Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence
Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 2015-06, Vol.23 (3), p.176-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Dallery, Jesse Meredith, Steven Jarvis, Brantley Nuzzo, Paul A. |
description | Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all team members had to meet group treatment goals to receive monetary consequences (full group), and 1 in which team members had to meet some group goals and some individual goals to receive these consequences (mixed group). Mōtiv8 Systems, an Internet-based remote monitoring platform, was used to collect video-recorded breath carbon monoxide (CO) samples. All team members could communicate with each other via an online discussion forum. During baseline conditions, only 3.3% of CO samples were negative for smoking, which suggests that self-monitoring and access to the online discussion forum were insufficient to initiate abstinence. When the group contingencies were instituted 41.3% of CO samples were negative. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 arrangements in the percentage of negative CO samples or point prevalence at the end of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. Participants posted an average of 25 comments on the discussion forum, most of which were rated as positive by independent observers. The mean cost of vouchers per participant was lower in the full group ($33) relative to the mixed group ($190). The present results replicate and extend previous findings on group contingencies to promote abstinence and social support. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pha0000013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4461474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1687346799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-25c8c99eb95d3e8bc2ce80a4888000be0ac770b7531a3981d415915b61652c733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0VtLHDEYBuBQlHpob_oDZMCbokyb0-RwU9DFw4KlhbbXIZP9XEdnkjHJCPvvzbIeqrlJIA8v78eH0BeCvxHM5PfxxuL1IewD2iWaiZpSzbbKGwteE6rlDtpL6bYIzjT9iHZooyjRpNlF87nPED3k-tQmWFQXMUxjNQs-d34J3q2qn9bbJQzgc5VD9TuGIWSo_gzhrojqpE1FFgif0Pa17RN8frr30b_zs7-zy_rq18V8dnJV24bQXNPGKac1tLpZMFCtow4UtlwpVUZoAVsnJW5lw4hlWpEFJ01p2goiGuokY_voxyZ3nNoBFq4Ui7Y3Y-wGG1cm2M68_fHdjVmGB8O5IFzyEvD1KSCG-wlSNkOXHPS99RCmZIhQknEhtS708B29DVP0ZbyiRCmsMVuro41yMaQU4fqlDMFmvSHzuqGCD_6v_0KfV1LA8QbY0ZoxrZyNuXM9JDfFWEZahxnKDDNECvYIL6yavw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1668009039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Dallery, Jesse ; Meredith, Steven ; Jarvis, Brantley ; Nuzzo, Paul A.</creator><contributor>Evans, Suzette M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dallery, Jesse ; Meredith, Steven ; Jarvis, Brantley ; Nuzzo, Paul A. ; Evans, Suzette M</creatorcontrib><description>Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all team members had to meet group treatment goals to receive monetary consequences (full group), and 1 in which team members had to meet some group goals and some individual goals to receive these consequences (mixed group). Mōtiv8 Systems, an Internet-based remote monitoring platform, was used to collect video-recorded breath carbon monoxide (CO) samples. All team members could communicate with each other via an online discussion forum. During baseline conditions, only 3.3% of CO samples were negative for smoking, which suggests that self-monitoring and access to the online discussion forum were insufficient to initiate abstinence. When the group contingencies were instituted 41.3% of CO samples were negative. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 arrangements in the percentage of negative CO samples or point prevalence at the end of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. Participants posted an average of 25 comments on the discussion forum, most of which were rated as positive by independent observers. The mean cost of vouchers per participant was lower in the full group ($33) relative to the mixed group ($190). The present results replicate and extend previous findings on group contingencies to promote abstinence and social support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-1297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pha0000013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25821915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavior Therapy - methods ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Contingency Management ; Drug Abstinence ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Internet ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mobile Health ; Smoking - psychology ; Smoking - therapy ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Tobacco Smoking ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015-06, Vol.23 (3), p.176-183</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-25c8c99eb95d3e8bc2ce80a4888000be0ac770b7531a3981d415915b61652c733</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Evans, Suzette M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dallery, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meredith, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Brantley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuzzo, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><title>Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence</title><title>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>Exp Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><description>Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all team members had to meet group treatment goals to receive monetary consequences (full group), and 1 in which team members had to meet some group goals and some individual goals to receive these consequences (mixed group). Mōtiv8 Systems, an Internet-based remote monitoring platform, was used to collect video-recorded breath carbon monoxide (CO) samples. All team members could communicate with each other via an online discussion forum. During baseline conditions, only 3.3% of CO samples were negative for smoking, which suggests that self-monitoring and access to the online discussion forum were insufficient to initiate abstinence. When the group contingencies were instituted 41.3% of CO samples were negative. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 arrangements in the percentage of negative CO samples or point prevalence at the end of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. Participants posted an average of 25 comments on the discussion forum, most of which were rated as positive by independent observers. The mean cost of vouchers per participant was lower in the full group ($33) relative to the mixed group ($190). The present results replicate and extend previous findings on group contingencies to promote abstinence and social support.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Contingency Management</subject><subject>Drug Abstinence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mobile Health</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Smoking - therapy</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoking</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-1297</issn><issn>1936-2293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0VtLHDEYBuBQlHpob_oDZMCbokyb0-RwU9DFw4KlhbbXIZP9XEdnkjHJCPvvzbIeqrlJIA8v78eH0BeCvxHM5PfxxuL1IewD2iWaiZpSzbbKGwteE6rlDtpL6bYIzjT9iHZooyjRpNlF87nPED3k-tQmWFQXMUxjNQs-d34J3q2qn9bbJQzgc5VD9TuGIWSo_gzhrojqpE1FFgif0Pa17RN8frr30b_zs7-zy_rq18V8dnJV24bQXNPGKac1tLpZMFCtow4UtlwpVUZoAVsnJW5lw4hlWpEFJ01p2goiGuokY_voxyZ3nNoBFq4Ui7Y3Y-wGG1cm2M68_fHdjVmGB8O5IFzyEvD1KSCG-wlSNkOXHPS99RCmZIhQknEhtS708B29DVP0ZbyiRCmsMVuro41yMaQU4fqlDMFmvSHzuqGCD_6v_0KfV1LA8QbY0ZoxrZyNuXM9JDfFWEZahxnKDDNECvYIL6yavw</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Dallery, Jesse</creator><creator>Meredith, Steven</creator><creator>Jarvis, Brantley</creator><creator>Nuzzo, Paul A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence</title><author>Dallery, Jesse ; Meredith, Steven ; Jarvis, Brantley ; Nuzzo, Paul A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-25c8c99eb95d3e8bc2ce80a4888000be0ac770b7531a3981d415915b61652c733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Contingency Management</topic><topic>Drug Abstinence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mobile Health</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Smoking - therapy</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoking</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dallery, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meredith, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Brantley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuzzo, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dallery, Jesse</au><au>Meredith, Steven</au><au>Jarvis, Brantley</au><au>Nuzzo, Paul A.</au><au>Evans, Suzette M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence</atitle><jtitle>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>176-183</pages><issn>1064-1297</issn><eissn>1936-2293</eissn><abstract>Internet-based group contingencies have been shown to promote brief periods of abstinence from cigarette smoking. Under a group contingency, small teams of smokers must collectively meet abstinence goals to receive monetary consequences. The present study investigated 2 arrangements, 1 in which all team members had to meet group treatment goals to receive monetary consequences (full group), and 1 in which team members had to meet some group goals and some individual goals to receive these consequences (mixed group). Mōtiv8 Systems, an Internet-based remote monitoring platform, was used to collect video-recorded breath carbon monoxide (CO) samples. All team members could communicate with each other via an online discussion forum. During baseline conditions, only 3.3% of CO samples were negative for smoking, which suggests that self-monitoring and access to the online discussion forum were insufficient to initiate abstinence. When the group contingencies were instituted 41.3% of CO samples were negative. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 arrangements in the percentage of negative CO samples or point prevalence at the end of treatment or at the 3-month follow-up. Participants posted an average of 25 comments on the discussion forum, most of which were rated as positive by independent observers. The mean cost of vouchers per participant was lower in the full group ($33) relative to the mixed group ($190). The present results replicate and extend previous findings on group contingencies to promote abstinence and social support.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>25821915</pmid><doi>10.1037/pha0000013</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-1297 |
ispartof | Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015-06, Vol.23 (3), p.176-183 |
issn | 1064-1297 1936-2293 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4461474 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Behavior Therapy - methods Chi-Square Distribution Contingency Management Drug Abstinence Female Human Humans Internet Male Middle Aged Mobile Health Smoking - psychology Smoking - therapy Smoking Cessation - methods Surveys and Questionnaires Time Factors Tobacco Smoking Young Adult |
title | Internet-Based Group Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Abstinence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A00%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Internet-Based%20Group%20Contingency%20Management%20to%20Promote%20Smoking%20Abstinence&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20and%20clinical%20psychopharmacology&rft.au=Dallery,%20Jesse&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=176-183&rft.issn=1064-1297&rft.eissn=1936-2293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pha0000013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1687346799%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1668009039&rft_id=info:pmid/25821915&rfr_iscdi=true |