Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management
Presentation of the diagnostic and surgical treatment methods of our extrauterine intrauterine device (IUD) cases. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 21 extrauterine IUD cases at our clinic between 2008 and 2010. The symptoms, diagnostic methods, and surgical treatments were evaluated. A total...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association 2015-06, Vol.16 (2), p.91-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Kaplanoğlu, Mustafa Bülbül, Mehmet Yüce, Tuncay Kaplanoğlu, Dilek Aban, Meral |
description | Presentation of the diagnostic and surgical treatment methods of our extrauterine intrauterine device (IUD) cases.
We retrospectively evaluated the data of 21 extrauterine IUD cases at our clinic between 2008 and 2010. The symptoms, diagnostic methods, and surgical treatments were evaluated.
A total of 14 copper and seven levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs were used. IUD had been inserted during lactation in 71.4% of the patients. The reasons for presentation of patients were unintended pregnancy in 19.05%, pelvic pain in 19.05%, and pelvic pain with vaginal bleeding in 23.8%. IUD in two patients were located the retroperitoneal area. IUD string had not been visible during routine follow-up in 38.1% of the patients. Laparoscopy was performed in 14 patients and laparotomy was performed for dense adhesions in seven patients.
Extrauterine IUDs can present with various clinical symptoms. Ultrasonography and X-Ray are sufficient for the diagnosis. Surgical removal is needed to prevent possible complications, and the preferred surgical technique in appropriate patients is laparoscopy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15243 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4456980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3732220831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6731ab9f278bd3a22c24496078b1220f137a92fc96fea12ee8e322630922e04a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1PwzAMjRCITWN3TqgS543EST_CAQmNT2loFzhHaeuWTG06knaCf0_3wTRO9pPt52c_Qi4ZnYYshJtlW5Z6CpSF0x4KfkKGjFM5oTyhp4dcygEZe29SKkQsQin5ORlARGXMJRuSxZvxVZPpFvMAv1unuxadsRgYewRyXJsM_W3wYHRpG298oG0e-M6VJtNVUGurS6zRthfkrNCVx_E-jsjH0-P77GUyXzy_zu7nk0yAaCdRzJlOZQFxkuZcA2QghIxoDxkALRiPtYQik1GBmgFighwg6k8CQCo0H5G7He-qS2vMM9zIrdTKmVq7H9Voo_5XrPlUZbNWQoSRTGhPcL0ncM1Xh75Vy6ZzttesWCQhFpQJ3nfRXVfmGu8dFocNjKqNC2rrgtq4oLYu9CNXx8oOA38_578wrIUZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1692740143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kaplanoğlu, Mustafa ; Bülbül, Mehmet ; Yüce, Tuncay ; Kaplanoğlu, Dilek ; Aban, Meral</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaplanoğlu, Mustafa ; Bülbül, Mehmet ; Yüce, Tuncay ; Kaplanoğlu, Dilek ; Aban, Meral</creatorcontrib><description>Presentation of the diagnostic and surgical treatment methods of our extrauterine intrauterine device (IUD) cases.
We retrospectively evaluated the data of 21 extrauterine IUD cases at our clinic between 2008 and 2010. The symptoms, diagnostic methods, and surgical treatments were evaluated.
A total of 14 copper and seven levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs were used. IUD had been inserted during lactation in 71.4% of the patients. The reasons for presentation of patients were unintended pregnancy in 19.05%, pelvic pain in 19.05%, and pelvic pain with vaginal bleeding in 23.8%. IUD in two patients were located the retroperitoneal area. IUD string had not been visible during routine follow-up in 38.1% of the patients. Laparoscopy was performed in 14 patients and laparotomy was performed for dense adhesions in seven patients.
Extrauterine IUDs can present with various clinical symptoms. Ultrasonography and X-Ray are sufficient for the diagnosis. Surgical removal is needed to prevent possible complications, and the preferred surgical technique in appropriate patients is laparoscopy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1309-0399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1309-0380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26097391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Galenos Publishing House</publisher><subject>Original Investigation</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2015-06, Vol.16 (2), p.91-95</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI. Jun 2015</rights><rights>Copyright 2015 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6731ab9f278bd3a22c24496078b1220f137a92fc96fea12ee8e322630922e04a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456980/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456980/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaplanoğlu, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bülbül, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yüce, Tuncay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplanoğlu, Dilek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aban, Meral</creatorcontrib><title>Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management</title><title>Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association</title><addtitle>J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc</addtitle><description>Presentation of the diagnostic and surgical treatment methods of our extrauterine intrauterine device (IUD) cases.
We retrospectively evaluated the data of 21 extrauterine IUD cases at our clinic between 2008 and 2010. The symptoms, diagnostic methods, and surgical treatments were evaluated.
A total of 14 copper and seven levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs were used. IUD had been inserted during lactation in 71.4% of the patients. The reasons for presentation of patients were unintended pregnancy in 19.05%, pelvic pain in 19.05%, and pelvic pain with vaginal bleeding in 23.8%. IUD in two patients were located the retroperitoneal area. IUD string had not been visible during routine follow-up in 38.1% of the patients. Laparoscopy was performed in 14 patients and laparotomy was performed for dense adhesions in seven patients.
Extrauterine IUDs can present with various clinical symptoms. Ultrasonography and X-Ray are sufficient for the diagnosis. Surgical removal is needed to prevent possible complications, and the preferred surgical technique in appropriate patients is laparoscopy.</description><subject>Original Investigation</subject><issn>1309-0399</issn><issn>1309-0380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1PwzAMjRCITWN3TqgS543EST_CAQmNT2loFzhHaeuWTG06knaCf0_3wTRO9pPt52c_Qi4ZnYYshJtlW5Z6CpSF0x4KfkKGjFM5oTyhp4dcygEZe29SKkQsQin5ORlARGXMJRuSxZvxVZPpFvMAv1unuxadsRgYewRyXJsM_W3wYHRpG298oG0e-M6VJtNVUGurS6zRthfkrNCVx_E-jsjH0-P77GUyXzy_zu7nk0yAaCdRzJlOZQFxkuZcA2QghIxoDxkALRiPtYQik1GBmgFighwg6k8CQCo0H5G7He-qS2vMM9zIrdTKmVq7H9Voo_5XrPlUZbNWQoSRTGhPcL0ncM1Xh75Vy6ZzttesWCQhFpQJ3nfRXVfmGu8dFocNjKqNC2rrgtq4oLYu9CNXx8oOA38_578wrIUZ</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Kaplanoğlu, Mustafa</creator><creator>Bülbül, Mehmet</creator><creator>Yüce, Tuncay</creator><creator>Kaplanoğlu, Dilek</creator><creator>Aban, Meral</creator><general>Galenos Publishing House</general><general>AVES</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management</title><author>Kaplanoğlu, Mustafa ; Bülbül, Mehmet ; Yüce, Tuncay ; Kaplanoğlu, Dilek ; Aban, Meral</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6731ab9f278bd3a22c24496078b1220f137a92fc96fea12ee8e322630922e04a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Original Investigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaplanoğlu, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bülbül, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yüce, Tuncay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplanoğlu, Dilek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aban, Meral</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaplanoğlu, Mustafa</au><au>Bülbül, Mehmet</au><au>Yüce, Tuncay</au><au>Kaplanoğlu, Dilek</au><au>Aban, Meral</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>91-95</pages><issn>1309-0399</issn><eissn>1309-0380</eissn><abstract>Presentation of the diagnostic and surgical treatment methods of our extrauterine intrauterine device (IUD) cases.
We retrospectively evaluated the data of 21 extrauterine IUD cases at our clinic between 2008 and 2010. The symptoms, diagnostic methods, and surgical treatments were evaluated.
A total of 14 copper and seven levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs were used. IUD had been inserted during lactation in 71.4% of the patients. The reasons for presentation of patients were unintended pregnancy in 19.05%, pelvic pain in 19.05%, and pelvic pain with vaginal bleeding in 23.8%. IUD in two patients were located the retroperitoneal area. IUD string had not been visible during routine follow-up in 38.1% of the patients. Laparoscopy was performed in 14 patients and laparotomy was performed for dense adhesions in seven patients.
Extrauterine IUDs can present with various clinical symptoms. Ultrasonography and X-Ray are sufficient for the diagnosis. Surgical removal is needed to prevent possible complications, and the preferred surgical technique in appropriate patients is laparoscopy.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Galenos Publishing House</pub><pmid>26097391</pmid><doi>10.5152/jtgga.2015.15243</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1309-0399 |
ispartof | Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2015-06, Vol.16 (2), p.91-95 |
issn | 1309-0399 1309-0380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4456980 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Original Investigation |
title | Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T11%3A53%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mislocated%20extrauterine%20intrauterine%20devices:%20Diagnosis%20and%20surgical%20management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Turkish%20German%20Gynecological%20Association&rft.au=Kaplano%C4%9Flu,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=91-95&rft.issn=1309-0399&rft.eissn=1309-0380&rft_id=info:doi/10.5152/jtgga.2015.15243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3732220831%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1692740143&rft_id=info:pmid/26097391&rfr_iscdi=true |