The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale:a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Although the Australasian Triage Scale(ATS) has been developed two decades ago, its reliability has not been def ined; therefore, we present a meta-analyis of the reliability of the ATS in order to reveal to what extent the ATS is reliable.DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of emergency medicine 2015, Vol.6 (2), p.94-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 99 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 94 |
container_title | World journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Ebrahimi, Mohsen Heydari, Abbas Mazlom, Reza Mirhaghi, Amir |
description | BACKGROUND: Although the Australasian Triage Scale(ATS) has been developed two decades ago, its reliability has not been def ined; therefore, we present a meta-analyis of the reliability of the ATS in order to reveal to what extent the ATS is reliable.DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched to March 2014. The included studies were those that reported samples size, reliability coefficients, and adequate description of the ATS reliability assessment. The guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies(GRRAS) were used. Two reviewers independently examined abstracts and extracted data. The effect size was obtained by the z-transformation of reliability coefficients. Data were pooled with random-effects models, and meta-regression was done based on the method of moment’s estimator.RESULTS: Six studies were included in this study at last. Pooled coefficient for the ATS was substantial 0.428(95%CI 0.340–0.509). The rate of mis-triage was less than fifty percent. The agreement upon the adult version is higher than the pediatric version.CONCLUSION: The ATS has shown an acceptable level of overall reliability in the emergency department, but it needs more development to reach an almost perfect agreement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4458479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>74909068504849534850484851</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1687351466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-4e0040bd36fcc95b7b102cb81f1788fd74fed891f8936acc4be3e9c04bd804a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhn0A0artX0CR4MAl6dieODZCiKpqAakSB5az5TjOrqN8tHYC2n-Po11WtL7YGr_zzsdDyHsKRSmxuv7TuaHoCqoY5FIgKxjQsgBWALBX5PwUPyNXMXaQjqRCVvQNOWMCSlFyeU6-bHYuC673pva9n_fZ1GZzCt0scQ6mN9GbMdsEb7Yu-2lN7z6abHCzyc1o-n308ZK8bk0f3dXxviC_7u82t9_yhx9fv9_ePOQWOc45OgCEuuGitVaVdVVTYLaWtKWVlG1TYesaqWgrFRfGWqwdd8oC1o0ENIxfkM8H38elHlxj3bj2px-DH0zY68l4_fxn9Du9nX5rxHVbKhl8OBqE6WlxcdaDj9b1vRndtES97oaXFIVI0ncvpN20hDRw1IwCB14xgUn16aCyYYoxuPbUDAW91tQrId3plYReSeiVkAamE6GU_vb_gU7J_9gkAT_676Zx--TH7UlToQIFQpaAElXJ8fCSJeV_AXMRn84</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2103037264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale:a meta-analysis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ebrahimi, Mohsen ; Heydari, Abbas ; Mazlom, Reza ; Mirhaghi, Amir</creator><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, Mohsen ; Heydari, Abbas ; Mazlom, Reza ; Mirhaghi, Amir</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Although the Australasian Triage Scale(ATS) has been developed two decades ago, its reliability has not been def ined; therefore, we present a meta-analyis of the reliability of the ATS in order to reveal to what extent the ATS is reliable.DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched to March 2014. The included studies were those that reported samples size, reliability coefficients, and adequate description of the ATS reliability assessment. The guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies(GRRAS) were used. Two reviewers independently examined abstracts and extracted data. The effect size was obtained by the z-transformation of reliability coefficients. Data were pooled with random-effects models, and meta-regression was done based on the method of moment’s estimator.RESULTS: Six studies were included in this study at last. Pooled coefficient for the ATS was substantial 0.428(95%CI 0.340–0.509). The rate of mis-triage was less than fifty percent. The agreement upon the adult version is higher than the pediatric version.CONCLUSION: The ATS has shown an acceptable level of overall reliability in the emergency department, but it needs more development to reach an almost perfect agreement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1920-8642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26056538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: World Journal of Emergency Medicine (WJEM)</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Emergency medical care ; Meta-analysis ; Methods ; Researchers ; Review ; Statistics ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Variables</subject><ispartof>World journal of emergency medicine, 2015, Vol.6 (2), p.94-99</ispartof><rights>Copyright World Journal of Emergency Medicine (WJEM) 2015</rights><rights>Copyright: © World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-4e0040bd36fcc95b7b102cb81f1788fd74fed891f8936acc4be3e9c04bd804a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-4e0040bd36fcc95b7b102cb81f1788fd74fed891f8936acc4be3e9c04bd804a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/86073X/86073X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458479/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458479/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,313,314,723,776,780,788,881,4009,27901,27902,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heydari, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazlom, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirhaghi, Amir</creatorcontrib><title>The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale:a meta-analysis</title><title>World journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>World Journal of Emergency Medicine</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Although the Australasian Triage Scale(ATS) has been developed two decades ago, its reliability has not been def ined; therefore, we present a meta-analyis of the reliability of the ATS in order to reveal to what extent the ATS is reliable.DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched to March 2014. The included studies were those that reported samples size, reliability coefficients, and adequate description of the ATS reliability assessment. The guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies(GRRAS) were used. Two reviewers independently examined abstracts and extracted data. The effect size was obtained by the z-transformation of reliability coefficients. Data were pooled with random-effects models, and meta-regression was done based on the method of moment’s estimator.RESULTS: Six studies were included in this study at last. Pooled coefficient for the ATS was substantial 0.428(95%CI 0.340–0.509). The rate of mis-triage was less than fifty percent. The agreement upon the adult version is higher than the pediatric version.CONCLUSION: The ATS has shown an acceptable level of overall reliability in the emergency department, but it needs more development to reach an almost perfect agreement.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1920-8642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhn0A0artX0CR4MAl6dieODZCiKpqAakSB5az5TjOrqN8tHYC2n-Po11WtL7YGr_zzsdDyHsKRSmxuv7TuaHoCqoY5FIgKxjQsgBWALBX5PwUPyNXMXaQjqRCVvQNOWMCSlFyeU6-bHYuC673pva9n_fZ1GZzCt0scQ6mN9GbMdsEb7Yu-2lN7z6abHCzyc1o-n308ZK8bk0f3dXxviC_7u82t9_yhx9fv9_ePOQWOc45OgCEuuGitVaVdVVTYLaWtKWVlG1TYesaqWgrFRfGWqwdd8oC1o0ENIxfkM8H38elHlxj3bj2px-DH0zY68l4_fxn9Du9nX5rxHVbKhl8OBqE6WlxcdaDj9b1vRndtES97oaXFIVI0ncvpN20hDRw1IwCB14xgUn16aCyYYoxuPbUDAW91tQrId3plYReSeiVkAamE6GU_vb_gU7J_9gkAT_676Zx--TH7UlToQIFQpaAElXJ8fCSJeV_AXMRn84</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Ebrahimi, Mohsen</creator><creator>Heydari, Abbas</creator><creator>Mazlom, Reza</creator><creator>Mirhaghi, Amir</creator><general>World Journal of Emergency Medicine (WJEM)</general><general>Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale:a meta-analysis</title><author>Ebrahimi, Mohsen ; Heydari, Abbas ; Mazlom, Reza ; Mirhaghi, Amir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-4e0040bd36fcc95b7b102cb81f1788fd74fed891f8936acc4be3e9c04bd804a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heydari, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazlom, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirhaghi, Amir</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ebrahimi, Mohsen</au><au>Heydari, Abbas</au><au>Mazlom, Reza</au><au>Mirhaghi, Amir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale:a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>World journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Emergency Medicine</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>94-99</pages><issn>1920-8642</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Although the Australasian Triage Scale(ATS) has been developed two decades ago, its reliability has not been def ined; therefore, we present a meta-analyis of the reliability of the ATS in order to reveal to what extent the ATS is reliable.DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched to March 2014. The included studies were those that reported samples size, reliability coefficients, and adequate description of the ATS reliability assessment. The guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies(GRRAS) were used. Two reviewers independently examined abstracts and extracted data. The effect size was obtained by the z-transformation of reliability coefficients. Data were pooled with random-effects models, and meta-regression was done based on the method of moment’s estimator.RESULTS: Six studies were included in this study at last. Pooled coefficient for the ATS was substantial 0.428(95%CI 0.340–0.509). The rate of mis-triage was less than fifty percent. The agreement upon the adult version is higher than the pediatric version.CONCLUSION: The ATS has shown an acceptable level of overall reliability in the emergency department, but it needs more development to reach an almost perfect agreement.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>World Journal of Emergency Medicine (WJEM)</pub><pmid>26056538</pmid><doi>10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1920-8642 |
ispartof | World journal of emergency medicine, 2015, Vol.6 (2), p.94-99 |
issn | 1920-8642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4458479 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Decision making Emergency medical care Meta-analysis Methods Researchers Review Statistics Studies Systematic review Variables |
title | The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale:a meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T03%3A41%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20reliability%20of%20the%20Australasian%20Triage%20Scale:a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Ebrahimi,%20Mohsen&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=94-99&rft.issn=1920-8642&rft_id=info:doi/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1687351466%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2103037264&rft_id=info:pmid/26056538&rft_cqvip_id=74909068504849534850484851&rfr_iscdi=true |