Paul A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 183
container_issue 3
container_start_page 176
container_title Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology
container_volume 23
creator Dallery, Jesse
Meredith, Steven
Jarvis, Brantley
Nuzzo, Paul A.
description Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all team members had to meet group treatment goals to receive monetary consequences (full group), and 1 in which team members had to meet some group goals and some individual goals to receive these consequences (mixed group). Mōtiv8 Systems, an Internet-based remote monitoring platform, was used to collect video-recorded breath carbon monoxide (CO) samples. All team members could communicate with each other via an online discussion forum. During baseline conditions, only 3.3% of CO samples were negative for smoking, which suggests that self-monitoring and access to the online discussion forum were insufficient to initiate abstinence. When the group contingencies were instituted 41.3% of CO samples were negative. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 arrangements in the percentage of negative CO samples or point prevalence at the end of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. Participants posted an average of 25 comments on the discussion forum, most of which were rated as positive by independent observers. The mean cost of vouchers per participant was lower in the full group ($33) relative to the mixed group ($190). The present results replicate and extend previous findings on group contingencies to promote abstinence and social support.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/pha0000013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4461474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1687346799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-25c8c99eb95d3e8bc2ce80a4888000be0ac770b7531a3981d415915b61652c733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0VtLHDEYBuBQlHpob_oDZMCbokyb0-RwU9DFw4KlhbbXIZP9XEdnkjHJCPvvzbIeqrlJIA8v78eH0BeCvxHM5PfxxuL1IewD2iWaiZpSzbbKGwteE6rlDtpL6bYIzjT9iHZooyjRpNlF87nPED3k-tQmWFQXMUxjNQs-d34J3q2qn9bbJQzgc5VD9TuGIWSo_gzhrojqpE1FFgif0Pa17RN8frr30b_zs7-zy_rq18V8dnJV24bQXNPGKac1tLpZMFCtow4UtlwpVUZoAVsnJW5lw4hlWpEFJ01p2goiGuokY_voxyZ3nNoBFq4Ui7Y3Y-wGG1cm2M68_fHdjVmGB8O5IFzyEvD1KSCG-wlSNkOXHPS99RCmZIhQknEhtS708B29DVP0ZbyiRCmsMVuro41yMaQU4fqlDMFmvSHzuqGCD_6v_0KfV1LA8QbY0ZoxrZyNuXM9JDfFWEZahxnKDDNECvYIL6yavw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1668009039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Dallery, Jesse ; Meredith, Steven ; Jarvis, Brantley ; Nuzzo, Paul A.</creator><contributor>Evans, Suzette M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dallery, Jesse ; Meredith, Steven ; Jarvis, Brantley ; Nuzzo, Paul A. ; Evans, Suzette M</creatorcontrib><description>Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all team members had to meet group treatment goals to receive monetary consequences (full group), and 1 in which team members had to meet some group goals and some individual goals to receive these consequences (mixed group). Mōtiv8 Systems, an Internet-based remote monitoring platform, was used to collect video-recorded breath carbon monoxide (CO) samples. All team members could communicate with each other via an online discussion forum. During baseline conditions, only 3.3% of CO samples were negative for smoking, which suggests that self-monitoring and access to the online discussion forum were insufficient to initiate abstinence. When the group contingencies were instituted 41.3% of CO samples were negative. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 arrangements in the percentage of negative CO samples or point prevalence at the end of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. Participants posted an average of 25 comments on the discussion forum, most of which were rated as positive by independent observers. The mean cost of vouchers per participant was lower in the full group ($33) relative to the mixed group ($190). The present results replicate and extend previous findings on group contingencies to promote abstinence and social support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-1297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pha0000013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25821915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavior Therapy - methods ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Contingency Management ; Drug Abstinence ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Internet ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mobile Health ; Smoking - psychology ; Smoking - therapy ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Tobacco Smoking ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015-06, Vol.23 (3), p.176-183</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-25c8c99eb95d3e8bc2ce80a4888000be0ac770b7531a3981d415915b61652c733</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Evans, Suzette M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dallery, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meredith, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Brantley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuzzo, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><title>Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence</title><title>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>Exp Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><description>Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all team members had to meet group treatment goals to receive monetary consequences (full group), and 1 in which team members had to meet some group goals and some individual goals to receive these consequences (mixed group). Mōtiv8 Systems, an Internet-based remote monitoring platform, was used to collect video-recorded breath carbon monoxide (CO) samples. All team members could communicate with each other via an online discussion forum. During baseline conditions, only 3.3% of CO samples were negative for smoking, which suggests that self-monitoring and access to the online discussion forum were insufficient to initiate abstinence. When the group contingencies were instituted 41.3% of CO samples were negative. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 arrangements in the percentage of negative CO samples or point prevalence at the end of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. Participants posted an average of 25 comments on the discussion forum, most of which were rated as positive by independent observers. The mean cost of vouchers per participant was lower in the full group ($33) relative to the mixed group ($190). The present results replicate and extend previous findings on group contingencies to promote abstinence and social support.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Contingency Management</subject><subject>Drug Abstinence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mobile Health</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Smoking - therapy</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoking</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-1297</issn><issn>1936-2293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0VtLHDEYBuBQlHpob_oDZMCbokyb0-RwU9DFw4KlhbbXIZP9XEdnkjHJCPvvzbIeqrlJIA8v78eH0BeCvxHM5PfxxuL1IewD2iWaiZpSzbbKGwteE6rlDtpL6bYIzjT9iHZooyjRpNlF87nPED3k-tQmWFQXMUxjNQs-d34J3q2qn9bbJQzgc5VD9TuGIWSo_gzhrojqpE1FFgif0Pa17RN8frr30b_zs7-zy_rq18V8dnJV24bQXNPGKac1tLpZMFCtow4UtlwpVUZoAVsnJW5lw4hlWpEFJ01p2goiGuokY_voxyZ3nNoBFq4Ui7Y3Y-wGG1cm2M68_fHdjVmGB8O5IFzyEvD1KSCG-wlSNkOXHPS99RCmZIhQknEhtS708B29DVP0ZbyiRCmsMVuro41yMaQU4fqlDMFmvSHzuqGCD_6v_0KfV1LA8QbY0ZoxrZyNuXM9JDfFWEZahxnKDDNECvYIL6yavw</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Dallery, Jesse</creator><creator>Meredith, Steven</creator><creator>Jarvis, Brantley</creator><creator>Nuzzo, Paul A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence</title><author>Dallery, Jesse ; Meredith, Steven ; Jarvis, Brantley ; Nuzzo, Paul A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-25c8c99eb95d3e8bc2ce80a4888000be0ac770b7531a3981d415915b61652c733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Contingency Management</topic><topic>Drug Abstinence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mobile Health</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Smoking - therapy</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoking</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dallery, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meredith, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Brantley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuzzo, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dallery, Jesse</au><au>Meredith, Steven</au><au>Jarvis, Brantley</au><au>Nuzzo, Paul A.</au><au>Evans, Suzette M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence</atitle><jtitle>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>176-183</pages><issn>1064-1297</issn><eissn>1936-2293</eissn><abstract>Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all team members had to meet group treatment goals to receive monetary consequences (full group), and 1 in which team members had to meet some group goals and some individual goals to receive these consequences (mixed group). Mōtiv8 Systems, an Internet-based remote monitoring platform, was used to collect video-recorded breath carbon monoxide (CO) samples. All team members could communicate with each other via an online discussion forum. During baseline conditions, only 3.3% of CO samples were negative for smoking, which suggests that self-monitoring and access to the online discussion forum were insufficient to initiate abstinence. When the group contingencies were instituted 41.3% of CO samples were negative. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 arrangements in the percentage of negative CO samples or point prevalence at the end of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. Participants posted an average of 25 comments on the discussion forum, most of which were rated as positive by independent observers. The mean cost of vouchers per participant was lower in the full group ($33) relative to the mixed group ($190). The present results replicate and extend previous findings on group contingencies to promote abstinence and social support.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>25821915</pmid><doi>10.1037/pha0000013</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-1297
ispartof Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015-06, Vol.23 (3), p.176-183
issn 1064-1297
1936-2293
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4461474
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Behavior Therapy - methods
Chi-Square Distribution
Contingency Management
Drug Abstinence
Female
Human
Humans
Internet
Male
Middle Aged
Mobile Health
Smoking - psychology
Smoking - therapy
Smoking Cessation - methods
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Tobacco Smoking
Young Adult
title Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A00%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Internet-Based%20Group%20Contingency%20Management%20to%20Promote%20Smoking%20Abstinence&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20and%20clinical%20psychopharmacology&rft.au=Dallery,%20Jesse&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=176-183&rft.issn=1064-1297&rft.eissn=1936-2293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pha0000013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1687346799%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1668009039&rft_id=info:pmid/25821915&rfr_iscdi=true