Contributions of dynamic systems theory to cognitive development

► We provide an overview of the contributions of dynamic system theory to the field of cognitive development. ► We discuss a dynamic field theory of infant perseverative reaching that explains and predicts novel findings from the A-not-B literature. ► We discuss a dynamic field theory of spatial cog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognitive development 2012-10, Vol.27 (4), p.401-418
Hauptverfasser: Spencer, John P., Austin, Andrew, Schutte, Anne R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► We provide an overview of the contributions of dynamic system theory to the field of cognitive development. ► We discuss a dynamic field theory of infant perseverative reaching that explains and predicts novel findings from the A-not-B literature. ► We discuss a dynamic field theory of spatial cognitive development that explains and predicts novel findings from spatial memory research. ► We conclude that computational models are having an impact in cognitive development but this impact does not extend to neural and clinical research which is a missed opportunity. We examine the contributions of dynamic systems theory to the field of cognitive development, focusing on modeling using dynamic neural fields. After introducing central concepts of dynamic field theory (DFT), we probe empirical predictions and findings around two examples—the DFT of infant perseverative reaching that explains Piaget's A-not-B error and the DFT of spatial memory that explain changes in spatial cognition in early development. Review of the literature around these examples reveals that computational modeling is having an impact on empirical research in cognitive development; however, this impact does not extend to neural and clinical research. Moreover, there is a tendency for researchers to interpret models narrowly, anchoring them to specific tasks. We conclude on an optimistic note, encouraging both theoreticians and experimentalists to work toward a more theory-driven future.
ISSN:0885-2014
1879-226X
DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.07.006